Brexit outcome
#31
Re: Brexit outcome
Why would you want to? Our exports are either high end machine tools, financial services or weapons. Anything else would be a re-export, you'd be better off sourcing it directly from China?
Unless you are considering becoming an arms dealer, in which case I am interested in any vacancies.
Unless you are considering becoming an arms dealer, in which case I am interested in any vacancies.
#32
Account Closed
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 0
Re: Brexit outcome
To get back to the the OP's original question of a prediction on what we are going to wake up to on 30th March 2019, what I find most worrying is that it is literally impossible to predict. Not in general terms or details, not nationally or in foreign policy, not economically, socially, culturally or ethically. Not in imports or exports, not in jobs, incomes, economic and social divides. Not in the rejuvenation of the neglected parts of UK, not in migration both professional and humanitarian. Not in anything.
The only thing predictable about 30th March 2019 is that we were always going to be in the position of having no idea what was going to happen. Brexit was never about voting in favour of a definite, quantifiable future, it was about rejecting a perceived past.
The only thing predictable about 30th March 2019 is that we were always going to be in the position of having no idea what was going to happen. Brexit was never about voting in favour of a definite, quantifiable future, it was about rejecting a perceived past.
#33
Account Closed
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 0
Re: Brexit outcome
To get back to the the OP's original question of a prediction on what we are going to wake up to on 30th March 2019, what I find most worrying is that it is literally impossible to predict. Not in general terms or details, not nationally or in foreign policy, not economically, socially, culturally or ethically. Not in imports or exports, not in jobs, incomes, economic and social divides. Not in the rejuvenation of the neglected parts of UK, not in migration both professional and humanitarian. Not in anything.
The only thing predictable about 30th March 2019 is that we were always going to be in the position of having no idea what was going to happen. Brexit was never about voting in favour of a definite, quantifiable future, it was about rejecting a perceived past.
The only thing predictable about 30th March 2019 is that we were always going to be in the position of having no idea what was going to happen. Brexit was never about voting in favour of a definite, quantifiable future, it was about rejecting a perceived past.
#34
Onwards and Upwards!
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 884
Re: Brexit outcome
And we'll have three less layers of bureaucracy: European Parliament, European Commission and European Council. Really looking forward to April
#36
Re: Brexit outcome
Good to see the headlines that all the EU savings are going to the NHS as promised....
#37
Re: Brexit outcome
Of course the caveat to that is that there will be NO savings after the loss of earnings by industry, the extra costs of imports, the loss of the value of the pound, the loss of many of the EU workers etc.
#40
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Nov 2012
Location: bute
Posts: 9,740
Re: Brexit outcome
Now we know that they really will spend a squillion ponds on the NHS it is all hunkey-dorey. Excuse me now, I have to report back to the State Hospital for the criminally insane.
#41
Forum Regular
Joined: Feb 2017
Location: Dubai
Posts: 237
Re: Brexit outcome
NHS is in desperate need of reform anyways. Any extra budget will be swallowed without any necessary improvements to the frontline (more just middle management inflation and non-jobs like 'diversity and inclusion managers'.
#44
Account Closed
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 0
Re: Brexit outcome
Actually, instead of being costly, hiring someone to increase levels of diversity probably offers a greater ROI than lots of other 'support' or 'admin' or 'HR' type roles.
McKinsey have done enough studies to show that boards with greater diversity perform best and also that boards with greater diversity generate more revenue. Credit Suisse even demosntrated through research that more money made by diverse boards wasn't linked to the pre-existing strength of the company.
Perhaps if the NHS, which is already diverse by nature of being such a large employer, promoted it even more, they generate greater efficiencies to stop wasting resources?
Just a thought.
#45
Re: Brexit outcome
You said that it's a non-job and now that it's a waste of resources, so logic dictates it can't be a good thing in your mind.
Actually, instead of being costly, hiring someone to increase levels of diversity probably offers a greater ROI than lots of other 'support' or 'admin' or 'HR' type roles.
McKinsey have done enough studies to show that boards with greater diversity perform best and also that boards with greater diversity generate more revenue. Credit Suisse even demosntrated through research that more money made by diverse boards wasn't linked to the pre-existing strength of the company.
Perhaps if the NHS, which is already diverse by nature of being such a large employer, promoted it even more, they generate greater efficiencies to stop wasting resources?
Just a thought.
Actually, instead of being costly, hiring someone to increase levels of diversity probably offers a greater ROI than lots of other 'support' or 'admin' or 'HR' type roles.
McKinsey have done enough studies to show that boards with greater diversity perform best and also that boards with greater diversity generate more revenue. Credit Suisse even demosntrated through research that more money made by diverse boards wasn't linked to the pre-existing strength of the company.
Perhaps if the NHS, which is already diverse by nature of being such a large employer, promoted it even more, they generate greater efficiencies to stop wasting resources?
Just a thought.
Oh, and I don’t believe for a minute that you believe what you wrote.