BBC Licence Fee Could By Cut
#16
Soupy twist
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,271
Re: BBC Licence Fee Could By Cut
It's somewhat depressing that the BBC can be so widely respected and admired around the world, where it is often held up as a beacon of what broadcasting should be, while a small but growing minority in the UK can't see beyond £145 per year to ensure that television and radio of at least some degree of quality and diversity, free from downmarket commercial imperatives and interfering owners with an agenda, continues to be made... and yet an awful lot of those people who begrudge £145 per year are seemingly happy to pay around £600 per year to Sky for hundreds of channels full of utter ad-ridden shit.
Choice, you say? Oh yes, choice... Fry and Laurie did an excellent sketch about choice in broadcasting. Make sure you watch to the end:
#17
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,869
Re: BBC Licence Fee Could By Cut
Why would becoming a subscription and/or advertising channel (a la Sky) detract from the BBC's 'quality'? "Well, because the advertisers would determine what sort of programmes are shown, they would try to influence editorial policy, etc" is the usual response. I've never followed that argument - perhaps someone can enlighten me.
And I'm still waiting for someone to explain why I should be forced to give money to Sainsbury's when Tesco's are offering food free of charge.
And I'm still waiting for someone to explain why I should be forced to give money to Sainsbury's when Tesco's are offering food free of charge.
Everyone knows that Tesco's food is a bunch of dogcrap compared to Sainsbury's. Everyone knows Sky TV progrtamming is a bunch of dogcrap compared to the BBC.