Re: Assisted Suicide
Originally Posted by Elmer Fudd
(Post 9449912)
Not a bad argument on the benefits to NHS, but factor in harm - all the negative externalities - cost of drunks clogging up hospitals in front of genuine cases & abusing staff on Friday & Saturday nights, long run liver transplants free of charge, the costs to me slipping on puddles of liquid laughs, me paying more tax towards plod to police the streets, me changing route to avoid punch ups, plus costs of cleaning up litter from smokers & the private costs of having to wash all clothes & shower after a night in a smoke filled pub, the benefits might not be as great as you believe? I am all for freedom of choice and expression, but so long as the costs of these activities do not affect others i.e. my wallet ;)
I said "as long as it causes no harm to others"...getting pissed up and bothering hospital staff, wasting people's time, beating your kids, and messing up the place is harm to others and should be dealt with. Same goes for smoking around people who don't want to breath the smoke, or take drugs or anything. N. |
Re: Assisted Suicide
Originally Posted by WakeUp
(Post 9449745)
I agree with this 100% .
:eek: are you sure? |
Re: Assisted Suicide
Originally Posted by Norm_uk
(Post 9449926)
Read my post again.
I said "as long as it causes no harm to others"...getting pissed up and bothering hospital staff, wasting people's time, beating your kids, and messing up the place is harm to others and should be dealt with. Same goes for smoking around people who don't want to breath the smoke, or take drugs or anything. N. |
Re: Assisted Suicide
Originally Posted by Madam Medusa
(Post 9449552)
but the issue is that they face possible murder charges the way the law stands...that's why on this programme, even in this swiss clinic, it's the person who has to administer the poison themselves, not even the doctor can do it for fear of a law case...
MM, xx PS Went to Aussie Legends quiz night two weeks ago - you & MH weren't there...only 4 teams playing..seems to have died (pardon the unintended pun)? |
Re: Assisted Suicide
Re the DNR (Do not resuscitate) notice - Mother in Law was admitted to hospital in very late 1999 - aged 86yrs old. Was definitely very compos mentis and insisted upon this note being added to her hospital record. A hospital psychiatrist talked to her before agreeing to this - but all of her children were aware that this was what she would have wished although none were aware that she had had this put on her hospital records until after her death just three days after being admitted to hospital.
|
Re: Assisted Suicide
Originally Posted by Elmer Fudd
(Post 9449945)
I agree 100% with your sentiment, but sadly, lots of others do go over the top and in no way think it is their responsibility to consider the effects of their behaviour on others, this is one (minor) reason for me deciding to move out of the UK for a while - try reasoning with such people and it can get very nasty - even fatal :(. That is why governments try to intervene by educating us on the disadvantages of booze & fags and restricting consumption by taxation etc.
The problem really is one of community. If people are raised knowing drinking and bad behaviour are completely unacceptable and bring shame on the family/community etc we'll see a big drop in stupid drunks. But then in Britain we've spent the last 50 years trying to dismantle community, culture and family and seen a comparative rise in crime, drink related crime and youth problems...so 'nuff said really :sneaky: N. |
Re: Assisted Suicide
The biggest problem the UK has, is for too long, there has been a Nanny-state happily saying to people " No, it can't be your fault, there must be some underlying reason for your actions, but surely you cannot be responsible!" The joys of the blame culture and a lack of acceptance for the principals of being responsible for your own actions. What a crock of sh*t!:huh:
|
Re: Assisted Suicide
Originally Posted by OleJanx
(Post 9450593)
The biggest problem the UK has, is for too long, there has been a Nanny-state happily saying to people " No, it can't be your fault, there must be some underlying reason for your actions, but surely you cannot be responsible!" The joys of the blame culture and a lack of acceptance for the principals of being responsible for your own actions. What a crock of sh*t!:huh:
N. |
Re: Assisted Suicide
Originally Posted by weasel central
(Post 9449932)
:eek: are you sure?
|
Re: Assisted Suicide
MM I watched the Terry Pratchett thing last night. Very well done in my opinion and very moving. The Newsnight discussion after brought up various worries about legalising it, however I still think it should be legalised even if it is just for terminally ill patients first.
|
Re: Assisted Suicide
Originally Posted by Blue Cat
(Post 9451435)
MM I watched the Terry Pratchett thing last night. Very well done in my opinion and very moving. The Newsnight discussion after brought up various worries about legalising it, however I still think it should be legalised even if it is just for terminally ill patients first.
MM, xx |
Re: Assisted Suicide
Originally Posted by Madam Medusa
(Post 9451459)
yes, it was very well balanced, wasn't it...very thought provoking...
MM, xx |
All times are GMT. The time now is 8:41 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.