![]() |
Minimum income requirements
Sign Petition: Allow British families to stay together by removing minimum income req
________________________________________ Petition requires 100,000 signatures before the government will debate it and 10k to respond. So far, there's just under 7,000 - let's spread the word in case it helps improve visibility for some of us! If any of you are active on social media, this would be a great thing to promote and sharing options are available on the petition page. https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/107958 Deadline is 11 March, 2016 - let's do this! |
Re: Minimum income requirements
from the other thread below, will this thread also get closed ?
http://britishexpats.com/forum/movin...me-req-866299/ My opinion on the OP is that the UK government will not change anything pertaining to the income requirement for family of a settled person visa category. I for one would leave it as 'it is', I would even endorse raising the limit to 100k Remember the [fight for] an indexed state pension for those living in the colonies, which was squashed by the European Parliament - so, fat chance the UK government will reverse the high income requirement for 'family of a settled person' So we have the Surinder Singh for now |
Re: Minimum income requirements
Surely you don't mean the INCOME limit should be raised to 100k - do you? Savings limit, maybe?
|
Re: Minimum income requirements
Originally Posted by not2old
(Post 11767218)
I for one would leave it as 'it is', I would even endorse raising the limit to 100k
You may not have seen me commenting on this issue before. My income in retirement is way above UK means tested levels. I have two modestly priced houses in Canada, as you know, and the money raised from selling would easily pay for a suitable home in the UK. My wife died earlier this year but when this legislation was introduced it was obvious that although I could have provided a UK home, still had a tidy sum in the bank and have an income high enough to rule out any need for benefits, I would have been unable to live in the UK with my Canadian wife of many years because the threshold was too high. And you want to raise it further? :eek: Of course I could have sold up here and then kept the money in the bank and qualified under the savings exception. But then there's that small matter of where we'd live and how to pay for it. I know, rent somewhere. Oh hang on though, that means I'd have to start using the capital to pay for rent. Guess what. When that capital is significantly reduced and I'm no longer in a position to buy a home because it's been going on rent, I then become due Housing Benefit. So the system to discourage benefit reliance would have prevented me coming back with my wife even though there would have been no need for benefits except for the exception that would have created a need for benefits where none need have existed. That's really screwed up. |
Re: Minimum income requirements
I posted on the other thread, and the fact is that the oly way the threshold will be reduced is by it being taken through the supreme court and the government ordeered to lower it. With the current debate in the UK over immigration and the fact that the figures are far too high according to the government, then it's unlikely that any thing will get done.
I fully sympathise with those unable to return to the UK, but they are stuck between a rock and a hard place in the current climate. |
Re: Minimum income requirements
Originally Posted by mikelincs
(Post 11767479)
...With the current debate in the UK over immigration....
It would have been easy to exempt those married for a minimum period or even to look at the reasons for return. I mean, supposing someone was returning to care for an ageing or sick parent? And the fact they are prevented from returning means they can't care for their parent who then needs residential or nursing care at a far greater cost to the country. |
Re: Minimum income requirements
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 11767474)
Really?
You may not have seen me commenting on this issue before. My income in retirement is way above UK means tested levels. I have two modestly priced houses in Canada, as you know, and the money raised from selling would easily pay for a suitable home in the UK. My wife died earlier this year but when this legislation was introduced it was obvious that although I could have provided a UK home, still had a tidy sum in the bank and have an income high enough to rule out any need for benefits, I would have been unable to live in the UK with my Canadian wife of many years because the threshold was too high. And you want to raise it further? :eek: Of course I could have sold up here and then kept the money in the bank and qualified under the savings exception. But then there's that small matter of where we'd live and how to pay for it. I know, rent somewhere. Oh hang on though, that means I'd have to start using the capital to pay for rent. Guess what. When that capital is significantly reduced and I'm no longer in a position to buy a home because it's been going on rent, I then become due Housing Benefit. So the system to discourage benefit reliance would have prevented me coming back with my wife even though there would have been no need for benefits except for the exception that would have created a need for benefits where none need have existed. That's really screwed up. |
Re: Minimum income requirements
Originally Posted by Editha
(Post 11767203)
Sign Petition: Allow British families to stay together by removing minimum income req
________________________________________ Petition requires 100,000 signatures before the government will debate it and 10k to respond. So far, there's just under 7,000 - let's spread the word in case it helps improve visibility for some of us! If any of you are active on social media, this would be a great thing to promote and sharing options are available on the petition page. https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/107958 Deadline is 11 March, 2016 - let's do this! |
Re: Minimum income requirements
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 11767489)
It shouldn't be viewed as an immigration issue though. It's about Brits returning to their country and being able to do so with their loved ones.
It would have been easy to exempt those married for a minimum period or even to look at the reasons for return. I mean, supposing someone was returning to care for an ageing or sick parent? And the fact they are prevented from returning means they can't care for their parent who then needs residential or nursing care at a far greater cost to the country. |
Re: Minimum income requirements
Originally Posted by spouse of scouse
(Post 11767511)
Can't sign yet as I'm still in Australia, but the minute I arrive in the UK (4 November!) I'll sign :thumbup:
|
Re: Minimum income requirements
Originally Posted by curleytops
(Post 11767583)
But don't forget Scouse can sign now :thumbsup:
He's fast asleep dreaming good British dreams, while I've just finished the nightmare also known as UK online spouse visa application :blink: |
Re: Minimum income requirements
Originally Posted by robin1234
(Post 11767221)
Surely you don't mean the INCOME limit should be raised to 100k - do you? Savings limit, maybe?
|
Re: Minimum income requirements
Originally Posted by not2old
(Post 11767750)
oops, that's correct - savings limit 100K, income limit 25k
|
Re: Minimum income requirements
on the OP, why was it the government changed the rules in 2012 & introduced what is now in place?
Someone, somewhere must have done this for a reason & purpose? Of course as Bristol mentioned there could have been other options or provisions made for particular circumstance - then again, where do you draw the line. I stick with savings limit increase as well as income increase from where it is now. You can have a go at me, re-write the legislation... but you know what, IMO the UK doesn't want non EU spouses coming in & will IMO continue to make it tougher. At some point, should the UK get its way, they will abolish the 'Surinder Singh' route. An EU exit vote will fix everything |
Re: Minimum income requirements
Originally Posted by not2old
(Post 11767766)
on the OP, why was it the government changed the rules in 2012 & introduced what is now in place?
Someone, somewhere must have done this for a reason & purpose? Of course as Bristol mentioned there could have been other options or provisions made for particular circumstance - then again, where do you draw the line. I stick with savings limit increase as well as income increase from where it is now. You can have a go at me, re-write the legislation... but you know what, IMO the UK doesn't want non EU spouses coming in & will IMO continue to make it tougher. At some point, should the UK get its way, they will abolish the 'Surinder Singh' route. An EU exit vote will fix everything |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 8:16 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.