USA going after Iran now
Nov 18th 2004, 3:54 pm
#46
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
Go Fig writes:
> But the U.S. does have a military as part of its diplomacy.
Diplomacy and military are mutually exclusive.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
> But the U.S. does have a military as part of its diplomacy.
Diplomacy and military are mutually exclusive.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
Nov 18th 2004, 3:57 pm
#47
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
ARKADYA writes:
> Arabs have yet to be nice to ANYONE in their entire
> miserable existance. Even to themselves.
They are no worse than Israelis--which is understandable, since both
groups are virtually identical in terms of ethnicity and culture.
> People that dont have a problem
> sacrifising their own children in suicide bombings are nothing but dirty filthy
> animals fit for the gas chambers.
Just because one or two Israelis did so doesn't mean that all Israelis
are like that.
Besides, Americans are sacrificing their children in useless foreign
wars solely for the purpose of enriching the President's friends.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
> Arabs have yet to be nice to ANYONE in their entire
> miserable existance. Even to themselves.
They are no worse than Israelis--which is understandable, since both
groups are virtually identical in terms of ethnicity and culture.
> People that dont have a problem
> sacrifising their own children in suicide bombings are nothing but dirty filthy
> animals fit for the gas chambers.
Just because one or two Israelis did so doesn't mean that all Israelis
are like that.
Besides, Americans are sacrificing their children in useless foreign
wars solely for the purpose of enriching the President's friends.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
Nov 18th 2004, 4:12 pm
#48
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 03:16:21 +0000, ARKADYA wrote:
>>> Do you think Arabs would treat us nicely if they were in the drivers
>>> seat?
>>Yes.
>
> Put the crack down. Arabs have yet to be nice to ANYONE in their entire
> miserable existance.
Going back to Spain (and presumably Portugal too), they sure were a hell
of a lot more civilized than the Christian kings who eventually pushed
them back to Africa.
Their contribution to arts and science was also quite superior to that of
the Catholic barbarians.
>>> Do you think Arabs would treat us nicely if they were in the drivers
>>> seat?
>>Yes.
>
> Put the crack down. Arabs have yet to be nice to ANYONE in their entire
> miserable existance.
Going back to Spain (and presumably Portugal too), they sure were a hell
of a lot more civilized than the Christian kings who eventually pushed
them back to Africa.
Their contribution to arts and science was also quite superior to that of
the Catholic barbarians.
Nov 18th 2004, 4:16 pm
#49
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
Max Mustermann wrote:
> Here we go again, right on cue as many predicted.........
>
> Powell: Intelligence suggests Iran trying to adapt missiles for nukes
>
> SANTIAGO, Chile (AP) -- The United States has intelligence indicating
> Iran is trying to fit missiles to carry nuclear weapons, U.S.
> Secretary of State Colin Powell said.
Fox News has now hired some Iranian emigres (who fled Iran) as "foreign
affairs experts." And in the last couple of days, these "experts" have
been saying how Iran is building all kinds of horrible WMD. As a
result, Fox News broadcasts have been sounding the alarm over the need
to confront Iran.
In addition, Fox News is giving practically around-the-clock coverage to
the U.N. oil-for-food scandal. Their commentators and "foreign affairs
experts" have denounced the U.N. as worse than the Mafia, etc.
So the case for unilateral (non-U.N.) action against Iran is being made.
Bit by bit.
--
Steven D. Litvintchouk
Email: [email protected]
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
> Here we go again, right on cue as many predicted.........
>
> Powell: Intelligence suggests Iran trying to adapt missiles for nukes
>
> SANTIAGO, Chile (AP) -- The United States has intelligence indicating
> Iran is trying to fit missiles to carry nuclear weapons, U.S.
> Secretary of State Colin Powell said.
Fox News has now hired some Iranian emigres (who fled Iran) as "foreign
affairs experts." And in the last couple of days, these "experts" have
been saying how Iran is building all kinds of horrible WMD. As a
result, Fox News broadcasts have been sounding the alarm over the need
to confront Iran.
In addition, Fox News is giving practically around-the-clock coverage to
the U.N. oil-for-food scandal. Their commentators and "foreign affairs
experts" have denounced the U.N. as worse than the Mafia, etc.
So the case for unilateral (non-U.N.) action against Iran is being made.
Bit by bit.
--
Steven D. Litvintchouk
Email: [email protected]
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
Nov 18th 2004, 4:16 pm
#50
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
In article <Ye6nd.149559$hj.54364@fed1read07>, Arizona Bushwhacker
<[email protected]> wrote:
> "The Drums of Fascinet" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected] ups.com...
> > Max Mustermann wrote:
> > > Here we go again, right on cue as many predicted.........
> > >
> >
> > Well, yes, but everyone already knew what the Iranians were doing.
>
> We all knew what Iraq was doing too! NOT!
>
> I don't believe these republican lies about what Iran
> is up to for a New York minute!
>
> You republicans are not going to fool America with
> the same lies you used to fool America into a war
> with Iraq.
What? You mean that Powell might have a credibility problem? No...
E. K.
>
>
>
> >
> > In fact, it's one of the really bad reasons that people gave to not
> > support the invasion of Iraq or to change their minds about its
> > propriety.
> >
> > -F
> >
> > >
> > > Powell: Intelligence suggests Iran trying to adapt missiles for nukes
> > >
> > > SANTIAGO, Chile (AP) -- The United States has intelligence indicating
> > > Iran is trying to fit missiles to carry nuclear weapons, U.S.
> > > Secretary of State Colin Powell said.
> > >
> > > Powell partially confirmed claims by an Iranian opposition group that
> > > Tehran is deceiving the United Nations and is attempting to secretly
> > > continue activities meant to give it atomic arms by next year.
> > >
> > > "I have seen intelligence which would corroborate what this dissident
> > > group is saying," Powell told reporters Wednesday as he traveled to
> > > the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in Santiago, Chile. "And
> > > it should be of concern to all parties."
> > >
> > > Pressed by reporters on the intelligence reports, Powell said the
> > > intelligence indicates that Iran "had been actively working on
> > > delivery systems" capable of carrying a nuclear weapon.
> > >
> > > Powell said there is no evidence to suggest that Iran has developed
> > > the technology to make a nuclear weapon, but suggested that the
> > regime
> > > is working to adapt missiles for nuclear warheads.
> > >
> > > "I'm talking about information that says that they not only had these
> > > missiles, but I'm aware of information that suggests they were
> > working
> > > hard as to how to put the two together," Powell said.
> > >
> > > A senior official for the National Council for Resistance in Iran
> > said
> > > Tuesday that a bomb diagram -- along with an unspecified amount of
> > > weapons-grade uranium -- was provided to Iran by Abdul Qadeer Khan,
> > > the disgraced former head of Pakistani's nuclear development which
> > was
> > > tied to both Iran and Libya.
> > >
> > > The official said the designs were handed to the Iranians between
> > 1994
> > > and 1996, while Khan delivered HEU -- highly enriched uranium -- in
> > > 2001.
> > >
> > > Banned in the United States as a terrorist organization, the group
> > was
> > > instrumental in 2002 in revealing Iran's enrichment program in the
> > > central city of Natanz, based on what it said was information
> > provided
> > > by sources in Iran.
> > >
> > > The opposition group says a facility at Lavizan-Shian northeast of
> > > Tehran was part of a secret nuclear weapons program.
> > >
> > > Powell declined comment on Khan but said that "for 20 years the
> > > Iranians have been trying to hide things from the international
> > > community."
> > >
> > > Iran says its sole interest is to generate nuclear fuel through
> > > low-level uranium enrichment, but the United States suspects Iran
> > > wants to produce weapons-grade enriched uranium.
> > >
> > > Enrichment does not violate the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, but
> > > the International Atomic Energy Agency and most of its members want
> > > Iran to scrap enrichment plans as a confidence building measure.
> > >
> > > Iran announced suspension of enrichment last week, and the agency
> > said
> > > it would police that commitment starting next week, in advance of a
> > > Nov. 25 IAEA board meeting.
> > >
> > > The pledge reduced Washington's hopes of having the board refer Iran
> > > to the U.N. Security Council for alleged violations of the
> > > Nonproliferation Treaty.
> > >
> > > Tehran has not dropped plans to run 50,000 centrifuges to enrich
> > > uranium for what it says will be the fuel requirements of a nuclear
> > > reactor to be finished next year.
> > >
> > > It currently possesses less than 1,000 centrifuges. But if it added
> > > 500 centrifuges, experts say Iran would be able to make enough
> > > weapons-grade uranium to make a bomb annually.
> >
>
--
"Honestly, I think we should just trust our president in every decision that he
makes and we should just support that."-Britney Spears, 9/2003
"Too many good docs are getting out of business. Too many OB-GYNs aren't able
to practice their love with women all across this country."- George W. Bush,
9/6/04
Free humor. Whenever you want. http://www.psmueller.com
<[email protected]> wrote:
> "The Drums of Fascinet" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected] ups.com...
> > Max Mustermann wrote:
> > > Here we go again, right on cue as many predicted.........
> > >
> >
> > Well, yes, but everyone already knew what the Iranians were doing.
>
> We all knew what Iraq was doing too! NOT!
>
> I don't believe these republican lies about what Iran
> is up to for a New York minute!
>
> You republicans are not going to fool America with
> the same lies you used to fool America into a war
> with Iraq.
What? You mean that Powell might have a credibility problem? No...
E. K.
>
>
>
> >
> > In fact, it's one of the really bad reasons that people gave to not
> > support the invasion of Iraq or to change their minds about its
> > propriety.
> >
> > -F
> >
> > >
> > > Powell: Intelligence suggests Iran trying to adapt missiles for nukes
> > >
> > > SANTIAGO, Chile (AP) -- The United States has intelligence indicating
> > > Iran is trying to fit missiles to carry nuclear weapons, U.S.
> > > Secretary of State Colin Powell said.
> > >
> > > Powell partially confirmed claims by an Iranian opposition group that
> > > Tehran is deceiving the United Nations and is attempting to secretly
> > > continue activities meant to give it atomic arms by next year.
> > >
> > > "I have seen intelligence which would corroborate what this dissident
> > > group is saying," Powell told reporters Wednesday as he traveled to
> > > the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in Santiago, Chile. "And
> > > it should be of concern to all parties."
> > >
> > > Pressed by reporters on the intelligence reports, Powell said the
> > > intelligence indicates that Iran "had been actively working on
> > > delivery systems" capable of carrying a nuclear weapon.
> > >
> > > Powell said there is no evidence to suggest that Iran has developed
> > > the technology to make a nuclear weapon, but suggested that the
> > regime
> > > is working to adapt missiles for nuclear warheads.
> > >
> > > "I'm talking about information that says that they not only had these
> > > missiles, but I'm aware of information that suggests they were
> > working
> > > hard as to how to put the two together," Powell said.
> > >
> > > A senior official for the National Council for Resistance in Iran
> > said
> > > Tuesday that a bomb diagram -- along with an unspecified amount of
> > > weapons-grade uranium -- was provided to Iran by Abdul Qadeer Khan,
> > > the disgraced former head of Pakistani's nuclear development which
> > was
> > > tied to both Iran and Libya.
> > >
> > > The official said the designs were handed to the Iranians between
> > 1994
> > > and 1996, while Khan delivered HEU -- highly enriched uranium -- in
> > > 2001.
> > >
> > > Banned in the United States as a terrorist organization, the group
> > was
> > > instrumental in 2002 in revealing Iran's enrichment program in the
> > > central city of Natanz, based on what it said was information
> > provided
> > > by sources in Iran.
> > >
> > > The opposition group says a facility at Lavizan-Shian northeast of
> > > Tehran was part of a secret nuclear weapons program.
> > >
> > > Powell declined comment on Khan but said that "for 20 years the
> > > Iranians have been trying to hide things from the international
> > > community."
> > >
> > > Iran says its sole interest is to generate nuclear fuel through
> > > low-level uranium enrichment, but the United States suspects Iran
> > > wants to produce weapons-grade enriched uranium.
> > >
> > > Enrichment does not violate the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, but
> > > the International Atomic Energy Agency and most of its members want
> > > Iran to scrap enrichment plans as a confidence building measure.
> > >
> > > Iran announced suspension of enrichment last week, and the agency
> > said
> > > it would police that commitment starting next week, in advance of a
> > > Nov. 25 IAEA board meeting.
> > >
> > > The pledge reduced Washington's hopes of having the board refer Iran
> > > to the U.N. Security Council for alleged violations of the
> > > Nonproliferation Treaty.
> > >
> > > Tehran has not dropped plans to run 50,000 centrifuges to enrich
> > > uranium for what it says will be the fuel requirements of a nuclear
> > > reactor to be finished next year.
> > >
> > > It currently possesses less than 1,000 centrifuges. But if it added
> > > 500 centrifuges, experts say Iran would be able to make enough
> > > weapons-grade uranium to make a bomb annually.
> >
>
--
"Honestly, I think we should just trust our president in every decision that he
makes and we should just support that."-Britney Spears, 9/2003
"Too many good docs are getting out of business. Too many OB-GYNs aren't able
to practice their love with women all across this country."- George W. Bush,
9/6/04
Free humor. Whenever you want. http://www.psmueller.com
Nov 18th 2004, 4:20 pm
#51
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
Arizona Bushwhacker wrote:
> "The Drums of Fascinet" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected] ups.com...
>
>>Max Mustermann wrote:
>>>Here we go again, right on cue as many predicted.........
>>Well, yes, but everyone already knew what the Iranians were doing.
>
>
> We all knew what Iraq was doing too! NOT!
>
> I don't believe these republican lies about what Iran
> is up to for a New York minute!
>
> You republicans are not going to fool America with
> the same lies you used to fool America into a war
> with Iraq.
Yes we will.
Fox News has now hired some Iranian emigres (who fled Iran) as "foreign
affairs experts." And in the last couple of days, these "experts" have
been saying how Iran is building all kinds of horrible WMD. As a
result, Fox News broadcasts have been sounding the alarm over the need
to confront Iran.
In addition, Fox News is giving practically around-the-clock coverage to
the U.N. oil-for-food scandal. Their commentators and "foreign affairs
experts" have denounced the U.N. as worse than the Mafia, etc.
So the case for unilateral (non-U.N.) action against Iran is being made.
Bit by bit.
--
Steven D. Litvintchouk
Email: [email protected]
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
> "The Drums of Fascinet" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected] ups.com...
>
>>Max Mustermann wrote:
>>>Here we go again, right on cue as many predicted.........
>>Well, yes, but everyone already knew what the Iranians were doing.
>
>
> We all knew what Iraq was doing too! NOT!
>
> I don't believe these republican lies about what Iran
> is up to for a New York minute!
>
> You republicans are not going to fool America with
> the same lies you used to fool America into a war
> with Iraq.
Yes we will.
Fox News has now hired some Iranian emigres (who fled Iran) as "foreign
affairs experts." And in the last couple of days, these "experts" have
been saying how Iran is building all kinds of horrible WMD. As a
result, Fox News broadcasts have been sounding the alarm over the need
to confront Iran.
In addition, Fox News is giving practically around-the-clock coverage to
the U.N. oil-for-food scandal. Their commentators and "foreign affairs
experts" have denounced the U.N. as worse than the Mafia, etc.
So the case for unilateral (non-U.N.) action against Iran is being made.
Bit by bit.
--
Steven D. Litvintchouk
Email: [email protected]
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
Nov 18th 2004, 4:35 pm
#52
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
Steven Litvintchouk writes:
> So the case for unilateral (non-U.N.) action against Iran is being made.
> Bit by bit.
"You provide the pictures, I'll provide the war."
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
> So the case for unilateral (non-U.N.) action against Iran is being made.
> Bit by bit.
"You provide the pictures, I'll provide the war."
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
Nov 18th 2004, 5:22 pm
#53
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
"Arizona Bushwhacker" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<Y47nd.149813$hj.80906@fed1read07>...
> "The Twisted Dreams of Fascinet" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected] oups.com...
> >
> > Arizona Bushwhacker wrote:
> > > "Rick Carney" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected] om...
> > > > If you're smart you will assume that the majority of the American
> people
> > > > will indeed be fooled by the Bush cabal again and again. Do not
> > > > underestimate the stupidity of these people. They will amaze you
> with
> their
> > > > ignorance.
> > >
> > > It the republicans didn't lie their asses off the last time,
> > > I would not expect real proof this time. I want them
> > > to go into Iran and bring out one of those nuclear
> > > weapons they are working on.
> > >
> >
> > Ah, so you support invading Iran, then?
> > Excellent.
> >
> > Glad to have you aboard.
>
> Not until I see real proof of their WMDs! Not just
> pictures of hospitals where republicans tell me it's a
> nuclear reactor!
>
> I have no doubt that republicans are dim enough to
> fall for the same lie twice, but I'm not!
>
> >
> > -F
> >
If President Bush our Commander in Chief and Secretary Powell and
Secretary Rumsfeld tell us that we need to Invade Iran thats good
enough for me and it Should be Good Enough for Any Loyal American!
> "The Twisted Dreams of Fascinet" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected] oups.com...
> >
> > Arizona Bushwhacker wrote:
> > > "Rick Carney" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected] om...
> > > > If you're smart you will assume that the majority of the American
> people
> > > > will indeed be fooled by the Bush cabal again and again. Do not
> > > > underestimate the stupidity of these people. They will amaze you
> with
> their
> > > > ignorance.
> > >
> > > It the republicans didn't lie their asses off the last time,
> > > I would not expect real proof this time. I want them
> > > to go into Iran and bring out one of those nuclear
> > > weapons they are working on.
> > >
> >
> > Ah, so you support invading Iran, then?
> > Excellent.
> >
> > Glad to have you aboard.
>
> Not until I see real proof of their WMDs! Not just
> pictures of hospitals where republicans tell me it's a
> nuclear reactor!
>
> I have no doubt that republicans are dim enough to
> fall for the same lie twice, but I'm not!
>
> >
> > -F
> >
If President Bush our Commander in Chief and Secretary Powell and
Secretary Rumsfeld tell us that we need to Invade Iran thats good
enough for me and it Should be Good Enough for Any Loyal American!
Nov 18th 2004, 5:39 pm
#54
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 03:26:11 +0100, Mxsmanic <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Deep Frayed Morgues writes:
>> Do you think Arabs would treat us nicely if they were in the drivers
>> seat?
>Yes.
I hope we never know for sure. The Arab states have never been able to
get along with each other in any lasting way, and that exists even to
an interpersonal level. It's a pretty hard place to live.
But then experience shows us that if Iran actually HAD nuclear
weapons, war would not be inevitable, but a less appealing option.
Just look at Pakistan and Nth Korea for an example. No-one is going to
be invading them!
The fact is that this whole anti-WMD/Iran thing is purely a political
thing. The last thing the west wants is to lose political might to
another Islamic country at the moment.
I believe this has been the line of US policy for the last 60 years -
stop anyone else getting the good cards.
---
DFM
wrote:
>Deep Frayed Morgues writes:
>> Do you think Arabs would treat us nicely if they were in the drivers
>> seat?
>Yes.
I hope we never know for sure. The Arab states have never been able to
get along with each other in any lasting way, and that exists even to
an interpersonal level. It's a pretty hard place to live.
But then experience shows us that if Iran actually HAD nuclear
weapons, war would not be inevitable, but a less appealing option.
Just look at Pakistan and Nth Korea for an example. No-one is going to
be invading them!
The fact is that this whole anti-WMD/Iran thing is purely a political
thing. The last thing the west wants is to lose political might to
another Islamic country at the moment.
I believe this has been the line of US policy for the last 60 years -
stop anyone else getting the good cards.
---
DFM
Nov 18th 2004, 6:46 pm
#55
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
Deep Frayed Morgues wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 03:26:11 +0100, Mxsmanic <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >Deep Frayed Morgues writes:
> >
> >> Do you think Arabs would treat us nicely if they were in the drivers
> >> seat?
> >
> >Yes.
> I hope we never know for sure. The Arab states have never been able to
> get along with each other in any lasting way, and that exists even to
> an interpersonal level. It's a pretty hard place to live.
Heh. Remember the United Arab Republic?
> But then experience shows us that if Iran actually HAD nuclear
> weapons, war would not be inevitable, but a less appealing option.
> Just look at Pakistan and Nth Korea for an example. No-one is going to
> be invading them!
> The fact is that this whole anti-WMD/Iran thing is purely a political
> thing. The last thing the west wants is to lose political might to
> another Islamic country at the moment.
> I believe this has been the line of US policy for the last 60 years -
> stop anyone else getting the good cards.
Yer darn tootin' - I for one would rather the US and the West have the "good
cards" than any Islamic/Arab states...
--
Best
Greg
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 03:26:11 +0100, Mxsmanic <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >Deep Frayed Morgues writes:
> >
> >> Do you think Arabs would treat us nicely if they were in the drivers
> >> seat?
> >
> >Yes.
> I hope we never know for sure. The Arab states have never been able to
> get along with each other in any lasting way, and that exists even to
> an interpersonal level. It's a pretty hard place to live.
Heh. Remember the United Arab Republic?
> But then experience shows us that if Iran actually HAD nuclear
> weapons, war would not be inevitable, but a less appealing option.
> Just look at Pakistan and Nth Korea for an example. No-one is going to
> be invading them!
> The fact is that this whole anti-WMD/Iran thing is purely a political
> thing. The last thing the west wants is to lose political might to
> another Islamic country at the moment.
> I believe this has been the line of US policy for the last 60 years -
> stop anyone else getting the good cards.
Yer darn tootin' - I for one would rather the US and the West have the "good
cards" than any Islamic/Arab states...
--
Best
Greg
Nov 18th 2004, 7:00 pm
#56
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
Gregory Morrow wrote:
> Deep Frayed Morgues wrote:
>
>
>>On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 03:26:11 +0100, Mxsmanic <[email protected]>
>>wrote:
>>>Deep Frayed Morgues writes:
>>>>Do you think Arabs would treat us nicely if they were in the drivers
>>>>seat?
>>>Yes.
>>I hope we never know for sure. The Arab states have never been able to
>>get along with each other in any lasting way, and that exists even to
>>an interpersonal level. It's a pretty hard place to live.
>
>
>
> Heh. Remember the United Arab Republic?
>
>
>
>>But then experience shows us that if Iran actually HAD nuclear
>>weapons, war would not be inevitable, but a less appealing option.
>>Just look at Pakistan and Nth Korea for an example. No-one is going to
>>be invading them!
>>The fact is that this whole anti-WMD/Iran thing is purely a political
>>thing. The last thing the west wants is to lose political might to
>>another Islamic country at the moment.
>>I believe this has been the line of US policy for the last 60 years -
>>stop anyone else getting the good cards.
>
>
>
> Yer darn tootin' - I for one would rather the US and the West have the "good
> cards" than any Islamic/Arab states...
>
Most of the West is pretty damn worried about Bush and his warmongering
cabinet, considering the "good cards" they hold.
Richard.
> Deep Frayed Morgues wrote:
>
>
>>On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 03:26:11 +0100, Mxsmanic <[email protected]>
>>wrote:
>>>Deep Frayed Morgues writes:
>>>>Do you think Arabs would treat us nicely if they were in the drivers
>>>>seat?
>>>Yes.
>>I hope we never know for sure. The Arab states have never been able to
>>get along with each other in any lasting way, and that exists even to
>>an interpersonal level. It's a pretty hard place to live.
>
>
>
> Heh. Remember the United Arab Republic?
>
>
>
>>But then experience shows us that if Iran actually HAD nuclear
>>weapons, war would not be inevitable, but a less appealing option.
>>Just look at Pakistan and Nth Korea for an example. No-one is going to
>>be invading them!
>>The fact is that this whole anti-WMD/Iran thing is purely a political
>>thing. The last thing the west wants is to lose political might to
>>another Islamic country at the moment.
>>I believe this has been the line of US policy for the last 60 years -
>>stop anyone else getting the good cards.
>
>
>
> Yer darn tootin' - I for one would rather the US and the West have the "good
> cards" than any Islamic/Arab states...
>
Most of the West is pretty damn worried about Bush and his warmongering
cabinet, considering the "good cards" they hold.
Richard.
Nov 18th 2004, 10:44 pm
#57
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
>>
>> I have to admit that a small part of me would love to see Israel go up
>> in a puff of smoke
A part of me wants to see the whole Arab world burn down, and many parts of
Europe :) I want to see a greater Israel dominate the entire middle east. I
also wouldnt mind seeing France and other places get overwelmed with muslims
to teach them a lesson :)
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
>> I have to admit that a small part of me would love to see Israel go up
>> in a puff of smoke
A part of me wants to see the whole Arab world burn down, and many parts of
Europe :) I want to see a greater Israel dominate the entire middle east. I
also wouldnt mind seeing France and other places get overwelmed with muslims
to teach them a lesson :)
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
Nov 18th 2004, 10:46 pm
#58
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
>p.s. Are you by any chance one of those "born again" christians?
I was born one time that was enough. I was baptised Roman Catholic but I
consider myself just Christian.
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
I was born one time that was enough. I was baptised Roman Catholic but I
consider myself just Christian.
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
Nov 18th 2004, 10:48 pm
#59
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
>> ... but if a nuke should
>> "accidently" fall in Teheran, I wouldnt lose TOO much sleep.
>And if it fell in Israel?
It wouldnt. Israel is under the American umbrella :) Nukes are reserved for the
low lifes
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
>> "accidently" fall in Teheran, I wouldnt lose TOO much sleep.
>And if it fell in Israel?
It wouldnt. Israel is under the American umbrella :) Nukes are reserved for the
low lifes
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
Nov 18th 2004, 10:50 pm
#60
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
>of a lot more civilized than the Christian kings who eventually pushed
>them back to Africa.
>Their contribution to arts and science was also quite superior to that of
>the Catholic barbarians.
>
Again, That is all a myth and historical revision. If they were so advanced why
are they such primitive people today? doesnt add up. Its all a hoax
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
>them back to Africa.
>Their contribution to arts and science was also quite superior to that of
>the Catholic barbarians.
>
Again, That is all a myth and historical revision. If they were so advanced why
are they such primitive people today? doesnt add up. Its all a hoax
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
