USA going after Iran now
Nov 18th 2004, 12:02 pm
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
Iran couldnt even penetrate Iraqs borders during their 10 year war. It took the
US only a few minutes. PELEASE. These people dont know their right foot from
their left in an army. It will be a turkey shoot.
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
US only a few minutes. PELEASE. These people dont know their right foot from
their left in an army. It will be a turkey shoot.
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
Nov 18th 2004, 1:22 pm
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
Arizona Bushwhacker writes:
> Why should any non-republican be expected to fight
> and pay for a republican war when their are plenty
> of republicans out there who can fight and pay for it
> themselves?
You have not answered my question.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
> Why should any non-republican be expected to fight
> and pay for a republican war when their are plenty
> of republicans out there who can fight and pay for it
> themselves?
You have not answered my question.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
Nov 18th 2004, 1:22 pm
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
ARKADYA writes:
> No one has to fight it. It could be done quickly and cleanly with small
> Tactical Nukes. purge the Human race of the Persians and Arabs
So you advocate genocide?
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
> No one has to fight it. It could be done quickly and cleanly with small
> Tactical Nukes. purge the Human race of the Persians and Arabs
So you advocate genocide?
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
Nov 18th 2004, 1:24 pm
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
Frank F. Matthews writes:
> Don't bother to worry. The US military cannot manage to get enough
> troops together to keep Iraq quiet. Two or three years from now, if the
> US manages to bail out of Iraq the Iranians might have reason to worry.
> Until then they should be pretty safe.
The President has shown little awareness or concern for military
capacity in the past while planning his attack on Iraq; I don't expect
him to show any new awareness or concern while planning his attacks on
Iran and Syria.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
> Don't bother to worry. The US military cannot manage to get enough
> troops together to keep Iraq quiet. Two or three years from now, if the
> US manages to bail out of Iraq the Iranians might have reason to worry.
> Until then they should be pretty safe.
The President has shown little awareness or concern for military
capacity in the past while planning his attack on Iraq; I don't expect
him to show any new awareness or concern while planning his attacks on
Iran and Syria.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
Nov 18th 2004, 1:26 pm
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
Deep Frayed Morgues writes:
> Do you think Arabs would treat us nicely if they were in the drivers
> seat?
Yes.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
> Do you think Arabs would treat us nicely if they were in the drivers
> seat?
Yes.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
Nov 18th 2004, 2:16 pm
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
>> Do you think Arabs would treat us nicely if they were in the drivers
>> seat?
>Yes.
Put the crack down. Arabs have yet to be nice to ANYONE in their entire
miserable existance. Even to themselves. People that dont have a problem
sacrifising their own children in suicide bombings are nothing but dirty filthy
animals fit for the gas chambers.
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
>> seat?
>Yes.
Put the crack down. Arabs have yet to be nice to ANYONE in their entire
miserable existance. Even to themselves. People that dont have a problem
sacrifising their own children in suicide bombings are nothing but dirty filthy
animals fit for the gas chambers.
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
Nov 18th 2004, 2:18 pm
#37
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
>> No one has to fight it. It could be done quickly and cleanly with small
>> Tactical Nukes. purge the Human race of the Persians and Arabs
>So you advocate genocide?
absolutely not, that would be politically incorrect.,but if a nuke should
"accidently" fall in Teheran, I wouldnt lose TOO much sleep.
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
>> Tactical Nukes. purge the Human race of the Persians and Arabs
>So you advocate genocide?
absolutely not, that would be politically incorrect.,but if a nuke should
"accidently" fall in Teheran, I wouldnt lose TOO much sleep.
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
Nov 18th 2004, 2:57 pm
#38
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
Deep Frayed Morgues wrote:
>
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 19:30:46 +0100, Max Mustermann
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >Here we go again, right on cue as many predicted.........
> >
> >Powell: Intelligence suggests Iran trying to adapt missiles for nukes
> >
>
> I have to admit that a small part of me would love to see Israel go up
> in a puff of smoke
You think you're the only one?
:)
(that is what this is about, yeah?), I don't
> actually think it would help matters at all.
>
> Just let it happen. The west has been shitting on these countries for
> hundreds of years now, and this will continue. Just because we have
> better access to information now and know whats going on, doesn't mean
> we can somehow stop it from happening. Just be glad you are on the
> right side of the fence.
>
> Do you think Arabs would treat us nicely if they were in the drivers
> seat?
> ---
> DFM
>
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 19:30:46 +0100, Max Mustermann
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >Here we go again, right on cue as many predicted.........
> >
> >Powell: Intelligence suggests Iran trying to adapt missiles for nukes
> >
>
> I have to admit that a small part of me would love to see Israel go up
> in a puff of smoke
You think you're the only one?
:)
(that is what this is about, yeah?), I don't
> actually think it would help matters at all.
>
> Just let it happen. The west has been shitting on these countries for
> hundreds of years now, and this will continue. Just because we have
> better access to information now and know whats going on, doesn't mean
> we can somehow stop it from happening. Just be glad you are on the
> right side of the fence.
>
> Do you think Arabs would treat us nicely if they were in the drivers
> seat?
> ---
> DFM
Nov 18th 2004, 3:01 pm
#39
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
arkadya driveled:
>Put the crack down. Arabs have yet to be nice
> to ANYONE in their entire miserable
> existance. Even to themselves. People that
> dont have a problem sacrifising their own
> children in suicide bombings are nothing but
> dirty filthy animals fit for the gas chambers.
>Never Forgive, Never Forget
>****************9-11-01
You should have signed this gobbledeguck with "Heil Hitler"
I, and many others, know you for some years now. I always hoped you
would finally grow up but apparently you are a hopeless case.
As I said before, I give you this advice: Before sitting down at your
keyboard, switch on brain.
I know all your other readers told me before, "he doesn't have one."
Are they right?
Regards,
Sandor
p.s. Are you by any chance one of those "born again" christians?
>Put the crack down. Arabs have yet to be nice
> to ANYONE in their entire miserable
> existance. Even to themselves. People that
> dont have a problem sacrifising their own
> children in suicide bombings are nothing but
> dirty filthy animals fit for the gas chambers.
>Never Forgive, Never Forget
>****************9-11-01
You should have signed this gobbledeguck with "Heil Hitler"
I, and many others, know you for some years now. I always hoped you
would finally grow up but apparently you are a hopeless case.
As I said before, I give you this advice: Before sitting down at your
keyboard, switch on brain.
I know all your other readers told me before, "he doesn't have one."
Are they right?
Regards,
Sandor
p.s. Are you by any chance one of those "born again" christians?
Nov 18th 2004, 3:07 pm
#40
ana bahabak rawad
Joined: Nov 2004
Location: milwaukee
Posts: 30
Re: USA going after Iran now
Originally Posted by The Twisted Dreams of Fascinet
Arizona Bushwhacker wrote:
> "The Twisted Dreams of Fascinet" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
> news:[email protected] oups.com...
> >
> > Arizona Bushwhacker wrote:
> > > "Rick Carney" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected] om...
> > > > If you're smart you will assume that the majority of the
American
> > people
> > > > will indeed be fooled by the Bush cabal again and again. Do not
> > > > underestimate the stupidity of these people. They will amaze
you
> > with
> > > their
> > > > ignorance.
> > >
> > > It the republicans didn't lie their asses off the last time,
> > > I would not expect real proof this time. I want them
> > > to go into Iran and bring out one of those nuclear
> > > weapons they are working on.
> > >
> >
> > Ah, so you support invading Iran, then?
> > Excellent.
> >
> > Glad to have you aboard.
> Not until I see real proof of their WMDs! Not just
> pictures of hospitals where republicans tell me it's a
> nuclear reactor!
> I have no doubt that republicans are dim enough to
> fall for the same lie twice, but I'm not!
It's too late. You already said you want to go in and get the WMDs
(that, if you read the article, Washington does not say are there) as
proof of WMDs. That's a perfectly fine emperical mode of analysis, but
you can't expect them to do it without an invasion.
Don't worry, I'll submit your name to your local recruiter.
You'll thank me later.
Why don't you believe the Iranians are building a nuclear reactor?
"Tehran has not dropped plans to run 50,000 centrifuges to enrich
uranium for what it says will be the fuel requirements of a nuclear
reactor to be finished next year." They admit it.
But no, you're right. Iran only wants a nuclear power plant, just like
North Korea.
-F
> "The Twisted Dreams of Fascinet" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
> news:[email protected] oups.com...
> >
> > Arizona Bushwhacker wrote:
> > > "Rick Carney" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected] om...
> > > > If you're smart you will assume that the majority of the
American
> > people
> > > > will indeed be fooled by the Bush cabal again and again. Do not
> > > > underestimate the stupidity of these people. They will amaze
you
> > with
> > > their
> > > > ignorance.
> > >
> > > It the republicans didn't lie their asses off the last time,
> > > I would not expect real proof this time. I want them
> > > to go into Iran and bring out one of those nuclear
> > > weapons they are working on.
> > >
> >
> > Ah, so you support invading Iran, then?
> > Excellent.
> >
> > Glad to have you aboard.
> Not until I see real proof of their WMDs! Not just
> pictures of hospitals where republicans tell me it's a
> nuclear reactor!
> I have no doubt that republicans are dim enough to
> fall for the same lie twice, but I'm not!
It's too late. You already said you want to go in and get the WMDs
(that, if you read the article, Washington does not say are there) as
proof of WMDs. That's a perfectly fine emperical mode of analysis, but
you can't expect them to do it without an invasion.
Don't worry, I'll submit your name to your local recruiter.
You'll thank me later.
Why don't you believe the Iranians are building a nuclear reactor?
"Tehran has not dropped plans to run 50,000 centrifuges to enrich
uranium for what it says will be the fuel requirements of a nuclear
reactor to be finished next year." They admit it.
But no, you're right. Iran only wants a nuclear power plant, just like
North Korea.
-F
Souriya
Nov 18th 2004, 3:10 pm
#41
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
In article <[email protected]>, Mxsmanic
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Frank F. Matthews writes:
>
> > Don't bother to worry. The US military cannot manage to get enough
> > troops together to keep Iraq quiet. Two or three years from now, if the
> > US manages to bail out of Iraq the Iranians might have reason to worry.
> > Until then they should be pretty safe.
>
> The President has shown little awareness or concern for military
> capacity in the past while planning his attack on Iraq; I don't expect
> him to show any new awareness or concern while planning his attacks on
> Iran and Syria.
But the U.S. does have a military as part of its diplomacy.
About a year ago, IIRC, there was a very good article in the LFT about
what the U.S. has got with its 3-4% of GDP investment (historically
very low for any nation). I think it was by Paul Kennedy. It is very
remarkable, particularly the 13 Carrier Task forces.
jay
Thu Nov 18, 2004
mailto:[email protected]
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Frank F. Matthews writes:
>
> > Don't bother to worry. The US military cannot manage to get enough
> > troops together to keep Iraq quiet. Two or three years from now, if the
> > US manages to bail out of Iraq the Iranians might have reason to worry.
> > Until then they should be pretty safe.
>
> The President has shown little awareness or concern for military
> capacity in the past while planning his attack on Iraq; I don't expect
> him to show any new awareness or concern while planning his attacks on
> Iran and Syria.
But the U.S. does have a military as part of its diplomacy.
About a year ago, IIRC, there was a very good article in the LFT about
what the U.S. has got with its 3-4% of GDP investment (historically
very low for any nation). I think it was by Paul Kennedy. It is very
remarkable, particularly the 13 Carrier Task forces.
jay
Thu Nov 18, 2004
mailto:[email protected]
Nov 18th 2004, 3:17 pm
#42
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
tim gueguen wrote:
> "John Bermont" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > President Bush is getting smarter as the butt holes keep pushing toward
> > global nuclear murder. Today Iran is reported to have missles to deliver
> > the bads. France and Britain slept from September 1939 to May of 1940, and
> > then cried out for Uncle Sam to come over and save them.
> Sounds like you need to read some history books. Your view of the events of
> 1940 sounds like it came from watching old Hollywood war films.
You saved me posting something similar.
'Uncle Sam' wasn't interested in playing until he got his butt kicked by the
Japs @ Pearl Harbor.
I guess the previous poster forgot / never knew that it happened several years
after WW2 actually broke out.
I'm just waiting for the *new* Hollywood war films. Tom Cruise wins the Battle
of Britain ( when the USA wasn't even in the war ) . Yuk !
Graham
> "John Bermont" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > President Bush is getting smarter as the butt holes keep pushing toward
> > global nuclear murder. Today Iran is reported to have missles to deliver
> > the bads. France and Britain slept from September 1939 to May of 1940, and
> > then cried out for Uncle Sam to come over and save them.
> Sounds like you need to read some history books. Your view of the events of
> 1940 sounds like it came from watching old Hollywood war films.
You saved me posting something similar.
'Uncle Sam' wasn't interested in playing until he got his butt kicked by the
Japs @ Pearl Harbor.
I guess the previous poster forgot / never knew that it happened several years
after WW2 actually broke out.
I'm just waiting for the *new* Hollywood war films. Tom Cruise wins the Battle
of Britain ( when the USA wasn't even in the war ) . Yuk !
Graham
Nov 18th 2004, 3:40 pm
#43
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
"tim gueguen" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:pU9nd.265301$%k.102784@pd7tw2no...
> "John Bermont" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > President Bush is getting smarter as the butt holes keep pushing toward
> > global nuclear murder. Today Iran is reported to have missles to deliver
> > the bads. France and Britain slept from September 1939 to May of 1940,
and
> > then cried out for Uncle Sam to come over and save them.
> Sounds like you need to read some history books. Your view of the events
of
> 1940 sounds like it came from watching old Hollywood war films.
Nah, his argument isn't even that deep.
Maybe some comic book he read.
That, or Fox. Maybe a Republican website.
news:pU9nd.265301$%k.102784@pd7tw2no...
> "John Bermont" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > President Bush is getting smarter as the butt holes keep pushing toward
> > global nuclear murder. Today Iran is reported to have missles to deliver
> > the bads. France and Britain slept from September 1939 to May of 1940,
and
> > then cried out for Uncle Sam to come over and save them.
> Sounds like you need to read some history books. Your view of the events
of
> 1940 sounds like it came from watching old Hollywood war films.
Nah, his argument isn't even that deep.
Maybe some comic book he read.
That, or Fox. Maybe a Republican website.
Nov 18th 2004, 3:50 pm
#44
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
tim gueguen wrote:
> "John Bermont" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>President Bush is getting smarter as the butt holes keep pushing toward
>>global nuclear murder. Today Iran is reported to have missles to deliver
>>the bads. France and Britain slept from September 1939 to May of 1940, and
>>then cried out for Uncle Sam to come over and save them.
>
>
> Sounds like you need to read some history books. Your view of the events of
> 1940 sounds like it came from watching old Hollywood war films.
>
> tim gueguen 101867
>
>
A few facts of history for you Tim:
August 24, 1939. German Russian Non-Aggression Pact signed.
September 1, 1939. Germany invaded Poland.
September 3, 1939. France and Britain declared war on Germany.
September 17, 1939. Russia invaded Poland. (Notice that France and
Britain did not declare war on Russia.)
September 18, 1939. The Polish government fled into Romania.
September 28, 1939. Warsaw falls to Germany.
September 28, 1939. Another German Russian agreement.
All quiet on the eastern front, almost.
Russia gobbled up the Baltics.
November 30, 1939. Russia attacked Finland.
France and Britain still did not declare war on Russia.
May 10, 1940. Germany attacked Belgium and Holland.
May 10, 1940. Winston Churchill became Prime Minister of Britain.
May 12, 1940. German army moved into France.
May 13, 1940. Dutch queen flees to Britain.
May 14, 1940. Holland surrenders to Germany.
May 26 to June 4, 1940. 340,000 British, French, and Belgian troops flee
at Dunkirk, leaving their equipment behind.
June 5, 1940. Charles de Gaulle flees to London.
June 14, 1940. German army takes Paris.
June 22, 1940. France and Germany sign an armistice. (French surrender)
July 1, 1940. Vichy French government formed.
July 4, 1940. French government broke relations with Britain.
Does your history book report the same?
John Bermont
--
------------------------------------------------------
* * * Mastering Independent Budget Travel * * *
http://www.enjoy-europe.com/
------------------------------------------------------
> "John Bermont" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>President Bush is getting smarter as the butt holes keep pushing toward
>>global nuclear murder. Today Iran is reported to have missles to deliver
>>the bads. France and Britain slept from September 1939 to May of 1940, and
>>then cried out for Uncle Sam to come over and save them.
>
>
> Sounds like you need to read some history books. Your view of the events of
> 1940 sounds like it came from watching old Hollywood war films.
>
> tim gueguen 101867
>
>
A few facts of history for you Tim:
August 24, 1939. German Russian Non-Aggression Pact signed.
September 1, 1939. Germany invaded Poland.
September 3, 1939. France and Britain declared war on Germany.
September 17, 1939. Russia invaded Poland. (Notice that France and
Britain did not declare war on Russia.)
September 18, 1939. The Polish government fled into Romania.
September 28, 1939. Warsaw falls to Germany.
September 28, 1939. Another German Russian agreement.
All quiet on the eastern front, almost.
Russia gobbled up the Baltics.
November 30, 1939. Russia attacked Finland.
France and Britain still did not declare war on Russia.
May 10, 1940. Germany attacked Belgium and Holland.
May 10, 1940. Winston Churchill became Prime Minister of Britain.
May 12, 1940. German army moved into France.
May 13, 1940. Dutch queen flees to Britain.
May 14, 1940. Holland surrenders to Germany.
May 26 to June 4, 1940. 340,000 British, French, and Belgian troops flee
at Dunkirk, leaving their equipment behind.
June 5, 1940. Charles de Gaulle flees to London.
June 14, 1940. German army takes Paris.
June 22, 1940. France and Germany sign an armistice. (French surrender)
July 1, 1940. Vichy French government formed.
July 4, 1940. French government broke relations with Britain.
Does your history book report the same?
John Bermont
--
------------------------------------------------------
* * * Mastering Independent Budget Travel * * *
http://www.enjoy-europe.com/
------------------------------------------------------
Nov 18th 2004, 3:53 pm
#45
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: USA going after Iran now
ARKADYA writes:
> absolutely not, that would be politically incorrect.
What is "purging the human race of the Persians and Arabs," if not
genocide?
> ... but if a nuke should
> "accidently" fall in Teheran, I wouldnt lose TOO much sleep.
And if it fell in Israel?
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
> absolutely not, that would be politically incorrect.
What is "purging the human race of the Persians and Arabs," if not
genocide?
> ... but if a nuke should
> "accidently" fall in Teheran, I wouldnt lose TOO much sleep.
And if it fell in Israel?
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
