US Derclaration of Expulsion
Nov 28th 2004, 2:42 am
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: US Derclaration of Expulsion
You are new to the Usenet, aren't you?
Welcome anyway....
Tee
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 13:45:27 GMT, ah <[email protected]> wrote:
>Huzzah!
>--
>ah
--
Verba volant, scripta manent.
Welcome anyway....
Tee
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 13:45:27 GMT, ah <[email protected]> wrote:
>Huzzah!
>--
>ah
--
Verba volant, scripta manent.
Nov 28th 2004, 3:56 am
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: US Derclaration of Expulsion
Tee Doubleyou wrote:
> You are new to the Usenet, aren't you?
No; just most parts of it <g>
> Welcome anyway....
Good morning.
I'm making buttermilk biscuits from cratch . . . .
> Tee
>
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 13:45:27 GMT, ah <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Huzzah!
>>--
>>ah
>
> --
> Verba volant, scripta manent.
<p class="solo"><em>So true</em></p>
--
ah
> You are new to the Usenet, aren't you?
No; just most parts of it <g>
> Welcome anyway....
Good morning.
I'm making buttermilk biscuits from cratch . . . .
> Tee
>
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 13:45:27 GMT, ah <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Huzzah!
>>--
>>ah
>
> --
> Verba volant, scripta manent.
<p class="solo"><em>So true</em></p>
--
ah
Nov 29th 2004, 9:16 am
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: US Derclaration of Expulsion
In article <oEkqd.2578$6o5.2338@trnddc08>, ah <[email protected]> wrote:
>PJ O'Donovan wrote:
>> ah <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<t4wmd.5868$J55.3630@trnddc06>...
>>> george wrote:
>>> > "PJ O'Donovan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> > news:[email protected] om...
>>> >> "george" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> >> news:<XT4kd.317672$wV.294178@attbi_s54>...
>>> >>> "PJ O'Donovan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> >>> news:[email protected] om...
>>> >>> > January 1848 Lincoln said: "Any people anywhere, being inclined and
>>> >>> > having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the existing
>>> >>> > government, and form a new one that suits them better.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > "If the Union was formed by the accession of States then the Union may
>>> >>> > be
>>> >>> > dissolved by the secession of States."
>>> >>> > --Daniel Webster, US Senate, February 15, 1833
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > Having been amended only 17 times since 10 vital amendments (the Bill
>>> >>> > of Rights) were added at the republic's inception, the U.S.
>>> >>> > Constitution is not easily changed, primarily because so many states
>>> >>> > (75%, now 38 of 50) must agree. Yet, there are 38 states today that
>>> >>> > may be inclined to adopt, let us call it, a "Declaration of
>>> >>> > Expulsion," that is, a specific constitutional amendment to kick out
>>> >>> > the systemically troublesome states and those trending rapidly toward
>>> >>> > anti-American, if not outright subversive, behavior. The 12 states
>>> >>> > that must go: California, Illinois, New York, New Jersey,
>>> >>> > Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine, Rhode Island,
>>> >>> > Connecticut, Maryland, and Delaware. Only the remaining 38 states
>>> >>> > would retain the name, "United States of America." The 12 expelled
>>> >>> > mobs could call themselves the "Dirty Dozen," or individually keep
>>> >>> > their identity and go their separate ways, probably straight to Hell,
>>> >>> > or to Canada, eh?
>>> >>>
>>>
>>> >>> California, for > instance is the most populous state, with the largest
>>> >>> >economy, and is the nations' vegetable garden.
>>> >>
>>> >> Vegetable garden? The rest of the universe knows CA's main output is
>>> >> fruits and nuts.
>>> >>
>>> >> What planet do you live on?
>>> >
>>> > Where do you think winter lettuce comes from?
>>>
>>> Californication exports 79% of the World's lettuce, 13% of
>Yellow-Neck, 25% of
>>> cabbage, 43% of total grapes, and 57% of the total output in strawberries.
>>>
>>> Thanks to CA, Peru and Ecuador, we here on the East coast of the US have
>>> vegetables 24/7/52
>>
>> Where does this otherwise uninhabitable waste land called CA get its water to
>> grow its crops?
>Colorado.
Plenty of it comes from California.
http://reference.allrefer.com/gazett...reservoir.html
http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/Wat...ons/slide3.htm
>PJ O'Donovan wrote:
>> ah <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<t4wmd.5868$J55.3630@trnddc06>...
>>> george wrote:
>>> > "PJ O'Donovan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> > news:[email protected] om...
>>> >> "george" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> >> news:<XT4kd.317672$wV.294178@attbi_s54>...
>>> >>> "PJ O'Donovan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> >>> news:[email protected] om...
>>> >>> > January 1848 Lincoln said: "Any people anywhere, being inclined and
>>> >>> > having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the existing
>>> >>> > government, and form a new one that suits them better.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > "If the Union was formed by the accession of States then the Union may
>>> >>> > be
>>> >>> > dissolved by the secession of States."
>>> >>> > --Daniel Webster, US Senate, February 15, 1833
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > Having been amended only 17 times since 10 vital amendments (the Bill
>>> >>> > of Rights) were added at the republic's inception, the U.S.
>>> >>> > Constitution is not easily changed, primarily because so many states
>>> >>> > (75%, now 38 of 50) must agree. Yet, there are 38 states today that
>>> >>> > may be inclined to adopt, let us call it, a "Declaration of
>>> >>> > Expulsion," that is, a specific constitutional amendment to kick out
>>> >>> > the systemically troublesome states and those trending rapidly toward
>>> >>> > anti-American, if not outright subversive, behavior. The 12 states
>>> >>> > that must go: California, Illinois, New York, New Jersey,
>>> >>> > Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine, Rhode Island,
>>> >>> > Connecticut, Maryland, and Delaware. Only the remaining 38 states
>>> >>> > would retain the name, "United States of America." The 12 expelled
>>> >>> > mobs could call themselves the "Dirty Dozen," or individually keep
>>> >>> > their identity and go their separate ways, probably straight to Hell,
>>> >>> > or to Canada, eh?
>>> >>>
>>>
>>> >>> California, for > instance is the most populous state, with the largest
>>> >>> >economy, and is the nations' vegetable garden.
>>> >>
>>> >> Vegetable garden? The rest of the universe knows CA's main output is
>>> >> fruits and nuts.
>>> >>
>>> >> What planet do you live on?
>>> >
>>> > Where do you think winter lettuce comes from?
>>>
>>> Californication exports 79% of the World's lettuce, 13% of
>Yellow-Neck, 25% of
>>> cabbage, 43% of total grapes, and 57% of the total output in strawberries.
>>>
>>> Thanks to CA, Peru and Ecuador, we here on the East coast of the US have
>>> vegetables 24/7/52
>>
>> Where does this otherwise uninhabitable waste land called CA get its water to
>> grow its crops?
>Colorado.
Plenty of it comes from California.
http://reference.allrefer.com/gazett...reservoir.html
http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/Wat...ons/slide3.htm
Nov 29th 2004, 9:43 am
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: US Derclaration of Expulsion
"Hatunen" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
copyright traps *
Try some deer traps, deer taste much nicer than copyright.:-)
news:[email protected]...
copyright traps *
Try some deer traps, deer taste much nicer than copyright.:-)
Nov 29th 2004, 9:49 am
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: US Derclaration of Expulsion
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 16:56:30 GMT, ah <[email protected]> wrote:
>Tee Doubleyou wrote:
>> You are new to the Usenet, aren't you?
>No; just most parts of it <g>
>> Welcome anyway....
>Good morning.
>I'm making buttermilk biscuits from cratch . . . .
You mispeld "crotch".
************* DAVE HATUNEN ([email protected]) *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
>Tee Doubleyou wrote:
>> You are new to the Usenet, aren't you?
>No; just most parts of it <g>
>> Welcome anyway....
>Good morning.
>I'm making buttermilk biscuits from cratch . . . .
You mispeld "crotch".
************* DAVE HATUNEN ([email protected]) *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
Nov 30th 2004, 12:43 am
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: US Derclaration of Expulsion
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 13:45:27 GMT, ah <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> > January 1848 Lincoln said: "Any people anywhere, being inclined and
>>>>>>>> > having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the existing
>>>>>>>> > government, and form a new one that suits them better.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > "If the Union was formed by the accession of States then the Union may
>>>>>>>> > be
>>>>>>>> > dissolved by the secession of States."
>>>>>>>> > --Daniel Webster, US Senate, February 15, 1833
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Having been amended only 17 times since 10 vital amendments (the Bill
>>>>>>>> > of Rights) were added at the republic's inception, the U.S.
>>>>>>>> > Constitution is not easily changed, primarily because so many states
>>>>>>>> > (75%, now 38 of 50) must agree. Yet, there are 38 states today that
>>>>>>>> > may be inclined to adopt, let us call it, a "Declaration of
>>>>>>>> > Expulsion," that is, a specific constitutional amendment to kick out
>>>>>>>> > the systemically troublesome states and those trending rapidly toward
>>>>>>>> > anti-American, if not outright subversive, behavior. The 12 states
>>>>>>>> > that must go: California, Illinois, New York, New Jersey,
>>>>>>>> > Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine, Rhode Island,
>>>>>>>> > Connecticut, Maryland, and Delaware. Only the remaining 38 states
>>>>>>>> > would retain the name, "United States of America." The 12 expelled
>>>>>>>> > mobs could call themselves the "Dirty Dozen," or individually keep
>>>>>>>> > their identity and go their separate ways, probably straight to Hell,
>>>>>>>> > or to Canada, eh?
Connecticut is home state of Bush where he has always garnered least
amount of votes. Could it be we know the bastard better than most.
By the time this sob leaves office we can look forward to a $15
trillion deficit which would guarantee a lower employment and less
jobs but we will surely have Virgin Birth coming out of our gazoo.
>>>>>>>> > January 1848 Lincoln said: "Any people anywhere, being inclined and
>>>>>>>> > having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the existing
>>>>>>>> > government, and form a new one that suits them better.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > "If the Union was formed by the accession of States then the Union may
>>>>>>>> > be
>>>>>>>> > dissolved by the secession of States."
>>>>>>>> > --Daniel Webster, US Senate, February 15, 1833
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Having been amended only 17 times since 10 vital amendments (the Bill
>>>>>>>> > of Rights) were added at the republic's inception, the U.S.
>>>>>>>> > Constitution is not easily changed, primarily because so many states
>>>>>>>> > (75%, now 38 of 50) must agree. Yet, there are 38 states today that
>>>>>>>> > may be inclined to adopt, let us call it, a "Declaration of
>>>>>>>> > Expulsion," that is, a specific constitutional amendment to kick out
>>>>>>>> > the systemically troublesome states and those trending rapidly toward
>>>>>>>> > anti-American, if not outright subversive, behavior. The 12 states
>>>>>>>> > that must go: California, Illinois, New York, New Jersey,
>>>>>>>> > Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine, Rhode Island,
>>>>>>>> > Connecticut, Maryland, and Delaware. Only the remaining 38 states
>>>>>>>> > would retain the name, "United States of America." The 12 expelled
>>>>>>>> > mobs could call themselves the "Dirty Dozen," or individually keep
>>>>>>>> > their identity and go their separate ways, probably straight to Hell,
>>>>>>>> > or to Canada, eh?
Connecticut is home state of Bush where he has always garnered least
amount of votes. Could it be we know the bastard better than most.
By the time this sob leaves office we can look forward to a $15
trillion deficit which would guarantee a lower employment and less
jobs but we will surely have Virgin Birth coming out of our gazoo.
Nov 30th 2004, 7:35 am
#37
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: US Derclaration of Expulsion
"pencil" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> "PJ O'Donovan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected] om...
> > January 1848 Lincoln said: "Any people anywhere, being inclined and
> > having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the
> > existing
> > government, and form a new one that suits them better.
> >
> >
> > "If the Union was formed by the accession of States then the Union
> > may
> > be
> > dissolved by the secession of States."
> > --Daniel Webster, US Senate, February 15, 1833
> >
> > Having been amended only 17 times since 10 vital amendments (the
> > Bill
> > of Rights) were added at the republic's inception, the U.S.
> > Constitution is not easily changed, primarily because so many states
> > (75%, now 38 of 50) must agree. Yet, there are 38 states today that
> > may be inclined to adopt, let us call it, a "Declaration of
> > Expulsion," that is, a specific constitutional amendment to kick out
> > the systemically troublesome states and those trending rapidly
> > toward
> > anti-American, if not outright subversive, behavior. The 12 states
> > that must go: California, Illinois, New York, New Jersey,
> > Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine, Rhode Island,
> > Connecticut, Maryland, and Delaware. Only the remaining 38 states
> > would retain the name, "United States of America." The 12 expelled
> > mobs could call themselves the "Dirty Dozen," or individually keep
> > their identity and go their separate ways, probably straight to
> > Hell,
> > or to Canada, eh?
>
> Not likely to happen yet - unfortunately. But just for a moment let us
> pretend that such a thing was imminent - how do you think the federal
> govern,ment would respond?
I can tell you from experience how the Federal Government would react.
I am a Texan and supported the Army of the Republic of Texas. The
Federal Government sent ATF agents, National Guard, and FBI into Ft.
Davis, TX. to bring down the Army of the Republic of Texas. That is
not HOW they would react...that is how they DID react. By the way,
Texas never voted to join the Union, we were a free Republic and were
annexed. I still feel that Texas should be a free Republic and there
are many other Texans who feel the same way.
> "PJ O'Donovan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected] om...
> > January 1848 Lincoln said: "Any people anywhere, being inclined and
> > having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the
> > existing
> > government, and form a new one that suits them better.
> >
> >
> > "If the Union was formed by the accession of States then the Union
> > may
> > be
> > dissolved by the secession of States."
> > --Daniel Webster, US Senate, February 15, 1833
> >
> > Having been amended only 17 times since 10 vital amendments (the
> > Bill
> > of Rights) were added at the republic's inception, the U.S.
> > Constitution is not easily changed, primarily because so many states
> > (75%, now 38 of 50) must agree. Yet, there are 38 states today that
> > may be inclined to adopt, let us call it, a "Declaration of
> > Expulsion," that is, a specific constitutional amendment to kick out
> > the systemically troublesome states and those trending rapidly
> > toward
> > anti-American, if not outright subversive, behavior. The 12 states
> > that must go: California, Illinois, New York, New Jersey,
> > Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine, Rhode Island,
> > Connecticut, Maryland, and Delaware. Only the remaining 38 states
> > would retain the name, "United States of America." The 12 expelled
> > mobs could call themselves the "Dirty Dozen," or individually keep
> > their identity and go their separate ways, probably straight to
> > Hell,
> > or to Canada, eh?
>
> Not likely to happen yet - unfortunately. But just for a moment let us
> pretend that such a thing was imminent - how do you think the federal
> govern,ment would respond?
I can tell you from experience how the Federal Government would react.
I am a Texan and supported the Army of the Republic of Texas. The
Federal Government sent ATF agents, National Guard, and FBI into Ft.
Davis, TX. to bring down the Army of the Republic of Texas. That is
not HOW they would react...that is how they DID react. By the way,
Texas never voted to join the Union, we were a free Republic and were
annexed. I still feel that Texas should be a free Republic and there
are many other Texans who feel the same way.
Nov 30th 2004, 12:24 pm
#38
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: US Derclaration of Expulsion
>Connecticut is home state of Bush where he has always garnered least
>amount of votes
Thats because people in Connecticut are dimwits
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
>amount of votes
Thats because people in Connecticut are dimwits
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
Nov 30th 2004, 12:25 pm
#39
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: US Derclaration of Expulsion
>>>>>>>>> > January 1848 Lincoln said: "Any people anywhere, being inclined
>and
>>>>>>>>> > having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the
>existing
>>>>>>>>> > government, and form a new one that suits them better.
Is that why the bastard didnt let the south leave the union? I'm glad Booth
shot him in the head
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
>and
>>>>>>>>> > having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the
>existing
>>>>>>>>> > government, and form a new one that suits them better.
Is that why the bastard didnt let the south leave the union? I'm glad Booth
shot him in the head
Never Forgive, Never Forget
9-11-01
Nov 30th 2004, 12:32 pm
#40
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: US Derclaration of Expulsion
Rick wrote:
> "pencil" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
>
>>"PJ O'Donovan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:[email protected] .com...
>>>January 1848 Lincoln said: "Any people anywhere, being inclined and
>>>having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the
>>>existing
>>>government, and form a new one that suits them better.
>>>"If the Union was formed by the accession of States then the Union
>>>may
>>>be
>>>dissolved by the secession of States."
>>>--Daniel Webster, US Senate, February 15, 1833
>>>Having been amended only 17 times since 10 vital amendments (the
>>>Bill
>>>of Rights) were added at the republic's inception, the U.S.
>>>Constitution is not easily changed, primarily because so many states
>>>(75%, now 38 of 50) must agree. Yet, there are 38 states today that
>>>may be inclined to adopt, let us call it, a "Declaration of
>>>Expulsion," that is, a specific constitutional amendment to kick out
>>>the systemically troublesome states and those trending rapidly
>>>toward
>>>anti-American, if not outright subversive, behavior. The 12 states
>>>that must go: California, Illinois, New York, New Jersey,
>>>Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine, Rhode Island,
>>>Connecticut, Maryland, and Delaware. Only the remaining 38 states
>>>would retain the name, "United States of America." The 12 expelled
>>>mobs could call themselves the "Dirty Dozen," or individually keep
>>>their identity and go their separate ways, probably straight to
>>>Hell,
>>>or to Canada, eh?
>>Not likely to happen yet - unfortunately. But just for a moment let us
>>pretend that such a thing was imminent - how do you think the federal
>>govern,ment would respond?
>
>
>
> I can tell you from experience how the Federal Government would react.
> I am a Texan and supported the Army of the Republic of Texas. The
> Federal Government sent ATF agents, National Guard, and FBI into Ft.
> Davis, TX. to bring down the Army of the Republic of Texas. That is
> not HOW they would react...that is how they DID react. By the way,
> Texas never voted to join the Union, we were a free Republic and were
> annexed. I still feel that Texas should be a free Republic and there
> are many other Texans who feel the same way.
The annexation of Texas was by treaty, however. The government of the
Republic signed the treaty. In any case joining the US was the
intention all along. It just took a while to get the US to agree.
> "pencil" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
>
>>"PJ O'Donovan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:[email protected] .com...
>>>January 1848 Lincoln said: "Any people anywhere, being inclined and
>>>having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the
>>>existing
>>>government, and form a new one that suits them better.
>>>"If the Union was formed by the accession of States then the Union
>>>may
>>>be
>>>dissolved by the secession of States."
>>>--Daniel Webster, US Senate, February 15, 1833
>>>Having been amended only 17 times since 10 vital amendments (the
>>>Bill
>>>of Rights) were added at the republic's inception, the U.S.
>>>Constitution is not easily changed, primarily because so many states
>>>(75%, now 38 of 50) must agree. Yet, there are 38 states today that
>>>may be inclined to adopt, let us call it, a "Declaration of
>>>Expulsion," that is, a specific constitutional amendment to kick out
>>>the systemically troublesome states and those trending rapidly
>>>toward
>>>anti-American, if not outright subversive, behavior. The 12 states
>>>that must go: California, Illinois, New York, New Jersey,
>>>Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine, Rhode Island,
>>>Connecticut, Maryland, and Delaware. Only the remaining 38 states
>>>would retain the name, "United States of America." The 12 expelled
>>>mobs could call themselves the "Dirty Dozen," or individually keep
>>>their identity and go their separate ways, probably straight to
>>>Hell,
>>>or to Canada, eh?
>>Not likely to happen yet - unfortunately. But just for a moment let us
>>pretend that such a thing was imminent - how do you think the federal
>>govern,ment would respond?
>
>
>
> I can tell you from experience how the Federal Government would react.
> I am a Texan and supported the Army of the Republic of Texas. The
> Federal Government sent ATF agents, National Guard, and FBI into Ft.
> Davis, TX. to bring down the Army of the Republic of Texas. That is
> not HOW they would react...that is how they DID react. By the way,
> Texas never voted to join the Union, we were a free Republic and were
> annexed. I still feel that Texas should be a free Republic and there
> are many other Texans who feel the same way.
The annexation of Texas was by treaty, however. The government of the
Republic signed the treaty. In any case joining the US was the
intention all along. It just took a while to get the US to agree.
Nov 30th 2004, 3:25 pm
#41
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: US Derclaration of Expulsion
Hatunen wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 16:56:30 GMT, ah <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Tee Doubleyou wrote:
>>> You are new to the Usenet, aren't you?
>>No; just most parts of it <g>
>>> Welcome anyway....
>>Good morning.
>>I'm making buttermilk biscuits from cratch . . . .
>
> You mispeld "crotch".
perv
--
ah
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 16:56:30 GMT, ah <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Tee Doubleyou wrote:
>>> You are new to the Usenet, aren't you?
>>No; just most parts of it <g>
>>> Welcome anyway....
>>Good morning.
>>I'm making buttermilk biscuits from cratch . . . .
>
> You mispeld "crotch".
perv
--
ah
Nov 30th 2004, 3:26 pm
#42
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: US Derclaration of Expulsion
Bill Moore wrote:
> In article <oEkqd.2578$6o5.2338@trnddc08>, ah <[email protected]> wrote:
>>PJ O'Donovan wrote:
>>> ah <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<t4wmd.5868$J55.3630@trnddc06>...
>>>> george wrote:
>>>> > "PJ O'Donovan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>> > news:[email protected] om...
>>>> >> "george" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>> >> news:<XT4kd.317672$wV.294178@attbi_s54>...
>>>> >>> "PJ O'Donovan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>> >>> news:[email protected] om...
>>>> >>> > January 1848 Lincoln said: "Any people anywhere, being inclined and
>>>> >>> > having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the existing
>>>> >>> > government, and form a new one that suits them better.
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > "If the Union was formed by the accession of States then the Union may
>>>> >>> > be
>>>> >>> > dissolved by the secession of States."
>>>> >>> > --Daniel Webster, US Senate, February 15, 1833
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > Having been amended only 17 times since 10 vital amendments (the Bill
>>>> >>> > of Rights) were added at the republic's inception, the U.S.
>>>> >>> > Constitution is not easily changed, primarily because so many states
>>>> >>> > (75%, now 38 of 50) must agree. Yet, there are 38 states today that
>>>> >>> > may be inclined to adopt, let us call it, a "Declaration of
>>>> >>> > Expulsion," that is, a specific constitutional amendment to kick out
>>>> >>> > the systemically troublesome states and those trending rapidly toward
>>>> >>> > anti-American, if not outright subversive, behavior. The 12 states
>>>> >>> > that must go: California, Illinois, New York, New Jersey,
>>>> >>> > Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine, Rhode Island,
>>>> >>> > Connecticut, Maryland, and Delaware. Only the remaining 38 states
>>>> >>> > would retain the name, "United States of America." The 12 expelled
>>>> >>> > mobs could call themselves the "Dirty Dozen," or individually keep
>>>> >>> > their identity and go their separate ways, probably straight to Hell,
>>>> >>> > or to Canada, eh?
>>>> >>>
>>>>
>>>> >>> California, for > instance is the most populous state, with the largest
>>>> >>> >economy, and is the nations' vegetable garden.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Vegetable garden? The rest of the universe knows CA's main output is
>>>> >> fruits and nuts.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> What planet do you live on?
>>>> >
>>>> > Where do you think winter lettuce comes from?
>>>>
>>>> Californication exports 79% of the World's lettuce, 13% of
>>Yellow-Neck, 25% of
>>>> cabbage, 43% of total grapes, and 57% of the total output in strawberries.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to CA, Peru and Ecuador, we here on the East coast of the US have
>>>> vegetables 24/7/52
>>>
>>> Where does this otherwise uninhabitable waste land called CA get its water to
>>> grow its crops?
>>Colorado.
>
> Plenty of it comes from California.
>
> http://reference.allrefer.com/gazett...reservoir.html
>
> http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/Wat...ons/slide3.htm
'potable'?
--
ah
> In article <oEkqd.2578$6o5.2338@trnddc08>, ah <[email protected]> wrote:
>>PJ O'Donovan wrote:
>>> ah <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<t4wmd.5868$J55.3630@trnddc06>...
>>>> george wrote:
>>>> > "PJ O'Donovan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>> > news:[email protected] om...
>>>> >> "george" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>> >> news:<XT4kd.317672$wV.294178@attbi_s54>...
>>>> >>> "PJ O'Donovan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>> >>> news:[email protected] om...
>>>> >>> > January 1848 Lincoln said: "Any people anywhere, being inclined and
>>>> >>> > having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the existing
>>>> >>> > government, and form a new one that suits them better.
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > "If the Union was formed by the accession of States then the Union may
>>>> >>> > be
>>>> >>> > dissolved by the secession of States."
>>>> >>> > --Daniel Webster, US Senate, February 15, 1833
>>>> >>> >
>>>> >>> > Having been amended only 17 times since 10 vital amendments (the Bill
>>>> >>> > of Rights) were added at the republic's inception, the U.S.
>>>> >>> > Constitution is not easily changed, primarily because so many states
>>>> >>> > (75%, now 38 of 50) must agree. Yet, there are 38 states today that
>>>> >>> > may be inclined to adopt, let us call it, a "Declaration of
>>>> >>> > Expulsion," that is, a specific constitutional amendment to kick out
>>>> >>> > the systemically troublesome states and those trending rapidly toward
>>>> >>> > anti-American, if not outright subversive, behavior. The 12 states
>>>> >>> > that must go: California, Illinois, New York, New Jersey,
>>>> >>> > Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine, Rhode Island,
>>>> >>> > Connecticut, Maryland, and Delaware. Only the remaining 38 states
>>>> >>> > would retain the name, "United States of America." The 12 expelled
>>>> >>> > mobs could call themselves the "Dirty Dozen," or individually keep
>>>> >>> > their identity and go their separate ways, probably straight to Hell,
>>>> >>> > or to Canada, eh?
>>>> >>>
>>>>
>>>> >>> California, for > instance is the most populous state, with the largest
>>>> >>> >economy, and is the nations' vegetable garden.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Vegetable garden? The rest of the universe knows CA's main output is
>>>> >> fruits and nuts.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> What planet do you live on?
>>>> >
>>>> > Where do you think winter lettuce comes from?
>>>>
>>>> Californication exports 79% of the World's lettuce, 13% of
>>Yellow-Neck, 25% of
>>>> cabbage, 43% of total grapes, and 57% of the total output in strawberries.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to CA, Peru and Ecuador, we here on the East coast of the US have
>>>> vegetables 24/7/52
>>>
>>> Where does this otherwise uninhabitable waste land called CA get its water to
>>> grow its crops?
>>Colorado.
>
> Plenty of it comes from California.
>
> http://reference.allrefer.com/gazett...reservoir.html
>
> http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/Wat...ons/slide3.htm
'potable'?
--
ah
Nov 30th 2004, 3:38 pm
#43
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: US Derclaration of Expulsion
[email protected] wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 13:45:27 GMT, ah <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>> > January 1848 Lincoln said: "Any people anywhere, being inclined and
>>>>>>>>> > having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the existing
>>>>>>>>> > government, and form a new one that suits them better.
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > "If the Union was formed by the accession of States then the Union may
>>>>>>>>> > be
>>>>>>>>> > dissolved by the secession of States."
>>>>>>>>> > --Daniel Webster, US Senate, February 15, 1833
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > Having been amended only 17 times since 10 vital amendments (the Bill
>>>>>>>>> > of Rights) were added at the republic's inception, the U.S.
>>>>>>>>> > Constitution is not easily changed, primarily because so many states
>>>>>>>>> > (75%, now 38 of 50) must agree. Yet, there are 38 states today that
>>>>>>>>> > may be inclined to adopt, let us call it, a "Declaration of
>>>>>>>>> > Expulsion," that is, a specific constitutional amendment to kick out
>>>>>>>>> > the systemically troublesome states and those trending rapidly toward
>>>>>>>>> > anti-American, if not outright subversive, behavior. The 12 states
>>>>>>>>> > that must go: California, Illinois, New York, New Jersey,
>>>>>>>>> > Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine, Rhode Island,
>>>>>>>>> > Connecticut, Maryland, and Delaware. Only the remaining 38 states
>>>>>>>>> > would retain the name, "United States of America." The 12 expelled
>>>>>>>>> > mobs could call themselves the "Dirty Dozen," or individually keep
>>>>>>>>> > their identity and go their separate ways, probably straight to Hell,
>>>>>>>>> > or to Canada, eh?
>
> Connecticut is home state of Bush where he has always garnered least
> amount of votes. Could it be we know the bastard better than most.
> By the time this sob leaves office we can look forward to a $15
> trillion deficit which would guarantee a lower employment and less
> jobs but we will surely have Virgin Birth coming out of our gazoo.
CT doing worse tham MA?!??!
What a mess . . . .
--
ah
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 13:45:27 GMT, ah <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>> > January 1848 Lincoln said: "Any people anywhere, being inclined and
>>>>>>>>> > having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the existing
>>>>>>>>> > government, and form a new one that suits them better.
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > "If the Union was formed by the accession of States then the Union may
>>>>>>>>> > be
>>>>>>>>> > dissolved by the secession of States."
>>>>>>>>> > --Daniel Webster, US Senate, February 15, 1833
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > Having been amended only 17 times since 10 vital amendments (the Bill
>>>>>>>>> > of Rights) were added at the republic's inception, the U.S.
>>>>>>>>> > Constitution is not easily changed, primarily because so many states
>>>>>>>>> > (75%, now 38 of 50) must agree. Yet, there are 38 states today that
>>>>>>>>> > may be inclined to adopt, let us call it, a "Declaration of
>>>>>>>>> > Expulsion," that is, a specific constitutional amendment to kick out
>>>>>>>>> > the systemically troublesome states and those trending rapidly toward
>>>>>>>>> > anti-American, if not outright subversive, behavior. The 12 states
>>>>>>>>> > that must go: California, Illinois, New York, New Jersey,
>>>>>>>>> > Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine, Rhode Island,
>>>>>>>>> > Connecticut, Maryland, and Delaware. Only the remaining 38 states
>>>>>>>>> > would retain the name, "United States of America." The 12 expelled
>>>>>>>>> > mobs could call themselves the "Dirty Dozen," or individually keep
>>>>>>>>> > their identity and go their separate ways, probably straight to Hell,
>>>>>>>>> > or to Canada, eh?
>
> Connecticut is home state of Bush where he has always garnered least
> amount of votes. Could it be we know the bastard better than most.
> By the time this sob leaves office we can look forward to a $15
> trillion deficit which would guarantee a lower employment and less
> jobs but we will surely have Virgin Birth coming out of our gazoo.
CT doing worse tham MA?!??!
What a mess . . . .
--
ah
Dec 1st 2004, 6:05 am
#44
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: US Derclaration of Expulsion
In article <[email protected]>,
ARKADYA <[email protected]> wrote:
>>Connecticut is home state of Bush where he has always garnered least
>>amount of votes
>Thats because people in Connecticut are dimwits
You say that about everyone who disagrees with you,
which puts your credibility at about zero.
BTW, Bush was born in Connecticut but grew up in Texas.
ARKADYA <[email protected]> wrote:
>>Connecticut is home state of Bush where he has always garnered least
>>amount of votes
>Thats because people in Connecticut are dimwits
You say that about everyone who disagrees with you,
which puts your credibility at about zero.
BTW, Bush was born in Connecticut but grew up in Texas.
Dec 1st 2004, 6:08 am
#45
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: US Derclaration of Expulsion
In article <aKbrd.4467$1z5.37@trnddc06>, ah <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Where does this otherwise uninhabitable waste land called CA get
>its water to
>>>> grow its crops?
>>>Colorado.
>>
>> Plenty of it comes from California.
>>
>http://reference.allrefer.com/gazett...reservoir.html
>>
>> http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/Wat...ons/slide3.htm
>'potable'?
Huh?
>>>> Where does this otherwise uninhabitable waste land called CA get
>its water to
>>>> grow its crops?
>>>Colorado.
>>
>> Plenty of it comes from California.
>>
>http://reference.allrefer.com/gazett...reservoir.html
>>
>> http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/Wat...ons/slide3.htm
>'potable'?
Huh?
