Strongest snowstorm in half century hits NE China
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
In article <[email protected] om>,
"Capitalist Pig" <[email protected]> wrote:
> When you sober up evelynoldgoat, reread what you just wrote, you may
> be embarassed.
I don't think that she'll be "embarassed" (sic), Stephen Bach, or even
embarrassed. Your grasp of the English language is as patchy as your
criminal past.
--
Mr Q. Z. D.
Remove luncheonmeat (truncheon) to reply.
" Everyone's always in favour of saving Hitler's brain.
But when you put it in the body of a great white shark,
ooohh! Suddenly you've gone too far!"
"Capitalist Pig" <[email protected]> wrote:
> When you sober up evelynoldgoat, reread what you just wrote, you may
> be embarassed.
I don't think that she'll be "embarassed" (sic), Stephen Bach, or even
embarrassed. Your grasp of the English language is as patchy as your
criminal past.
--
Mr Q. Z. D.
Remove luncheonmeat (truncheon) to reply.
" Everyone's always in favour of saving Hitler's brain.
But when you put it in the body of a great white shark,
ooohh! Suddenly you've gone too far!"
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
In article <C21445EF.D4512%[email protected]>, Earl Evleth
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 7/03/07 10:18, in article
> [email protected]. com, "Gregory Morrow"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > The American Revolution was not so much about human rights as it was
> > about *property* rights...
>
> It was not a "revolution" but a tax rebellion by those who paid that
> taxes.
Not so much...
> But progressively the Colonials got their dander up. They
> were saved from disaster by the French
Not so much, the British lost because of their tactics, failure to use
the most powerful navy in the world.
George F. Scheer's "Rebels and Redcoats" documents this excellently as
well as the Parliamentary and King George's shortcomings.
jay
Fri Mar 09, 2007
mailto:[email protected]
> who after the Colonials
> won the Battle at Saratoga decided to back them in order to
> do as much harm as possible to their traditional enemy, the
> English (the French at times had also aided the Irish and Scottish
> against the English).
>
> The French revolution had much broader consequences in being a social
> revolution, almost classical Marxist class warfare.
>
> What were the eventual consequences of the French Revolution? To
> that question Chou En Lai responded "It is too early to say".
>
> Revolution implies change. But the French are masters of the
> technique of having Revolutions without change.
>
>
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 7/03/07 10:18, in article
> [email protected]. com, "Gregory Morrow"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > The American Revolution was not so much about human rights as it was
> > about *property* rights...
>
> It was not a "revolution" but a tax rebellion by those who paid that
> taxes.
Not so much...
> But progressively the Colonials got their dander up. They
> were saved from disaster by the French
Not so much, the British lost because of their tactics, failure to use
the most powerful navy in the world.
George F. Scheer's "Rebels and Redcoats" documents this excellently as
well as the Parliamentary and King George's shortcomings.
jay
Fri Mar 09, 2007
mailto:[email protected]
> who after the Colonials
> won the Battle at Saratoga decided to back them in order to
> do as much harm as possible to their traditional enemy, the
> English (the French at times had also aided the Irish and Scottish
> against the English).
>
> The French revolution had much broader consequences in being a social
> revolution, almost classical Marxist class warfare.
>
> What were the eventual consequences of the French Revolution? To
> that question Chou En Lai responded "It is too early to say".
>
> Revolution implies change. But the French are masters of the
> technique of having Revolutions without change.
>
>
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
On 9/03/07 17:49, in article 090320070849469467%[email protected], "Go Fig"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> In article <C21445EF.D4512%[email protected]>, Earl Evleth
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 7/03/07 10:18, in article
>> [email protected]. com, "Gregory Morrow"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> The American Revolution was not so much about human rights as it was
>>> about *property* rights...
>>
>> It was not a "revolution" but a tax rebellion by those who paid that
>> taxes.
>
> Not so much...
What else?
>> But progressively the Colonials got their dander up. They
>> were saved from disaster by the French
>
>
> Not so much, the British lost because of their tactics, failure to use
> the most powerful navy in the world.
>
> George F. Scheer's "Rebels and Redcoats" documents this excellently as
> well as the Parliamentary and King George's shortcomings.
>
So they were like the Americans in Vietnam or Iraq.
And, alas, their navy tried to be present at Yorktown and the French
fleet chased them off. The French represented some 75% of the total
fighting force at Yorktown, land, sea and air. Well not so much in the
air!
<[email protected]> wrote:
> In article <C21445EF.D4512%[email protected]>, Earl Evleth
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 7/03/07 10:18, in article
>> [email protected]. com, "Gregory Morrow"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> The American Revolution was not so much about human rights as it was
>>> about *property* rights...
>>
>> It was not a "revolution" but a tax rebellion by those who paid that
>> taxes.
>
> Not so much...
What else?
>> But progressively the Colonials got their dander up. They
>> were saved from disaster by the French
>
>
> Not so much, the British lost because of their tactics, failure to use
> the most powerful navy in the world.
>
> George F. Scheer's "Rebels and Redcoats" documents this excellently as
> well as the Parliamentary and King George's shortcomings.
>
So they were like the Americans in Vietnam or Iraq.
And, alas, their navy tried to be present at Yorktown and the French
fleet chased them off. The French represented some 75% of the total
fighting force at Yorktown, land, sea and air. Well not so much in the
air!
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
In article <C2174FE6.D4CC2%[email protected]>, Earl Evleth
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 9/03/07 17:49, in article 090320070849469467%[email protected], "Go Fig"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > In article <C21445EF.D4512%[email protected]>, Earl Evleth
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> On 7/03/07 10:18, in article
> >> [email protected]. com, "Gregory Morrow"
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The American Revolution was not so much about human rights as it was
> >>> about *property* rights...
> >>
> >> It was not a "revolution" but a tax rebellion by those who paid that
> >> taxes.
> >
> > Not so much...
>
> What else?
Independence !
>
> >> But progressively the Colonials got their dander up. They
> >> were saved from disaster by the French
> >
> >
> > Not so much, the British lost because of their tactics, failure to use
> > the most powerful navy in the world.
> >
> > George F. Scheer's "Rebels and Redcoats" documents this excellently as
> > well as the Parliamentary and King George's shortcomings.
> >
>
>
> So they were like the Americans in Vietnam or Iraq.
More the restriction of fighting with one hand tied behind their back.
jay
Fri Mar 09, 2007
mailto:[email protected]
>
> And, alas, their navy tried to be present at Yorktown and the French
> fleet chased them off. The French represented some 75% of the total
> fighting force at Yorktown, land, sea and air. Well not so much in the
> air!
>
>
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 9/03/07 17:49, in article 090320070849469467%[email protected], "Go Fig"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > In article <C21445EF.D4512%[email protected]>, Earl Evleth
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> On 7/03/07 10:18, in article
> >> [email protected]. com, "Gregory Morrow"
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The American Revolution was not so much about human rights as it was
> >>> about *property* rights...
> >>
> >> It was not a "revolution" but a tax rebellion by those who paid that
> >> taxes.
> >
> > Not so much...
>
> What else?
Independence !
>
> >> But progressively the Colonials got their dander up. They
> >> were saved from disaster by the French
> >
> >
> > Not so much, the British lost because of their tactics, failure to use
> > the most powerful navy in the world.
> >
> > George F. Scheer's "Rebels and Redcoats" documents this excellently as
> > well as the Parliamentary and King George's shortcomings.
> >
>
>
> So they were like the Americans in Vietnam or Iraq.
More the restriction of fighting with one hand tied behind their back.
jay
Fri Mar 09, 2007
mailto:[email protected]
>
> And, alas, their navy tried to be present at Yorktown and the French
> fleet chased them off. The French represented some 75% of the total
> fighting force at Yorktown, land, sea and air. Well not so much in the
> air!
>
>
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
On 9/03/07 18:12, in article 090320070912411968%[email protected], "Go Fig"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>> So they were like the Americans in Vietnam or Iraq.
>
> More the restriction of fighting with one hand tied behind their back.
It was a question of a lack of brains. In what way did they
have their hands tied behind their backs?
In Iraq Rumsfeld, the cold war warrior, gave the military all
he thought they needed. The "back stabbing" Democrats had
no power to do anything, even now.
<[email protected]> wrote:
>> So they were like the Americans in Vietnam or Iraq.
>
> More the restriction of fighting with one hand tied behind their back.
It was a question of a lack of brains. In what way did they
have their hands tied behind their backs?
In Iraq Rumsfeld, the cold war warrior, gave the military all
he thought they needed. The "back stabbing" Democrats had
no power to do anything, even now.
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
In article <C2176067.D4CEC%[email protected]>, Earl Evleth
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 9/03/07 18:12, in article 090320070912411968%[email protected], "Go Fig"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> So they were like the Americans in Vietnam or Iraq.
> >
> > More the restriction of fighting with one hand tied behind their back.
>
> It was a question of a lack of brains. In what way did they
> have their hands tied behind their backs?
"The Rules of Engagement" are now guided by "escalation of force".
jay
Fri Mar 09, 2007
mailto:[email protected]
>
> In Iraq Rumsfeld, the cold war warrior, gave the military all
> he thought they needed. The "back stabbing" Democrats had
> no power to do anything, even now.
>
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 9/03/07 18:12, in article 090320070912411968%[email protected], "Go Fig"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> So they were like the Americans in Vietnam or Iraq.
> >
> > More the restriction of fighting with one hand tied behind their back.
>
> It was a question of a lack of brains. In what way did they
> have their hands tied behind their backs?
"The Rules of Engagement" are now guided by "escalation of force".
jay
Fri Mar 09, 2007
mailto:[email protected]
>
> In Iraq Rumsfeld, the cold war warrior, gave the military all
> he thought they needed. The "back stabbing" Democrats had
> no power to do anything, even now.
>
#37
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
so anyone one wants to report this thread ?
No ?
just old donovan's own threads ?
Duh.
"Go Fig" <[email protected]> a écrit dans le message de news:
090320070849469467%[email protected]...
> In article <C21445EF.D4512%[email protected]>, Earl Evleth
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 7/03/07 10:18, in article
>> [email protected]. com, "Gregory Morrow"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > The American Revolution was not so much about human rights as it was
>> > about *property* rights...
>>
>> It was not a "revolution" but a tax rebellion by those who paid that
>> taxes.
>
> Not so much...
>
>> But progressively the Colonials got their dander up. They
>> were saved from disaster by the French
>
>
> Not so much, the British lost because of their tactics, failure to use
> the most powerful navy in the world.
>
> George F. Scheer's "Rebels and Redcoats" documents this excellently as
> well as the Parliamentary and King George's shortcomings.
>
> jay
> Fri Mar 09, 2007
> mailto:[email protected]
>
>
>
>
>
>> who after the Colonials
>> won the Battle at Saratoga decided to back them in order to
>> do as much harm as possible to their traditional enemy, the
>> English (the French at times had also aided the Irish and Scottish
>> against the English).
>>
>> The French revolution had much broader consequences in being a social
>> revolution, almost classical Marxist class warfare.
>>
>> What were the eventual consequences of the French Revolution? To
>> that question Chou En Lai responded "It is too early to say".
>>
>> Revolution implies change. But the French are masters of the
>> technique of having Revolutions without change.
>>
>>
>
No ?
just old donovan's own threads ?
Duh.
"Go Fig" <[email protected]> a écrit dans le message de news:
090320070849469467%[email protected]...
> In article <C21445EF.D4512%[email protected]>, Earl Evleth
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 7/03/07 10:18, in article
>> [email protected]. com, "Gregory Morrow"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > The American Revolution was not so much about human rights as it was
>> > about *property* rights...
>>
>> It was not a "revolution" but a tax rebellion by those who paid that
>> taxes.
>
> Not so much...
>
>> But progressively the Colonials got their dander up. They
>> were saved from disaster by the French
>
>
> Not so much, the British lost because of their tactics, failure to use
> the most powerful navy in the world.
>
> George F. Scheer's "Rebels and Redcoats" documents this excellently as
> well as the Parliamentary and King George's shortcomings.
>
> jay
> Fri Mar 09, 2007
> mailto:[email protected]
>
>
>
>
>
>> who after the Colonials
>> won the Battle at Saratoga decided to back them in order to
>> do as much harm as possible to their traditional enemy, the
>> English (the French at times had also aided the Irish and Scottish
>> against the English).
>>
>> The French revolution had much broader consequences in being a social
>> revolution, almost classical Marxist class warfare.
>>
>> What were the eventual consequences of the French Revolution? To
>> that question Chou En Lai responded "It is too early to say".
>>
>> Revolution implies change. But the French are masters of the
>> technique of having Revolutions without change.
>>
>>
>
#38
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
"GoMavs" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:kSaHh.1122$NA4.392@trnddc07...
> Sigh. Something those of you who do not believe in global warming do not
> understand is that climate and weather arent the same. We had snow storms
> into April 2 years ago. Yet it was still the hottest year on record. Go
> ahead though. Keep pretending that the ice caps arent melting, and that the
> seas are not rising, and the islands in the south pacific arent sinking and
> that the coral reef isnt bleaching. C02 is invisible so it must not exist
> right? Kind of like the God you believe in?
Or the apostrophes you don't believe in. :-)
<clipped>
Planet Visitor II
Official publisher of AADP Official dictionary
http://www.planetvisitor.name/dictionary.html
> Sigh. Something those of you who do not believe in global warming do not
> understand is that climate and weather arent the same. We had snow storms
> into April 2 years ago. Yet it was still the hottest year on record. Go
> ahead though. Keep pretending that the ice caps arent melting, and that the
> seas are not rising, and the islands in the south pacific arent sinking and
> that the coral reef isnt bleaching. C02 is invisible so it must not exist
> right? Kind of like the God you believe in?
Or the apostrophes you don't believe in. :-)
<clipped>
Planet Visitor II
Official publisher of AADP Official dictionary
http://www.planetvisitor.name/dictionary.html