|
Re: Made in Britain, dumped in China
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:35:45 GMT, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote:
>It is estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy available. >What you going to use then? ;) It seems the Dutch send 5000 tons/annum of nuclear waste to Siberia. -- Martin |
Re: Made in Britain, dumped in China
Let is be knownst that on Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:03:40 +0000, The Reid
<[email protected]> writted: >On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:14:42 +0100, Deeply Filled Mortician ><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote: > >>Next in line had better be ME!!! > >then my pro car posts, is there a smoking fan here? :-) We could all try to get along and love one another, but boredom's not a burden anyone should bear. -- --- DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com --- -- |
Re: Made in Britain, dumped in China
"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected] ups.com... > > > On Jan 30, 7:35 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote: >> "Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in >> messagenews:[email protected] oglegroups.com... >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Jan 29, 12:30 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 29 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician >> >> ><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote: >> >> >> Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus" >> >> >> <[email protected]> writted: >> >> >> >> >On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician >> >> >> ><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote: >> >> >> >> Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100, >> >> >> >> [email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted: >> >> >> >> >> >Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Alfred Molon wrote: >> >> >> >> >> > Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where >> >> >> >> >> > nobody lives >> >> >> >> >> > and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The >> >> >> >> >> > transportation >> >> >> >> >> > cost would also be lower. >> >> >> >> >> >> Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there! >> >> >> >> >> >Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet. >> >> >> >> >> It's a requirement that their economy is shit. >> >> >> >> >....it would give the Abo's something to do :)Maybe the world >> >> >> >should >> >> >> >be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows >> >> >> they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling >> >> >> sewerage >> >> >> for drinking now - not such a popular notion. >> >> >> >time for some solar desalination.....Australia has 30% of the world's >> >> >uranium, what would you use as a power source >> >> in their situation? >> >> -- >> >> >> Martin >> >> > Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first >> > place. >> > After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to >> > Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......It is >> > estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy available. >> What you going to use then? ;) > > do you have a cite for that ? > http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefings/ > energyfactsheet4.pdf > And your page is unavailable. |
Re: Made in Britain, dumped in China
"Martin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]... > On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:35:45 GMT, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>It is estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy >>available. >>What you going to use then? ;) > > It seems the Dutch send 5000 tons/annum of nuclear waste to Siberia. > -- > > Martin > But what is the waste? the waste from the power plants are actually small amounts. but contaminated clothes, etc add up. |
Re: Made in Britain, dumped in China
Calif Bill wrote:
> "Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected] ups.com... > >> >>On Jan 30, 7:35 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>messagenews:1170070896.283337.16700@m58g2000cwm .googlegroups.com... >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>On Jan 29, 12:30 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On 29 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]> >>>>>wrote: >>> >>>>>>On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician >>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus" >>>>>>><[email protected]> writted: >>> >>>>>>>>On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician >>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.n u> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100, >>>>>>>>>[email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted: >>> >>>>>>>>>>Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>>>Alfred Molon wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where >>>>>>>>>>>>nobody lives >>>>>>>>>>>>and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The >>>>>>>>>>>>transportation >>>>>>>>>>>>cost would also be lower. >>> >>>>>>>>>>>Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there! >>> >>>>>>>>>>Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet. >>> >>>>>>>>>It's a requirement that their economy is shit. >>> >>>>>>>>....it would give the Abo's something to do :)Maybe the world >>>>>>>>should >>>>>>>>be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows >>>>>>> >>>>>>>they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling >>>>>>>sewerage >>>>>>>for drinking now - not such a popular notion. >>> >>>>>>time for some solar desalination.....Australia has 30% of the world's >>>>>>uranium, what would you use as a power source >>>>> >>>>>in their situation? >>>>>-- >>> >>>>>Martin >>> >>>>Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first >>>>place. >>>>After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to >>>>Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......It is >>>>estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy available. >>> >>>What you going to use then? ;) >> >>do you have a cite for that ? >>http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefings/ >>energyfactsheet4.pdf >> > > > And your page is unavailable. > > Wake up. It is a PDF file so that might be your problem. More likely you are simply having a problem with a 2 line link. |
Re: Made in Britain, dumped in China
"Frank F. Matthews" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]... > > > Calif Bill wrote: > >> "Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in message >> news:[email protected] ups.com... >> >>> >>>On Jan 30, 7:35 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>messagenews:1170070896.283337.16700@m58g2000cw m.googlegroups.com... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>On Jan 29, 12:30 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On 29 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]> >>>>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician >>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu > wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus" >>>>>>>><[email protected]> writted: >>>> >>>>>>>>>On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician >>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu > wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100, >>>>>>>>>>[email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted: >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Alfred Molon wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where >>>>>>>>>>>>>nobody lives >>>>>>>>>>>>>and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The >>>>>>>>>>>>>transportation >>>>>>>>>>>>>cost would also be lower. >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there! >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet. >>>> >>>>>>>>>>It's a requirement that their economy is shit. >>>> >>>>>>>>>....it would give the Abo's something to do :)Maybe the world >>>>>>>>>should >>>>>>>>>be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling sewerage >>>>>>>>for drinking now - not such a popular notion. >>>> >>>>>>>time for some solar desalination.....Australia has 30% of the world's >>>>>>>uranium, what would you use as a power source >>>>>> >>>>>>in their situation? >>>>>>-- >>>> >>>>>>Martin >>>> >>>>>Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first >>>>>place. >>>>>After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to >>>>>Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......It is >>>>>estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy available. >>>> >>>>What you going to use then? ;) >>> >>>do you have a cite for that ? >>>http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefings/ >>>energyfactsheet4.pdf >>> >> >> >> And your page is unavailable. > > Wake up. It is a PDF file so that might be your problem. More likely you > are simply having a problem with a 2 line link. > Nope, said page was unavailable. |
Re: Made in Britain, dumped in China
"Frank F. Matthews" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]... > > > Calif Bill wrote: > >> "Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in message >> news:[email protected] ups.com... >> >>> >>>On Jan 30, 7:35 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>messagenews:1170070896.283337.16700@m58g2000cw m.googlegroups.com... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>On Jan 29, 12:30 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On 29 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]> >>>>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician >>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu > wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus" >>>>>>>><[email protected]> writted: >>>> >>>>>>>>>On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician >>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu > wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100, >>>>>>>>>>[email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted: >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Alfred Molon wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where >>>>>>>>>>>>>nobody lives >>>>>>>>>>>>>and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The >>>>>>>>>>>>>transportation >>>>>>>>>>>>>cost would also be lower. >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there! >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet. >>>> >>>>>>>>>>It's a requirement that their economy is shit. >>>> >>>>>>>>>....it would give the Abo's something to do :)Maybe the world >>>>>>>>>should >>>>>>>>>be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling sewerage >>>>>>>>for drinking now - not such a popular notion. >>>> >>>>>>>time for some solar desalination.....Australia has 30% of the world's >>>>>>>uranium, what would you use as a power source >>>>>> >>>>>>in their situation? >>>>>>-- >>>> >>>>>>Martin >>>> >>>>>Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first >>>>>place. >>>>>After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to >>>>>Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......It is >>>>>estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy available. >>>> >>>>What you going to use then? ;) >>> >>>do you have a cite for that ? >>>http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefings/ >>>energyfactsheet4.pdf >>> >> >> >> And your page is unavailable. > > Wake up. It is a PDF file so that might be your problem. More likely you > are simply having a problem with a 2 line link. > Uranium is actually a very common mineral. Burning coal puts about 17 tons a year of it in to the atmosphere. |
Re: Made in Britain, dumped in China
On Jan 31, 6:11 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote:
> "Frank F. Matthews" <[email protected]> wrote in messagenews:[email protected] m... > > > > > > > Calif Bill wrote: > > >> "Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in message > >>news:[email protected] roups.com... > > >>>On Jan 30, 7:35 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in > >>>>messagenews:1170070896.283337.16700@m58g2000cw m.googlegroups.com... > > >>>>>On Jan 29, 12:30 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>On 29 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]> > >>>>>>wrote: > > >>>>>>>On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician > >>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu > wrote: > > >>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus" > >>>>>>>><[email protected]> writted: > > >>>>>>>>>On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician > >>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu > wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100, > >>>>>>>>>>[email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted: > > >>>>>>>>>>>Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>Alfred Molon wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where > >>>>>>>>>>>>>nobody lives > >>>>>>>>>>>>>and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The > >>>>>>>>>>>>>transportation > >>>>>>>>>>>>>cost would also be lower. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there! > > >>>>>>>>>>>Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet. > > >>>>>>>>>>It's a requirement that their economy is shit. > > >>>>>>>>>....it would give the Abo's something to do :)Maybe the world > >>>>>>>>>should > >>>>>>>>>be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows > > >>>>>>>>they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling sewerage > >>>>>>>>for drinking now - not such a popular notion. > > >>>>>>>time for some solar desalination.....Australia has 30% of the world's > >>>>>>>uranium, what would you use as a power source > > >>>>>>in their situation? > >>>>>>-- > > >>>>>>Martin > > >>>>>Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first > >>>>>place. > >>>>>After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to > >>>>>Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......It is > >>>>>estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy available. > > >>>>What you going to use then? ;) > > >>>do you have a cite for that ? > >>>http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefings/ > >>>energyfactsheet4.pdf > > >> And your page is unavailable. > > > Wake up. It is a PDF file so that might be your problem. More likely you > > are simply having a problem with a 2 line link. > > Nope, said page was unavailable. no problem here, but here is the :- Summary A new generation of nuclear reactors will increase demand for uranium ore to produce reactor fuel. In 2005 the world nuclear fleet consumed about 68,000 tonnes of natural uranium, mostly from mined sources. At the end of 2005 the world known recoverable uranium resources amounted to about 3.6 million tonnes (t). These resources show a wide variation in ore grade and accessibility. Understanding this variation is essential for assessing nuclear energy security. Uranium ore is not an energy resource unless the ore grade is high enough. Below grade 0.02% (U3O8Uranium Oxide) more energy is required to produce and exploit the uranium fuel than can be generated from it. Falling ore grade leads to rapidly rising CO2 emissions from the nuclear energy cycle. Assuming world nuclear generating capacity remains at 2005 levels, after about 2016 the mean grade of uranium ore will fall significantly from today's levels, and even more so after 2034. After about 60 years the world nuclear power system will fall off the 'Energy Cliff' - meaning that the nuclear system will consume as much energy as can be generated from the uranium fuel. Whether large and rich new uranium ore deposits will be found or not is unknown. Once high-grade uranium ores are no-longer available, the nuclear industry will rely on uranium and plutonium from military and civil stockpiles. These will last only a few years, and questions remain about the net energy gain from reprocessing these materials. In the future, it is likely that the nuclear industry and governments will look to MOX fuel - a mixture of uranium and plutonium dioxides. In time, the nuclear industry hopes to develop fast breeder reactors fueled by weapons useable plutonium. The widespread use and production of either fuel has serious implications for nuclear weapons proliferation and the risk of nuclear terrorism. It is inevitable that replacements for uranium fuel will be sought within the lifetime of any new nuclear build in the UK. It is also inevitable that as high grade uranium supplies decrease, the cost of nuclear power will increase along with nuclear CO2 emissions. The security risks associated with MOX and plutonium fuel should not be underestimated. These concerns should be reviewed by Government, Parliament and the public before a decision is taken on the future of nuclear power. |
Re: Made in Britain, dumped in China
On Jan 30, 11:11 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician
<deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote: > Let is be knownst that on Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:03:40 +0000, The Reid > <[email protected]> writted: > > >On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:14:42 +0100, Deeply Filled Mortician > ><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote: > > >>Next in line had better be ME!!! > > >then my pro car posts, is there a smoking fan here? :-) > > We could all try to get along and love one another, but boredom's not > a burden anyone should bear. > -- > --- > DFM -http://www.deepfriedmars.com > --- > -- .....I'm so bored I could listen to Genesis...... |
Re: Made in Britain, dumped in China
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 01:50:40 GMT, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in message >news:[email protected] oups.com... >> >> >> On Jan 30, 7:35 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> "Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in >>> messagenews:[email protected] oglegroups.com... >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > On Jan 29, 12:30 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> On 29 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]> >>> >> wrote: >>> >>> >> >On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician >>> >> ><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote: >>> >> >> Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus" >>> >> >> <[email protected]> writted: >>> >>> >> >> >On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician >>> >> >> ><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> wrote: >>> >> >> >> Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100, >>> >> >> >> [email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted: >>> >>> >> >> >> >Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >> >> >> >> Alfred Molon wrote: >>> >> >> >> >> > Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where >>> >> >> >> >> > nobody lives >>> >> >> >> >> > and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The >>> >> >> >> >> > transportation >>> >> >> >> >> > cost would also be lower. >>> >>> >> >> >> >> Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there! >>> >>> >> >> >> >Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet. >>> >>> >> >> >> It's a requirement that their economy is shit. >>> >>> >> >> >....it would give the Abo's something to do :)Maybe the world >>> >> >> >should >>> >> >> >be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows >>> >> >> they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling >>> >> >> sewerage >>> >> >> for drinking now - not such a popular notion. >>> >>> >> >time for some solar desalination.....Australia has 30% of the world's >>> >> >uranium, what would you use as a power source >>> >> in their situation? >>> >> -- >>> >>> >> Martin >>> >>> > Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first >>> > place. >>> > After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to >>> > Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......It is >>> > estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy available. >>> What you going to use then? ;) >> >> do you have a cite for that ? http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefings/energyfactsheet4.pdf >> > >And your page is unavailable. It works for me. Did you lose the last part of the URL? -- Martin |
Re: Made in Britain, dumped in China
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 01:52:22 GMT, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >"Martin" <[email protected]> wrote in message >news:[email protected].. . >> On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:35:45 GMT, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>>It is estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy >>>available. >>>What you going to use then? ;) >> >> It seems the Dutch send 5000 tons/annum of nuclear waste to Siberia. >> -- >> >> Martin >> > >But what is the waste? the waste from the power plants are actually small >amounts. but contaminated clothes, etc add up. > Part of it is plutonium, which is returned to Russia for enrichment. -- Martin |
Re: Made in Britain, dumped in China
Calif Bill wrote:
> "Frank F. Matthews" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected]... > >> >>Calif Bill wrote: >> >> >>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>news:[email protected] groups.com... >>> >>> >>>>On Jan 30, 7:35 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>messagenews:1170070896.283337.16700@m58g2000c wm.googlegroups.com... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>On Jan 29, 12:30 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>On 29 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician >>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.n u> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus" >>>>>>>>><[email protected]> writted: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician >>>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.n u> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100, >>>>>>>>>>>[email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Alfred Molon wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where >>>>>>>>>>>>>>nobody lives >>>>>>>>>>>>>>and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The >>>>>>>>>>>>>>transportation >>>>>>>>>>>>>>cost would also be lower. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there! >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>It's a requirement that their economy is shit. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>....it would give the Abo's something to do :)Maybe the world >>>>>>>>>>should >>>>>>>>>>be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling sewerage >>>>>>>>>for drinking now - not such a popular notion. >>>>> >>>>>>>>time for some solar desalination.....Australia has 30% of the world's >>>>>>>>uranium, what would you use as a power source >>>>>>> >>>>>>>in their situation? >>>>>>>-- >>>>> >>>>>>>Martin >>>>> >>>>>>Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first >>>>>>place. >>>>>>After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to >>>>>>Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......It is >>>>>>estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy available. >>>>> >>>>>What you going to use then? ;) >>>> >>>>do you have a cite for that ? >>>>http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefings/ >>>>energyfactsheet4.pdf >>>> >>> >>> >>>And your page is unavailable. >> >>Wake up. It is a PDF file so that might be your problem. More likely you >>are simply having a problem with a 2 line link. >> > > > Nope, said page was unavailable. > > Did your attempted link end with factsheet.pdf? If it ended with /briefings/ then you were using only the first line of the link. I had no trouble. Earlier of now. Given the response I am sure that you simply did not use the full address. |
Re: Made in Britain, dumped in China
"Frank F. Matthews" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]... > > > Calif Bill wrote: > >> "Frank F. Matthews" <[email protected]> wrote in message >> news:[email protected]... >> >>> >>>Calif Bill wrote: >>> >>> >>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>news:[email protected] egroups.com... >>>> >>>> >>>>>On Jan 30, 7:35 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>messagenews:1170070896.283337.16700@m58g2000 cwm.googlegroups.com... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Jan 29, 12:30 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On 29 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician >>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu > wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus" >>>>>>>>>><[email protected]> writted: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician >>>>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l. nu> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100, >>>>>>>>>>>>[email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Alfred Molon wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>nobody lives >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>transportation >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>cost would also be lower. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there! >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>It's a requirement that their economy is shit. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>....it would give the Abo's something to do :)Maybe the world >>>>>>>>>>>should >>>>>>>>>>>be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling >>>>>>>>>>sewerage >>>>>>>>>>for drinking now - not such a popular notion. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>time for some solar desalination.....Australia has 30% of the >>>>>>>>>world's >>>>>>>>>uranium, what would you use as a power source >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>in their situation? >>>>>>>>-- >>>>>> >>>>>>>>Martin >>>>>> >>>>>>>Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first >>>>>>>place. >>>>>>>After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to >>>>>>>Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......It is >>>>>>>estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy >>>>>>>available. >>>>>> >>>>>>What you going to use then? ;) >>>>> >>>>>do you have a cite for that ? >>>>>http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefings/ >>>>>energyfactsheet4.pdf >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>And your page is unavailable. >>> >>>Wake up. It is a PDF file so that might be your problem. More likely >>>you are simply having a problem with a 2 line link. >>> >> >> >> Nope, said page was unavailable. > > Did your attempted link end with factsheet.pdf? If it ended with > /briefings/ then you were using only the first line of the link. > > I had no trouble. Earlier of now. > > > Given the response I am sure that you simply did not use the full address. > I used the full address. Said was not available at the time. The amount of known uranium reserves is huge. Depends on the cost per pound as to how much is available. Enough to tide us over until we figure out how to get energy from fusion or some other source, or we kill most of the worlds inhabitants and have only a small need for oil. |
Re: Made in Britain, dumped in China
On Feb 1, 6:08 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote:
> "Frank F. Matthews" <[email protected]> wrote in messagenews:[email protected] om... > > > > > > > Calif Bill wrote: > > >> "Frank F. Matthews" <[email protected]> wrote in message > >>news:[email protected].. . > > >>>Calif Bill wrote: > > >>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in message > >>>>news:[email protected] egroups.com... > > >>>>>On Jan 30, 7:35 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in > >>>>>>messagenews:1170070896.283337.16700@m58g2000 cwm.googlegroups.com... > > >>>>>>>On Jan 29, 12:30 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>On 29 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]> > >>>>>>>>wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician > >>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu > wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus" > >>>>>>>>>><[email protected]> writted: > > >>>>>>>>>>>On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician > >>>>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l. nu> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100, > >>>>>>>>>>>>[email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Alfred Molon wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>nobody lives > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>transportation > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>cost would also be lower. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there! > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>It's a requirement that their economy is shit. > > >>>>>>>>>>>....it would give the Abo's something to do :)Maybe the world > >>>>>>>>>>>should > >>>>>>>>>>>be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows > > >>>>>>>>>>they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling > >>>>>>>>>>sewerage > >>>>>>>>>>for drinking now - not such a popular notion. > > >>>>>>>>>time for some solar desalination.....Australia has 30% of the > >>>>>>>>>world's > >>>>>>>>>uranium, what would you use as a power source > > >>>>>>>>in their situation? > >>>>>>>>-- > > >>>>>>>>Martin > > >>>>>>>Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first > >>>>>>>place. > >>>>>>>After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to > >>>>>>>Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......It is > >>>>>>>estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy > >>>>>>>available. > > >>>>>>What you going to use then? ;) > > >>>>>do you have a cite for that ? > >>>>>http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefings/ > >>>>>energyfactsheet4.pdf > > >>>>And your page is unavailable. > > >>>Wake up. It is a PDF file so that might be your problem. More likely > >>>you are simply having a problem with a 2 line link. > > >> Nope, said page was unavailable. > > > Did your attempted link end with factsheet.pdf? If it ended with > > /briefings/ then you were using only the first line of the link. > > > I had no trouble. Earlier of now. > > > Given the response I am sure that you simply did not use the full address. > > I used the full address. Said was not available at the time. The amount of > known uranium reserves is huge. Depends on the cost per pound as to how > much is available. Enough to tide us over until we figure out how to get > energy from fusion or some other source, or we kill most of the worlds > inhabitants and have only a small need for oil. and you know that because ........?? |
Re: Made in Britain, dumped in China
Calif Bill wrote:
> "Frank F. Matthews" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected]... > >> >>Calif Bill wrote: >> >> >>>"Frank F. Matthews" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>news:[email protected]. .. >>> >>> >>>>Calif Bill wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>news:[email protected] legroups.com... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>On Jan 30, 7:35 am, "Calif Bill" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>"Jesus" <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>messagenews:1170070896.283337.16700@m58g200 0cwm.googlegroups.com... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Jan 29, 12:30 pm, Martin <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On 29 Jan 2007 03:04:44 -0800, "Jesus" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Jan 29, 11:37 am, Deeply Filled Mortician >>>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.n u> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on 28 Jan 2007 14:33:57 -0800, "Jesus" >>>>>>>>>>><[email protected]> writted: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>On Jan 28, 10:21 pm, Deeply Filled Mortician >>>>>>>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l .nu> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Let is be knownst that on Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:24:01 +0100, >>>>>>>>>>>>>[email protected] (Mister Bartlett) writted: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Mike O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Alfred Molon wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Why don't they dump the rubbish in the Sahara desert where >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>nobody lives >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>and there are no rivers to pollute? Just wondering. The >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>transportation >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>cost would also be lower. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Or in Antarctica. Nobody goes there! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Or Australia - lots of space with nothing in it yet. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>It's a requirement that their economy is shit. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>....it would give the Abo's something to do :)Maybe the world >>>>>>>>>>>>should >>>>>>>>>>>>be sending Oz all their waste water. God knows >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>they need it at the moment. They're talking about recycling >>>>>>>>>>>sewerage >>>>>>>>>>>for drinking now - not such a popular notion. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>time for some solar desalination.....Australia has 30% of the >>>>>>>>>>world's >>>>>>>>>>uranium, what would you use as a power source >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>in their situation? >>>>>>>>>-- >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Martin >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Its dumb thinking like this that ****s up the planet in the first >>>>>>>>place. >>>>>>>>After they have used up all their Uranium, and sent the waste to >>>>>>>>Holland; they are still stuck with the same problem......It is >>>>>>>>estimated there is 700 million years of uranium fuel energy >>>>>>>>available. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>What you going to use then? ;) >>>>>> >>>>>>do you have a cite for that ? >>>>>>http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefings/ >>>>>>energyfactsheet4.pdf >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>And your page is unavailable. >>>> >>>>Wake up. It is a PDF file so that might be your problem. More likely >>>>you are simply having a problem with a 2 line link. >>>> >>> >>> >>>Nope, said page was unavailable. >> >>Did your attempted link end with factsheet.pdf? If it ended with >>/briefings/ then you were using only the first line of the link. >> >>I had no trouble. Earlier of now. >> >> >>Given the response I am sure that you simply did not use the full address. >> > > > I used the full address. Said was not available at the time. The amount of > known uranium reserves is huge. Depends on the cost per pound as to how > much is available. Enough to tide us over until we figure out how to get > energy from fusion or some other source, or we kill most of the worlds > inhabitants and have only a small need for oil. > > Strange, all three times that I have tried when I click on the link I get the "not available" message. When I then add the rest of the address from the second line I get the fact sheet file in PDF format. Perhaps they have you blocked. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 11:59 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.