Digital photography, changing the world
#1171
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
Tim Challenger writes:
> It has a very similar effect.
Only superficially. It greatly increases noise.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
> It has a very similar effect.
Only superficially. It greatly increases noise.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
#1172
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
Following up to Mxsmanic
>> It has a very similar effect.
>Only superficially. It greatly increases noise.
If you had said that 1000 posts ago somebody might have cared
enough to discuss it, but at 1000 posts a "fact" I cant be arsed.
--
Mike Reid
Wasdale-Thames path-London-photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Eat-walk-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
>> It has a very similar effect.
>Only superficially. It greatly increases noise.
If you had said that 1000 posts ago somebody might have cared
enough to discuss it, but at 1000 posts a "fact" I cant be arsed.
--
Mike Reid
Wasdale-Thames path-London-photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Eat-walk-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
#1173
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
The Reids writes:
> If you had said that 1000 posts ago somebody might have cared
> enough to discuss it, but at 1000 posts a "fact" I cant be arsed.
If you weren't interested, you wouldn't be replying to me.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
> If you had said that 1000 posts ago somebody might have cared
> enough to discuss it, but at 1000 posts a "fact" I cant be arsed.
If you weren't interested, you wouldn't be replying to me.
--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.
#1174
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
Following up to Mxsmanic
>> If you had said that 1000 posts ago somebody might have cared
>> enough to discuss it, but at 1000 posts a "fact" I cant be arsed.
>If you weren't interested, you wouldn't be replying to me.
I'm "interested" in clarifying how to communicate, for when you
next go through the old routine.
--
Mike Reid
Wasdale-Thames path-London-photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Eat-walk-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
>> If you had said that 1000 posts ago somebody might have cared
>> enough to discuss it, but at 1000 posts a "fact" I cant be arsed.
>If you weren't interested, you wouldn't be replying to me.
I'm "interested" in clarifying how to communicate, for when you
next go through the old routine.
--
Mike Reid
Wasdale-Thames path-London-photos "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" <-- you can email us@ this site
Eat-walk-Spain "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" <-- dontuse@ all, it's a spamtrap
#1175
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 19:14:08 +0100, Mxsmanic wrote:
> The Reids writes:
>
>> If you had said that 1000 posts ago somebody might have cared
>> enough to discuss it, but at 1000 posts a "fact" I cant be arsed.
>
> If you weren't interested, you wouldn't be replying to me.
Some people do it out of habit. What's your excuse?
--
Tim C.
> The Reids writes:
>
>> If you had said that 1000 posts ago somebody might have cared
>> enough to discuss it, but at 1000 posts a "fact" I cant be arsed.
>
> If you weren't interested, you wouldn't be replying to me.
Some people do it out of habit. What's your excuse?
--
Tim C.
#1176
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Digital photography, changing the world
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 09:27:18 +0000, The Reids
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Following up to Mxsmanic
>>> If you had said that 1000 posts ago somebody might have cared
>>> enough to discuss it, but at 1000 posts a "fact" I cant be arsed.
>>If you weren't interested, you wouldn't be replying to me.
>I'm "interested" in clarifying how to communicate, for when you
>next go through the old routine.
Next? He hasn't finished the current performance yet :-)
--
Martin
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Following up to Mxsmanic
>>> If you had said that 1000 posts ago somebody might have cared
>>> enough to discuss it, but at 1000 posts a "fact" I cant be arsed.
>>If you weren't interested, you wouldn't be replying to me.
>I'm "interested" in clarifying how to communicate, for when you
>next go through the old routine.
Next? He hasn't finished the current performance yet :-)
--
Martin