EvelynVogtGamble

Frank F. Matthews wrote:

    > Yeah sure. In which millennia?

Well, he may mean they'll be free of PEOPLE, too! The
potential participants in a projected WW3 may have changed
with the demise of Russian Communism, but there's still
plenty of ill-will towards men (and women) out there, and
bigger and more efficent weapons are still being developed.
(Somehow, I don't find the notion of nuclear weapons in
the hands of religious fanatics exactly reassuring - the
"cold war" was largely a matter of who could out-bluff whom,
but when opponents believe "God" is on THEIR side......)

BruceB

What has this got to do with travel, you cross-posting asshole....??? Take
your agenda elsewhere..

Martin Edwards

Jack May wrote:
    > "Martin Edwards" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    >
    >>Frank F. Matthews wrote:
    >>>Yeah sure. In which millennia?
    >>>[email protected] wrote:
    >>>> Well, that's what I'm saying. Those modes will REPLACE cars and
    >>>>all the cities I mentioned will be free of cars.
    >>While the process may take some time, it will only be completed in one
    >>millenium.
    >
    >
    > The past never comes back because people keep inventing better and cheaper
    > ways to improve on the past.
    >
    > Joey Jolley's insanity will not become true until the earth is engulfed by
    > the sun
    >
    >
I was making a pedantic remark about his grammar. It would take a
little longer to unravel your unexamined assumptions.

--
You can't fool me: there ain't no Sanity Clause - Chico Marx

www.geocities.com/Athens/Agora/1955

Martin Edwards

EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) wrote:
    >
    >
    > Frank F. Matthews wrote:
    >
    >> Yeah sure. In which millennia?
    >
    >
    > Well, he may mean they'll be free of PEOPLE, too! The potential
    > participants in a projected WW3 may have changed with the demise of
    > Russian Communism, but there's still plenty of ill-will towards men (and
    > women) out there, and bigger and more efficent weapons are still being
    > developed. (Somehow, I don't find the notion of nuclear weapons in the
    > hands of religious fanatics exactly reassuring - the "cold war" was
    > largely a matter of who could out-bluff whom, but when opponents believe
    > "God" is on THEIR side......)
    >
We're damned lucky that nobody wokd Reagan up at the wring time.

--
You can't fool me: there ain't no Sanity Clause - Chico Marx

www.geocities.com/Athens/Agora/1955

Teaser

"Maxx." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected] ups.com...
    > When are you going to grow up John? Are you going to spend the rest of
    > your life being a total idiot? Get a life you crossposting shitstain.
MY! Aren't YOU the nice guy!?

Teaser

" BruceB" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected] ink.net...
    > What has this got to do with travel, you cross-posting asshole....???
    > Take your agenda elsewhere..
DUH!

Modes of transportation have nothing to do with travel????
What ya gonna do, walk???


DUH!

snoopy2032

Teaser (I AM the only one) wrote:
    > " BruceB" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected] ink.net...
    > > What has this got to do with travel, you cross-posting asshole....???
    > > Take your agenda elsewhere..
    > >
    > >
    > DUH!
    > Modes of transportation have nothing to do with travel????
    > What ya gonna do, walk???
    > DUH!

There are two eco-cities being constructed in China as we speak.
They won't have cars and as I recall San Francisco and a number of
other American cities are heading in the same direction.

Frank F. Matthews

[email protected] wrote:

    > Teaser (I AM the only one) wrote:
    >
    >>" BruceB" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    >>news:[email protected] hlink.net...
    >>>What has this got to do with travel, you cross-posting asshole....???
    >>>Take your agenda elsewhere..
    >>DUH!
    >>Modes of transportation have nothing to do with travel????
    >>What ya gonna do, walk???
    >>DUH!
    >
    >
    > There are two eco-cities being constructed in China as we speak.
    > They won't have cars and as I recall San Francisco and a number of
    > other American cities are heading in the same direction.
    >


Yeah sure. When I was last in San Francisco a couple of months ago
there were so many cars it was hard to drive thru. Will their lack of
cars come before the death of the sun?

EvelynVogtGamble

[email protected] wrote:
    > Teaser (I AM the only one) wrote:
    >
    >>" BruceB" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    >>news:[email protected] hlink.net...
    >>>What has this got to do with travel, you cross-posting asshole....???
    >>>Take your agenda elsewhere..
    >>DUH!
    >>Modes of transportation have nothing to do with travel????
    >>What ya gonna do, walk???
    >>DUH!
    >
    >
    > There are two eco-cities being constructed in China as we speak.
    > They won't have cars and as I recall San Francisco and a number of
    > other American cities are heading in the same direction.

Which alternative universe do you live in?

    >

Hans-Joachim Zierke

f'up


EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) schrieb:

    > Which alternative universe do you live in?


Since years, he's posting this stuff again and again. And the fact is:
He has /ALWAYS/ found somebody, who starts a thread on it. It never
fails, even though it must have been 100 - 500 postings (under different
pseudos).

While he might not know a lot about traffic technology, it has to be
admitted, that he has a very realistic view of Usenet participants...

;-)
Hans-Joachim