Go Back  British Expats > Usenet Groups > rec.travel.* > rec.travel.australia+nz
Reload this Page >

Which Airline? LAX->AKL->LAX

Wikiposts

Which Airline? LAX->AKL->LAX

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 21st 2004, 4:07 am
  #1  
Amanda Rekkonwith
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Which Airline? LAX->AKL->LAX

Hello all and my apologies for jut barging in....

I'm going on Holiday to visit my sweetie in NZ for a couple of weeks in
Feb-March.

Both Qantas and Air New Zealand ply the LAX<--> AKL route, so I'm wondering
which airline would be the better to travel on as far as "comfort in the
steerage section" is concerned?

Thanks for any advice...

Amanda
 
Old Dec 21st 2004, 6:35 am
  #2  
Al Bennett
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Which Airline? LAX->AKL->LAX

"Amanda Rekkonwith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:qLYxd.2435$_62.414@trnddc01...
    >Hello all and my apologies for jut barging in....
    >I'm going on Holiday to visit my sweetie in NZ for a couple of weeks in
    >Feb-March.
    >Both Qantas and Air New Zealand ply the LAX<--> AKL route,
    >so I'm wondering which airline would be the better to travel on
    >as far as "comfort in the steerage section" is concerned?

Depends on your definition of "comfort". NZ has 34" of knee space
between seat rows, QF has 32". QF has ISV at each seat, NZ has
the main screen & scattered small monitors set up around the cabin.
Both will water you and feed you a couple of times.
Both will be crewed as a general rule by the senior staffers (LAX
is still a prized route for the crews) so service will range from
uncaring/blase but adequate to warm and friendly with any
number of moods in between. NZ seems to have a better
reputation for it's crews than QF does reading past responses
in forums such as this, but that's all relative and subjective.
Both carriers have fine reputations for equipment and safety
matters.

If you are one that can't sleep on planes the ISV of QF wins
you over or you are one that can sleep and can't be bothered
with ISV where NZ's extra room will win you over.

Bottom line - they are both much the same whichever you pick,
so $ and frequent flyer affiliations will probably decide the
outcome for you. (NZ is in Star, QF is in oneworld).
 
Old Dec 21st 2004, 7:52 am
  #3  
Roger & Lorraine Martin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Which Airline? LAX->AKL->LAX

"Al Bennett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
    > "Amanda Rekkonwith" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
    > news:qLYxd.2435$_62.414@trnddc01...
    > >Hello all and my apologies for jut barging in....
    > >
    > >I'm going on Holiday to visit my sweetie in NZ for a couple of weeks in
    > >Feb-March.
    > >
    > >Both Qantas and Air New Zealand ply the LAX<--> AKL route,
    > >so I'm wondering which airline would be the better to travel on
    > >as far as "comfort in the steerage section" is concerned?
    > Depends on your definition of "comfort". NZ has 34" of knee space
    > between seat rows, QF has 32". QF has ISV at each seat, NZ has
    > the main screen & scattered small monitors set up around the cabin.
    > Both will water you and feed you a couple of times.
    > Both will be crewed as a general rule by the senior staffers (LAX
    > is still a prized route for the crews) so service will range from
    > uncaring/blase but adequate to warm and friendly with any
    > number of moods in between. NZ seems to have a better
    > reputation for it's crews than QF does reading past responses
    > in forums such as this, but that's all relative and subjective.
    > Both carriers have fine reputations for equipment and safety
    > matters.
    > If you are one that can't sleep on planes the ISV of QF wins
    > you over or you are one that can sleep and can't be bothered
    > with ISV where NZ's extra room will win you over.
    > Bottom line - they are both much the same whichever you pick,
    > so $ and frequent flyer affiliations will probably decide the
    > outcome for you. (NZ is in Star, QF is in oneworld).
I recently flew Air NZ and found that the fold out head supports on the
chairs were great - got a good sleep without having my head flopping around
on my shoulders.
 
Old Dec 21st 2004, 3:25 pm
  #4  
A Mate
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Which Airline? LAX->AKL->LAX

The one with the cheapest seats!!! and/or the most convenient timetable!!

Qantas aircraft are newer, otherwise they're very similar.





"Amanda Rekkonwith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:qLYxd.2435$_62.414@trnddc01...
    > Hello all and my apologies for jut barging in....
    > I'm going on Holiday to visit my sweetie in NZ for a couple of weeks in
    > Feb-March.
    > Both Qantas and Air New Zealand ply the LAX<--> AKL route, so I'm
    > wondering
    > which airline would be the better to travel on as far as "comfort in the
    > steerage section" is concerned?
    > Thanks for any advice...
    > Amanda
    >
 
Old Dec 21st 2004, 11:58 pm
  #5  
Frank Slootweg
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Which Airline? LAX->AKL->LAX

Roger & Lorraine Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
[deleted]
    > I recently flew Air NZ and found that the fold out head supports on the
    > chairs were great - got a good sleep without having my head flopping around
    > on my shoulders.

FWIW, for the last few years also the Qantas 747's, at least the ones
flying from London to Singapore and Melbourne and from Sydney to
Singapore and London, also have fold out head supports. They are indeed
much more comfortable than an inflatable neck cushion.
 
Old Dec 22nd 2004, 5:17 am
  #6  
Dave Proctor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Which Airline? LAX->AKL->LAX

On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 20:52:55 GMT, "Roger & Lorraine Martin"
<[email protected]> wrote:

    >I recently flew Air NZ and found that the fold out head supports on the
    >chairs were great - got a good sleep without having my head flopping around
    >on my shoulders.

Qantas has them as well.

Dave

=====

NSW Rural Fire Service - become a volunteer today.

http://www.rfs.nsw.gov.au/
 
Old Dec 22nd 2004, 4:54 pm
  #7  
Neil Raines
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Which Airline? LAX->AKL->LAX

The Tahitian airline and Fijian airline will also sell you a though ticket

    > I'm going on Holiday to visit my sweetie in NZ for a couple of weeks in
    > Feb-March.
    > Both Qantas and Air New Zealand ply the LAX<--> AKL route, so I'm
    > wondering
    > which airline would be the better to travel on as far as "comfort in the
    > steerage section" is concerned?
    > Thanks for any advice...
    > Amanda
    >
 
Old Dec 22nd 2004, 6:18 pm
  #8  
Texan Usenet
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Which Airline? LAX->AKL->LAX

On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 17:07:34 GMT, "Amanda Rekkonwith"
<[email protected]> wrote:

    >Hello all and my apologies for jut barging in....
    >I'm going on Holiday to visit my sweetie in NZ for a couple of weeks in
    >Feb-March.
    >Both Qantas and Air New Zealand ply the LAX<--> AKL route, so I'm wondering
    >which airline would be the better to travel on as far as "comfort in the
    >steerage section" is concerned?
    >Thanks for any advice...
    >Amanda

Two alternatives:

www.airtahitinui.com which flies via Tahiti

www.airpacific.com which flies via Fiji

I did a quick check on Orbitz's website and also found United flights
LAX-Sydney [Australia] then Air New Zealand to Auckland.
Warning: often this routing costs more.
Alternative return was either via SYD or Air NZ to LAX non-stop.
United & NZ code share.

Are you a member of any frequent flier programmes?
If so, check the partner airlines.

Cath
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.