Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > Europe > Portugal
Reload this Page >

Capital Gains Conundrum

Capital Gains Conundrum

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 2nd 2022, 7:28 pm
  #1  
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Location: North West England and Eastern Algarve
Posts: 124
ARCNET has a reputation beyond reputeARCNET has a reputation beyond reputeARCNET has a reputation beyond reputeARCNET has a reputation beyond reputeARCNET has a reputation beyond reputeARCNET has a reputation beyond reputeARCNET has a reputation beyond reputeARCNET has a reputation beyond reputeARCNET has a reputation beyond reputeARCNET has a reputation beyond reputeARCNET has a reputation beyond repute
Question Capital Gains Conundrum

Pursuant to Article 45 1(a) of the CIRS, https://info.portaldasfinancas.gov.p...ges/irs45.aspx, the acquisition value of donated real estate is deemed to be the value upon which stamp duty is paid at the time the donation deed is executed, i.e. the VPT.

But, is this still the case when real estate is purchased by a married couple (Separação de bens) and then the wife transfers by way of donation her half share to the husband and some years later the husband transfers the half share back to the wife again by way of donation? The non-resident married couple then sell the real estate and make a capital gain each.

Applying Article 45 1(a), it would appear that the acquisition value to calculate the wife’s capital gain is the VPT at the time she received the half share back from her husband. That, however, creates a much higher gain for the wife which doesn’t represent the real monetary gain and results in significantly more CGT equating to about 74% of the actual realised gain.

Does anyone know if there is any exemption available to the married couple to disregard transfers between themselves and thus use the original purchase price as the acquisition value? That is how it is treated by HMRC in the UK Capital Gains Tax: Gifts to your spouse or charity - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk).
ARCNET is offline  
Old Jan 3rd 2022, 1:43 pm
  #2  
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Sep 2021
Location: Peniche
Posts: 540
Alan PT has a reputation beyond reputeAlan PT has a reputation beyond reputeAlan PT has a reputation beyond reputeAlan PT has a reputation beyond reputeAlan PT has a reputation beyond reputeAlan PT has a reputation beyond reputeAlan PT has a reputation beyond reputeAlan PT has a reputation beyond reputeAlan PT has a reputation beyond reputeAlan PT has a reputation beyond reputeAlan PT has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Capital Gains Conundrum

This might be of interest: https://www.eurofinesco.com/mdocs-po...cgt-and-swaps/
Alan PT is offline  
Old Jan 3rd 2022, 2:32 pm
  #3  
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Location: North West England and Eastern Algarve
Posts: 124
ARCNET has a reputation beyond reputeARCNET has a reputation beyond reputeARCNET has a reputation beyond reputeARCNET has a reputation beyond reputeARCNET has a reputation beyond reputeARCNET has a reputation beyond reputeARCNET has a reputation beyond reputeARCNET has a reputation beyond reputeARCNET has a reputation beyond reputeARCNET has a reputation beyond reputeARCNET has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Capital Gains Conundrum

Originally Posted by Alan PT
Thanks Alan PT . That made for some interesting reading but I don’t think it will assist. Ironically, the CGT benefit of that swapping regime is the pole opposite. It is because the original purchase price, which is considerably higher, is replaced by the most recent VPT when the wife received the half back from her husband that creates the CGT penalty! Swings and roundabouts I suppose.
ARCNET is offline  
Old Jan 3rd 2022, 3:26 pm
  #4  
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Sep 2021
Location: Peniche
Posts: 540
Alan PT has a reputation beyond reputeAlan PT has a reputation beyond reputeAlan PT has a reputation beyond reputeAlan PT has a reputation beyond reputeAlan PT has a reputation beyond reputeAlan PT has a reputation beyond reputeAlan PT has a reputation beyond reputeAlan PT has a reputation beyond reputeAlan PT has a reputation beyond reputeAlan PT has a reputation beyond reputeAlan PT has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Capital Gains Conundrum

Ah, sorry, best I could find. I'm afraid it's probably too complex and specific an example to get a good answer here, I fear you are in "consult an accountant" territory
Alan PT is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.