Me and My Family
#4246
BE Forum Addict
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2014
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,853
Re: Me and My Family
I give up. Yet again you attack somebody that's trying to help you and trying to tell you that despite what you're being told, Myoma's aren't anything dangerous or that need paid for treatment, they're something most women live with daily. I was agreeing that it was suspicious, but you're just being defensive and frankly bloody rude. You've done it repeatedly in the thread, it's fine for you to query your ex's motives, but heaven forbid anybody else do it. I simply agreed with you but for some reason when people do that you decide to attack them instead of the one person you should be angry with.
And yet again you decide to have a go because mods are daring to comment on your thread. And yet again, I reiterate - us being mods or supermods has NOTHING to do with us posting on the forums. Plus the same mods have helped you time and time again. Not quite sure why any of us bothered tbh.
And yet again you decide to have a go because mods are daring to comment on your thread. And yet again, I reiterate - us being mods or supermods has NOTHING to do with us posting on the forums. Plus the same mods have helped you time and time again. Not quite sure why any of us bothered tbh.
Regards
#4247
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2017
Location: Kuching, Sarawak
Posts: 674
Re: Me and My Family
My guess is that either the certificate is someone else's with the same name or her signature, digitally altered. BTW people's signatures DO change over the years. It is a natural process and the fact that it might look "forged" doesn't mean that it s. One would have to look at signatures from the same time frame that are authentically hers.
She doesn't want to give you access to other information on the certificate because it would show it possibly wasn't her Marriage certificate at all she showed you...or that the original was different. You need to get the record number and a copy of the original from the Federal or State government.
And there is a fundamental question here...why would a MALE forge a marriage certificate. Was he a foreigner trying to get some sort of long-stay status? Surely there would be agreeable young ladies that could be arranged to provide that service. Why fake one that may be challenged later? And how long has she known about this non-conjugal "arrangement"?
The third element is that she has children, by not one...but TWO different fathers...presumably neither one of whom she married. Or is one of these the husband that she has committed the act of adultery against? Is THAT why the marriage certificate shown is not complete? That the husband is actually the father of one (or both) of the children? Hence the forgery is not really so.
There is a reason she will not give you the copy of the original. You have told her that she needed to prove her marriage was not bigamous by providing the marriage certificate. She has not done so.
Last edited by moneypenny20; Feb 5th 2020 at 9:41 am.
#4248
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2017
Location: Kuching, Sarawak
Posts: 674
Re: Me and My Family
Hi JDW, Penang sounds interesting. Can I ask about the 90 day visa for Brits? Is it visa on arrival, or do you need to go to a foreign embassy? If it's the former I imagine it would make things simpler and less costly, as you can just book the cheapest flight to a neighbouring country every 90 days, and come back the same day. Maybe it's even renewable in country? When I was in Bahrain in the 2000s I knew a guy who lived there for several years on 3 month visas on arrival, which could be renewed for another 3 months at the immigration directorate, so he only had to leave every 6 months.Are there nice, civilised condos with good facilities (pool, gym, etc) for a reasonable rent? And is it possible to get things like internet, cable tv, club memberships etc without a residence permit?
There is a long-term NON-WORKING Ten-Year Multi-Entry stay visa (without getting married that is). It's called MM2H but ON the PENINSULA requires proof of both assets abroad (RM350,000 ~ £65,000) AND requires proof of income (RM10,000 or £1865) AND establishing a Fixed Account of RM150,000 (in Ringgit but that's @ £28,000). The above amounts are for those over 50. If you are under 50 the financial requirements are quite elevated. Visa fees are about RM90/year. Sarawak and Sabah have their own programs so if you want to live in those states there will be different rules. For example Sarawak only gives a 5 Year Visa, requires a local Sarawakian citizen as a sponsor, but one does not have to show any liquid foreign assets...simply that you have either RM10K pension for couples/kids (RM7000 for a single applicant) OR place that RM150K deposit (couples...discounted to RM100,000 for a single applicant). Visa is renewable for another 5 Years f one is still having that income coming in or if your fixed account hasn't dropped below RM60,000 (they do allow limited withdrawals for buying a car or property, health care costs and school fees). With some exceptions Sarawak only allows over 50 year old applicants. I've heard that Sabah's program is almost identical to the Peninsula except immigration wants people to buy or show long-term rental lease for approval.
The problem is the lag time on the Peninsula getting the MM2H visa application approved. It can run from 9 months to a year...in Sarawak the average time (once one has a sponsor) is about 2 months.
Sarawak and Sabah are known for their tropical forests and beaches, more laid back atmosphere. Sabah even has temperate to cold mountain climates. It's a little bit of Philippines "light" as there is a large Pinoy population there. Not a lot of old buildings as everything got leveled by Allied bombing during WW2. Sarawak has a mix of indigenous Dayak, Malay, and Chinese and more of a colonial flavor (although it was actually only briefly a British colony). It survived the Allied bombing unscathed...so a lot of history...and prehistory. Both speak English better than most of the Peninsula and are not as dominated by Muslim influences (especially Sarawak).
To rent a condo one would likely have to show a visa- but technically its up to the renter/seller. Generally they would be happy to sponsor one for Sarawak MM2H (sponsor is not necessary on the Peninsula). A visa would definitely be necessary for getting satellite TV/internet. There are whole branches over i the Malaysia Section on MM2H and Sarawak MM2H.
#4249
BE Forum Addict
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2014
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,853
Re: Me and My Family
Well what was NOT Accessible on the marriage certificate. The fact that she will not provide you with a copy is telling and then give you one that includes "a signature".
My guess is that either the certificate is someone else's with the same name or her signature, digitally altered. BTW people's signatures DO change over the years. It is a natural process and the fact that it might look "forged" doesn't mean that it s. One would have to look at signatures from the same time frame that are authentically hers.
She doesn't want to give you access to other information on the certificate because it would show it possibly wasn't her Marriage certificate at all she showed you...or that the original was different. You need to get the record number and a copy of the original from the Federal or State government.
And there is a fundamental question here...why would a MALE forge a marriage certificate. Was he a foreigner trying to get some sort of long-stay status? Surely there would be agreeable young ladies that could be arranged to provide that service. Why fake one that may be challenged later? And how long has she known about this non-conjugal "arrangement"?
The third element is that she has children, by not one...but TWO different fathers...presumably neither one of whom she married. Or is one of these the husband that she has committed the act of adultery against? Is THAT why the marriage certificate shown is not complete? That the husband is actually the father of one (or both) of the children? Hence the forgery is not really so.
There is a reason she will not give you the copy of the original. You have told her that she needed to prove her marriage was not bigamous by providing the marriage certificate. She has not done so.
My guess is that either the certificate is someone else's with the same name or her signature, digitally altered. BTW people's signatures DO change over the years. It is a natural process and the fact that it might look "forged" doesn't mean that it s. One would have to look at signatures from the same time frame that are authentically hers.
She doesn't want to give you access to other information on the certificate because it would show it possibly wasn't her Marriage certificate at all she showed you...or that the original was different. You need to get the record number and a copy of the original from the Federal or State government.
And there is a fundamental question here...why would a MALE forge a marriage certificate. Was he a foreigner trying to get some sort of long-stay status? Surely there would be agreeable young ladies that could be arranged to provide that service. Why fake one that may be challenged later? And how long has she known about this non-conjugal "arrangement"?
The third element is that she has children, by not one...but TWO different fathers...presumably neither one of whom she married. Or is one of these the husband that she has committed the act of adultery against? Is THAT why the marriage certificate shown is not complete? That the husband is actually the father of one (or both) of the children? Hence the forgery is not really so.
There is a reason she will not give you the copy of the original. You have told her that she needed to prove her marriage was not bigamous by providing the marriage certificate. She has not done so.
I have no idea why she will not show me the full marriage certificate and why she left it late in the day to send the portion with the signature. However, I can tell you that I can also see her fathers name printed on there. As far as authenticity of the signature is concerned, she states that her attorney in Manila has compared that signature with those contained on ID's etc she had at the time and declared the signature as faked. But who can believe a word she says. The only way I can get a copy is by obtaining a court order.
The marriage was to the father of the two girls back in 2006. She states she did not attend because she was in hospital after getting a beating from him. Yet she stayed with for a further two years and had their second daughter. But now the story gets convoluted or I didn't understand properly. If I seem to remember, the two daughters had different surnames which would indicate two different fathers. He wanted to marry so the first daughter could take his surname. That's how I understand it. The second daughter has his surname. Anyway this was explained to me about a year ago and due to the complexity I might have got the details wrong. But whats for sure, he wanted to marry because he wished the first daughter to carry his name. But most of her stories are convoluted and clear as mud.
She states that she did not know that the marriage went ahead and her family seem not to know also. She claims she had two witnesses attending and she told them that the wedding was off. So they never pitched up. So she claims surprise when I showed evidence from PSA that she was indeed married. I don't know what to believe but that academic now. But two questions stands out in my mind....Why should he have gone ahead with the wedding when it could be re-arranged in due course. Why should the registrar risk his/her job by forging or allowing the forging of the certificate.
Regards
#4250
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2017
Location: Kuching, Sarawak
Posts: 674
Re: Me and My Family
But then I wonder how she Obtained a copy of of her first marriage certificate. She also makes jibes about me affording an attorney to defend myself.
The only thing I may have to do is attend a family court where they will determine how much alimony she is entitled to. I suspect very little or nothing. But unless she can prove that she is not a bigamist by legal process... Then nothing. I think she knows that.
Thinking about change of identity etc. I suspect the new passport will have the former name included. Ie... Smith formerly Jones.
The only thing I may have to do is attend a family court where they will determine how much alimony she is entitled to. I suspect very little or nothing. But unless she can prove that she is not a bigamist by legal process... Then nothing. I think she knows that.
Thinking about change of identity etc. I suspect the new passport will have the former name included. Ie... Smith formerly Jones.
Her jibes about you not being able to afford a lawyer is telling. She knows it would cost her a bundle to obtain a lawyer...she's asked. If YOU would have trouble affording a lawyer that would be doubly-true in her case. She has no job, no allowance and no good prospect of winning a case of bigamy.
Her supposed strategy of "sue husband first...worry about proving the forgery later" is precisely bass-ackward. One would have to FIRST show the initial marriage was fraudulent to show that she had not committed bigamy. She then would have to show that she was unaware of the false marriage for...what...ten years or more? That she did not seek annulment because she was UNAWARE of the marriage for this entire period. This gets even more complicated if the marriage was to one of the fathers of her children. If the kids use their fathers name. If there are other public records (school records) recording them as husband and wife...with her signature/participation. Consummation of a marriage (in the Philippines proved by having children) makes it damn difficult to get an annulment.
Both elements are key to her case. 1) Fraud occurred, 2) No Effort at corrective action (annulment) despite getting married a second time.
Only THEN could she use this as evidence in a court to show that she entered into the second marriage without herself committing fraud. It's not enough for her to get an annulment of the first marriage...and she's not even going to have that in hand at the time the civil court will make a decision? She would have to show that she was unaware of the false marriage.
My suspicion is that her marriage had entered a long period of separation...she took jobs abroad...perhaps with periodic phases of renewed conjugality. Divorce/annulment is nearly impossible. She took the lazy route. Then she tried the "sugar daddy" route with an older foreigner. Hid the facts relating to her former marriage and kids from the "mark" and falsely declared that she was unmarried to the civil magistrates. Remember all those rumors that were bounding around prior to the wedding? Warning flags were everywhere. She was probably was told "everyone does it...nobody ever checks to see if there is a previous marriage license".
One failing Phil11 is that you never had a heart-to-heart about her previous men in her life and the children in any depth. She knows all about your family, divorce, children but you were not told anything about her prior relationships...why she was not married to her childrens' fathers? How many children there were? What conditions for their upbringing existed? The length of these relationships? What caused their break up?
#4251
BE Forum Addict
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2014
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,853
Re: Me and My Family
She likely had a copy all along. From the wedding ;-) As noted, signatures change enough over time that an authentic one from a decade ago may look like someone having a go at forgery. Look at your old passports. As well parties to a marriage would surely have access to getting a copy of their civil documents recording that event. But the fact that she didn't want you to see the entire marriage certificate indicates to me that there is something on that document that she doesn't want you to have access to...former husbands name, document #, evidence of a prior annulment, or that the document itself is faked or altered, etc. There's something odd.
Her jibes about you not being able to afford a lawyer is telling. She knows it would cost her a bundle to obtain a lawyer...she's asked. If YOU would have trouble affording a lawyer that would be doubly-true in her case. She has no job, no allowance and no good prospect of winning a case of bigamy.
Her supposed strategy of "sue husband first...worry about proving the forgery later" is precisely bass-ackward. One would have to FIRST show the initial marriage was fraudulent to show that she had not committed bigamy. She then would have to show that she was unaware of the false marriage for...what...ten years or more? That she did not seek annulment because she was UNAWARE of the marriage for this entire period. This gets even more complicated if the marriage was to one of the fathers of her children. If the kids use their fathers name. If there are other public records (school records) recording them as husband and wife...with her signature/participation. Consummation of a marriage (in the Philippines proved by having children) makes it damn difficult to get an annulment.
Both elements are key to her case. 1) Fraud occurred, 2) No Effort at corrective action (annulment) despite getting married a second time.
Only THEN could she use this as evidence in a court to show that she entered into the second marriage without herself committing fraud. It's not enough for her to get an annulment of the first marriage...and she's not even going to have that in hand at the time the civil court will make a decision? She would have to show that she was unaware of the false marriage.
My suspicion is that her marriage had entered a long period of separation...she took jobs abroad...perhaps with periodic phases of renewed conjugality. Divorce/annulment is nearly impossible. She took the lazy route. Then she tried the "sugar daddy" route with an older foreigner. Hid the facts relating to her former marriage and kids from the "mark" and falsely declared that she was unmarried to the civil magistrates. Remember all those rumors that were bounding around prior to the wedding? Warning flags were everywhere. She was probably was told "everyone does it...nobody ever checks to see if there is a previous marriage license".
One failing Phil11 is that you never had a heart-to-heart about her previous men in her life and the children in any depth. She knows all about your family, divorce, children but you were not told anything about her prior relationships...why she was not married to her childrens' fathers? How many children there were? What conditions for their upbringing existed? The length of these relationships? What caused their break up?
Her jibes about you not being able to afford a lawyer is telling. She knows it would cost her a bundle to obtain a lawyer...she's asked. If YOU would have trouble affording a lawyer that would be doubly-true in her case. She has no job, no allowance and no good prospect of winning a case of bigamy.
Her supposed strategy of "sue husband first...worry about proving the forgery later" is precisely bass-ackward. One would have to FIRST show the initial marriage was fraudulent to show that she had not committed bigamy. She then would have to show that she was unaware of the false marriage for...what...ten years or more? That she did not seek annulment because she was UNAWARE of the marriage for this entire period. This gets even more complicated if the marriage was to one of the fathers of her children. If the kids use their fathers name. If there are other public records (school records) recording them as husband and wife...with her signature/participation. Consummation of a marriage (in the Philippines proved by having children) makes it damn difficult to get an annulment.
Both elements are key to her case. 1) Fraud occurred, 2) No Effort at corrective action (annulment) despite getting married a second time.
Only THEN could she use this as evidence in a court to show that she entered into the second marriage without herself committing fraud. It's not enough for her to get an annulment of the first marriage...and she's not even going to have that in hand at the time the civil court will make a decision? She would have to show that she was unaware of the false marriage.
My suspicion is that her marriage had entered a long period of separation...she took jobs abroad...perhaps with periodic phases of renewed conjugality. Divorce/annulment is nearly impossible. She took the lazy route. Then she tried the "sugar daddy" route with an older foreigner. Hid the facts relating to her former marriage and kids from the "mark" and falsely declared that she was unmarried to the civil magistrates. Remember all those rumors that were bounding around prior to the wedding? Warning flags were everywhere. She was probably was told "everyone does it...nobody ever checks to see if there is a previous marriage license".
One failing Phil11 is that you never had a heart-to-heart about her previous men in her life and the children in any depth. She knows all about your family, divorce, children but you were not told anything about her prior relationships...why she was not married to her childrens' fathers? How many children there were? What conditions for their upbringing existed? The length of these relationships? What caused their break up?
As far as the signature is concerned, it is completely different and not a resemblance on her signature now. So there was no attempt to copy her signature that is unless she has completely changed her signature over time which is different to morphing over time.
The marriage...she also states there were no documents relating to that marriage except for the certificate itself. IE....No Cenomar nor application for marriage.
Bigamy...As you know, I have threatened her with a case of bigamy if any litigation came my way. I hope that puts her off. But in reality that has to remain a threat because I doubt if I can fund a defence against me and carry out my threat. Maybe defending myself in court and funding a case against her might work. I have seen a msg from her lawyer friend (school friend) to her who stated that I cannot file a bigamy case.....only the first husband can. I proved him wrong when I found out that the Philippine High Court ruled that the second husband can in fact pursue a charge of bigamy. She now counters by stating that her attorney can prove in court that the wedding was fake with the documents they have received. Incidentally her free lawyer could be her school friend. But I am only guessing. Interestingly one attorney I was chatting to said it was rare for a woman to commit bigamy....its normally the man.
She married in 2006 and she had a second daughter 2 about yrs after that if my memory serves me correct. I don't know when she left her first husband but she came back here and had a relationship with a guy here and had the two boys. She went to Kuwait about 9yrs ago for a 4yr contract. She left her first husband after another bout of beating. I have told that story earlier... Second guy she left because he was spending all the money she sent home on booze and didn't work.
I never enquired about her previous relationships when we first met because it was none of my business. I had to be upfront about mine because I was a married man albeit separated. Obviously when the two sets of kids appeared on the scene then she had to reveal all. Which she did candidly.
Regards
#4252
Re: Me and My Family
Thanks again! I will try and answer a few points....
As far as the signature is concerned, it is completely different and not a resemblance on her signature now. So there was no attempt to copy her signature that is unless she has completely changed her signature over time which is different to morphing over time.
The marriage...she also states there were no documents relating to that marriage except for the certificate itself. IE....No Cenomar nor application for marriage.
Bigamy...As you know, I have threatened her with a case of bigamy if any litigation came my way. I hope that puts her off. But in reality that has to remain a threat because I doubt if I can fund a defence against me and carry out my threat. Maybe defending myself in court and funding a case against her might work. I have seen a msg from her lawyer friend (school friend) to her who stated that I cannot file a bigamy case.....only the first husband can. I proved him wrong when I found out that the Philippine High Court ruled that the second husband can in fact pursue a charge of bigamy. She now counters by stating that her attorney can prove in court that the wedding was fake with the documents they have received. Incidentally her free lawyer could be her school friend. But I am only guessing. Interestingly one attorney I was chatting to said it was rare for a woman to commit bigamy....its normally the man.
She married in 2006 and she had a second daughter 2 about yrs after that if my memory serves me correct. I don't know when she left her first husband but she came back here and had a relationship with a guy here and had the two boys. She went to Kuwait about 9yrs ago for a 4yr contract. She left her first husband after another bout of beating. I have told that story earlier... Second guy she left because he was spending all the money she sent home on booze and didn't work.
I never enquired about her previous relationships when we first met because it was none of my business. I had to be upfront about mine because I was a married man albeit separated. Obviously when the two sets of kids appeared on the scene then she had to reveal all. Which she did candidly.
Regards
As far as the signature is concerned, it is completely different and not a resemblance on her signature now. So there was no attempt to copy her signature that is unless she has completely changed her signature over time which is different to morphing over time.
The marriage...she also states there were no documents relating to that marriage except for the certificate itself. IE....No Cenomar nor application for marriage.
Bigamy...As you know, I have threatened her with a case of bigamy if any litigation came my way. I hope that puts her off. But in reality that has to remain a threat because I doubt if I can fund a defence against me and carry out my threat. Maybe defending myself in court and funding a case against her might work. I have seen a msg from her lawyer friend (school friend) to her who stated that I cannot file a bigamy case.....only the first husband can. I proved him wrong when I found out that the Philippine High Court ruled that the second husband can in fact pursue a charge of bigamy. She now counters by stating that her attorney can prove in court that the wedding was fake with the documents they have received. Incidentally her free lawyer could be her school friend. But I am only guessing. Interestingly one attorney I was chatting to said it was rare for a woman to commit bigamy....its normally the man.
She married in 2006 and she had a second daughter 2 about yrs after that if my memory serves me correct. I don't know when she left her first husband but she came back here and had a relationship with a guy here and had the two boys. She went to Kuwait about 9yrs ago for a 4yr contract. She left her first husband after another bout of beating. I have told that story earlier... Second guy she left because he was spending all the money she sent home on booze and didn't work.
I never enquired about her previous relationships when we first met because it was none of my business. I had to be upfront about mine because I was a married man albeit separated. Obviously when the two sets of kids appeared on the scene then she had to reveal all. Which she did candidly.
Regards
Re your last sentence, she's never been candid with you, and it's unlikely she ever will.
#4253
BE Forum Addict
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2014
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,853
Re: Me and My Family
The signature on the partial bit of the marriage certificate she's shown you is different because it's not her signature, and it's not her marriage certificate. It's not exactly hard to find a blank template on the internet that allows you to fill in all the details yourself, took me all of 2 minutes https://www.pdffiller.com/jsfiller-d...46245d2f0f6d85
Re your last sentence, she's never been candid with you, and it's unlikely she ever will.
Re your last sentence, she's never been candid with you, and it's unlikely she ever will.
Moving on...
Today she sent me a part photo of an envelope addressed in my name from the municipal court. This was from a third person who has now been blocked. The address was not shown but I assume was to my last known address. She will forward it on. It contains a subpoena. She claims she knows my address... But I doubt it. I asked her previously
to send a screenshot of any litigation... But she refused. She also claimed another one from NBI for libel is on its way...
Regards
#4254
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 466
Re: Me and My Family
Sorry to say that my legal beagle disagrees with you. Also I was unaware that you were privy to all our conversations during the good days.
Moving on...
Today she sent me a part photo of an envelope addressed in my name from the municipal court. This was from a third person who has now been blocked. The address was not shown but I assume was to my last known address. She will forward it on. It contains a subpoena. She claims she knows my address... But I doubt it. I asked her previously
to send a screenshot of any litigation... But she refused. She also claimed another one from NBI for libel is on its way...
Regards
Moving on...
Today she sent me a part photo of an envelope addressed in my name from the municipal court. This was from a third person who has now been blocked. The address was not shown but I assume was to my last known address. She will forward it on. It contains a subpoena. She claims she knows my address... But I doubt it. I asked her previously
to send a screenshot of any litigation... But she refused. She also claimed another one from NBI for libel is on its way...
Regards
This whole saga is now becoming absolutely ridiculous. P11 is forever finding excuses, and acting like a qualified lawyer. Why does not P11 just go back to where he came from and face all the accusations thrown at him by his L/L . He can then defend himself in court, after all all the free legal advice he has been given he must surely win any case.
#4255
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2017
Location: Kuching, Sarawak
Posts: 674
Re: Me and My Family
As far as the signature is concerned, it is completely different and not a resemblance on her signature now. So there was no attempt to copy her signature that is unless she has completely changed her signature over time which is different to morphing over time.
She fabricated it to suggest the real document was forged. But she doesn't want you to have access to the registration number or witness names or the official who supposedly signed it. Or perhaps even the date of marriage.
It makes no sense for the official to perjure himself as well as the witnesses (yeah money could be paid, but they will deny it...and charging that officials and others committed a crime is itself a serious matter). She will, in effect, be claiming that the official, the witnesses, perhaps her father (doesn't he have to sign some sort of document), and her ostensible first husband all committed a crime. As I pointed out this will have to be adjudicated first.
This, at that point, has nothing to do with you, and you need not get involved in it. If she tries to show that your evidence of prior marriage is incorrect they will need to prove separately that the marriage document was forged.
Now the Court will issue an order for the actual document on file to be brought forward. They will not accept a document just handed to them by a plaintiff. If she tries to foist off her fake on the court they will charge HER with evidence tampering.
I have seen a msg from her lawyer friend (school friend) to her who stated that I cannot file a bigamy case.....only the first husband can. I proved him wrong when I found out that the Philippine High Court ruled that the second husband can in fact pursue a charge of bigamy.
TIMELINE
As to knowledge of the marriage: Presumably she was aware that this second daughter bore his surname (while daughter #1 did not). Therefore she must have known about the fake marriage sometime about 2008, or earlier. She did nothing to challenge or annul it.
2006 was 14 years ago. Daughter #2 must be about 12; born around 2008.
But maybe he wasn't that way when she left him in charge of the sons and sending him money. At that point he was reliable.
If so I'd think "partner #2" would be a far better candidate as one that she would want to get married before she took off to work in Kuwait. Why didn't she?
Or did she KNOW that she could NOT get married to him because she already was married?
Better to find a "not working" British guy on the internet who spends his own pension money on younger women and boozing.
#4256
Re: Me and My Family
Sorry to say that my legal beagle disagrees with you. Also I was unaware that you were privy to all our conversations during the good days.
Moving on...
Today she sent me a part photo of an envelope addressed in my name from the municipal court. This was from a third person who has now been blocked. The address was not shown but I assume was to my last known address. She will forward it on. It contains a subpoena. She claims she knows my address... But I doubt it. I asked her previously
Moving on...
Today she sent me a part photo of an envelope addressed in my name from the municipal court. This was from a third person who has now been blocked. The address was not shown but I assume was to my last known address. She will forward it on. It contains a subpoena. She claims she knows my address... But I doubt it. I asked her previously
#4257
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 9,988
Re: Me and My Family
I just raised the question whether all along deep down you enjoyed the drama, as evidenced not by your recent posts but the continued desire to go through all this for a number of years, and share the experience. Your recent posts neither prove or disprove this- though considering your recent responses and attitude, maybe you are realizing many comments on this thread were correct but you are too proud or stubborn to admit.. .
#4258
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 9,988
Re: Me and My Family
Sorry to say that my legal beagle disagrees with you. Also I was unaware that you were privy to all our conversations during the good days.
Moving on...
Today she sent me a part photo of an envelope addressed in my name from the municipal court. This was from a third person who has now been blocked. The address was not shown but I assume was to my last known address. She will forward it on. It contains a subpoena. She claims she knows my address... But I doubt it. I asked her previously
to send a screenshot of any litigation... But she refused. She also claimed another one from NBI for libel is on its way...
Regards
Moving on...
Today she sent me a part photo of an envelope addressed in my name from the municipal court. This was from a third person who has now been blocked. The address was not shown but I assume was to my last known address. She will forward it on. It contains a subpoena. She claims she knows my address... But I doubt it. I asked her previously
to send a screenshot of any litigation... But she refused. She also claimed another one from NBI for libel is on its way...
Regards
My thoughts are you need to leave for at least a short time, and truly cut-off any direct or indirect contact.
#4259
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 9,988
Re: Me and My Family
This whole saga is now becoming absolutely ridiculous. P11 is forever finding excuses, and acting like a qualified lawyer. Why does not P11 just go back to where he came from and face all the accusations thrown at him by his L/L . He can then defend himself in court, after all all the free legal advice he has been given he must surely win any case.
#4260
BE Forum Addict
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2014
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,853
Re: Me and My Family
This whole saga is now becoming absolutely ridiculous. P11 is forever finding excuses, and acting like a qualified lawyer. Why does not P11 just go back to where he came from and face all the accusations thrown at him by his L/L . He can then defend himself in court, after all all the free legal advice he has been given he must surely win any case.
You ask why I don't go back to defend myself. I Intend to which is why I will not buy furniture for an unfurnished apartment as you have constantly suggested. I have limited funds.
Must surely win the case. Naivety. This is the Philippines. As you have found out.
Regards
Last edited by Philosophical 11; Feb 5th 2020 at 11:03 am.