Stephanie Key
Aug 26th 2013, 9:43 pm
#1
Account Closed
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 755
Stephanie Key
Well what do you know!!!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-Big-Macs.html
I wonder if John Key is getting the GCSB as we speak to remove all references about this incident
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-Big-Macs.html
I wonder if John Key is getting the GCSB as we speak to remove all references about this incident
Aug 26th 2013, 9:45 pm
#2
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2012
Location: St Albans, Christchurch
Posts: 586
Re: Stephanie Key
Apparently he is very proud of her work.
Aug 26th 2013, 10:21 pm
#3
*********
Joined: May 2008
Location: Up in dem hills.........
Posts: 1,458
Re: Stephanie Key
Thats calamari off the menu for a while.
Aug 29th 2013, 12:38 am
#4
Truth is the safest lie.
Joined: Jul 2008
Location: @ the beach.
Posts: 7,240
Re: Stephanie Key
Nyotaimori is actually an established art form you heathens.
It's historical origin is likely that of Japanese organised criminals who use the practise of covering sex slaves in food for their pleasure. It was however exceedingly rare until in the 1980's when Japanese corporate executives realised it was the perfect display of their affluence (isn't sex always?). Sometime after it came to the rest of us in the surge of contemporary Japanism of the early 2000's.
However this work is hardly ground-breaking or innovative is it? For me it lacks a certain homage to the origin of the art form, it’s fun and playful whereas the origins of the style where rooted in subservience of the performer in being a pure expression of beauty for the enjoyment of others. It’s disingenuous as performance IYSWIM.
It's historical origin is likely that of Japanese organised criminals who use the practise of covering sex slaves in food for their pleasure. It was however exceedingly rare until in the 1980's when Japanese corporate executives realised it was the perfect display of their affluence (isn't sex always?). Sometime after it came to the rest of us in the surge of contemporary Japanism of the early 2000's.
However this work is hardly ground-breaking or innovative is it? For me it lacks a certain homage to the origin of the art form, it’s fun and playful whereas the origins of the style where rooted in subservience of the performer in being a pure expression of beauty for the enjoyment of others. It’s disingenuous as performance IYSWIM.
