Would you retire in the UK?
#46
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Apr 2011
Location: The Shire
Posts: 1,117
Re: Would you retire in the UK?
No, the Totalisation Agreement does not come into play since they already qualify for the UK state pension.
#47
Re: Would you retire in the UK?
IF, the OP worked in the UK for two years, she would have paid two years worth of class 1 NICs towards a pension. Under the Totalisation Agreement, she can use her US SSA contributions of eight years in order to obtain the mandatory ten years of contributions to qualify for the UK state pension. BUT, she would only be paid a sum equal to two years worth of contributions as a UK state pension and not ten. She may also have made voluntarily contributions for additional NICs, or use a top-up contribution to increase the amount. Of course, the two years of working contributions to the now obtainable UK state pension will bring about WEP for the US SSA payout.
That's assuming the rules for a UK pension remain at the current minimum qualifying period under the Totalisation Agreement, and isn't altered due to the new UK pension rules, and the Totalisation Agreement remains unchanged in respect to UK pension amounts payable.
That's assuming the rules for a UK pension remain at the current minimum qualifying period under the Totalisation Agreement, and isn't altered due to the new UK pension rules, and the Totalisation Agreement remains unchanged in respect to UK pension amounts payable.
#48
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Apr 2011
Location: The Shire
Posts: 1,117
Re: Would you retire in the UK?
If the UK pension amount is calculated on 2 years of contributions the WEP amount would be minimal.......I only brought up the idea of using the Reciprocal SS agreement so that the OP could qualify for the UK state pension and then use that eligibility to get other benefits if she wanted to move to another EU country...that actual amount of the pension was incidental.
#49
Re: Would you retire in the UK?
nun @ post # 47, it was about her being a British citizen & 'Health coverage or benefits if she was to take up ordinary residency in Europe.
https://ehealth.gov.mt/HealthPortal/...e_maltauk.aspx
Portal da Saúde - Ao abrigo de convenções internacionais
International conventions concluded by Portugal covering to protect sickness and maternity
Countries with which Portugal is bound by agreement or bilateral social security convention:
Andorra
Brazil
Cape Verde
Morocco
United Kingdom
Contacts:
Social Security - Sou Cidadão - Segurança Social
Directorate-General of Social Security
Largo do Rato No. 1
1269-144 Lisboa
Phone - Via Social Security - 808 266 266 E-mail : DGSS @ sec-social. en
Portal da Saúde - Ao abrigo de convenções internacionais
https://ehealth.gov.mt/HealthPortal/...e_maltauk.aspx
Portal da Saúde - Ao abrigo de convenções internacionais
International conventions concluded by Portugal covering to protect sickness and maternity
Countries with which Portugal is bound by agreement or bilateral social security convention:
Andorra
Brazil
Cape Verde
Morocco
United Kingdom
Contacts:
Social Security - Sou Cidadão - Segurança Social
Directorate-General of Social Security
Largo do Rato No. 1
1269-144 Lisboa
Phone - Via Social Security - 808 266 266 E-mail : DGSS @ sec-social. en
Portal da Saúde - Ao abrigo de convenções internacionais
#50
Re: Would you retire in the UK?
Yes, someone mentioned that to get healthcare in Portugal you needed to have a UK state pension.....I don't know anything about that, but I did see a way for the OP to qualify for a UK state pension using US SS credits if she needed one to quailfy for other benefits.
#51
Re: Would you retire in the UK?
The first part is certainly true. As to the OP being able to use US credits to get a basic UK pension I've no idea.
Last edited by Novocastrian; Nov 3rd 2014 at 10:02 pm.
#52
Just Joined
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 3
Re: Would you retire in the UK?
Thanks, All. No, I'm not eligible for pension credits. Have to make do with Social Security and my 401(k) retirement savings and cash from sale of my home. I fully expect to pay regular income tax to the IRS for the remainder of my earthly existence.
#53
Re: Would you retire in the UK?
You may well be able to get a minimal UK state pension by using catch up NI credits and the reciprocal SS agreement. If that helps you in eligibility for other benefits you should look into it.
#55
I still dont believe it..
Joined: Oct 2013
Location: 12 degrees north
Posts: 2,777
Re: Would you retire in the UK?
How does NHS funding actually work? As someone who has worked recently in an nhs clinical commissioning group i can tell you.
There are budgets, and targets for the quantity and quality of treatments. Money belongs to patients ultimately, and this money per patient is aggregated up to the size of a GPs list, and that sum is added to other GPs in the area (county or borough) to get to a total. If an area loses people it loses money. With current immigration a lot of budgets are going up, hence the declared need for more, but theres no lottery involved.
There are budgets, and targets for the quantity and quality of treatments. Money belongs to patients ultimately, and this money per patient is aggregated up to the size of a GPs list, and that sum is added to other GPs in the area (county or borough) to get to a total. If an area loses people it loses money. With current immigration a lot of budgets are going up, hence the declared need for more, but theres no lottery involved.
#56
I still dont believe it..
Joined: Oct 2013
Location: 12 degrees north
Posts: 2,777
Re: Would you retire in the UK?
Care is definitely rationed but to meet targets on care given and to husband resources. Which of course leads to unhappy people but its relatively fair and overall its an amazing service fr the admittedly huge price. Cost per patient is public domain.
#57
Re: Would you retire in the UK?
How does NHS funding actually work? As someone who has worked recently in an nhs clinical commissioning group i can tell you.
There are budgets, and targets for the quantity and quality of treatments. Money belongs to patients ultimately, and this money per patient is aggregated up to the size of a GPs list, and that sum is added to other GPs in the area (county or borough) to get to a total. If an area loses people it loses money. With current immigration a lot of budgets are going up, hence the declared need for more, but theres no lottery involved.
There are budgets, and targets for the quantity and quality of treatments. Money belongs to patients ultimately, and this money per patient is aggregated up to the size of a GPs list, and that sum is added to other GPs in the area (county or borough) to get to a total. If an area loses people it loses money. With current immigration a lot of budgets are going up, hence the declared need for more, but theres no lottery involved.
Like schools, roads, and other public services, where you live makes a difference in the quality of services you get. It's an inescapable fact. I just have no idea of the exact reason why things are this way but I guess it's due to a certain degree of autonomy among local authorities in how they spend the money they are given.
#58
Re: Would you retire in the UK?
For an ex-pat considering moving back to the UK, I think it is also important to stress that any rationing that takes place is not of life-saving or essential treatment. Nobody gets told that they can't have their gallstones removed, their appendix out, or their heart surgery because the money has run out. What rationing there is, is of things like fertility treatment, weight loss surgery, counselling, etc.
Rationing is different from waiting lists, which do exist for some operations. Some expensive cancer drugs which only extend life by a few months have been denied because they are not cost-effective, which is a hard decision, but I think a correct one. Transplants are not available for everyone because of a shortage of donors.
Rationing is different from waiting lists, which do exist for some operations. Some expensive cancer drugs which only extend life by a few months have been denied because they are not cost-effective, which is a hard decision, but I think a correct one. Transplants are not available for everyone because of a shortage of donors.
#59
Re: Would you retire in the UK?
For an ex-pat considering moving back to the UK, I think it is also important to stress that any rationing that takes place is not of life-saving or essential treatment. Nobody gets told that they can't have their gallstones removed, their appendix out, or their heart surgery because the money has run out. What rationing there is, is of things like fertility treatment, weight loss surgery, counselling, etc.
Rationing is different from waiting lists, which do exist for some operations. Some expensive cancer drugs which only extend life by a few months have been denied because they are not cost-effective, which is a hard decision, but I think a correct one. Transplants are not available for everyone because of a shortage of donors.
Rationing is different from waiting lists, which do exist for some operations. Some expensive cancer drugs which only extend life by a few months have been denied because they are not cost-effective, which is a hard decision, but I think a correct one. Transplants are not available for everyone because of a shortage of donors.
#60
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,477
Re: Would you retire in the UK?
This is just a question .. If you know you are going to spend retirement years in UK can you stop US medicare payments. I likely won't but wondered if you can.