Tea Party

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 15th 2009, 6:25 pm
  #106  
Ivegotta Member
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 900
Triumphrob has a reputation beyond reputeTriumphrob has a reputation beyond reputeTriumphrob has a reputation beyond reputeTriumphrob has a reputation beyond reputeTriumphrob has a reputation beyond reputeTriumphrob has a reputation beyond reputeTriumphrob has a reputation beyond reputeTriumphrob has a reputation beyond reputeTriumphrob has a reputation beyond reputeTriumphrob has a reputation beyond reputeTriumphrob has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Tea Party

Now this is scary....
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8000763.stm
Triumphrob is offline  
Old Apr 15th 2009, 6:49 pm
  #107  
Unmitigated Gall
 
another bloody yank's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Location: it's still too dark to tell
Posts: 16,162
another bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Tea Party

Originally Posted by Triumphrob
It makes sense.

Would you say there was a growth of left wing activity and organization during, and in response to, Bush?
another bloody yank is offline  
Old Apr 15th 2009, 8:21 pm
  #108  
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,605
chartreuse is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Tea Party

Originally Posted by another bloody yank
Would you say there was a growth of left wing activity and organization during, and in response to, Bush?
Would you say that an organization, which depends for its existence on certain activity, would need to actually see an increase in such activity in order to claim that there was?
chartreuse is offline  
Old Apr 15th 2009, 8:45 pm
  #109  
The Unmod
 
paddingtongreen's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Glen Mills, PA
Posts: 8,870
paddingtongreen has a reputation beyond reputepaddingtongreen has a reputation beyond reputepaddingtongreen has a reputation beyond reputepaddingtongreen has a reputation beyond reputepaddingtongreen has a reputation beyond reputepaddingtongreen has a reputation beyond reputepaddingtongreen has a reputation beyond reputepaddingtongreen has a reputation beyond reputepaddingtongreen has a reputation beyond reputepaddingtongreen has a reputation beyond reputepaddingtongreen has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Tea Party

Originally Posted by chartreuse
Would you say that an organization, which depends for its existence on certain activity, would need to actually see an increase in such activity in order to claim that there was?


There were stories at the end of the cold war, of US and USSR spooks getting together and manufacturing scares for each other so they could keep their jobs.

It is true though, their job is to identify the shadows in the darkness, and then watch them to see if they move.
paddingtongreen is offline  
Old Apr 15th 2009, 9:32 pm
  #110  
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,605
chartreuse is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Tea Party

The backlash to that report has begun.

One quote that stood out was:
Originally Posted by Lamar Smith, R-Texas
"Their leftwing assessment identifies actual terrorist organizations, like the Earth Liberation Front and Animal Liberation Front. The rightwing report uses broad generalizations about veterans, pro-life groups, federalists and supporters of gun rights," said Smith. "That's like saying if you love puppies you might be susceptible to recruitment by the Animal Liberation Front. It is ridiculous and deeply offensive to millions of Americans."
chartreuse is offline  
Old Apr 15th 2009, 9:48 pm
  #111  
Forum Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 263
Islandgurl is just really niceIslandgurl is just really niceIslandgurl is just really niceIslandgurl is just really niceIslandgurl is just really niceIslandgurl is just really niceIslandgurl is just really niceIslandgurl is just really niceIslandgurl is just really niceIslandgurl is just really niceIslandgurl is just really nice
Default Re: Tea Party

Isn't forceable teabagging considered sexual assault?
Islandgurl is offline  
Old Apr 16th 2009, 2:41 am
  #112  
Not living a 9 to 5 life
 
NC Penguin's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,061
NC Penguin has a reputation beyond reputeNC Penguin has a reputation beyond reputeNC Penguin has a reputation beyond reputeNC Penguin has a reputation beyond reputeNC Penguin has a reputation beyond reputeNC Penguin has a reputation beyond reputeNC Penguin has a reputation beyond reputeNC Penguin has a reputation beyond reputeNC Penguin has a reputation beyond reputeNC Penguin has a reputation beyond reputeNC Penguin has a reputation beyond repute
Exclamation Re: Tea Party

Those tea parties are so bourgeois.
NC Penguin is offline  
Old Apr 16th 2009, 2:47 am
  #113  
Lapine Member
 
snowbunny's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Location: Austin, Texas in my own little world
Posts: 21,691
snowbunny has a reputation beyond reputesnowbunny has a reputation beyond reputesnowbunny has a reputation beyond reputesnowbunny has a reputation beyond reputesnowbunny has a reputation beyond reputesnowbunny has a reputation beyond reputesnowbunny has a reputation beyond reputesnowbunny has a reputation beyond reputesnowbunny has a reputation beyond reputesnowbunny has a reputation beyond reputesnowbunny has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Tea Party

chartreuse, tut tut! Quoting Fox News?

Never have liked Lamar Smith's brand of politics - but yeah, I'd have to say that someone who loves puppies *is more likely* to be a possible recruit for the Animal Liberation Front than someone who doesn't.
snowbunny is offline  
Old Apr 16th 2009, 11:43 am
  #114  
Unmitigated Gall
 
another bloody yank's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Location: it's still too dark to tell
Posts: 16,162
another bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Tea Party

Originally Posted by chartreuse
Would you say that an organization, which depends for its existence on certain activity, would need to actually see an increase in such activity in order to claim that there was?
Eh?
another bloody yank is offline  
Old Apr 16th 2009, 4:18 pm
  #115  
Unmitigated Gall
 
another bloody yank's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Location: it's still too dark to tell
Posts: 16,162
another bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Tea Party

Sigh.


MARINE PROTECTION, RESEARCH, AND SANCTUARIES
ACT OF 1972
[As Amended Through P.L. 106–580, Dec. 29, 2000]
AN ACT To regulate the transportation for dumping, and the dumping, of material
into ocean waters, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled, ¿33 U.S.C. 1401
ntÀ That this Act may be cited as the ‘‘Marine Protection, Research,
and Sanctuaries Act of 1972’’.
FINDING, POLICY, AND PURPOSE
SEC. 2. ¿33 U.S.C. 1401À (a) Unregulated dumping of material
into ocean waters endangers human health, welfare, and amenities,
and the marine environment, ecological systems, and economic
potentialities.
(b) The Congress declares that it is the policy of the United
States to regulate the dumping of all types of materials into ocean
waters and to prevent or strictly limit the dumping into ocean waters
of any material which would adversely affect human health,
welfare, or amenities, or the marine environment, ecological systems,
or economic potentialities.
(c) It is the purpose of this Act to regulate (1) the transportation
by any person of material from the United States and, in the
case of United States vessels, aircraft, or agencies, the transportation
of material from a location outside the United States, when
in either case the transportation is for the purpose of dumping the
material into ocean waters, and (2) the dumping of material transported
by any person from a location outside the United States, if
the dumping occurs in the territorial sea or the contiguous zone of
the United States.
another bloody yank is offline  
Old Apr 16th 2009, 4:26 pm
  #116  
WTF?
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Homeostasis
Posts: 79,367
Leslie has a reputation beyond reputeLeslie has a reputation beyond reputeLeslie has a reputation beyond reputeLeslie has a reputation beyond reputeLeslie has a reputation beyond reputeLeslie has a reputation beyond reputeLeslie has a reputation beyond reputeLeslie has a reputation beyond reputeLeslie has a reputation beyond reputeLeslie has a reputation beyond reputeLeslie has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Tea Party

Who will save Jenny?

http://www.wowowow.com/post/lily-tom...elephant-79334
Leslie is offline  
Old Apr 16th 2009, 4:40 pm
  #117  
Unmitigated Gall
 
another bloody yank's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Location: it's still too dark to tell
Posts: 16,162
another bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond reputeanother bloody yank has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Tea Party

Originally Posted by Leslie66
The Dallas Zoo must be stopped from dumping Jenny the retarded elephant in a Mexican drive through safari park where she will likely be shot by drug gangs.:curse::curse:

And people are worried about stupid crap like the economy...
another bloody yank is offline  
Old Apr 16th 2009, 4:53 pm
  #118  
 
meauxna's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 35,082
meauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Tea Party

Originally Posted by another bloody yank
Sigh.


MARINE PROTECTION, RESEARCH, AND SANCTUARIES
ACT OF 1972
Detective work cuts off flow of chicken goo into Columbia
The case stunk from the very beginning. A pair of law students had stood watch at the Foster Farms plant in Kelso, Wash., then followed a truckload of chicken carcasses to a fish processing plant near the mouth of the Columbia River.

There they observed the phantom pipeline, which spewed chicken parts into the air and belched chemically rendered goo into the water.


so it could be worse than tea...

do these guys think they made their point yesterday? I say 'not'. They only attached the teabags with paper clips!!! Not very committed IMO.


meauxna is offline  
Old Apr 16th 2009, 5:07 pm
  #119  
Sursum corda
 
cindyabs's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Location: Richmond Hill, GA USA
Posts: 38,860
cindyabs has a reputation beyond reputecindyabs has a reputation beyond reputecindyabs has a reputation beyond reputecindyabs has a reputation beyond reputecindyabs has a reputation beyond reputecindyabs has a reputation beyond reputecindyabs has a reputation beyond reputecindyabs has a reputation beyond reputecindyabs has a reputation beyond reputecindyabs has a reputation beyond reputecindyabs has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Tea Party

Originally Posted by meauxna
Detective work cuts off flow of chicken goo into Columbia
The case stunk from the very beginning. A pair of law students had stood watch at the Foster Farms plant in Kelso, Wash., then followed a truckload of chicken carcasses to a fish processing plant near the mouth of the Columbia River.

There they observed the phantom pipeline, which spewed chicken parts into the air and belched chemically rendered goo into the water.


so it could be worse than tea...

do these guys think they made their point yesterday? I say 'not'. They only attached the teabags with paper clips!!! Not very committed IMO.


http://blog.oregonlive.com/politics_...ay.272.cdb.jpg

No worse I guess than corks dangling.
Attached Images  
cindyabs is offline  
Old Apr 16th 2009, 5:26 pm
  #120  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Steerpike's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 13,111
Steerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Tea Party

Originally Posted by Leslie66
Oh that's just ****ing great.
At first I thought you were upset at the thought of shooting Hannity, then I figured you were pissed off that he's coming to Texas!

Originally Posted by Leslie66
So, whose taxes have gone up exactly?
Mine have gone down pretty steadily over the past few years; I have fixed state and federal withholdings (by choice), and my refund keeps going up. I'd happily pay more for the right reasons ...

Originally Posted by notacrime
The only people paying more tax this year than last are those that who earned more.
Next year, not this year .... and only those making over $250k.

Originally Posted by cindyabs
I think that's where some of the partisanship has come in, the anticpation that they will rise. BUT also could be a dissatifaction with what we're getting or NOT getting for monies spent by Washington, things that NEED to be paid for that have been discussed on here that are not because monies went elsewhere........
....
yeah, like a trillion dollars spent fighting a dumb war in Iraq. Donald Trump - not a radical Left winger - said on Larry King last night that we went after the wrong guys ...

What bothers me most about this 'Tea Party' shit is the active participation by Hannity et al. I acknowledge that the mainstream media bashed Bush pretty hard, but their main commentators didn't stand up and actually lead protests, like Hannity is doing. I hate those guys (Hannity, O'Reilly, and that utter moron Beck) more than Cheney at this point ....

Last edited by Steerpike; Apr 16th 2009 at 5:30 pm.
Steerpike is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.