![]() |
Re: Recession
Originally Posted by Nu-Shooz
(Post 5355449)
Great, love to be able to do that. Purse strings abit tight:frown: So is it Yorkshire?
|
Re: Recession
Originally Posted by Jerseygirl
(Post 5355455)
Sorry I forgot to say where...I edited my previous post. No it will be in Cheshire.
|
Re: Recession
Originally Posted by Nu-Shooz
(Post 5355457)
You posh buggers!!! really expensive there innit?
|
Re: Recession
Originally Posted by Elvira
(Post 5321730)
Houses may become cheaper :thumbup:
Little sympathy for BTL folks either regardless of their backgrounds - they have taken a gamble and done very well recently so they need to be able to take the good with the bad. In addition I have general misgivings about anyone who makes money out of residential property - you are making your cash at the expense of your neighbours, so again, imo you deserve little sympathy. |
Re: Recession
Originally Posted by BigDavyG
(Post 5357140)
Yep - as long as I keep my job its good news for me :thumbup:
Little sympathy for BTL folks either regardless of their backgrounds - they have taken a gamble and done very well recently so they need to be able to take the good with the bad. In addition I have general misgivings about anyone who makes money out of residential property - you are making your cash at the expense of your neighbours, so again, imo you deserve little sympathy. |
Re: Recession
Originally Posted by Elvira
(Post 5358071)
But surely there is a need for rental property, and thus landlords - not everyone wants or is able to buy.
Of course its somewhat unfortunate that this role used to be handled by the state in many cases, then maggie decided to buy a few votes and use people's taxes so sell houses to people who pay less tax, and in many cases actually take more from the system than they paid in. |
Re: Recession
Originally Posted by BigDavyG
(Post 5361480)
One would assume that it becomes a problem when 90% of the population want to have a go at being a landlord.
Of course its somewhat unfortunate that this role used to be handled by the state in many cases, then maggie decided to buy a few votes and use people's taxes so sell houses to people who pay less tax, and in many cases actually take more from the system than they paid in. |
Re: Recession
Originally Posted by Sally
(Post 5362070)
What I find crazy is the government now paying private landlords who have bought up council houses the rent for their tenants.
To take the thread completely off on a tangent why is it seemingly acceptable that year on year the rate of sickness amongst public sector workers massively outstrips that in the private sector ?? :curse: |
Re: Recession
Originally Posted by BigDavyG
(Post 5364791)
Yep - kind of like any form of privatisation really - if the government can't find the right people to run it efficiently and profitably themselves then they shouldn't be in government.
To take the thread completely off on a tangent why is it seemingly acceptable that year on year the rate of sickness amongst public sector workers massively outstrips that in the private sector ?? :curse: |
Re: Recession
Originally Posted by BigDavyG
(Post 5364791)
Yep - kind of like any form of privatisation really - if the government can't find the right people to run it efficiently and profitably themselves then they shouldn't be in government.
To take the thread completely off on a tangent why is it seemingly acceptable that year on year the rate of sickness amongst public sector workers massively outstrips that in the private sector ?? :curse: |
Re: Recession
Originally Posted by BigDavyG
(Post 5364791)
Yep - kind of like any form of privatisation really - if the government can't find the right people to run it efficiently and profitably themselves then they shouldn't be in government.
To take the thread completely off on a tangent why is it seemingly acceptable that year on year the rate of sickness amongst public sector workers massively outstrips that in the private sector ?? :curse: |
Re: Recession
Originally Posted by Sally
(Post 5366465)
Dunno but I certainly got fed up covering for people on the 'sick'.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7030723.stm The tenants have perpetuated a fraud motivated by what I can only describe as greed (they are on benefits - was that not enough free stuff for them ??). If they had wanted to leave the house to their kids the kids could have bought it on their behalf (happens a lot) - unless of course the kids are dole spongers too (ok - so I have no idea what age the kids are). The tenants were clearly encouraged to make the purchase and commit the fraud by the mortgage company who will no doubt now be the proud possessors (no pun intended) of an ex-council house purchased at a massive discount. Will anyone be prosecuted over this - unlikely. Who loses out - well the mortgage firm get the house at a nice discount for minimal risk, the tenants will no doubt get a new house (and maybe have to pay some fines at 50p a week out of their benefits), but joe taxpayer sees yet another state owned asset sold off at a massive discount. |
Re: Recession
Originally Posted by BigDavyG
(Post 5396114)
Here's an interesting article - I wonder how many times this has happened recently...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7030723.stm The tenants have perpetuated a fraud motivated by what I can only describe as greed (they are on benefits - was that not enough free stuff for them ??). If they had wanted to leave the house to their kids the kids could have bought it on their behalf (happens a lot) - unless of course the kids are dole spongers too (ok - so I have no idea what age the kids are). The tenants were clearly encouraged to make the purchase and commit the fraud by the mortgage company who will no doubt now be the proud possessors (no pun intended) of an ex-council house purchased at a massive discount. Will anyone be prosecuted over this - unlikely. Who loses out - well the mortgage firm get the house at a nice discount for minimal risk, the tenants will no doubt get a new house (and maybe have to pay some fines at 50p a week out of their benefits), but joe taxpayer sees yet another state owned asset sold off at a massive discount. Absolutely criminal. |
Re: Recession
Originally Posted by Sally
(Post 5396240)
"Despite being in their late 50s, on benefits and in poor health, David and Maureen Bradbury were given a 25-year mortgage worth £55,000 by London and Scottish Bank."
Absolutely criminal. A couple were interviewed on BBC news earlier, similar situation except the guy was employed. Apparently they were told the monthly payments would not go above 400, but after 3 months they went up to 700 and then later on to 900. This just doesn't make sense to me. At current tracker rates, that would be what you'd pay on a mortgage of about 130k, but this was just a pokey little terrace. Plus, I just don't see how mortgage payments would more than double in a few months ... I think the financial services industry has a lot to answer for over the last few years, with endowment mis-selling, ramping up stock prices in the 90's, and now the crazy housing/motgage situation. |
Re: Recession
Payments can double and more because of escrow for taxes...we could not keep up with ours or change to a non tax escrow loan so we paid the house off...some places want to hold $2k or more in escrow for your taxes at all times...even the day after payout...
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 3:41 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.