Wikiposts

Bad times ahead for GB ?

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 8th 2013, 6:45 am
  #16  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 41,518
Sally Redux has a reputation beyond reputeSally Redux has a reputation beyond reputeSally Redux has a reputation beyond reputeSally Redux has a reputation beyond reputeSally Redux has a reputation beyond reputeSally Redux has a reputation beyond reputeSally Redux has a reputation beyond reputeSally Redux has a reputation beyond reputeSally Redux has a reputation beyond reputeSally Redux has a reputation beyond reputeSally Redux has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Bad times ahead for GB ?

Originally Posted by Pulaski
Well the USPS has to fund its pension liabilities, unlike the Federal government which has "borrowed" the SS trust fund making payment of future social security dependent on future contributions and the ability of the Federal government to create a budget surplus ( ) or borrow even more money.
Do the private postal services have to as well? (I don't know).
Sally Redux is offline  
Old Feb 8th 2013, 6:45 am
  #17  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Michael's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 10,678
Michael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Bad times ahead for GB ?

Originally Posted by Sally Redux
Isn't something to with having to pay pensions upfront?

They really ought to look at their customer service though. The staff are generally vile and everything takes an eternity at the counter.
It is. Republicans want to make USPS insolvent so they passed a law to make USPS pay for pensions for the next 75 years so that postal delivery will become privatized.

Then they borrow that money to pay for general fund expenditures so they won't have to raise taxes.
Michael is offline  
Old Feb 8th 2013, 6:51 am
  #18  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Michael's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 10,678
Michael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Bad times ahead for GB ?

Originally Posted by Sally Redux
Do the private postal services have to as well? (I don't know).
In a sense, yes but their pensions are backed by the government Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) so if they go bankrupt, the government foots the bill.

Although private pensions are supposed to be 100% funded, private pensions are currently underfunded by about $400 billion.
Michael is offline  
Old Feb 8th 2013, 6:51 am
  #19  
 
Pulaski's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Dixie, ex UK
Posts: 52,622
Pulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Bad times ahead for GB ?

Originally Posted by Sally Redux
Do the private postal services have to as well? (I don't know).
I doubt they were provide (UK speak) "company pensions" for many/ any of their employees. They likely do however provide a 401k scheme with some employer match, (3-4% match after 12 months employment would be typical) but that match element would be the end of their liability to provide post-employment income for retirees.
Pulaski is offline  
Old Feb 8th 2013, 6:54 am
  #20  
 
Pulaski's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Dixie, ex UK
Posts: 52,622
Pulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Bad times ahead for GB ?

Originally Posted by Michael
It is. Republicans want to make USPS insolvent so they passed a law to make USPS pay for pensions for the next 75 years so that postal delivery will become privatized.

Then they borrow that money to pay for general fund expenditures so they won't have to raise taxes.
The credibility of your analysis is severely compromised by your unsupported political rhetoric.
Pulaski is offline  
Old Feb 8th 2013, 6:56 am
  #21  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Michael's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 10,678
Michael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Bad times ahead for GB ?

Originally Posted by Pulaski
I doubt they were provide (UK speak) "company pensions" for many/ any of their employees. They likely do however provide a 401k scheme with some employer match, (3-4% match after 12 months employment would be typical) but that match element would be the end of their liability to provide post-employment income for retirees.
There are still quite a few old companies that provide standard pensions such as AT&T.
Michael is offline  
Old Feb 8th 2013, 6:57 am
  #22  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 41,518
Sally Redux has a reputation beyond reputeSally Redux has a reputation beyond reputeSally Redux has a reputation beyond reputeSally Redux has a reputation beyond reputeSally Redux has a reputation beyond reputeSally Redux has a reputation beyond reputeSally Redux has a reputation beyond reputeSally Redux has a reputation beyond reputeSally Redux has a reputation beyond reputeSally Redux has a reputation beyond reputeSally Redux has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Bad times ahead for GB ?

Originally Posted by Pulaski
The credibility of your analysis is severely compromised by your unsupported political rhetoric.
It certainly makes it harder for them to compete on a level playing field.

Also I believe they've been prevented from raising the cost of stamps to a realistic price.
Sally Redux is offline  
Old Feb 8th 2013, 7:03 am
  #23  
 
Pulaski's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Dixie, ex UK
Posts: 52,622
Pulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Bad times ahead for GB ?

Originally Posted by Michael
There are still quite a few old companies that provide standard pensions such as AT&T.
But many have scrapped them for newly hired employees, or for all employees after a certain date. I work for an "old" company which closed its pension to new hires a year or so after I joined, and froze it completely two years later, so I will eventually get a pension, but only based on about three or four years service around 2003-2006.
Pulaski is offline  
Old Feb 8th 2013, 7:11 am
  #24  
 
Pulaski's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Dixie, ex UK
Posts: 52,622
Pulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Bad times ahead for GB ?

Originally Posted by Sally Redux
It certainly makes it harder for them to compete on a level playing field. .....
If they wanted to do that they should scrap the USPS pension in favour of a 401k.
.... Also, I believe they've been prevented from raising the cost of stamps to a realistic price.
I wish they'd raise the bulk (junk) mail rate - which is still as little as 10¢ for delivery of "paper for recycling". ..... I suspect that the USPS could solve much of its problem by raising the bulk mail rate, .... however the Direct Mail Association (or whatever they call themselves) has a powerful lobby in DC.
Pulaski is offline  
Old Feb 8th 2013, 7:14 am
  #25  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 41,518
Sally Redux has a reputation beyond reputeSally Redux has a reputation beyond reputeSally Redux has a reputation beyond reputeSally Redux has a reputation beyond reputeSally Redux has a reputation beyond reputeSally Redux has a reputation beyond reputeSally Redux has a reputation beyond reputeSally Redux has a reputation beyond reputeSally Redux has a reputation beyond reputeSally Redux has a reputation beyond reputeSally Redux has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Bad times ahead for GB ?

Originally Posted by Pulaski
If they wanted to do that they should scrap the USPS pension in favour of a 401k.

I wish they'd raise the bulk (junk) mail rate - which is still as little as 10¢ for delivery of "paper for recycling". ..... I suspect that the USPS could solve much of its problem by raising the bulk mail rate, .... however the Direct Mail Association (or whatever they call themselves) has a powerful lobby in DC.
I thought that was the whole point though, they can't choose on the pensions.

That junk mail is disgusting and should be prosecuted for crimes against trees
Sally Redux is offline  
Old Feb 8th 2013, 7:19 am
  #26  
 
Pulaski's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Dixie, ex UK
Posts: 52,622
Pulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Bad times ahead for GB ?

Originally Posted by Sally Redux
..... That junk mail is disgusting and should be prosecuted for crimes against trees
On that we do agree!
Pulaski is offline  
Old Feb 8th 2013, 7:22 am
  #27  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Michael's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 10,678
Michael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Bad times ahead for GB ?

Originally Posted by Pulaski
The credibility of your analysis is severely compromised by your unsupported political rhetoric.
That could be debatable since the republicans will never admit it.

But if you look at what they did with Medicare, that seems to be the poster child of what they want to do.

In 2003, they passed Medicare reform which reduced the solvency of Medicare by 15 years and started "Medicare Advantage" at 14% more cost than traditional Medicare for the same coverage. They also passed the prescription drug program with private companies selling plans where the government pays 75% of the cost of drugs and the bill contained a provision that the government couldn't negotiate reduced drug prices.

The republicans opposed the provisions in health care reform to reduce the 14% subsidy, the negotiation with drug companies to fill the donut hole, and the reduction in payments to doctors and hospitals to extend the life of Medicare for another 8 years. They also called end of life consoling "death panels" but that could save the Medicare a lot of money.

Everything seemed to be aimed at making Medicare insolvent and therefore privatizing Medicare with additional costs being passed on to the consumer. It seemed to be a bait and switch tactic where they give everyone what they want but then pull the rug out from under them when Medicare runs out of money.

Last edited by Michael; Feb 8th 2013 at 7:32 am.
Michael is offline  
Old Feb 8th 2013, 7:26 am
  #28  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 12,897
Giantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Bad times ahead for GB ?

Originally Posted by Sally Redux
I thought that was the whole point though, they can't choose on the pensions.
I doubt the Republicans would stand in the way of closing the USPS pension plan to future enrollees. Or of removing retirement health benefits. A more likely obstacle is USPS's union contract.

I do agree with Michael that there's a lot of politics wrapped up in this.

Can the USPS declare bankruptcy I wonder, and simply shovel its pension obligations to the PBGC?

Last edited by Giantaxe; Feb 8th 2013 at 7:28 am.
Giantaxe is offline  
Old Feb 8th 2013, 7:54 am
  #29  
Deep in the woods of CT
 
Nutmegger's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 7,017
Nutmegger has a reputation beyond reputeNutmegger has a reputation beyond reputeNutmegger has a reputation beyond reputeNutmegger has a reputation beyond reputeNutmegger has a reputation beyond reputeNutmegger has a reputation beyond reputeNutmegger has a reputation beyond reputeNutmegger has a reputation beyond reputeNutmegger has a reputation beyond reputeNutmegger has a reputation beyond reputeNutmegger has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Bad times ahead for GB ?

Originally Posted by robin1234
What about books though? I recently ordered two used books, from two different bookstores using abebooks.com. Both came via USPS, they have a very preferential media rate.. I'm not sure if FedEx, UPS etc. compete when it comes to books and other similar media..
I read that Saturday delivery of packages will continue, as packages are the most profitable part of USPS's operation -- it is just letters that are becoming obsolete and won't be delivered on Saturdays.
Nutmegger is offline  
Old Feb 8th 2013, 8:51 am
  #30  
Member
 
jeffreyhy's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,049
jeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Bad times ahead for GB ?

I support the USPS by using the postage-paid envelope often provided to send junk mail back to whence it came.

Regards, JEff


Originally Posted by Pulaski
I wish they'd raise the bulk (junk) mail rate - which is still as little as 10¢ for delivery of "paper for recycling". ..... I suspect that the USPS could solve much of its problem by raising the bulk mail rate, .... however the Direct Mail Association (or whatever they call themselves) has a powerful lobby in DC.
jeffreyhy is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.