Anyone any good at maths ?
#16
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Sep 2008
Location: Bouncing between Canada and US
Posts: 2,512
Re: Anyone any good at maths ?
I've got it... but will post in a minute...
Last edited by DeanUK2US; Oct 16th 2009 at 9:24 am.
#18
Re: Anyone any good at maths ?
I won't claim to have worked it out, I had to google it and i'm still slightly confused
A word triangle is created by taking a word, putting the first letter on the first line, putting two of the second letter on the next line, three of the third letter on the third line, et cetera. Given the word TEASER, the word triangle would look like this:
T
EE
AAA
SSSS
EEEEE
RRRRRR
If you begin at the top and start spelling TEASER by either moving to the letter directly below the letter you are currently on or by moving to the letter that is immediately to the right of the letter below the letter you are currently on, you could use several different paths to spell the word. For instance, if your path takes you to the third 'A' you could either go to the third 'S' or the fourth 'S', but not to the first or second 'S'.
Answer
2^5 = 32
#19
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Dec 2002
Location: Richmond Hill, Ga (ex Birmingham UK)
Posts: 490
Re: Anyone any good at maths ?
Strongl;y suspect that its not a simple answer - rather a matter of drawing paths from each letter you choose to the next and so on - you can only go to the next letter if it is directly below - or one to the left or one to the right - so if you chose the leftmost H - you have two O's to choose from - but if you choose the rightmost H - then you have all 3 O's to choose from
I don't know if this is the answer - but it would limit the choices and possibly end up like a Fibonacci sequence=
2 + 7 + 10 + 13 = 32
I don't know if this is the answer - but it would limit the choices and possibly end up like a Fibonacci sequence=
2 + 7 + 10 + 13 = 32
#21
Chocoholic !
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: Houston, TX - Officially Not Shit since 2009
Posts: 2,324
Re: Anyone any good at maths ?
He apparently gets 80% for getting it wrong anyway as he showed his working out and explained his process and remembered to have it signed by yours truly. It's not the 105% he usually gets but hey I'll take the 80
#22
Re: Anyone any good at maths ?
If you begin at the top and start spelling TEASER by either moving to the letter directly below the letter you are currently on or by moving to the letter that is immediately to the right of the letter below the letter you are currently on, you could use several different paths to spell the word. For instance, if your path takes you to the third 'A' you could either go to the third 'S' or the fourth 'S', but not to the first or second 'S'.
Answer
2^5 = 32
Answer
2^5 = 32
#23
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: Oz -> UK -> San Diego
Posts: 9,912
Re: Anyone any good at maths ?
Yeah, but the teacher did not give the path restriction. The example you give looks like paths to leaf nodes on binary trees, whereas the original (with no description) is a factorial. Tell the teacher to read Knuth's work on computer algorithms before assigning homework!
#24
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Sep 2008
Location: Bouncing between Canada and US
Posts: 2,512
Re: Anyone any good at maths ?
You would think the teacher would have explained to them rather than just telling them the answer
I won't claim to have worked it out, I had to google it and i'm still slightly confused
A word triangle is created by taking a word, putting the first letter on the first line, putting two of the second letter on the next line, three of the third letter on the third line, et cetera. Given the word TEASER, the word triangle would look like this:
T
EE
AAA
SSSS
EEEEE
RRRRRR
If you begin at the top and start spelling TEASER by either moving to the letter directly below the letter you are currently on or by moving to the letter that is immediately to the right of the letter below the letter you are currently on, you could use several different paths to spell the word. For instance, if your path takes you to the third 'A' you could either go to the third 'S' or the fourth 'S', but not to the first or second 'S'.
Answer
2^5 = 32
I won't claim to have worked it out, I had to google it and i'm still slightly confused
A word triangle is created by taking a word, putting the first letter on the first line, putting two of the second letter on the next line, three of the third letter on the third line, et cetera. Given the word TEASER, the word triangle would look like this:
T
EE
AAA
SSSS
EEEEE
RRRRRR
If you begin at the top and start spelling TEASER by either moving to the letter directly below the letter you are currently on or by moving to the letter that is immediately to the right of the letter below the letter you are currently on, you could use several different paths to spell the word. For instance, if your path takes you to the third 'A' you could either go to the third 'S' or the fourth 'S', but not to the first or second 'S'.
Answer
2^5 = 32
#25
Re: Anyone any good at maths ?
Yeah, but the teacher did not give the path restriction. The example you give looks like paths to leaf nodes on binary trees, whereas the original (with no description) is a factorial. Tell the teacher to read Knuth's work on computer algorithms before assigning homework!
Can't wait for my kid to reach 5th grade
#26
Chocoholic !
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2007
Location: Houston, TX - Officially Not Shit since 2009
Posts: 2,324
Re: Anyone any good at maths ?
Yeah, but the teacher did not give the path restriction. The example you give looks like paths to leaf nodes on binary trees, whereas the original (with no description) is a factorial. Tell the teacher to read Knuth's work on computer algorithms before assigning homework!
#27
Re: Anyone any good at maths ?
I tell ya, my 4th grader brought home a logic puzzle - the kind found in game magazines to fill in - and it was hard! It was three way instead of simply two way - a person's name, what they saw, and how they felt about seeing it!
They used "boy" and "girl" as some of the clues, but the names they gave these kids weren't like John, Bob, Mary and Anne. They were modern and inclusive like Brittany - that was one of the names. I kept muttering "Brittany had better be an effing girl" under my breath.
They used "boy" and "girl" as some of the clues, but the names they gave these kids weren't like John, Bob, Mary and Anne. They were modern and inclusive like Brittany - that was one of the names. I kept muttering "Brittany had better be an effing girl" under my breath.
#28
Re: Anyone any good at maths ?
Actually no, as written the 6! is correct (and would only spell ghosts) as was pointed out. It's only when you add the route restriction you get a reduced number of computations. For instance in 6! (and as written in the OP) the sequence 1, 2, 1, 4, 2, 1 would be acceptable and spell GHOSTS but with the made up restriction that you can't go backwards when you move down a line it is not acceptable. I would write to the teacher and say they are wrong if they really did word the question like that.
#29
Re: Anyone any good at maths ?
Apparently your 10 seconds of thought didn't give you time to understand your own answer then. 6! is the correct answer to spell GHOSTS (and only GHOSTS) if there is not path restriction moving from one row to the next.
#30
Re: Anyone any good at maths ?
Strongl;y suspect that its not a simple answer - rather a matter of drawing paths from each letter you choose to the next and so on - you can only go to the next letter if it is directly below - or one to the left or one to the right - so if you chose the leftmost H - you have two O's to choose from - but if you choose the rightmost H - then you have all 3 O's to choose from
I don't know if this is the answer - but it would limit the choices and possibly end up like a Fibonacci sequence=
2 + 7 + 10 + 13 = 32
I don't know if this is the answer - but it would limit the choices and possibly end up like a Fibonacci sequence=
2 + 7 + 10 + 13 = 32
Whether that rule was explained by the teacher is in some doubt, since factorials and the Fibonacci sequence are way over the heads of many teachers who are supposed to teach the subject.