Racial unrest in the UK
#16
Banned
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,393
Re: Racial unrest in the UK
Originally Posted by LakesLassie
That's a tricky one CN and I don't have the answers either. I remember the fuss in the UK when Hong Kong was being "handed back" to China and there was a rush for British passports. Not the sort of issue where you'll ever please everyone
I just want to know from you, as a British do you think that all these people from Chine/Hong Kong should be given British Passporys?
Do they have the same right to live their way of life in Britain as you live your way of life in britain as a British?
And what if it doesn;t works?
#17
Banned
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,393
Re: Racial unrest in the UK
Originally Posted by Jammy_Dodgers
If it causes that much upset to christians, jews or muslims that they cant wear religious icon at school just leave france...simple !!
I remeber the Islamic scholar "Al Tantawi" of egypt, declared that Muslims have no right to protest the French headscarf ban law. Its not a muslim country.
But on the other quarter, the North-Africa dismissed the calls of Tantawi by saying that Tantawi has no right of saying that! Its a French internal matter and the French must solve it out!
Now this makes me confuse
#18
Up in the air
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: I'm global baby!!!!!!
Posts: 7,263
Re: Racial unrest in the UK
Originally Posted by CasaNova
I remeber the Islamic scholar "Al Tantawi" of egypt, declared that Muslims have no right to protest the French headscarf ban law. Its not a muslim country.
However, there are many different interpretations of Islam, why can it not be left to the individual on how they wish to interpret the texts, rather than be forced to follow someones interpretation ??
I was told that the koran only says that women should cover their hair when praying.??
#19
Banned
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,393
Re: Racial unrest in the UK
Originally Posted by Jammy_Dodgers
I agree.
However, there are many different interpretations of Islam, why can it not be left to the individual on how they wish to interpret the texts, rather than be forced to follow someones interpretation ??
I was told that the koran only says that women should cover their hair when praying.??
However, there are many different interpretations of Islam, why can it not be left to the individual on how they wish to interpret the texts, rather than be forced to follow someones interpretation ??
I was told that the koran only says that women should cover their hair when praying.??
You must understand that Religion and Culture is two different entity! many people take the culture of Arabia and brand the Religion to it. Which is tottally wrong
Not just Holy Qu'ran but also its said in the Bible that women should dress in modesty till the end of times. even if we see the pictures of Holy Mary and she is dressed in modesty, same as you see a Muslim.
if you see a Muslim women from Europe and Africa, you will see that they are not as same as what you see here in Arabia.
Holy Qu'ran has one interpretation, but the path chosen by the Individual is based on the knowledge he posses.
The hair must be covered while praying to avoid distraction but to cover once face depends on the Individual.
It's like I ask you for your heart but you wanna give me your life. So basically these women or people think they will be holier by covering up than what is asked for.
#20
Re: Racial unrest in the UK
Originally Posted by Jammy_Dodgers
If only the migrants to the UK or EU did the same.
If you move/live in another country you have to accept it the way you find it, not try to change it because it does not fit in to your religious or moral point of view.
If you move/live in another country you have to accept it the way you find it, not try to change it because it does not fit in to your religious or moral point of view.
Originally Posted by china syndrome
The emerging problems in other more 'tolerant' countries is that if some people are not happy .... and show their discontent ... They know that in such transparent societies such events will be publicised and any hint at deportation etc will be met with a (I can hear it now) shouts of 'human right violations' ... I agree with you, we as expats ... have to abide by the laws and rules of that country we are guests in.
Point #2. The Western European countries were not "secular states" from the day when the first Caucasian decided to migrate Westwards. These countries were originally theocracies, just like Iran or Saudi Arabia. The separation of Church and State in Europe only came about starting in the 18th century after efforts by secular thinkers to change the system.
Now ... why is it that the secular thinkers had a right to demand a change in the system of their country, but a person with a religious outlook must accept secularism, or "leave the country"?
I thought the whole point of "liberal democracy" is that *any* citizen, irrespective of his or her ethnic origin, has the right to disagree with the way things are run, and to work towards changing the system.
It is not just certain Muslims who disagree with secularism ... in the US, there is a very strong Christian Fundamentalist lobby who want to convert the country to a Christian theocracy. Some of these Christians pursue the path through peaceful & democratic means. Others take the path of violence, such as the Fundamentalists who bombed abortion clinics.
So ... why is it that when a European Muslim with brown skin demands change, he is immediately labelled a "traitor" and asked to "go home" but when a Caucasian Christian bombs a clinic, there are no accusations of treachery or demands for "exile" (because "exile" is what it would be if a British or French Muslim is removed from the country)?!
#21
Forum Regular
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: dubai
Posts: 160
Re: Racial unrest in the UK
Originally Posted by Sid2
Point #1. Large-scale immigration to European countries stopped in the late 60's after the imposition of restrictive laws. The young people protesting in the streets are *not* "immigrants", they are citizens! Certainly, they are the sons and daughters of migrants, but they themselves were born in Europe and the citizenship they hold is of Britain or France. Hence, if you're asking them to "go home" then "home" for them is not Pakistan or Morrocco ... it is Bradford or one of the Paris "banlieues".
#22
Re: Racial unrest in the UK
Originally Posted by alowicious_28
You are right, us expats do have to abide by the rules of the country,as we would expect others to do so in our own countries, but it is easy to forget where you are sometimes. This was my first Ramadan in this country and I once forgot that it was a holy month and I went shopping and chewed gum. It was only when I passed a closed cafe that I remembered :-( I felt awful and thought that the Muslims must have thought I was really disrespectful. I didn't mean to be. Sometimes our own countries habits are hard to forget.
#23
Re: Racial unrest in the UK
Originally Posted by barsha barbie
You don't see any riots here!
#24
Re: Racial unrest in the UK
Originally Posted by MJC
Except at closing time at DD, Longs, Fibbers, the list is endless!!
#25
Up in the air
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: I'm global baby!!!!!!
Posts: 7,263
Re: Racial unrest in the UK
Originally Posted by NooNoo
PMSL - you know her too well!!!
#26
Re: Racial unrest in the UK
Originally Posted by barsha barbie
Both my grandfathers were posted to Bahrain in the 60's (RAF, Merchant Marines), my parents grew up in Bahrain, I was born in Bahrain ...... You don't see any riots here!
Here's what Amnesty had to say about the place a few years back:
http://web.amnesty.org/library/index/ENGMDE110181996
The Gulf State of Bahrain...has witnessed increasing political unrest and violence since the end of 1994. At least 22 people have been killed...and thousands of people have been arrested, including women and children. ... In early 1996, violence escalated with bomb explosions in hotels, restaurants and outside a bank.
The Government has responded to the unrest with widespread arbitrary arrests, apparent extrajudicial killings, imprisonment of prisoners of conscience, torture and the death sentence .... The government has also continued a policy of forcible exile of its own nationals.
#27
Forum Regular
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: dubai
Posts: 160
Re: Racial unrest in the UK
Originally Posted by Sid2
Ah, yes! Bahrain .....
Here's what Amnesty had to say about the place a few years back:
http://web.amnesty.org/library/index/ENGMDE110181996
Here's what Amnesty had to say about the place a few years back:
http://web.amnesty.org/library/index/ENGMDE110181996
all i really wanted was to agree with CN that they have the resident laws here right!
#28
Re: Racial unrest in the UK
Unlike the UAE, we tried to understand other cultures and religions and believed we could live quite happily alongside other peoples to the point of making them fellow citizens.
The UAE succeeds in racial and religious harmony because it does not recognise all cultures as equal to the native culture in their homeland. Expats here have boundries and those who cross them are punished and/or ejected. These are simple rules that have allowed Emiratis to be the rulers of their own country even when they form the minority of the population.
Taking the UK as an example, we have failed because we are at the point where anything too 'traditional' (even petty stuff like dressing 'properly' for certain occassions, waving the odd flag or admitting to being even slightly patriotic - especially for the English) is considered the domain of the racist idiot. Today we are desperate not to be seen as racist (which is of course a good thing) but we do it at the expense of not loving our own people and culture before others in our own land.
There is simply no way anyone can integrate into a society that hates itself...
My radical solution would be to strip citizenship of all people who do not culturally identify with any of the native populations of the UK (English, Irish, Scottish, Welsh etc) and instead give life residences for people who wish to stay and work or marry UK citizens. In order to get citizenship I would ask people to renounce their original culture, take up a name of British origin and swear to put British culture before any other...
In short I'd do exactly what the Japanese do.
The UAE succeeds in racial and religious harmony because it does not recognise all cultures as equal to the native culture in their homeland. Expats here have boundries and those who cross them are punished and/or ejected. These are simple rules that have allowed Emiratis to be the rulers of their own country even when they form the minority of the population.
Taking the UK as an example, we have failed because we are at the point where anything too 'traditional' (even petty stuff like dressing 'properly' for certain occassions, waving the odd flag or admitting to being even slightly patriotic - especially for the English) is considered the domain of the racist idiot. Today we are desperate not to be seen as racist (which is of course a good thing) but we do it at the expense of not loving our own people and culture before others in our own land.
There is simply no way anyone can integrate into a society that hates itself...
My radical solution would be to strip citizenship of all people who do not culturally identify with any of the native populations of the UK (English, Irish, Scottish, Welsh etc) and instead give life residences for people who wish to stay and work or marry UK citizens. In order to get citizenship I would ask people to renounce their original culture, take up a name of British origin and swear to put British culture before any other...
In short I'd do exactly what the Japanese do.
#29
Re: Racial unrest in the UK
Originally Posted by Norm_uk
Unlike the UAE, we tried to understand other cultures and religions and believed we could live quite happily alongside other peoples to the point of making them fellow citizens.
The UAE succeeds in racial and religious harmony because it does not recognise all cultures as equal to the native culture in their homeland. Expats here have boundries and those who cross them are punished and/or ejected. These are simple rules that have allowed Emiratis to be the rulers of their own country even when they form the minority of the population.
Taking the UK as an example, we have failed because we are at the point where anything too 'traditional' (even petty stuff like dressing 'properly' for certain occassions, waving the odd flag or admitting to being even slightly patriotic - especially for the English) is considered the domain of the racist idiot. Today we are desperate not to be seen as racist (which is of course a good thing) but we do it at the expense of not loving our own people and culture before others in our own land.
There is simply no way anyone can integrate into a society that hates itself...
My radical solution would be to strip citizenship of all people who do not culturally identify with any of the native populations of the UK (English, Irish, Scottish, Welsh etc) and instead give life residences for people who wish to stay and work or marry UK citizens. In order to get citizenship I would ask people to renounce their original culture, take up a name of British origin and swear to put British culture before any other...
In short I'd do exactly what the Japanese do.
The UAE succeeds in racial and religious harmony because it does not recognise all cultures as equal to the native culture in their homeland. Expats here have boundries and those who cross them are punished and/or ejected. These are simple rules that have allowed Emiratis to be the rulers of their own country even when they form the minority of the population.
Taking the UK as an example, we have failed because we are at the point where anything too 'traditional' (even petty stuff like dressing 'properly' for certain occassions, waving the odd flag or admitting to being even slightly patriotic - especially for the English) is considered the domain of the racist idiot. Today we are desperate not to be seen as racist (which is of course a good thing) but we do it at the expense of not loving our own people and culture before others in our own land.
There is simply no way anyone can integrate into a society that hates itself...
My radical solution would be to strip citizenship of all people who do not culturally identify with any of the native populations of the UK (English, Irish, Scottish, Welsh etc) and instead give life residences for people who wish to stay and work or marry UK citizens. In order to get citizenship I would ask people to renounce their original culture, take up a name of British origin and swear to put British culture before any other...
In short I'd do exactly what the Japanese do.
#30
Forum Regular
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: dubai
Posts: 160
Re: Racial unrest in the UK
Originally Posted by Norm_uk
Unlike the UAE, we tried to understand other cultures and religions and believed we could live quite happily alongside other peoples to the point of making them fellow citizens.
The UAE succeeds in racial and religious harmony because it does not recognise all cultures as equal to the native culture in their homeland. Expats here have boundries and those who cross them are punished and/or ejected. These are simple rules that have allowed Emiratis to be the rulers of their own country even when they form the minority of the population.
Taking the UK as an example, we have failed because we are at the point where anything too 'traditional' (even petty stuff like dressing 'properly' for certain occassions, waving the odd flag or admitting to being even slightly patriotic - especially for the English) is considered the domain of the racist idiot. Today we are desperate not to be seen as racist (which is of course a good thing) but we do it at the expense of not loving our own people and culture before others in our own land.
There is simply no way anyone can integrate into a society that hates itself...
My radical solution would be to strip citizenship of all people who do not culturally identify with any of the native populations of the UK (English, Irish, Scottish, Welsh etc) and instead give life residences for people who wish to stay and work or marry UK citizens. In order to get citizenship I would ask people to renounce their original culture, take up a name of British origin and swear to put British culture before any other...
In short I'd do exactly what the Japanese do.
The UAE succeeds in racial and religious harmony because it does not recognise all cultures as equal to the native culture in their homeland. Expats here have boundries and those who cross them are punished and/or ejected. These are simple rules that have allowed Emiratis to be the rulers of their own country even when they form the minority of the population.
Taking the UK as an example, we have failed because we are at the point where anything too 'traditional' (even petty stuff like dressing 'properly' for certain occassions, waving the odd flag or admitting to being even slightly patriotic - especially for the English) is considered the domain of the racist idiot. Today we are desperate not to be seen as racist (which is of course a good thing) but we do it at the expense of not loving our own people and culture before others in our own land.
There is simply no way anyone can integrate into a society that hates itself...
My radical solution would be to strip citizenship of all people who do not culturally identify with any of the native populations of the UK (English, Irish, Scottish, Welsh etc) and instead give life residences for people who wish to stay and work or marry UK citizens. In order to get citizenship I would ask people to renounce their original culture, take up a name of British origin and swear to put British culture before any other...
In short I'd do exactly what the Japanese do.