Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > Middle East
Reload this Page >

First time losses for some freehold investors

First time losses for some freehold investors

Old Sep 10th 2005, 1:48 pm
  #1  
BE Forum Addict
Thread Starter
 
IndieG's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,553
IndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond repute
Default First time losses for some freehold investors

- According to the Gulf News property Weekly.

Apparently, with so many new developments launched almost every week and the wide choice now available to investors, the freehold market has 'started to make its first acquaintance with negative equity'. Prices of units in some of the developments are hovering at their launch price or lower in the secondary market.

Walter Hart, Head of Special Projects at Better Homes, also wonders 'What will happen once all the myriad of projects under construction, or in the pipeline, come to the market? Will there be sufficient levels of demand to absorb all this stock'?

Delays in projects have apparently 'greatly reduced investor interest and created legal disputes" These investors are finding it difficult to sell their residences in the secondary market even at the original price.

In the case of Jumeirah Lake towers compared with the peak of well over AED 800 per sq foot, prices have softened to around AED 700-750 a sq foot.

I wonder how many individual investors put their hard earned money and jumped in just to make a quick buck

How many of these investors really do have the financial clout to sue the developers for delays (delays of over 18 months in some developments, since they keep changing their plans and can never seem to finalise it).

I guess those who have bought ready to occupy property and are actually living in it and saving on rent need not worry. Also, the losses are limited to the newer developments - but I wonder if this could have a ripple effect on the older properties?

IG
IndieG is offline  
Old Sep 10th 2005, 5:00 pm
  #2  
Premium Member
 
Truth Speak's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: Abu Dhabi soon
Posts: 4,123
Truth Speak has a reputation beyond reputeTruth Speak has a reputation beyond reputeTruth Speak has a reputation beyond reputeTruth Speak has a reputation beyond reputeTruth Speak has a reputation beyond reputeTruth Speak has a reputation beyond reputeTruth Speak has a reputation beyond reputeTruth Speak has a reputation beyond reputeTruth Speak has a reputation beyond reputeTruth Speak has a reputation beyond reputeTruth Speak has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: First time losses for some freehold investors

Originally Posted by IndieGirl
- According to the Gulf News property Weekly.

Apparently, with so many new developments launched almost every week and the wide choice now available to investors, the freehold market has 'started to make its first acquaintance with negative equity'. Prices of units in some of the developments are hovering at their launch price or lower in the secondary market.

IG
Wow, they said the bubble would burst, but not this soon. Alot of people have been put off by the building site appeal. Hopefully my rent will soon follow the trend......
Truth Speak is offline  
Old Sep 10th 2005, 5:26 pm
  #3  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,461
shoushou has much to be proud ofshoushou has much to be proud ofshoushou has much to be proud ofshoushou has much to be proud ofshoushou has much to be proud ofshoushou has much to be proud ofshoushou has much to be proud ofshoushou has much to be proud ofshoushou has much to be proud ofshoushou has much to be proud ofshoushou has much to be proud of
Default Re: First time losses for some freehold investors

Originally Posted by Truth Speak
Wow, they said the bubble would burst, but not this soon. Alot of people have been put off by the building site appeal. Hopefully my rent will soon follow the trend......

Hear hear.......
shoushou is offline  
Old Sep 10th 2005, 6:29 pm
  #4  
Restless soul
 
Happiness's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: Dubai
Posts: 556
Happiness is a splendid one to beholdHappiness is a splendid one to beholdHappiness is a splendid one to beholdHappiness is a splendid one to beholdHappiness is a splendid one to beholdHappiness is a splendid one to beholdHappiness is a splendid one to beholdHappiness is a splendid one to beholdHappiness is a splendid one to beholdHappiness is a splendid one to beholdHappiness is a splendid one to behold
Default Re: First time losses for some freehold investors

Originally Posted by IndieGirl
- According to the Gulf News property Weekly.

Apparently, with so many new developments launched almost every week and the wide choice now available to investors, the freehold market has 'started to make its first acquaintance with negative equity'. Prices of units in some of the developments are hovering at their launch price or lower in the secondary market.

Walter Hart, Head of Special Projects at Better Homes, also wonders 'What will happen once all the myriad of projects under construction, or in the pipeline, come to the market? Will there be sufficient levels of demand to absorb all this stock'?

Delays in projects have apparently 'greatly reduced investor interest and created legal disputes" These investors are finding it difficult to sell their residences in the secondary market even at the original price.

In the case of Jumeirah Lake towers compared with the peak of well over AED 800 per sq foot, prices have softened to around AED 700-750 a sq foot.

I wonder how many individual investors put their hard earned money and jumped in just to make a quick buck

How many of these investors really do have the financial clout to sue the developers for delays (delays of over 18 months in some developments, since they keep changing their plans and can never seem to finalise it).

I guess those who have bought ready to occupy property and are actually living in it and saving on rent need not worry. Also, the losses are limited to the newer developments - but I wonder if this could have a ripple effect on the older properties?

IG
YAY!!! HAAHAA!



ahem...
Happiness is offline  
Old Sep 10th 2005, 6:57 pm
  #5  
TA5
Banned (Always Correct)
 
TA5's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 941
TA5 has a reputation beyond reputeTA5 has a reputation beyond reputeTA5 has a reputation beyond reputeTA5 has a reputation beyond reputeTA5 has a reputation beyond reputeTA5 has a reputation beyond reputeTA5 has a reputation beyond reputeTA5 has a reputation beyond reputeTA5 has a reputation beyond reputeTA5 has a reputation beyond reputeTA5 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: First time losses for some freehold investors

Originally Posted by IndieGirl
How many of these investors really do have the financial clout to sue the developers for delays (delays of over 18 months in some developments, since they keep changing their plans and can never seem to finalise it).
That would be rather futile as this is a country without any form of property law...besides, as the government is either a partial or whole owner of all the major development companies you'd be suing the government...which doesn't exactly work here.

As i've said all along, its all a big scam, i sort of feel sorry for anybody who owns property here, only sort of because anybody who actually bought property needs their head examined.
TA5 is offline  
Old Sep 11th 2005, 3:23 am
  #6  
BE Forum Addict
Thread Starter
 
IndieG's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,553
IndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: First time losses for some freehold investors

Originally Posted by TA5
because anybody who actually bought property needs their head examined.

Good God, you sound like my other half :scared:

The other thing I heard was that investors would shortly be allowed to buy property even outside the present developments.

Later....got to go

IG
IndieG is offline  
Old Sep 11th 2005, 5:06 am
  #7  
Follow Your Heart
 
ZooZ's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: Qatar
Posts: 168
ZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud of
Default Re: First time losses for some freehold investors

[QUOTE=TA5] i sort of feel sorry for anybody who owns property here QUOTE]

The thing is.. that investors buy property from developers before sactioning and the investors then resell the property to the common ppl.. i.e. us.. with a profit of a min 15% as they bought it years ago with 15% below market incentive price and sell it a year or two later for original price + 15% + inflation % + property rise %, this is how investors make money..

to say that they lose money of original price.. that is a :scared: ...
coz the property price has dropped by a figure below inflation (3% a year) and below the 15% inv incentive... that could be a stagerring 20% drop in price..... before an invester can lose... sirous s**t.. if u are an investor or work with real estate or property development activities, construction/supply/support...

otherwise... enjoy a slow down in rent in the future.. not now.. coz if buyers get put off they will want to rent.. hence increasing the rent demand for the short term.. and rents will go up firt before all these properties find buyers and become available..

ZooZ
ZooZ is offline  
Old Sep 11th 2005, 5:36 am
  #8  
W10
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: First time losses for some freehold investors

I don't really believe that hundreds of projects are falling below launch price at all - unless you are talking about individual investors buying off plan in the last 2 months.

If you bought off plan on Jumeirah Lake Towers at the launches 2 years ago it was probably for less than Dh650 sq ft.

Also, why should you feel sorry for them? These people are speculating to try and make a fast buck. With any investment there is a risk, and it's not as if this risk has been kept a secret over the past year. If they lose money then that's just the way it goes. They could equally have made 200% profit in 18 months.

Just out of interest - for negative equity to occur, the markets would have to actually collapse. Being as in the UAE you need to have actually put down a hefty deposit. Most mortgages are only 15 years as well meaning your capital is repaid far more quickly than say in the UK.

The property market is definitely on a downward spiral though. Which I guess is why DM is going to introduce genuine freehold (where you own the land as well) in the next 3 months.
 
Old Sep 11th 2005, 5:46 am
  #9  
Follow Your Heart
 
ZooZ's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: Qatar
Posts: 168
ZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud of
Default Re: First time losses for some freehold investors

Originally Posted by W10
I don't really believe that hundreds of projects are falling below launch price at all - unless you are talking about individual investors buying off plan in the last 2 months.

........... These people are speculating to try and make a fast buck. With any investment there is a risk, and it's not as if this risk has been kept a secret over the past year. If they lose money then that's just the way it goes. They could equally have made 200% profit in 18 months.
i totally agree with you W10... just the statement of negative equaty is serious.. for these investors to go from big bucks to losing money is a serious situation.. if it is true...
ZooZ
ZooZ is offline  
Old Sep 11th 2005, 5:52 am
  #10  
W10
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: First time losses for some freehold investors

Well according to the synopsis of the article - prices are hovering at launch level or lower. Which suggests that there s a simple softening of prices after an original rise.

That isn't negative equity at all.

For Gulf News property weekly to make such statements would be pretty irresponsible - not to mention completely against the 'on message' mentality of the publication.
 
Old Sep 11th 2005, 6:03 am
  #11  
Follow Your Heart
 
ZooZ's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: Qatar
Posts: 168
ZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud of
Default Re: First time losses for some freehold investors

Originally Posted by W10
Well according to the synopsis of the article - prices are hovering at launch level or lower. Which suggests that there s a simple softening of prices after an original rise.

That isn't negative equity at all.
G thanks.. my millions are safe , for now ..
well in this case, it will take time.. and this is IF it dropped down to negative equaty.. so very little effect on us in the short and medium term, all what it means.. this is an indication of a boom slowdown and a possible market change in the long term, it could go either way, this is one indication and tells you to watch out for similar indications... if you want to make long term decisions..
ZooZ
ZooZ is offline  
Old Sep 11th 2005, 6:09 am
  #12  
MJC
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
MJC's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,596
MJC has a reputation beyond reputeMJC has a reputation beyond reputeMJC has a reputation beyond reputeMJC has a reputation beyond reputeMJC has a reputation beyond reputeMJC has a reputation beyond reputeMJC has a reputation beyond reputeMJC has a reputation beyond reputeMJC has a reputation beyond reputeMJC has a reputation beyond reputeMJC has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: First time losses for some freehold investors

Well, perhaps W10, with your incredibly positieve attitude that we all know and love should have a word...
Originally Posted by W10

For Gulf News property weekly to make such statements would be pretty irresponsible - not to mention completely against the 'on message' mentality of the publication.
MJC is offline  
Old Sep 11th 2005, 6:29 am
  #13  
BE Forum Addict
Thread Starter
 
IndieG's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,553
IndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: First time losses for some freehold investors

Originally Posted by W10
Well according to the synopsis of the article - prices are hovering at launch level or lower. Which suggests that there s a simple softening of prices after an original rise.
The point is that there is a loss of investor interest - this is the frightening part, since a majority of the buyers were investors (including speculators), this was what drove demand up. Investors were buying up entire floors - now with holding costs increasing and demand coming down, won't these investors cut their losses and start 'dumping' ?


IG
IndieG is offline  
Old Sep 11th 2005, 6:36 am
  #14  
Follow Your Heart
 
ZooZ's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: Qatar
Posts: 168
ZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud ofZooZ has much to be proud of
Default Re: First time losses for some freehold investors

Originally Posted by IndieGirl
The point is that there is a loss of investor interest - this is the frightening part, since a majority of the buyers were investors (including speculators), this was what drove demand up. Investors were buying up entire floors - now with holding costs increasing and demand coming down, won't these investors cut their losses and start 'dumping' ?


IG
Hiya Anya..
at the biginning it means they are not making as much money.. they are still making money though.. and unless there is not somewhere else to invest with higher reward (say Qatar, ) they will carry on and pressure will be put on developers, builders to cut cost.. it does not look like a losing business.. it is just slowing down..
ZooZ
ZooZ is offline  
Old Sep 11th 2005, 7:13 am
  #15  
BE Forum Addict
Thread Starter
 
IndieG's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,553
IndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond reputeIndieG has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: First time losses for some freehold investors

Originally Posted by ZooZ
Hiya Anya..
and unless there is not somewhere else to invest with higher reward (say Qatar, )
ZooZ
Hi
Yup...very high liquidity in the UAE market, and investors will need to look where to park their funds. Within the next couple of months, billions of dirhams expected in the UAE due to the redemption of the 'India Millennium Deposits'. The Indian Govt had raised $ 6.5 billion, of which 20% came from the Indian investors in the UAE !
Unless these investors choose to invest in the Indian Stock markets or may be in Qatar

Anya
IndieG is offline  

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.