URGENT-I-130 not accepted DCF London
#16
Re: URGENT-I-130 not accepted DCF London
[QUOTE=L D Jones
Interesting but still no one knows whether a decision made in the
building by the CIS office or the IV unit can be challenged/QUOTE]
I know
Interesting but still no one knows whether a decision made in the
building by the CIS office or the IV unit can be challenged/QUOTE]
I know
#17
Re: URGENT-I-130 not accepted DCF London
Originally Posted by StarlaLorien
Should I send an email and fax before trying to re-send the package? Also, what is the appropriate email address?
Do you think it would be helpful to send in my employment contract and proof of my UK bank account ,etc,to show that I'm actually living here as a resident?
They're pretty clear here:
"The London immigration office at the U.S. Embassy in London accepts I-130 petitions by post if the petitioner (U.S. citizen or Lawful Permanent Resident of the United States) is presently residing in the United Kingdom. Proof of residence in the UK should be submitted with the petition. "
Looks like a booboo to me. If you're nice and understanding and don't embarass them too much, they should take a re-look.
#18
Re: URGENT-I-130 not accepted DCF London
Originally Posted by meauxna
Starla, if at all possible I would gather your original submission + your copies plus the things you list here PLUS the kitchen sink and go in person if possible. Details here: http://uscis.gov/graphics/shared/fie...on/aboutus.htm
They're pretty clear here:
"The London immigration office at the U.S. Embassy in London accepts I-130 petitions by post if the petitioner (U.S. citizen or Lawful Permanent Resident of the United States) is presently residing in the United Kingdom. Proof of residence in the UK should be submitted with the petition. "
Looks like a booboo to me. If you're nice and understanding and don't embarass them too much, they should take a re-look.
They're pretty clear here:
"The London immigration office at the U.S. Embassy in London accepts I-130 petitions by post if the petitioner (U.S. citizen or Lawful Permanent Resident of the United States) is presently residing in the United Kingdom. Proof of residence in the UK should be submitted with the petition. "
Looks like a booboo to me. If you're nice and understanding and don't embarass them too much, they should take a re-look.
and for that it says
"who have entered the United Kingdom as a temporary visitor/student/or with limited leave to enter and remain in the United Kingdom, must file the petition with the appropriate USCIS Service Center in the United States
#19
Re: URGENT-I-130 not accepted DCF London
Originally Posted by MightBe
But the OP has "limited leave to remain"
and for that it says
"who have entered the United Kingdom as a temporary visitor/student/or with limited leave to enter and remain in the United Kingdom, must file the petition with the appropriate USCIS Service Center in the United States
and for that it says
"who have entered the United Kingdom as a temporary visitor/student/or with limited leave to enter and remain in the United Kingdom, must file the petition with the appropriate USCIS Service Center in the United States
I mean, if she hasn't lived in the US for a year, and works there as well, how can they tell her to file with a USCIS center in the US because she has no residence here?? In order to file with a USCIS center, she must have a residence in the US, which she obviously does not have. I think London just had a brainfart that day.
Starla, I'd definitely follow the advice that Meauxna has given you. If at first you don't succeed, try and try again.
Good luck!!
Jamie
#20
Re: URGENT-I-130 not accepted DCF London
Originally Posted by MightBe
But the OP has "limited leave to remain"
and for that it says
"who have entered the United Kingdom as a temporary visitor/student/or with limited leave to enter and remain in the United Kingdom, must file the petition with the appropriate USCIS Service Center in the United States
and for that it says
"who have entered the United Kingdom as a temporary visitor/student/or with limited leave to enter and remain in the United Kingdom, must file the petition with the appropriate USCIS Service Center in the United States
#21
Re: URGENT-I-130 not accepted DCF London
Originally Posted by meauxna
er, *where* on the USCIS Field Office page does it say that?
http://www.usembassy.org.uk/cons_web/ins/i130filing.htm
Jamie.. from my understanding
Further leave and limited leave are not the same thing
limited leave is for employment cases
My bet is the OP got this when she was a student
and never upgraded it using form SET(M)
But as always.. I bow to all your superior knowledge.
#22
Re: URGENT-I-130 not accepted DCF London
Originally Posted by MightBe
carefully read the first paragraph
http://www.usembassy.org.uk/cons_web/ins/i130filing.htm
http://www.usembassy.org.uk/cons_web/ins/i130filing.htm
We'll all just sit here argueing til she hears back from them anyway. I still think they 'should' accept her case if she shows up in person (with appointment!).
#23
Re: URGENT-I-130 not accepted DCF London
Originally Posted by meauxna
Yes, Sir. Note I cited the USCIS page.
We'll all just sit here argueing til she hears back from them anyway. I still think they 'should' accept her case if she shows up in person (with appointment!).
We'll all just sit here argueing til she hears back from them anyway. I still think they 'should' accept her case if she shows up in person (with appointment!).
#24
Re: URGENT-I-130 not accepted DCF London
Originally Posted by MightBe
Well I don't so there!
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: URGENT-I-130 not accepted DCF London
MightBe wrote:
>>er, *where* on the USCIS Field Office page does it say that?
>
>
> carefully read the first paragraph
> http://www.usembassy.org.uk/cons_web/ins/i130filing.htm
>
> Jamie.. from my understanding
> Further leave and limited leave are not the same thing
> limited leave is for employment cases
> My bet is the OP got this when she was a student
> and never upgraded it using form SET(M)
>
> But as always.. I bow to all your superior knowledge.
>
and to make it more complicated I don't think the UK IND has a status
called "limited leave to remain." One apparently holds Indefinite Leave
to Remain or Further Leave to Remain ("Exceptional Leave to Remain" for
asylum cases aside). I did not check on status awarded as part of the UK
Highly Skilled Migrant program since that does not appear to apply here
My guess is the US consular decides what the "limited" on their site
means for themselves
>>er, *where* on the USCIS Field Office page does it say that?
>
>
> carefully read the first paragraph
> http://www.usembassy.org.uk/cons_web/ins/i130filing.htm
>
> Jamie.. from my understanding
> Further leave and limited leave are not the same thing
> limited leave is for employment cases
> My bet is the OP got this when she was a student
> and never upgraded it using form SET(M)
>
> But as always.. I bow to all your superior knowledge.
>
and to make it more complicated I don't think the UK IND has a status
called "limited leave to remain." One apparently holds Indefinite Leave
to Remain or Further Leave to Remain ("Exceptional Leave to Remain" for
asylum cases aside). I did not check on status awarded as part of the UK
Highly Skilled Migrant program since that does not appear to apply here
My guess is the US consular decides what the "limited" on their site
means for themselves
#26
Re: URGENT-I-130 not accepted DCF London
Good point, LD.
Since she applied for a spousal visa through the British Consulate here in the US, one would assume she was given "Indefinite Leave." That is what I read when I was researching the UK Settlement Visa. This is most definitely not the same as "Limited Leave." Maybe she called it limited leave by mistake or is unfamiliar with the correct terminology - Lord knows we've all been there at one time or another. Indefinite Leave is definitely Resident status, as many others can attest to that have gone the same exact route. Starla, just try to follow what Meauxna suggested. When it comes to DCF, since she's been there, done that, she knows what she's talking about.
Since she applied for a spousal visa through the British Consulate here in the US, one would assume she was given "Indefinite Leave." That is what I read when I was researching the UK Settlement Visa. This is most definitely not the same as "Limited Leave." Maybe she called it limited leave by mistake or is unfamiliar with the correct terminology - Lord knows we've all been there at one time or another. Indefinite Leave is definitely Resident status, as many others can attest to that have gone the same exact route. Starla, just try to follow what Meauxna suggested. When it comes to DCF, since she's been there, done that, she knows what she's talking about.
#27
Re: URGENT-I-130 not accepted DCF London
Originally Posted by sunflwrgrl13
Good point, LD.
.
.
http://www.workingintheuk.gov.uk/wor...to_Remain.html
#28
Re: URGENT-I-130 not accepted DCF London
Originally Posted by sunflwrgrl13
Good point, LD.
Since she applied for a spousal visa through the British Consulate here in the US, one would assume she was given "Indefinite Leave." That is what I read when I was researching the UK Settlement Visa. This is most definitely not the same as "Limited Leave." Maybe she called it limited leave by mistake or is unfamiliar with the correct terminology - Lord knows we've all been there at one time or another. Indefinite Leave is definitely Resident status, as many others can attest to that have gone the same exact route. Starla, just try to follow what Meauxna suggested. When it comes to DCF, since she's been there, done that, she knows what she's talking about.
Since she applied for a spousal visa through the British Consulate here in the US, one would assume she was given "Indefinite Leave." That is what I read when I was researching the UK Settlement Visa. This is most definitely not the same as "Limited Leave." Maybe she called it limited leave by mistake or is unfamiliar with the correct terminology - Lord knows we've all been there at one time or another. Indefinite Leave is definitely Resident status, as many others can attest to that have gone the same exact route. Starla, just try to follow what Meauxna suggested. When it comes to DCF, since she's been there, done that, she knows what she's talking about.
Starla I hope that you manage to get this situation sorted out. When did you enter the UK? I was checking my husband's US passport. His original settlement visa did not state 'FLR' or 'ILR' it just gives a valid from to date and states that it is good for multiple entries. He also has a ILR stamp. I am just wondering if they gave you the wrong status...but then again I'm not sure if that would make a difference. You need to get in touch with the USCIS. I will check on my old documents and see if I can find any additional contact info and note it to you.
Ellie
#29
Re: URGENT-I-130 not accepted DCF London
Search for posts by Anyonefortea on here. She managed to DCF and her husband wasn't living in the UK, nor did he have any sort of leave to remain at all. She swung it by getting her British MP involved.
#30
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: URGENT-I-130 not accepted DCF London
MightBe wrote:
>>Good point, LD.
>>Since she applied for a spousal visa through the British Consulate
>>here in the US, one would assume she was given "Indefinite Leave."
>>That is what I read when I was researching the UK Settlement Visa.
>>This is most definitely not the same as "Limited Leave." Maybe she
>>called it limited leave by mistake or is unfamiliar with the correct
>>terminology - Lord knows we've all been there at one time or another.
>>Indefinite Leave is definitely Resident status, as many others can
>>attest to that have gone the same exact route. Starla, just try to
>>follow what Meauxna suggested. When it comes to DCF, since she's been
>>there, done that, she knows what she's talking about.
>
>
> Yup good point.. But wrong
> http://www.workingintheuk.gov.uk/wor...page/work_per-
> mits/mited_Leave_to_Remain.html
>
interesting. presumably the OP does not have this since she has not
mentioned a work permit and since the consulate's web page is not
specific we'll probably never know if this is what they refer to as
"limited leave to remain." UK IND has changed a lot since I left the country
>>Good point, LD.
>>Since she applied for a spousal visa through the British Consulate
>>here in the US, one would assume she was given "Indefinite Leave."
>>That is what I read when I was researching the UK Settlement Visa.
>>This is most definitely not the same as "Limited Leave." Maybe she
>>called it limited leave by mistake or is unfamiliar with the correct
>>terminology - Lord knows we've all been there at one time or another.
>>Indefinite Leave is definitely Resident status, as many others can
>>attest to that have gone the same exact route. Starla, just try to
>>follow what Meauxna suggested. When it comes to DCF, since she's been
>>there, done that, she knows what she's talking about.
>
>
> Yup good point.. But wrong
> http://www.workingintheuk.gov.uk/wor...page/work_per-
> mits/mited_Leave_to_Remain.html
>
interesting. presumably the OP does not have this since she has not
mentioned a work permit and since the consulate's web page is not
specific we'll probably never know if this is what they refer to as
"limited leave to remain." UK IND has changed a lot since I left the country