Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > USA > Marriage Based Visas
Reload this Page >

Removal of Jurisdiction question

Removal of Jurisdiction question

Old Feb 9th 2013, 6:39 pm
  #31  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Michael's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 10,678
Michael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Removal of Jurisdiction question

Originally Posted by materialcontroller
You seem to have done as much as you can do.

Where your ex is being unreasonable is in expecting you to shoulder the burden for his costs. It's right that you've drawn the line at that.
In my opinion, that is true but he has so much leverage that he could possibly withdraw his approval to allow the children to leave if the court rules against him. Also having someone accompanying a 15 year old on flight seems unreasonable (in my opinion, he along with flight attendents can look after the younger child).

Last edited by Michael; Feb 9th 2013 at 6:47 pm.
Michael is offline  
Old Feb 9th 2013, 6:53 pm
  #32  
Are we there yet?
 
Trixie_b's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: 31 miles from Cool (California)
Posts: 2,467
Trixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Removal of Jurisdiction question

How about suggesting that you will pay for 1 trip per year for each child outright, and 50/50 with him each additional trip per year.

Also, make sure that you discuss with your lawyer, that he can visit the children in America and have full access for 2 weeks (or another amount of time that you feel suitable). at his own expense of course (alluding to his 2 overseas vacations - he could choose to visit his own children for one of them)

Many of us live in the US away from our families, and use Vonage (cheap telephone system), Skype, facebook and other ways of staying connected that makes the world feel much smaller and the separation easier.

Also, your children are at the age (or approaching) when they don't stay home much anyway, so even if you stayed in the UK, he would be seeing less of them.

As for flying accompanied - that is the area I think he's making a ridiculous request, especially since the 14 year old is more than capable of escorting your 9 year old with few problems.

I do feel for the father, and as other people have said, moving your kids to a different continent away from a willing and suitable parent, and him agreeing bar a few financial issues, is better than many people get. See his agreement as a WIN, and while trying to make it fiscally fair, don't fight too hard and have him withdraw consent - as is his right.
Trixie_b is offline  
Old Feb 9th 2013, 7:19 pm
  #33  
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 45
Oregon Bound has a brilliant futureOregon Bound has a brilliant futureOregon Bound has a brilliant futureOregon Bound has a brilliant futureOregon Bound has a brilliant futureOregon Bound has a brilliant future
Default Re: Removal of Jurisdiction question

That is the point, he HAS withdrawn his consent because he is arguing that i now pay out more and more.
Oregon Bound is offline  
Old Feb 9th 2013, 8:26 pm
  #34  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 38,865
ian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Removal of Jurisdiction question

Originally Posted by Michael
... he has so much leverage that he could possibly withdraw his approval to allow the children to leave if the court rules against him.
If the court rules against him, it won't much matter if he withdraws his approval... as the court has already ruled.

Ian
ian-mstm is offline  
Old Feb 9th 2013, 9:15 pm
  #35  
Are we there yet?
 
Trixie_b's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: 31 miles from Cool (California)
Posts: 2,467
Trixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Removal of Jurisdiction question

Originally Posted by Oregon Bound
That is the point, he HAS withdrawn his consent because he is arguing that i now pay out more and more.
Sorry, I didn't pick up on that first read through.
Trixie_b is offline  
Old Feb 9th 2013, 9:25 pm
  #36  
Are we there yet?
 
Trixie_b's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: 31 miles from Cool (California)
Posts: 2,467
Trixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Removal of Jurisdiction question

Originally Posted by Oregon Bound
That is the point, he HAS withdrawn his consent because he is arguing that i now pay out more and more.
So next moves for you would be to define the "best interests of the children" - start making a list of what you're prepared to do to ensure that they are met.

You're making a great start by saying you'd like to get it sorted before the start of school for the 2 moving to the US.
You are showing that you're prepared to pay for them to visit their father, and have the eldest visit you.
The thing you may not have thought about is that it's not in the best interest of your children to be impoverished in the first 2 years meeting his $5000 demands, and paying for his visits. Cost these things out, and your income projections.

Then it's a case of court. Good luck.
Trixie_b is offline  
Old Feb 9th 2013, 10:25 pm
  #37  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Michael's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 10,678
Michael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Removal of Jurisdiction question

Originally Posted by ian-mstm
If the court rules against him, it won't much matter if he withdraws his approval... as the court has already ruled.

Ian
What I meant is that it currently sounds like his consent is "conditional" (he will give consent if she gives into his demands) but the court may initially only rule on what it considers is fair if he gives consent but not actually rule that the court gives her consent to remove the children since he is not a "deadbeat dad".

Then she may have to take him back to court to try to get a ruling where the court gives consent to remove the children and that may be difficult to get approval since again he is not a "deadbeat dad".

So she is right to try to get the money issue resolved before going to court.

The court may initially rule in her favor for the financial arrangements as well as consent if he states "my consent is conditional on the financial arrangements" but if he states "I do not give consent" and denies that his consent is conditional, the court may have a difficult time ruling in her favor on the consent issue unless she can prove that his consent is conditional (recorded conversations may help to prove that).
Michael is offline  
Old Feb 10th 2013, 3:06 am
  #38  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 4,759
GeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond reputeGeoffM has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Removal of Jurisdiction question

Originally Posted by Trixie_b
The thing you may not have thought about is that it's not in the best interest of your children to be impoverished in the first 2 years meeting his $5000 demands, and paying for his visits.
Good points.

What concerns me is that he appears to have been increasing his demands - basically testing the limits. From the first post he wanted somebody to accompany the older child. Now he wants to be the one to accompany the child. Next he'll want business class tickets. Then his wife will need to go too. Obviously they'll need to rent a car, no sorry, a luxury car. And so on. Where does it stop?

Anyway, good luck in whatever happens. The ranch idea sounds great!
GeoffM is offline  
Old Feb 10th 2013, 3:39 am
  #39  
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 45
Oregon Bound has a brilliant futureOregon Bound has a brilliant futureOregon Bound has a brilliant futureOregon Bound has a brilliant futureOregon Bound has a brilliant futureOregon Bound has a brilliant future
Default Re: Removal of Jurisdiction question

Thank you all for allowing me to share my troubles and gain different perspectives. The whole visa journey is a tough one and emotions run all over the place. Coupled with the fact I have an ex that changes his mind more times than he changes his underwear, I am hving a hard time staying positive.
He did tell the children he was giving permission for them to leave, he then revoked that permission to me by email but told the kids he hadn't said no, just he needed more assurances.
On a lighter note, my herd of 5 pygmy goats already out there became six early Saturday morning. I needed some good news and there it was.
Oregon Bound is offline  
Old Feb 10th 2013, 4:56 am
  #40  
Are we there yet?
 
Trixie_b's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: 31 miles from Cool (California)
Posts: 2,467
Trixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond reputeTrixie_b has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Removal of Jurisdiction question

Originally Posted by GeoffM
Good points.

What concerns me is that he appears to have been increasing his demands - basically testing the limits. From the first post he wanted somebody to accompany the older child. Now he wants to be the one to accompany the child. Next he'll want business class tickets. Then his wife will need to go too. Obviously they'll need to rent a car, no sorry, a luxury car. And so on. Where does it stop?

Anyway, good luck in whatever happens. The ranch idea sounds great!
A court will want to see the spirit of compromise. So make sure that you have all negotiations written down.
Best interest of the child is paramount - to me you sound like you are not denying access to their father, but are being very accommodating to maintaining contact and visitation. Make sure you document a number of weeks per year when the children can visit him or him them. When you tell him he can have the children for 5 weeks of the schools summer holidays and he doesn't want them for that length of time, it will speak volumes to a court.

Good luck. Please let us know how you get on.
Trixie_b is offline  
Old Feb 10th 2013, 6:23 am
  #41  
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 45
Oregon Bound has a brilliant futureOregon Bound has a brilliant futureOregon Bound has a brilliant futureOregon Bound has a brilliant futureOregon Bound has a brilliant futureOregon Bound has a brilliant future
Default Re: Removal of Jurisdiction question

He has already changed what I offered, 4 weeks in the summer, to flexible when they visit due to work commitments! He managed 3 weeks off in a row last summer. He is supposed to have them two weeks in the summer here since we split up four years ago but so far has not managed to have them in the summer except for his normal alternate weekends. I was hoping to be moving in June so I offered him this half term holiday in February as well as a week at easter so he could see more of them before we went. He declined the February half term as he says he is too busy
Oregon Bound is offline  
Old Feb 10th 2013, 6:54 am
  #42  
Joined on April fools day
 
Beaverstate's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Location: 30 miles from a decent grocery store.
Posts: 10,642
Beaverstate has a reputation beyond reputeBeaverstate has a reputation beyond reputeBeaverstate has a reputation beyond reputeBeaverstate has a reputation beyond reputeBeaverstate has a reputation beyond reputeBeaverstate has a reputation beyond reputeBeaverstate has a reputation beyond reputeBeaverstate has a reputation beyond reputeBeaverstate has a reputation beyond reputeBeaverstate has a reputation beyond reputeBeaverstate has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Removal of Jurisdiction question

Originally Posted by Michael
That may seem to make sense but US courts many times won't even allow a parent with custodial rights to move more than a few miles away without the other parents consent even if there isn't any jobs in the area. However once the parent without custodial rights moves away, then the courts generally side with the parent that has custodial rights.

The courts generally makes it determination as to what is best for the child and not what is best for the parent.
My experience is that is true. I was informed not to move more than 60 miles to keep joint custody.
Beaverstate is offline  
Old Feb 10th 2013, 10:28 am
  #43  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 38,865
ian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Removal of Jurisdiction question

Originally Posted by Oregon Bound
Thank you all for allowing me to share my troubles and gain different perspectives.
Here's something else you might not have thought about... document everything. Every email he sends, every time he adds to his demands, every time he changes his mind... make this available to the court to demonstrate a pattern of behavior. His inconsistencies may eventually work against him.

Ian
ian-mstm is offline  
Old Feb 10th 2013, 11:12 am
  #44  
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 45
Oregon Bound has a brilliant futureOregon Bound has a brilliant futureOregon Bound has a brilliant futureOregon Bound has a brilliant futureOregon Bound has a brilliant futureOregon Bound has a brilliant future
Default Re: Removal of Jurisdiction question

I have got the original agreement that he said he would sign then went back on. I have the email that says he is refusing permission for the children to leave. I ask and ask for him to use email but he often sends texts or just calls me. Hopefully a judge will see a lot of this as unreasonable and allow the children to leave with me if we can not reach an agreement before any court date.
Oregon Bound is offline  
Old Feb 10th 2013, 2:53 pm
  #45  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 38,865
ian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Removal of Jurisdiction question

Originally Posted by Oregon Bound
I ask and ask for him to use email but he often sends texts or just calls me.
Take photos of the text messages... don't answer the phone, let it go to voice mail and save the message.


Hopefully a judge will see a lot of this as unreasonable and allow the children to leave with me...
Do you have a backup plan in case the judge doesn't allow the children to leave? No need to respond... but you had better put some thought into it.

Ian
ian-mstm is offline  

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.