K3 Denial because no pics of a specific thing in custom ceremony
Nov 13th 2003, 3:09 pm
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: K3 Denial because no pics of a specific thing in custom ceremony
Politician cooked wife on restaurant grill
From AFP
November 04, 2003
India's main opposition Congress party, which has pledged to get tough on
crime against women, suffered a severe blow Monday when a court convicted a
former party leader of killing his wife and burning her body in an open-air
barbecue.
Additional Sessions Judge G. P. Thareja convicted former Congress politician
Sushil Sharma on charges of murder, criminal conspiracy and the destruction
of evidence following the July 2, 1995 murder of his wife Naina Sahni.
Sharma, currently in prison, is charged with shooting his then 29-year-old
wife, a pilot, on suspicion of infidelity, chopping up the corpse and
shoving it into the grill at the Baghiya restaurant to wipe out evidence.
But police raided the restaurant, owned by a friend of Sharma, and dug out
charred body parts later identified as Sahni's from the still-blazing
Indian-style oven.
Experts said the charges could mean the death sentence for Sharma, who was
president of the prestigious youth chapter of the Congress party when he
committed the crime.
Judge Thareja is likely to hand down punishment to Sharma and to one of his
accomplices on Wednesday. The verdict ends a marathon trial involving 300
separate sittings and cross-examination of more than 100 witnesses.
Keshav Kumar, Sharma's friend and owner of the restaurant, was convicted of
plotting with the politician to dispose of Sahni's corpse.
The judge, however, acquitted three other people who had been arrested on
charges of harbouring Sharma while he was on the run for a month after the
crime was committed in the heart of New Delhi.
Thareja ordered the criminal prosecution of a senior bureaucrat of the
western state of Gujarat on charges of sheltering Sharma during the
nationwide manhunt.
"Crime never pays and we always believed that our case against him was
solid," Joint Police Commissioner Maxwell Pereira, who hunted down Sharma,
told AFP just after the verdict.
The police say Sharma, who was opposed to publicising his marriage to former
pilot Sahni, on the fateful night redialled a number his wife was talking to
on the telephone and then shot her three times in the belief the person on
the other end was her lover.
The verdict is widely seen as a blow to the Congress party, which is gearing
up for provincial polls in four states and in the New Delhi legislature next
month, offering a clean and corruption-free administration.
"This could not have happened at a worse time because it is we who have
pledged to fight against crime against women," said a senior politician from
the Congress party, which ruled the New Delhi city legislature.
The Congress, credited with modernising New Delhi, has been stung by a
recent wave of crime against women in the city including last month's
gang-rape of a college student by soldiers and then a Swiss diplomat's rape
at a film festival.
AFP
From AFP
November 04, 2003
India's main opposition Congress party, which has pledged to get tough on
crime against women, suffered a severe blow Monday when a court convicted a
former party leader of killing his wife and burning her body in an open-air
barbecue.
Additional Sessions Judge G. P. Thareja convicted former Congress politician
Sushil Sharma on charges of murder, criminal conspiracy and the destruction
of evidence following the July 2, 1995 murder of his wife Naina Sahni.
Sharma, currently in prison, is charged with shooting his then 29-year-old
wife, a pilot, on suspicion of infidelity, chopping up the corpse and
shoving it into the grill at the Baghiya restaurant to wipe out evidence.
But police raided the restaurant, owned by a friend of Sharma, and dug out
charred body parts later identified as Sahni's from the still-blazing
Indian-style oven.
Experts said the charges could mean the death sentence for Sharma, who was
president of the prestigious youth chapter of the Congress party when he
committed the crime.
Judge Thareja is likely to hand down punishment to Sharma and to one of his
accomplices on Wednesday. The verdict ends a marathon trial involving 300
separate sittings and cross-examination of more than 100 witnesses.
Keshav Kumar, Sharma's friend and owner of the restaurant, was convicted of
plotting with the politician to dispose of Sahni's corpse.
The judge, however, acquitted three other people who had been arrested on
charges of harbouring Sharma while he was on the run for a month after the
crime was committed in the heart of New Delhi.
Thareja ordered the criminal prosecution of a senior bureaucrat of the
western state of Gujarat on charges of sheltering Sharma during the
nationwide manhunt.
"Crime never pays and we always believed that our case against him was
solid," Joint Police Commissioner Maxwell Pereira, who hunted down Sharma,
told AFP just after the verdict.
The police say Sharma, who was opposed to publicising his marriage to former
pilot Sahni, on the fateful night redialled a number his wife was talking to
on the telephone and then shot her three times in the belief the person on
the other end was her lover.
The verdict is widely seen as a blow to the Congress party, which is gearing
up for provincial polls in four states and in the New Delhi legislature next
month, offering a clean and corruption-free administration.
"This could not have happened at a worse time because it is we who have
pledged to fight against crime against women," said a senior politician from
the Congress party, which ruled the New Delhi city legislature.
The Congress, credited with modernising New Delhi, has been stung by a
recent wave of crime against women in the city including last month's
gang-rape of a college student by soldiers and then a Swiss diplomat's rape
at a film festival.
AFP
Nov 13th 2003, 10:37 pm
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: K3 Denial because no pics of a specific thing in custom ceremony
>Well, the first thing for you should be to try and understand the other
>side. The consular officer's job is to prevent people from getting a visa
>through fraud.
excuse rejected
>side. The consular officer's job is to prevent people from getting a visa
>through fraud.
excuse rejected
Nov 13th 2003, 10:42 pm
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: K3 Denial because no pics of a specific thing in custom ceremony
You might get some help from your local Congressional office at no charge.
http://Free-Immigration-Help.com
http://Free-Immigration-Help.com
Nov 15th 2003, 2:00 am
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: K3 Denial because no pics of a specific thing in custom ceremony
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 16:58:12 +0000 (UTC), "alfie"
<[email protected]> did say unto me:
>> You could live in India and therefore we won't have to put up with
>> another Indian moving to our country.
>Oh, so I take it you are an American Indian then. If not, why don't u go
>back to where u came from immigrant, if you want to start calling the USA
>your country u tosspot.
Oh no...not this lame ass tripe.... Just for the record,
anyone born in the U.S. is NOT an immigrant. That whole "the only real
citizens of the U.S. are the native americans" line is a bunch of
crap. I'm not an immigrant, I'm a true citizen since I was born here.
So is anyone else who was born in the States. You can say my ancestors
at some point were immigrants, but not me, and not anyone else who was
born here. Native Americans are NOT the only real citizens, and all
others are "immigrants."
<[email protected]> did say unto me:
>> You could live in India and therefore we won't have to put up with
>> another Indian moving to our country.
>Oh, so I take it you are an American Indian then. If not, why don't u go
>back to where u came from immigrant, if you want to start calling the USA
>your country u tosspot.
Oh no...not this lame ass tripe.... Just for the record,
anyone born in the U.S. is NOT an immigrant. That whole "the only real
citizens of the U.S. are the native americans" line is a bunch of
crap. I'm not an immigrant, I'm a true citizen since I was born here.
So is anyone else who was born in the States. You can say my ancestors
at some point were immigrants, but not me, and not anyone else who was
born here. Native Americans are NOT the only real citizens, and all
others are "immigrants."
Nov 15th 2003, 7:20 pm
#20
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Nov 2002
Location: Birmingham, USA
Posts: 802
Re: K3 Denial because no pics of a specific thing in custom ceremony
Originally posted by Citizen Outkast
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 16:58:12 +0000 (UTC), "alfie"
<[email protected]> did say unto me:
>> You could live in India and therefore we won't have to put up with
>> another Indian moving to our country.
>Oh, so I take it you are an American Indian then. If not, why don't u go
>back to where u came from immigrant, if you want to start calling the USA
>your country u tosspot.
Oh no...not this lame ass tripe.... Just for the record,
anyone born in the U.S. is NOT an immigrant. That whole "the only real
citizens of the U.S. are the native americans" line is a bunch of
crap. I'm not an immigrant, I'm a true citizen since I was born here.
So is anyone else who was born in the States. You can say my ancestors
at some point were immigrants, but not me, and not anyone else who was
born here. Native Americans are NOT the only real citizens, and all
others are "immigrants."
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 16:58:12 +0000 (UTC), "alfie"
<[email protected]> did say unto me:
>> You could live in India and therefore we won't have to put up with
>> another Indian moving to our country.
>Oh, so I take it you are an American Indian then. If not, why don't u go
>back to where u came from immigrant, if you want to start calling the USA
>your country u tosspot.
Oh no...not this lame ass tripe.... Just for the record,
anyone born in the U.S. is NOT an immigrant. That whole "the only real
citizens of the U.S. are the native americans" line is a bunch of
crap. I'm not an immigrant, I'm a true citizen since I was born here.
So is anyone else who was born in the States. You can say my ancestors
at some point were immigrants, but not me, and not anyone else who was
born here. Native Americans are NOT the only real citizens, and all
others are "immigrants."
Nov 19th 2003, 6:54 pm
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: K3 Denial because no pics of a specific thing in custom ceremony
"Sylvia Ottemoeller" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> Hitesh, if I were you I would immediately hire a good immigration attorney
> with lots of consular experience (10 years would be good) and state
> department contacts. I think some quick agressive moves are needed here.
> If they close the file and send it back, I think you are looking at long
> delays, whatever happens.
This seems exceedingly weird. I would ask your Congressman for
assistance, and I would also seek a court order attesting to your
marriage.
For the rest, it depends how much money you have to spend. They can't
keep you apart indefinitely, but they can cause you temporary grief.
I didn't see a statement as to whether you are an Amcit or not. If you
have a US passport, then you are in a somewhat bettr position. Indeed,
you could turn the tables on the consular officer if you could get an
assignment abroad with a US employer and then seek "expedited
naturalization" for your wife. (8 USC § 1430(b))
> Hitesh, if I were you I would immediately hire a good immigration attorney
> with lots of consular experience (10 years would be good) and state
> department contacts. I think some quick agressive moves are needed here.
> If they close the file and send it back, I think you are looking at long
> delays, whatever happens.
This seems exceedingly weird. I would ask your Congressman for
assistance, and I would also seek a court order attesting to your
marriage.
For the rest, it depends how much money you have to spend. They can't
keep you apart indefinitely, but they can cause you temporary grief.
I didn't see a statement as to whether you are an Amcit or not. If you
have a US passport, then you are in a somewhat bettr position. Indeed,
you could turn the tables on the consular officer if you could get an
assignment abroad with a US employer and then seek "expedited
naturalization" for your wife. (8 USC § 1430(b))
Nov 22nd 2003, 7:56 am
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: K3 Denial because no pics of a specific thing in custom ceremony
mrtravel <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<l%[email protected]> ...
> M. Ranjit Mathews wrote:
>
> > The quickest way around it might be to quickly have an Arya Samaj
> > wedding and both videotape and photagraph the whole thing.
> >
>
> Wouldn't they think that is indicating the original wedding was fake?
Not at all. There are lots of "limping marriages" valid in one
jurisdiction but not in another. The "rule of validation" says that
once you have been domiciled (or perhaps habitually resident) in a
jurisdiction that recognizes the marriage, you are deemed married
everywhere. But it is safer to marry again when the impediment is
removed (by a divorce, a death of prior spouse, a change in religion).
A civil marriage will be enough. Then the only remaining wrinkle is
the legitimacy of children born during the period of the limping
marriage. (Most, not all, jurisdictions provide for retroactive
legitimation or legitimation by declaration of paternity.)
> M. Ranjit Mathews wrote:
>
> > The quickest way around it might be to quickly have an Arya Samaj
> > wedding and both videotape and photagraph the whole thing.
> >
>
> Wouldn't they think that is indicating the original wedding was fake?
Not at all. There are lots of "limping marriages" valid in one
jurisdiction but not in another. The "rule of validation" says that
once you have been domiciled (or perhaps habitually resident) in a
jurisdiction that recognizes the marriage, you are deemed married
everywhere. But it is safer to marry again when the impediment is
removed (by a divorce, a death of prior spouse, a change in religion).
A civil marriage will be enough. Then the only remaining wrinkle is
the legitimacy of children born during the period of the limping
marriage. (Most, not all, jurisdictions provide for retroactive
legitimation or legitimation by declaration of paternity.)
