K-3 Processing: Chronological?
Jul 19th 2002, 9:20 pm
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
K-3 Processing: Chronological?
I've noticed a few people, like osaeed, being approved lately by MSC. Now, question:
Are cases processed bu chronological order, surnames or country? Or is it a
combination of all three (i.e. by date, then by surname, then by country, or vice
versa)? If so, some people's timelines stated MSC recv'd thier application after ones
such as ours (May 20, 2002) and they've gotten approved recently, however the phone
system was never updated and they just recieved thier 2nd NOA in the mail. If this is
true, then something's def. going on here. Then again, I may just be looking down a
blind alley here. MSC is very backlogged as I hear it, while most of the other SC's
are almost up-to-date on K-3's.
Our timeline:
May 14: Chicago sends first NOA May 20: MSC recieves application (found out by
automated phone system)
Still waiting, waiting
Are cases processed bu chronological order, surnames or country? Or is it a
combination of all three (i.e. by date, then by surname, then by country, or vice
versa)? If so, some people's timelines stated MSC recv'd thier application after ones
such as ours (May 20, 2002) and they've gotten approved recently, however the phone
system was never updated and they just recieved thier 2nd NOA in the mail. If this is
true, then something's def. going on here. Then again, I may just be looking down a
blind alley here. MSC is very backlogged as I hear it, while most of the other SC's
are almost up-to-date on K-3's.
Our timeline:
May 14: Chicago sends first NOA May 20: MSC recieves application (found out by
automated phone system)
Still waiting, waiting
Jul 19th 2002, 10:20 pm
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: K-3 Processing: Chronological?
Whoops...typos. make "bu" by, hehe.
Evan Audette <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I've noticed a few people, like osaeed, being approved lately by MSC. Now,
> question: Are cases processed bu chronological order, surnames or country? Or is it
> a combination of all three (i.e. by date, then by surname, then
by
> country, or vice versa)? If so, some people's timelines stated MSC recv'd thier
> application after ones such as ours (May 20, 2002) and they've
gotten
> approved recently, however the phone system was never updated and they
just
> recieved thier 2nd NOA in the mail. If this is true, then something's def. going on
> here. Then again, I may just be looking down a blind alley here. MSC is very
> backlogged as I hear it, while most of the other SC's are
almost
> up-to-date on K-3's.
>
> Our timeline:
>
> May 14: Chicago sends first NOA May 20: MSC recieves application (found out by
> automated phone system)
>
> Still waiting, waiting
Evan Audette <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I've noticed a few people, like osaeed, being approved lately by MSC. Now,
> question: Are cases processed bu chronological order, surnames or country? Or is it
> a combination of all three (i.e. by date, then by surname, then
by
> country, or vice versa)? If so, some people's timelines stated MSC recv'd thier
> application after ones such as ours (May 20, 2002) and they've
gotten
> approved recently, however the phone system was never updated and they
just
> recieved thier 2nd NOA in the mail. If this is true, then something's def. going on
> here. Then again, I may just be looking down a blind alley here. MSC is very
> backlogged as I hear it, while most of the other SC's are
almost
> up-to-date on K-3's.
>
> Our timeline:
>
> May 14: Chicago sends first NOA May 20: MSC recieves application (found out by
> automated phone system)
>
> Still waiting, waiting
Jul 20th 2002, 10:20 am
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: K-3 Processing: Chronological?
One thing to clarify: MSC is the only Service center to processs K3. You cannot
predict when your case will be approved. The most recent update says that k3 after
June 1 filing date will take 60 days to process. Someone post the message here says
that MSC will redirect resources to process K3 since K3 is really backlog. I would
think you can ask your congressmen to inquery the case. The fact that many
congressmen inquery the cases will push MSC speed up the process. I file K3 on June
14 and wait to ask congressman later.
> Evan Audette <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > I've noticed a few people, like osaeed, being approved lately by MSC. Now,
> > question: Are cases processed bu chronological order, surnames or country? Or is
> > it a combination of all three (i.e. by date, then by surname, then
> by
> > country, or vice versa)? If so, some people's timelines stated MSC recv'd thier
> > application after ones such as ours (May 20, 2002) and they've
> gotten
> > approved recently, however the phone system was never updated and they
> just
> > recieved thier 2nd NOA in the mail. If this is true, then something's def. going
> > on here. Then again, I may just be looking down a blind alley here. MSC is very
> > backlogged as I hear it, while most of the other SC's are
> almost
> > up-to-date on K-3's.
> >
> > Our timeline:
> >
> > May 14: Chicago sends first NOA May 20: MSC recieves application (found out by
> > automated phone system)
> >
> > Still waiting, waiting
> >
predict when your case will be approved. The most recent update says that k3 after
June 1 filing date will take 60 days to process. Someone post the message here says
that MSC will redirect resources to process K3 since K3 is really backlog. I would
think you can ask your congressmen to inquery the case. The fact that many
congressmen inquery the cases will push MSC speed up the process. I file K3 on June
14 and wait to ask congressman later.
> Evan Audette <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > I've noticed a few people, like osaeed, being approved lately by MSC. Now,
> > question: Are cases processed bu chronological order, surnames or country? Or is
> > it a combination of all three (i.e. by date, then by surname, then
> by
> > country, or vice versa)? If so, some people's timelines stated MSC recv'd thier
> > application after ones such as ours (May 20, 2002) and they've
> gotten
> > approved recently, however the phone system was never updated and they
> just
> > recieved thier 2nd NOA in the mail. If this is true, then something's def. going
> > on here. Then again, I may just be looking down a blind alley here. MSC is very
> > backlogged as I hear it, while most of the other SC's are
> almost
> > up-to-date on K-3's.
> >
> > Our timeline:
> >
> > May 14: Chicago sends first NOA May 20: MSC recieves application (found out by
> > automated phone system)
> >
> > Still waiting, waiting
> >
Jul 20th 2002, 5:20 pm
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: K-3 Processing: Chronological?
our I-129 1st NOV dated May 28,still waitting for 2nd.MSC updated processing time for
I-129F filing after Jul 1st to 60 days,no idea what they deal with the cases pre-.
I-129F filing after Jul 1st to 60 days,no idea what they deal with the cases pre-.
Jul 20th 2002, 5:37 pm
#5
Forum Regular
Joined: Jul 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 59
Re: K-3 Processing: Chronological?
Our K-3 Timeline is posted for u to see! We have a received date of 05/28/2002, and a notice date of 05/29/2002... althought.. the phone says 05/30/2002... still no 2nd NOA.
http://207.21.230.28/k3
Praying for quick response!
Wish everyone good luck.. and lots of love for our wifeys and hubbys.. i love mine so much.
Bob
http://207.21.230.28/k3
Praying for quick response!
Wish everyone good luck.. and lots of love for our wifeys and hubbys.. i love mine so much.
Bob
Jul 25th 2002, 8:20 am
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: K-3 Processing: Chronological?
It seems to be not what you know but who. I contacted my congressman and they told me
it hasn't been assigned yet. (great thanks for telling me)
"Evan Audette" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I've noticed a few people, like osaeed, being approved lately by MSC. Now,
> question: Are cases processed bu chronological order, surnames or country? Or is it
> a combination of all three (i.e. by date, then by surname, then
by
> country, or vice versa)? If so, some people's timelines stated MSC recv'd thier
> application after ones such as ours (May 20, 2002) and they've
gotten
> approved recently, however the phone system was never updated and they
just
> recieved thier 2nd NOA in the mail. If this is true, then something's def. going on
> here. Then again, I may just be looking down a blind alley here. MSC is very
> backlogged as I hear it, while most of the other SC's are
almost
> up-to-date on K-3's.
>
> Our timeline:
>
> May 14: Chicago sends first NOA May 20: MSC recieves application (found out by
> automated phone system)
>
> Still waiting, waiting
it hasn't been assigned yet. (great thanks for telling me)
"Evan Audette" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I've noticed a few people, like osaeed, being approved lately by MSC. Now,
> question: Are cases processed bu chronological order, surnames or country? Or is it
> a combination of all three (i.e. by date, then by surname, then
by
> country, or vice versa)? If so, some people's timelines stated MSC recv'd thier
> application after ones such as ours (May 20, 2002) and they've
gotten
> approved recently, however the phone system was never updated and they
just
> recieved thier 2nd NOA in the mail. If this is true, then something's def. going on
> here. Then again, I may just be looking down a blind alley here. MSC is very
> backlogged as I hear it, while most of the other SC's are
almost
> up-to-date on K-3's.
>
> Our timeline:
>
> May 14: Chicago sends first NOA May 20: MSC recieves application (found out by
> automated phone system)
>
> Still waiting, waiting
