I-94s for PRs
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm confused. A few years ago the situation for non-citizens (probably
non-NAFTA too) entering the US, in terms of forms to fill in, seemed
to be:
Non-immigrant, no visa - fill in green I-94 form
Non-immigrant, visa - fill in white I-94 form
Immigrant, visa[1] - no I-94
Immigrant, I-551 - no I-94
[1] e.g. an IR-1 or something
Then, maybe around December 2001, when I got to the POE with my I-551
and passport, the INS people were surprised that I hadn't been given a
magical pre-printed I-94 at check in, and went off to make me one. I
shrugged my shoulders and accepted the I-94, returning it at the gate
when I next left the US.
I'm still a permanent resident. A few days ago I flew from London
Heathrow to Chicago O'Hare by United. At check in they had no idea
that PRs might need an I-94, on the aeroplane they gave out the old
green and white forms instead of the computer-printed things, and
indeed at the POE they didn't want me to have an I-94.
So, what's going on? Are different airports different? Did PRs briefly
need I-94s, but no longer? I was just surpised not again to have to
have a new computerised I-94.
-- Mark
non-NAFTA too) entering the US, in terms of forms to fill in, seemed
to be:
Non-immigrant, no visa - fill in green I-94 form
Non-immigrant, visa - fill in white I-94 form
Immigrant, visa[1] - no I-94
Immigrant, I-551 - no I-94
[1] e.g. an IR-1 or something
Then, maybe around December 2001, when I got to the POE with my I-551
and passport, the INS people were surprised that I hadn't been given a
magical pre-printed I-94 at check in, and went off to make me one. I
shrugged my shoulders and accepted the I-94, returning it at the gate
when I next left the US.
I'm still a permanent resident. A few days ago I flew from London
Heathrow to Chicago O'Hare by United. At check in they had no idea
that PRs might need an I-94, on the aeroplane they gave out the old
green and white forms instead of the computer-printed things, and
indeed at the POE they didn't want me to have an I-94.
So, what's going on? Are different airports different? Did PRs briefly
need I-94s, but no longer? I was just surpised not again to have to
have a new computerised I-94.
-- Mark
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
On 26 Sep 2002, Mark Carroll wrote:
> I'm confused. A few years ago the situation for non-citizens (probably
> non-NAFTA too) entering the US, in terms of forms to fill in, seemed
> to be:
> Non-immigrant, no visa - fill in green I-94 form
> Non-immigrant, visa - fill in white I-94 form
> Immigrant, visa[1] - no I-94
> Immigrant, I-551 - no I-94
> [1] e.g. an IR-1 or something
> Then, maybe around December 2001, when I got to the POE with my I-551
> and passport, the INS people were surprised that I hadn't been given a
> magical pre-printed I-94 at check in, and went off to make me one. I
> shrugged my shoulders and accepted the I-94, returning it at the gate
> when I next left the US.
> I'm still a permanent resident. A few days ago I flew from London
> Heathrow to Chicago O'Hare by United. At check in they had no idea
> that PRs might need an I-94, on the aeroplane they gave out the old
> green and white forms instead of the computer-printed things, and
> indeed at the POE they didn't want me to have an I-94.
> So, what's going on? Are different airports different? Did PRs briefly
> need I-94s, but no longer? I was just surpised not again to have to
> have a new computerised I-94.
PRs don't have to fill out an I-94.
Whoever had you fill out one didn't have a clue.
There was, however, a pilot program in the late 1990s which used the
boarding pass as an automatic I-94 for all non-citizens. This was
tested with certain airlines (TWA and USAirways, I think) and on
certain routes to and from Europe only.
There is also one other use of an I-94 for PRs that I've come across:
instead of getting the I-551 stamp in the passport, it is possible
that INS puts it on an I-94, and attaches a photo to it. This I-94
is not to be handed over to the airline when you travel abroad.
-Joe
> I'm confused. A few years ago the situation for non-citizens (probably
> non-NAFTA too) entering the US, in terms of forms to fill in, seemed
> to be:
> Non-immigrant, no visa - fill in green I-94 form
> Non-immigrant, visa - fill in white I-94 form
> Immigrant, visa[1] - no I-94
> Immigrant, I-551 - no I-94
> [1] e.g. an IR-1 or something
> Then, maybe around December 2001, when I got to the POE with my I-551
> and passport, the INS people were surprised that I hadn't been given a
> magical pre-printed I-94 at check in, and went off to make me one. I
> shrugged my shoulders and accepted the I-94, returning it at the gate
> when I next left the US.
> I'm still a permanent resident. A few days ago I flew from London
> Heathrow to Chicago O'Hare by United. At check in they had no idea
> that PRs might need an I-94, on the aeroplane they gave out the old
> green and white forms instead of the computer-printed things, and
> indeed at the POE they didn't want me to have an I-94.
> So, what's going on? Are different airports different? Did PRs briefly
> need I-94s, but no longer? I was just surpised not again to have to
> have a new computerised I-94.
PRs don't have to fill out an I-94.
Whoever had you fill out one didn't have a clue.
There was, however, a pilot program in the late 1990s which used the
boarding pass as an automatic I-94 for all non-citizens. This was
tested with certain airlines (TWA and USAirways, I think) and on
certain routes to and from Europe only.
There is also one other use of an I-94 for PRs that I've come across:
instead of getting the I-551 stamp in the passport, it is possible
that INS puts it on an I-94, and attaches a photo to it. This I-94
is not to be handed over to the airline when you travel abroad.
-Joe