Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > USA > Marriage Based Visas
Reload this Page >

I-751 waiver - marriage in good faith - premarital agreement

Wikiposts

I-751 waiver - marriage in good faith - premarital agreement

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 18th 2009, 6:57 pm
  #1  
Just Joined
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 6
pc3787 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default I-751 waiver - marriage in good faith - premarital agreement

I obtained my conditional green card by marriage. We divorced before the 2 years was up. I am about to submit the I-751 application on the basis of marriage in good faith. Should our premarital agreement be submitted as part of the supporting documentation?

Here is the background. A prenup kept our assets totally separate with the exception of a house. According to the prenup, I acquired a 50% interest in the million dollar home she purchased just before our marriage in return for an obligation to pay 50% of the mortgage, property taxes, improvement costs, utility bills, joint expenses, etc. I was not on the title of the house nor on the mortgage nor on any of the utility bills. My ownership interest in the house (if that's the right term) and my obligation to cover 50% of the costs of acquiring, improving, and maintaining the home were solely by virtue of the prenup.

I wanted to submit the prenup as part of the supporting documentation to show that we had entered 50:50 into a million dollar commitment . Without the prenup, it looks as if we had no joint assets (and not even joint utility bills as all the utilities were in her name). I thought that the 38-page prenup showing we had entered into this huge financial commitment together would be very advantageous to my application.

But my immigration attorney disagrees. She says that the prenup (a) makes it look as if the marriage was more like a financial arrangement than love and (b) we were planning for the event that the marriage would fail. She does not want us to submit it.

I am very nervous that if we don't submit it, my case will be weak because it will appear that there were no joint assets.

If we do submit it, we will show we had a million dollar joint asset. But as my attorney says, we might give the impression the marriage was all about a financial arrangement rather than love.

What is the best strategy?

pc3787 is offline  
Old Jun 18th 2009, 7:35 pm
  #2  
Passport Collector
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: Princeton, NJ
Posts: 725
dreamercon has a reputation beyond reputedreamercon has a reputation beyond reputedreamercon has a reputation beyond reputedreamercon has a reputation beyond reputedreamercon has a reputation beyond reputedreamercon has a reputation beyond reputedreamercon has a reputation beyond reputedreamercon has a reputation beyond reputedreamercon has a reputation beyond reputedreamercon has a reputation beyond reputedreamercon has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: I-751 waiver - marriage in good faith - premarital agreement

You can do anything you want. However, I agree with your attorney - it appears to me that the prenup has little to show in your favor. You should trust your attorney or get a new one if you don't.


Originally Posted by pc3787
I obtained my conditional green card by marriage. We divorced before the 2 years was up. I am about to submit the I-751 application on the basis of marriage in good faith. Should our premarital agreement be submitted as part of the supporting documentation?

Here is the background. A prenup kept our assets totally separate with the exception of a house. According to the prenup, I acquired a 50% interest in the million dollar home she purchased just before our marriage in return for an obligation to pay 50% of the mortgage, property taxes, improvement costs, utility bills, joint expenses, etc. I was not on the title of the house nor on the mortgage nor on any of the utility bills. My ownership interest in the house (if that's the right term) and my obligation to cover 50% of the costs of acquiring, improving, and maintaining the home were solely by virtue of the prenup.

I wanted to submit the prenup as part of the supporting documentation to show that we had entered 50:50 into a million dollar commitment . Without the prenup, it looks as if we had no joint assets (and not even joint utility bills as all the utilities were in her name). I thought that the 38-page prenup showing we had entered into this huge financial commitment together would be very advantageous to my application.

But my immigration attorney disagrees. She says that the prenup (a) makes it look as if the marriage was more like a financial arrangement than love and (b) we were planning for the event that the marriage would fail. She does not want us to submit it.

I am very nervous that if we don't submit it, my case will be weak because it will appear that there were no joint assets.

If we do submit it, we will show we had a million dollar joint asset. But as my attorney says, we might give the impression the marriage was all about a financial arrangement rather than love.

What is the best strategy?

dreamercon is offline  
Old Jun 19th 2009, 12:45 am
  #3  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 38,865
ian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: I-751 waiver - marriage in good faith - premarital agreement

Originally Posted by pc3787
What is the best strategy?
The "best" strategy, always, is the one that works for you and not against you. There is nothing wrong with having a prenup agreement... but in this case, I think the attorney is right. Since, by your own words, you had no obligation to pay the mortgage/utilities other than via the prenup, you don't really demonstrate that this was anything other than a financial relationship.

Ian
ian-mstm is offline  
Old Jun 19th 2009, 2:15 am
  #4  
Concierge
 
Rete's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 46,477
Rete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: I-751 waiver - marriage in good faith - premarital agreement

Who is the "we" in your post? Your ex-wife or your attorney? I agree with your attorney as that was my first thought. Wow he married well and made sure his nest would be feathered in the future.

Go with whatever evidence you have of a commingled life together with your former spouse, i.e. pass health benefits jointly held, pictures and itineraries of vacations and/or business trips togehter, in your case letters from family and friends attesting to your marriage.

Hey good luck. Did you get your 50% of the interest in the million dollar home yet?
Rete is offline  
Old Jun 19th 2009, 4:07 am
  #5  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,266
Folinskyinla is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: I-751 waiver - marriage in good faith - premarital agreement

Originally Posted by pc3787
What is the best strategy?
Hi:

I am a lawyer, but I am not YOUR lawyer. I have not seen the paperwork. I am not familiar with Texas laws on marital property [which can vary even between "community property" states].

That said, my off-the-top of my head reaction is that I would put it in. However, this is a judgment call -- and I will not say what is "best."
Folinskyinla is offline  
Old Jun 19th 2009, 7:05 am
  #6  
Just Joined
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 6
pc3787 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: I-751 waiver - marriage in good faith - premarital agreement

Originally Posted by ian-mstm
The "best" strategy, always, is the one that works for you and not against you. There is nothing wrong with having a prenup agreement... but in this case, I think the attorney is right. Since, by your own words, you had no obligation to pay the mortgage/utilities other than via the prenup, you don't really demonstrate that this was anything other than a financial relationship.
Ian, thanks for interesting comments. I'd like to ask you for some clarification.

An obligation to pay the mortgage/utilities via the prenup is still evidence of financial co-mingling, is it not? Why do you think it matters that the obligation arose as a result of the prenup? Originally, I wanted to be on the title of the house but my own attorney said a prenup that gave me a 50% interest in return for a 50% financial obligation was just as good. I now realize that is false -- I should have been on the title then I could have simply said in my I-751 petition that "We bought a house together" rather than going into convoluted explanations of how the prenup effectively meant we bought a house together.

Regarding the prenup you say: (a) nothing wrong with having one and (b) if you have one it suggests nothing more than a financial relationship. I don't mean to put words in your mouth but rather to say how I understood your remarks. Why would a prenup suggest it is "nothing more" than a financial relationship?
pc3787 is offline  
Old Jun 19th 2009, 7:21 am
  #7  
Just Joined
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 6
pc3787 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: I-751 waiver - marriage in good faith - premarital agreement

Originally Posted by Rete
Who is the "we" in your post? Your ex-wife or your attorney?
Either, depending on context. When I said we entered into a million dollar commitment over a house, I meant my ex-wife and I. When I asked if we should submit the prenup as part of the application, I meant my attorney and I.

Originally Posted by Rete
I agree with your attorney as that was my first thought. Wow he married well and made sure his nest would be feathered in the future.
How do you read feathering of a nest into what I said? The prenup made me responsible for half the mortgage payments and every other expense associated with the house.
Originally Posted by Rete
Did you get your 50% of the interest in the million dollar home yet?
The prenup required us both to get an appraisal of the house and average the results. Then subtract the acquisition costs to determine the appreciation. Then divide the appreciation between the two of us. My then wife found an appraiser who came up with such a low valuation that she owed me exactly nothing. I helped her pay for that house for the year we were living in it together and at the same time I was paying all the costs on my old house that I had not yet managed to sell. I gave up my interest in the house at divorce for zero dollars (actually $10 because according to the lawyers you can't part with something for zero). Overall, the marriage was a financial drain on me and I'm surprised you appear to see it as mercenary on my part.
pc3787 is offline  
Old Jun 19th 2009, 7:27 am
  #8  
Concierge
 
Rete's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 46,477
Rete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond reputeRete has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: I-751 waiver - marriage in good faith - premarital agreement

Originally Posted by pc3787
Ian, thanks for interesting comments. I'd like to ask you for some clarification.

Originally, I wanted to be on the title of the house but my own attorney said a prenup that gave me a 50% interest in return for a 50% financial obligation was just as good.
Smart wife you have there. 50% interest on the profit of the house is better for her since she bought the house, not you. Since you didn't buy the house, why would your name be included on the deed?

What does the prenup say about what you give to her in case of a divorce? If you came into the marriage with nothing, then leaving with 50% of the increased value of a property is damn good.

And yes, that is not comingling.

I now realize that is false -- I should have been on the title then I could have simply said in my I-751 petition that "We bought a house together" rather than going into convoluted explanations of how the prenup effectively meant we bought a house together.
Did you add to the down payment? If not, then again why would your name be on it?

Regarding the prenup you say: (a) nothing wrong with having one and (b) if you have one it suggests nothing more than a financial relationship. I don't mean to put words in your mouth but rather to say how I understood your remarks. Why would a prenup suggest it is "nothing more" than a financial relationship?
A prenup doesn't say that it only shows that the persons involved in the marriage have decided NOT to comingle their assets obtained prior to marriage with their spouse.

Since your prenup went as far as to outline who would pay for utilities, in the eyes of some people, it would seen as a marriage where if things are not laid out then advantage would be taken of the other person. For instance I would view the prenup as you outlined as her saying to you "You can only have a 50% interest in the increased value of the house if you pay for the heat, gas, lights, maintenance, etc. If you don't do that, then you are not entitled to share in the increased evaluation of the house.

That is the rub.

But as I noted, your wife is very smart and has a damn good attorney.
Rete is offline  
Old Jun 19th 2009, 7:59 am
  #9  
Just Joined
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 6
pc3787 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: I-751 waiver - marriage in good faith - premarital agreement

Originally Posted by Rete
Smart wife you have there. 50% interest on the profit of the house is better for her since she bought the house, not you. Since you didn't buy the house, why would your name be included on the deed?
My name was not on the title.
Originally Posted by Rete
What does the prenup say about what you give to her in case of a divorce? If you came into the marriage with nothing, then leaving with 50% of the increased value of a property is damn good.
Leaving with 50% of the increased value was in return for an obligation to share the expenses. Because she made a a down payment on the house and I did not, the mortgage was split according to the capital payments that had been made. The formula made me responsible for more than 50% of the mortgage payments. So I disagree the arrangement was "damn good" -- I wasn't getting anything for nothing.
Originally Posted by Rete
And yes, that is not comingling.
That's a thought provoking point. Some of the prenup is about having no community property - no comingling. But another part is about sharing the costs of purchasing the house, which is comingling.

Originally Posted by Rete
Did you add to the down payment? If not, then again why would your name be on it?
My name was not on the title. I did not add to the down payment but because of that I was responsible for more than 50% of the mortgage payments. Let's simplify the numbers a bit. Say the house cost a million and she put down 100k. Then she paid the mortgage on 400k (half the price of the house minus her down payment) and I paid the mortgage on 500k (half the price of the house minus my downpayment of zero). That's how it worked in simple terms.

Originally Posted by Rete
A prenup doesn't say that it only shows that the persons involved in the marriage have decided NOT to comingle their assets obtained prior to marriage with their spouse.

Since your prenup went as far as to outline who would pay for utilities, in the eyes of some people, it would seen as a marriage where if things are not laid out then advantage would be taken of the other person. ....
You mean a prenup suggests a lack of trust? But isn't a prenup just a prudent precaution to define expectations of both parties?
Originally Posted by Rete
But as I noted, your wife is very smart and has a damn good attorney.
My ex-wife is in fact a lawyer. She did not draft the prenup herself but had another lawyer do it. She did pay for the drafting of the prenup -- at the time, she made out she was being altruistic but I now realize it was to keep control of the wording of the prenup.
pc3787 is offline  
Old Jun 19th 2009, 8:05 am
  #10  
Just Joined
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 6
pc3787 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: I-751 waiver - marriage in good faith - premarital agreement

Originally Posted by Folinskyinla
Hi:

I am a lawyer, but I am not YOUR lawyer. I have not seen the paperwork. I am not familiar with Texas laws on marital property [which can vary even between "community property" states].

That said, my off-the-top of my head reaction is that I would put it in. However, this is a judgment call -- and I will not say what is "best."
Thank you, I appreciate your comments. My ex-wfe is a Texas lawyer. Her assets far exceeded mine and she drafted the prenup to ensure that there was no community property whatsoever with the exception of the house where there were detailed rules on how to share expenses and how to deal with it in the event of divorce.

I'm inclined to think it best to submit the prenup because it's the only evidence of financial comingling in a big way (i.e. our sharing of expenses over the house). But at least one of the other posters here is seeing it as evidence of keeping finances separate, therefore not comingling. The immigration officers reviewing my application might possibly see it in the latter light too, I suppose, especially if they don't read the prenup carefully.
pc3787 is offline  
Old Jun 19th 2009, 8:27 am
  #11  
 
meauxna's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 35,082
meauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: I-751 waiver - marriage in good faith - premarital agreement

Originally Posted by pc3787
Thank you, I appreciate your comments. My ex-wfe is a Texas lawyer. Her assets far exceeded mine and she drafted the prenup to ensure that there was no community property whatsoever with the exception of the house where there were detailed rules on how to share expenses and how to deal with it in the event of divorce.

I'm inclined to think it best to submit the prenup because it's the only evidence of financial comingling in a big way (i.e. our sharing of expenses over the house). But at least one of the other posters here is seeing it as evidence of keeping finances separate, therefore not comingling. The immigration officers reviewing my application might possibly see it in the latter light too, I suppose, especially if they don't read the prenup carefully.
How about you express this to your current lawyer and ask him to seek a 2nd opinion from a colleague?

I've seen the prenup argument used both ways against an applicant. This thread shows that there are differences in opinion. Getting another opinion (sanctioned by your lawyer) seems like a good idea with no downside.
meauxna is offline  
Old Jun 19th 2009, 8:40 am
  #12  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 38,865
ian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond reputeian-mstm has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: I-751 waiver - marriage in good faith - premarital agreement

Originally Posted by pc3787
Why do you think it matters that the obligation arose as a result of the prenup?
I thought this because if the issue arose as part of the prenup concerning who paid what, you couldn't afterwards suggest that you would have willingly paid your share anyway as a means of commingling funds.


Regarding the prenup you say: (a) nothing wrong with having one...
My wife and I have a prenup agreement. Our situation is probably different than yours though, in that Sheila and I were both divorced at the time, we were in our mid-40s when we got married, we both had roughly equal value estates as we entered the marriage, and both had heirlooms that we felt should stay within our respective families.


... and (b) if you have one it suggests nothing more than a financial relationship.
I don't think all prenups suggest that... not at all. However, although this likely isn't what you guys had in mind when you signed it, to an outside observer, that's seems to be what happened.

Ian
ian-mstm is offline  
Old Jun 19th 2009, 10:03 am
  #13  
Just Joined
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 6
pc3787 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: I-751 waiver - marriage in good faith - premarital agreement

Originally Posted by meauxna
How about you express this to your current lawyer and ask him to seek a 2nd opinion from a colleague?
My attorney has checked with her senior partner and he concurred that the prenup should not be submitted. Having seen the responses on this thread, I'm now fairly satisfied that the prenup could be misinterpreted by the authorities in a variety of ways, so I think I am going to accept my attorney's advice and not submit it.

I wanted to use the prenup to prove we had a house together. However, the divorce decree makes reference to the Premarital Agreement and Property Agreement, states that these documents are incorporated into the decree by reference, and states my interest in the house is divested out of me and into her name. In addition, my ex-wife gave me an affidavit of "marriage in good faith" which contains the sentence "We selected a house together and the house was purchased on [date]". Affidavits from friends also speak about visiting us in our home. So maybe the allusions to shared assets will suffice. Of course, it's possible the authorities will ask for the Premarital Agreement and Property Agreement agreement anyway since these are referenced in the decree.
pc3787 is offline  
Old Jun 19th 2009, 10:26 am
  #14  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,266
Folinskyinla is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: I-751 waiver - marriage in good faith - premarital agreement

Originally Posted by pc3787
My attorney has checked with her senior partner and he concurred that the prenup should not be submitted. Having seen the responses on this thread, I'm now fairly satisfied that the prenup could be misinterpreted by the authorities in a variety of ways, so I think I am going to accept my attorney's advice and not submit it.

I wanted to use the prenup to prove we had a house together. However, the divorce decree makes reference to the Premarital Agreement and Property Agreement, states that these documents are incorporated into the decree by reference, and states my interest in the house is divested out of me and into her name. In addition, my ex-wife gave me an affidavit of "marriage in good faith" which contains the sentence "We selected a house together and the house was purchased on [date]". Affidavits from friends also speak about visiting us in our home. So maybe the allusions to shared assets will suffice. Of course, it's possible the authorities will ask for the Premarital Agreement and Property Agreement agreement anyway since these are referenced in the decree.
Hi:

Out of idle curiosity -- who is your lawyer? You can PM me on it if you wish.
Folinskyinla is offline  
Old Jun 19th 2009, 10:48 am
  #15  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,266
Folinskyinla is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: I-751 waiver - marriage in good faith - premarital agreement

Originally Posted by Folinskyinla
Hi:

Out of idle curiosity -- who is your lawyer? You can PM me on it if you wish.
Hi:

Your immigration law firm is excellent. Again, this may be a judgment call -- and I've heard of some pretty weird things coming out of Texas. One of my best professional friends practices in Dallas and what she deals with often causes a "WTF" response from yours truly.

I think it would be an interesting discussion between lawyers on this one and there just might be honest disagreement. As mentioned above, there is often no "best" way.
Folinskyinla is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.