DCF London - today's interview
#16
Forum Regular
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 93
Re: DCF London - today's interview
I have read posts where people managed to get their medical and interview on the same day in London. However, since it takes a few days to get the results from the medical, the embassy could not approve the visa that day. They had to wait for the medical results, then approve the visa and send it out.
If you don't mind waiting a while longer after the interview, you can try for the medical on the same day as the interview.
Rene
If you don't mind waiting a while longer after the interview, you can try for the medical on the same day as the interview.
Rene
#17
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,259
Re: DCF London - today's interview
Yeah this is what I am planning.
I plan to have the medical on the same day of or on the afternoon before the visa interview. Travel to London morning of day 1, have medical, stay over, interview morning of day 2, then travel back.
I plan to have the medical on the same day of or on the afternoon before the visa interview. Travel to London morning of day 1, have medical, stay over, interview morning of day 2, then travel back.
#18
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 32
Re: DCF London - today's interview
212(g)(s)(B)
PREVIOUS LPR Axx xxx xxx
PREVIOUS LPR Axx xxx xxx
(Which Act is that section from, incidentally? Wouldn't mind seeing what it says...)
Last edited by Targaff; May 24th 2008 at 10:38 am.
#20
Re: DCF London - today's interview
Light reading for a sunday
http://www.uscis.gov/propub/ProPubVA...b0686648558dbe
http://www.uscis.gov/propub/ProPubVA...b0686648558dbe
#21
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 32
Re: DCF London - today's interview
No kidding.
Anyhow, that particular point relates to vaccination waivers. On the vaccination worksheet they ticked "vaccination history incomplete" and "may be entitled to a waiver", and when I asked about it they said that's standard; which fits somewhat to my last experience. I imagine it crops up a lot on these visas, then.
So nothing of much interest.
Anyhow, that particular point relates to vaccination waivers. On the vaccination worksheet they ticked "vaccination history incomplete" and "may be entitled to a waiver", and when I asked about it they said that's standard; which fits somewhat to my last experience. I imagine it crops up a lot on these visas, then.
So nothing of much interest.
#22
Re: DCF London - today's interview
No kidding.
Anyhow, that particular point relates to vaccination waivers. On the vaccination worksheet they ticked "vaccination history incomplete" and "may be entitled to a waiver", and when I asked about it they said that's standard; which fits somewhat to my last experience. I imagine it crops up a lot on these visas, then.
So nothing of much interest.
Anyhow, that particular point relates to vaccination waivers. On the vaccination worksheet they ticked "vaccination history incomplete" and "may be entitled to a waiver", and when I asked about it they said that's standard; which fits somewhat to my last experience. I imagine it crops up a lot on these visas, then.
So nothing of much interest.
Notice any funny itching?
#23
Just Joined
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4
Re: DCF London - today's interview
Great original post Targaff, esp I-864 points (echoing others above)!
#24
Forum Regular
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 32
Re: DCF London - today's interview
Anyhow, a quick story relating to the different A numbers mentioned above: we flew into ATL on 28 May, primary processing was fine - I went through the residents' line as I was with my USC family - and then after picking up the luggage we went through to secondary. ATL's secondary, incidentally, is currently in need of some serious TLC; it's just an area near the agricultural inspection area that's cordoned off solely by the seats you sit on, and the structural pillars have been stripped bare. I asked about the secondary processing area that was there last time I went through and they told me it was "being used for other purposes".
I handed over my passport and packet and sat down to wait. It took perhaps 20-30 minutes before I was called up, and after saying hi the first thing the immigration officer said was "So I've looked through your documents and I can't see anything about your divorce..." Once I explained our background it took less than 5 minutes to get the rest done, but the officer explained to me that what had thrown her was the fact that they'd assigned a new A number this time around - she said London Embassy could've just used my original A number and it would've helped her understand the situation better.
So there you go; apparently there's no proper consensus about the use of A numbers in situations like this, and what you get may well depend on the Embassy.