chips' AOS from VWP questions
#16
Re: chips' AOS from VWP questions
ok, I'm confused..lawyer told me that if we get married in Canada it would take approx 9 months and I cannot visit the US during this time.
but she can visit me in Canada.
I just read this thread that says its ok for me to visit the US while waiting on I-130 pending...http://britishexpats.com/forum/showthread.php?t=578918
if this is true, then that would take some of the pressure off not seeing each other for a long time.
I guess the only question now is married in Canada or US. wondering if it makes a difference.
If we got married while I'm here on a VWP and then I go up to Canada to file for I-130 wouldn't that cause problems too though?? because US officals would see that I married a USC while on a VWP
but she can visit me in Canada.
I just read this thread that says its ok for me to visit the US while waiting on I-130 pending...http://britishexpats.com/forum/showthread.php?t=578918
if this is true, then that would take some of the pressure off not seeing each other for a long time.
I guess the only question now is married in Canada or US. wondering if it makes a difference.
If we got married while I'm here on a VWP and then I go up to Canada to file for I-130 wouldn't that cause problems too though?? because US officals would see that I married a USC while on a VWP
Hopefully someone can advise you re where the best place to file
GOOD LUCK
it will be worth it in the end
#17
Re: chips' AOS from VWP questions
Yes, when you enter the USA on the VWP, you waive your rights to an appeal in this case.
other options - we're talking about marrying either here and me returning to Canada, or getting married in Canada and filing from up there.
is there any benefit to go with one over the other? (married in the US over outside)
is there any benefit to go with one over the other? (married in the US over outside)
if I'm back in Canada I'm not allowed to visit the US whilst this is going through?
but as I understand it, my GF can visit me up in Canada.
perm res status in Canada should be unaffected because they allow you to be outside the country for quite a long time and retain this.
Canadian citizenship coming through too in approx 9 months.
Canadian citizenship coming through too in approx 9 months.
My advice is to marry in the USA, return to Canada, and pursue an Immigrant Visa. You should get your Immigrant Visa to the USA just after you become a Canadia citizen, so that would be a plus, I would think. Plus, that way you don't have to give up your job so suddenly, or your home. You can make solid plans for both while the immigrant visa processes.
Rene
Last edited by Noorah101; Apr 7th 2012 at 11:10 pm.
#18
Re: chips' AOS from VWP questions
You guys had a long distance relationship going before you got engaged....just figure it's another 8 to 10 months of long distance relationship after marriage. There's no urgent rush to live together, if you've already been having a long distance relationship for a while anyway. It will feel the same. Plus, you guys can still visit each other as you've been doing.
Rene
Rene
#19
Re: chips' AOS from VWP questions
Rene
#20
Re: chips' AOS from VWP questions
Why do you think difficult to get B2 visa that was the easiest thing so far , I was using VWP before that
#21
Re: chips' AOS from VWP questions
I just read this thread that says its ok for me to visit the US while waiting on I-130 pending...http://britishexpats.com/forum/showthread.php?t=578918
if this is true, then that would take some of the pressure off not seeing each other for a long time.
if this is true, then that would take some of the pressure off not seeing each other for a long time.
I guess the only question now is married in Canada or US. wondering if it makes a difference.
If we got married while I'm here on a VWP and then I go up to Canada to file for I-130 wouldn't that cause problems too though?? because US officals would see that I married a USC while on a VWP
But it's perfectly legal to marry in the USA and then return outside the USA to pursue an Immigrant Visa. The I-130, by the way, is filed in the USA and can be filed right after you get married. What you'll be doing in Canada is applying for an Immigrant Visa to the USA.
Rene
#22
Re: chips' AOS from VWP questions
If the B-2 visa application gets denied, then one has to re-do ESTA and check the box saying a visa has been denied. That, in turn, makes the ESTA get denied. Which makes it then impossible to visit the USA until 6 - 12 months later, when you can try ESTA again and hope for an approval.
Rene
#23
Re: chips' AOS from VWP questions
The reference to two months -- I am unclear as to whether this is to projected processing time or to the notional window for a VWP entrant to file for adjustment of status according to the some of the strange interpretations put on the law from some of the more twisted minions of the Dark Forces.
In any case, YMMV.
"The trouble is all inside your head she said to me. The answer is easy if you take it logically. I'd like to help you in your struggle to be free." Paul Simon
In any case, YMMV.
"The trouble is all inside your head she said to me. The answer is easy if you take it logically. I'd like to help you in your struggle to be free." Paul Simon
#24
Re: chips' AOS from VWP questions
Because if you qualify for VWP travel, you're less likely to get a B-2 approved. If you managed to get a B-2, while qualified to use the VWP, you were lucky.
If the B-2 visa application gets denied, then one has to re-do ESTA and check the box saying a visa has been denied. That, in turn, makes the ESTA get denied. Which makes it then impossible to visit the USA until 6 - 12 months later, when you can try ESTA again and hope for an approval.
Rene
If the B-2 visa application gets denied, then one has to re-do ESTA and check the box saying a visa has been denied. That, in turn, makes the ESTA get denied. Which makes it then impossible to visit the USA until 6 - 12 months later, when you can try ESTA again and hope for an approval.
Rene
#25
Re: chips' AOS from VWP questions
Perhaps you had an attorney helping you get a B-2, most people would not hire an attorney for that, they would just apply and wing it.
Rene
#26
Re: chips' AOS from VWP questions
I see. But for others, we suggest not trying to go for a B-2 visa when they are OK to travel by VWP, because we've seen too many of the B-2's get denied, which in turn makes the ESTA get denied, which in turn then means they are stuck, unable to visit the USA at all.
Perhaps you had an attorney helping you get a B-2, most people would not hire an attorney for that, they would just apply and wing it.
Rene
Perhaps you had an attorney helping you get a B-2, most people would not hire an attorney for that, they would just apply and wing it.
Rene
#27
Re: chips' AOS from VWP questions
The only help from an attorney I had was to recommend I applied for B2, I managed that all by myself ! . I appreciate this may not be right for everyone but the embassy in London were brilliant , maybe it is to do with attitude as it took my father in law a lot longer to get his B2 , purely for visiting my husband and brother in law .
Rene
#28
Re: chips' AOS from VWP questions
Just wanted to note that lawyers love aggressive risky approaches because they get more fees when it goes wrong besides it isn't their future they are playing with.
#29
Re: chips' AOS from VWP questions
After reading through the replies it sounds to me like you should seek a consultation with another lawyer.
As Noorah and Sir Eccles have pointed out the "aggressive approach" comes with a great number of risks, the greatest of which is lack of appeal should you be denied.
But what concerns me even more than the suggestion that you take the "aggressive approach" rather than the CR-1 approach is telling you that you can't visit while the I-130 is being processed. You can certainly visit and on the VWP too... It seems to me like your lawyer is pushing you into the riskier route because you're more likely to retain them and they'll make money. And as Sir Eccles pointed out, they don't lose anything if you're denied.
With the CR-1 the process is similar to the K-1 and can be found in the Wiki... but it basically goes like this:
You get married here in the US and then return to Canada
Your wife files the I-130 and supporting documentation
You wait for approval and visit (as you normally would) with the VWP
Your I-130 is decided upon and then moves on to the next stage... Which I can't help you with as my husband and I went the K-1 route but I'm pretty sure it involves embassy interviews and a medical.
It does take 8-10 months, but as someone pointed out it just means the long-distance part of your relationship goes on a little bit longer. It's FAR FAR FAR less risky than adjusting status from the VWP and you'll get to come into the US when it's all over with a Greencard and the right to work from day one (which removes a whole OTHER bucket of worries).
Hope this helps!
Katie
As Noorah and Sir Eccles have pointed out the "aggressive approach" comes with a great number of risks, the greatest of which is lack of appeal should you be denied.
But what concerns me even more than the suggestion that you take the "aggressive approach" rather than the CR-1 approach is telling you that you can't visit while the I-130 is being processed. You can certainly visit and on the VWP too... It seems to me like your lawyer is pushing you into the riskier route because you're more likely to retain them and they'll make money. And as Sir Eccles pointed out, they don't lose anything if you're denied.
With the CR-1 the process is similar to the K-1 and can be found in the Wiki... but it basically goes like this:
You get married here in the US and then return to Canada
Your wife files the I-130 and supporting documentation
You wait for approval and visit (as you normally would) with the VWP
Your I-130 is decided upon and then moves on to the next stage... Which I can't help you with as my husband and I went the K-1 route but I'm pretty sure it involves embassy interviews and a medical.
It does take 8-10 months, but as someone pointed out it just means the long-distance part of your relationship goes on a little bit longer. It's FAR FAR FAR less risky than adjusting status from the VWP and you'll get to come into the US when it's all over with a Greencard and the right to work from day one (which removes a whole OTHER bucket of worries).
Hope this helps!
Katie
#30
Account Closed
Joined: Jun 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 4,891
Re: chips' AOS from VWP questions
I've never understood why lots of people on BE look down their noses at AOS from VWP and don't consider it a "proper" way to immigrate even though it's perfectly legal and above board. There are greater risks attached to it, as have been outlined, but if you are fully aware of those risks you are at least able to make an informed choice about what is the best way to proceed for you.