borbers
#16
Just Joined
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 18
![cormic is an unknown quantity at this point](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/reputation/reputation_balance.gif)
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally posted by manc1976
I am a little perturbed to think that you expected us to endorse something so blatantly illegal.
I am a little perturbed to think that you expected us to endorse something so blatantly illegal.
![cormic is offline](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
When you ask about crossing undetected then anyone with at least several
working neurons would wonder why YOU would ask the question. It is easy to
cross a manned border crossing - IF you have no illegal motive. Why is
still the unanswered question. Perhaps YOU are just trolling.
cormic wrote:
> Originally posted by Ken Pisichko
> > Why would anyone
> want to cross a border illegally? Trolling? Into
> > independent
> business (that means illegal)? Got something to hide? Illegal
> > intent
> perhaps? The inquiring minds want to know. Remember, you asked the
> >
> question so you have to put up with the answers - whether you like them
> or
> > not.
> >
> > cormic wrote:
> >
> >
> > the original question asked
> something specific.if you had positive information pertaining to that
> question then a reply would have acceptable.if you did not then there
> was no reason for you to reply with negative answers that serve no
> purpose to the question.unless you feel you have to comment on every
> question thats posted?
> --
> Posted via http://britishexpats.com
working neurons would wonder why YOU would ask the question. It is easy to
cross a manned border crossing - IF you have no illegal motive. Why is
still the unanswered question. Perhaps YOU are just trolling.
cormic wrote:
> Originally posted by Ken Pisichko
> > Why would anyone
> want to cross a border illegally? Trolling? Into
> > independent
> business (that means illegal)? Got something to hide? Illegal
> > intent
> perhaps? The inquiring minds want to know. Remember, you asked the
> >
> question so you have to put up with the answers - whether you like them
> or
> > not.
> >
> > cormic wrote:
> >
> >
> > the original question asked
> something specific.if you had positive information pertaining to that
> question then a reply would have acceptable.if you did not then there
> was no reason for you to reply with negative answers that serve no
> purpose to the question.unless you feel you have to comment on every
> question thats posted?
> --
> Posted via http://britishexpats.com
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Oh, so you are now telling everyone reading this thread that YOUR question
is just plain stupid. Now reflect on all the answers - and YOUR own
stupidity.
Alas, just another troll asking stupid questions. And the troll even admits
the question is a stupid one. Not our problem if you don't like the answers.
cormic wrote:
> Originally posted by manc1976
> > I am a little perturbed
> to think that you expected us to endorse something so blatantly illegal.
> your quite right,and if i had recieved no replies to my
> question i would have deduced that quite successfully.im just replying
> to the users who feel that they have to comment on every post however
> stupid the question may be.
> --
> Posted via http://britishexpats.com
is just plain stupid. Now reflect on all the answers - and YOUR own
stupidity.
Alas, just another troll asking stupid questions. And the troll even admits
the question is a stupid one. Not our problem if you don't like the answers.
cormic wrote:
> Originally posted by manc1976
> > I am a little perturbed
> to think that you expected us to endorse something so blatantly illegal.
> your quite right,and if i had recieved no replies to my
> question i would have deduced that quite successfully.im just replying
> to the users who feel that they have to comment on every post however
> stupid the question may be.
> --
> Posted via http://britishexpats.com
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Just another example of the use of britishespats.com as a facilitator of
crime. Maybe we will get lucky and this guy will step on a land mine.
"cormic" <member22410@british_expats.com> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> any information about good places to cross the us canadian border
> without detection??
> --
> Posted via http://britishexpats.com
crime. Maybe we will get lucky and this guy will step on a land mine.
"cormic" <member22410@british_expats.com> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> any information about good places to cross the us canadian border
> without detection??
> --
> Posted via http://britishexpats.com
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Oh my, now that's really, really, RICH! You propose committing a crime and
then you complain when people for criticize you for it. Tell me - do you
balls drag on the ground, or do you put them on a cart when you move around?
"cormic" <member22410@british_expats.com> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
.....
> > the original question asked
> something specific.if you had positive information pertaining to that
> question then a reply would have acceptable.if you did not then there
> was no reason for you to reply with negative answers that serve no
> purpose to the question.unless you feel you have to comment on every
> question thats posted?
> Posted via http://britishexpats.com
then you complain when people for criticize you for it. Tell me - do you
balls drag on the ground, or do you put them on a cart when you move around?
"cormic" <member22410@british_expats.com> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
.....
> > the original question asked
> something specific.if you had positive information pertaining to that
> question then a reply would have acceptable.if you did not then there
> was no reason for you to reply with negative answers that serve no
> purpose to the question.unless you feel you have to comment on every
> question thats posted?
> Posted via http://britishexpats.com
#21
Just Joined
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 18
![cormic is an unknown quantity at this point](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/reputation/reputation_balance.gif)
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally posted by Ken Pisichko
Oh, so you are now telling everyone reading this thread that YOUR question
is just plain stupid. Now reflect on all the answers - and YOUR own
stupidity.
Alas, just another troll asking stupid questions. And the troll even admits
the question is a stupid one. Not our problem if you don't like the answers.
cormic wrote:
> Originally posted by manc1976
> > I am a little perturbed
> to think that you expected us to endorse something so blatantly illegal.
> your quite right,and if i had recieved no replies to my
> question i would have deduced that quite successfully.im just replying
> to the users who feel that they have to comment on every post however
> stupid the question may be.
> --
> Posted via http://britishexpats.com
Oh, so you are now telling everyone reading this thread that YOUR question
is just plain stupid. Now reflect on all the answers - and YOUR own
stupidity.
Alas, just another troll asking stupid questions. And the troll even admits
the question is a stupid one. Not our problem if you don't like the answers.
cormic wrote:
> Originally posted by manc1976
> > I am a little perturbed
> to think that you expected us to endorse something so blatantly illegal.
> your quite right,and if i had recieved no replies to my
> question i would have deduced that quite successfully.im just replying
> to the users who feel that they have to comment on every post however
> stupid the question may be.
> --
> Posted via http://britishexpats.com
![cormic is offline](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://britishexpats.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Maybe, but then both USA based and Canadian based Polar bears would ALL find
his kind tasty. Plus all that carbon would be recycled instead :-) It
would also remove any necessity of paperwork on the part of Canadian and US
border control types as well, thus allowing for more time to do other
things.
Poor follow - still cannot get the idea that folks replying to this thread
don't want to provide ANY positive reply to his criminally intentioned
question. What kind of comic relief does that joker actually require?
Anonymous wrote:
> Just another example of the use of britishespats.com as a facilitator of
> crime. Maybe we will get lucky and this guy will step on a land mine.
his kind tasty. Plus all that carbon would be recycled instead :-) It
would also remove any necessity of paperwork on the part of Canadian and US
border control types as well, thus allowing for more time to do other
things.
Poor follow - still cannot get the idea that folks replying to this thread
don't want to provide ANY positive reply to his criminally intentioned
question. What kind of comic relief does that joker actually require?
Anonymous wrote:
> Just another example of the use of britishespats.com as a facilitator of
> crime. Maybe we will get lucky and this guy will step on a land mine.