![]() |
Re: What should she do?
British pension provision is particularly inconsiderate in transitions to new requirements. Apart from the freezing pensions for some expats there are additional changes. A full pension now needs 35 years instead of 30. Plus if you're a woman born in the 1950s pensionable age has been moved from 60 to 66. All very well in the interests of equality but not enough notice was given to enable you to make provision even if you could.
I'm pretty pissed off by the whole thing. |
Re: What should she do?
Originally Posted by bats
(Post 12228108)
British pension provision is particularly inconsiderate in transitions to new requirements.
Apart from the freezing pensions for some expats there are additional changes. A full pension now needs 35 years instead of 30. Plus if you're a woman born in the 1950s pensionable age has been moved from 60 to 66. All very well in the interests of equality but not enough notice was given to enable you to make provision even if you could. I'm pretty pissed off by the whole thing. Good luck to you Bats, maybe just maybe there will be another change in your favour FWIW https://www.gov.uk/state-pension/eligibility My wife qualified for state pension in 2007 under the much older rules that required her to have 39 years of NIC's and before 'pension reform' that lowered it to 30 years NIC's for full pension Fortunately, I missed having to have to meet the requirement of 44 years NIC's for when I turned pension age in 2012, it was then down to 30 years NIC's for full pension The new 'state pension' rules are tight, 35 years + moving the qualifying age out & even worse because the Category B pension is gone as is survivor pension Under the old old rules that many fell into "Men born before 1945 and women born before 1950" You need more qualifying years to get a full State Pension and a certain minimum number of years to get any State Pension at all. Number of years needed for a full State Pension Men born before 6 April 1945 44 years Women born before 6 April 1950 39 years Minimum years need for any state pension Men 11 years Women 10 years |
Re: What should she do?
I'll get my pension when I'm 65 and 10 months, a friend from school is 9 months old than i am and she will get her pension when she's 64 and 8 months.
Really bloody annoying. |
Re: What should she do?
Originally Posted by bats
(Post 12228943)
I'll get my pension when I'm 65 and 10 months, a friend from school is 9 months old than i am and she will get her pension when she's 64 and 8 months.
Really bloody annoying. |
Re: What should she do?
Originally Posted by bats
(Post 12228943)
I'll get my pension when I'm 65 and 10 months, a friend from school is 9 months old than i am and she will get her pension when she's 64 and 8 months.
Really bloody annoying. |
Re: What should she do?
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 12229033)
Why is that, isn't it on 65th birthday or are you talking about non-state pension (based on work start date)?
Not sure about the "and x months" part. I get mine at 66. I thought it was just 66, 67, 68 etc...no Adrian Mole stuff. :lol::unsure: |
Re: What should she do?
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 12229058)
Not sure about the "and x months" part. I get mine at 66. |
Re: What should she do?
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 12229033)
Why is that, isn't it on 65th birthday or are you talking about non-state pension (based on work start date)?
|
Re: What should she do?
Originally Posted by geoff52
(Post 12227895)
This lady moved to Canada when she was 76 years of age. I assume she must have been sponsored by her daughter.
This may be an old fashioned view, but how about her daughter taking some responsibility for her welfare. I am glad the rules for sponsoring parents have been changed. In some immigrant communities in Canada there was so much abuse of this system. |
Re: What should she do?
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 12229033)
Why is that, isn't it on 65th birthday or are you talking about non-state pension (based on work start date)?
|
Re: What should she do?
I thought in some cases it was 68 now for women?
|
Re: What should she do?
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 12229033)
Why is that, isn't it on 65th birthday or are you talking about non-state pension (based on work start date)?
In 1995, it was changed to equalise it over time with men at 65 between 2010 and 2020 (so giving 15-25 years notice). In 2011, because male pension age was changed to 66, the timetable for women was changed as well, to equalise it at the new, higher level, by the same finish date, over the time between 2016 and 2020 (giving 5-10 years notice). This acceleration meant some women had their expected pension date changed by as much as 2 years, so the increase was capped at 18 months. This means some people in the transition years retiring at unusual times, against the normal birthday retirement both before and (in theory) after the change. Oh, and for fun, the 2014 act changed it again so the new age is 67, to be reached between 2026 and 2028. People born after 1977 will have a later date, as yet unplanned/announced. |
Re: What should she do?
Originally Posted by bats
(Post 12229883)
Because the effing government changed...didn't give enough notice...
When I left the UK I had 32 years in so I was due for about 80%. Then they dropped the 40 year requirement to 30 so it looked like I'd get the full rate and then it went up again to 35 so still a partial payment, albeit a partial of a higher rate than it would otherwise have been. :blink: They always say to plan for these things but while waiting beyond age 65 was something already pending (detail not announced yet) it's hard to plan when they make changes like this in so few years. Just as well my vision was always that the state pension was going to be a bonus it was just a case of how big a bonus. :nod: |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 6:07 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.