![]() |
UK benefits
Looks like England is the last place you want to be if you are on benefits or getting old.
|
Re: UK benefits
I suspect Canada is worse for those on minimal income to be honest, and at least they both have a safety net unlike some other places.
What does this have to do with Canada anyway? |
Re: UK benefits
Bizarre.
|
Re: UK benefits
There's a whiff of troll about this thread.
|
Re: UK benefits
i was under the impression that the UK's generous benefits is in part what has hurt the economy.
That being said, 98 quid a week that my old man is trying to get by on is pretty crap. He's had to keep a part time job as a school caretaker to get by. Sad when you think that he worked his balls off his whole life and never took nowt from the government. I think the old age benefits are more generous here but only if you have been here a good chunk of your working life |
Re: UK benefits
Originally Posted by didikai
(Post 10257047)
Looks like England is the last place you want to be if you are on benefits or getting old.
|
Re: UK benefits
Originally Posted by didikai
(Post 10257047)
Looks like England is the last place you want to be if you are on benefits or getting old.
|
Re: UK benefits
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 10257298)
Prince Philip has been on benefits most of his life, and he's 91.
|
Re: UK benefits
Originally Posted by Aviator
(Post 10257779)
And fringe benefits, he got to sleep with the boss.
|
Re: UK benefits
Originally Posted by Boy d
(Post 10257151)
I think the old age benefits are more generous here but only if you have been here a good chunk of your working life
Because she qualified for the top up, she qualified for the seniors prescription program and her meds were only $9 each. She cashed in an RRSP last year to pay off loans accumulated during her late husband's long illness and death. That was paid after deduction of tax. She then had an increased tax liability because Revenue Canada included the cashed in RRSP as her income last year. Because her assessed income for last year increased, she lost the income top up this year. Because she lost the income top up she has lost coverage under the seniors program and has to pay the full cost of meds. Even though there's been a considerable drop in her income. :( |
Re: UK benefits
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 10257820)
My mother in law gets (or did) the top up to her 'normal' pension. A bit like Pension Credit (ex income support in the UK).
Because she qualified for the top up, she qualified for the seniors prescription program and her meds were only $9 each. She cashed in an RRSP last year to pay off loans accumulated during her late husband's long illness and death. That was paid after deduction of tax. She then had an increased tax liability because Revenue Canada included the cashed in RRSP as her income last year. Because her assessed income for last year increased, she lost the income top up this year. Because she lost the income top up she has lost coverage under the seniors program and has to pay the full cost of meds. Even though there's been a considerable drop in her income. :( Assuming one made max contributions to CPP and max OAS, an average pension here would be around 1500 bucks a month or so, quite a bit more than 400 quid a month in the UK. Problem here though, is the amount of time in you have to have to max out. It's something like 40 years. |
Re: UK benefits
Originally Posted by Boy d
(Post 10257839)
like anywhere the rules tend to be a one size fits all. It should come as no surprise though that cashing out a rrsp creates a tax liability, after all it really was only a tax deferral investment.
Remember, too, that if you only get that £400 or so in the UK you can get your rent money on top and pension credit. A single pensioner is guaranteed almost £140 a week and if they have rent to pay, they'll get that too. A typical minimum income would then be around £1100 a month. And you can have several thousand ££ in the bank and not pay for prescriptions. :starsmile: The safety net is considerably stronger in the UK. |
Re: UK benefits
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 10257852)
Sure. But having your income reduced as well as the additional tax is a double whammy and then having to pay full cost for meds is a triple whammy.
Remember, too, that if you only get that £400 or so in the UK you can get your rent money on top and pension credit. A single pensioner is guaranteed almost £140 a week and if they have rent to pay, they'll get that too. A typical minimum income would then be around £1100 a month. And you can have several thousand ££ in the bank and not pay for prescriptions. :starsmile: The safety net is considerably stronger in the UK. The example of your MIL is really not a case of being penalised for having funds. RRSP are and always have been subject to income taxes and are added to total incomes for the year. One would hardly be punished for having savings as you suggest. CPP is based on contributions throughout one's working life and OAS is based on residency in Canada. GIS is designed to bridge the gap. Seems more equitable to me. The uk system seems unfair to me. If you own your own home you get 98 quid a week but if you don't you get more. My old man has a little bungalow but no other pensions or funds....for all his efforts and not sponging off the system he gets 98 squid a week. |
Re: UK benefits
Originally Posted by Boy d
(Post 10257861)
My old man has a little bungalow but no other pensions or funds....for all his efforts and not sponging off the system he gets 98 squid a week.
Council Tax benefit too. GIS is designed to bridge the gap. Seems more equitable to me. |
Re: UK benefits
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 10258014)
Well you should get him to apply for Pension Credit then as no single pensioner should be below £137.35 regardless of where they live.
Council Tax benefit too. How anyone can bemoan the poverty of their parents who own a home outright is beyond me. |
Re: UK benefits
Like Jingsamichty said you're wasting your breath. Boy d doesn't want to admit that the UK is better than Canada. :p
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 10258560)
Bristol, you're wasting your breath. Some people want to believe that the UK deliberately keeps its pensioners barely a day's gruel away from the poorhouse, while throwing bucketfuls of cash around at them bloody immigrants.
How anyone can bemoan the poverty of their parents who own a home outright is beyond me. |
Re: UK benefits
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 10258560)
Bristol, you're wasting your breath. Some people want to believe that the UK deliberately keeps its pensioners barely a day's gruel away from the poorhouse, while throwing bucketfuls of cash around at them bloody immigrants.
How anyone can bemoan the poverty of their parents who own a home outright is beyond me. Simply pointing out that they are two completely different systems. Granted a pensioner in the UK that has nowt will be better off. But why should a pensioner in the UK who has worked hard to pay off a mortgage be penalized over a pensioner earning the same who chooses not to pay off a mortgage. I see the system here as well, different, and being of benefit to one over the other. If one has been here for the chunk of their working life, regardless of personal assets they will likely be better off, as it's based on contributions and residency and you wont be penalized for owning your own home; however, some one at the end of the scale with lower CCP contributions will be in a different situation and likely better off in the UK. paying taxes on RRSP contributions is nothing to do with targeting pensioners, as RRSP's are intended to off set taxes as one will likely be in a lower tax bracket at retirement vs higher earning years. There is also the option of transfering to a riff if one wants to off set tax obligations at age 71. As for other benefits there are also property tax credits, hst credits, supplements for housing, perscriptions and public transport etc. |
Re: UK benefits
Originally Posted by Canuck74
(Post 10258577)
Like Jingsamichty said you're wasting your breath. Boy d doesn't want to admit that the UK is better than Canada. :p
The fact that you and jingy make such comments betrays your lack of knowledge. I'm basing my comparisons on my Canadian In Laws vs my old man. I know who is better off. As for better...well its down to one's situation is it not. I can retire in 8 years with a pension of around 60 - 70 k a year (ill be well under 60) :) |
Re: UK benefits
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 10258014)
Well you should get him to apply for Pension Credit then as no single pensioner should be below £137.35 regardless of where they live.
Council Tax benefit too. But cash in an RRSP or sell a house and incur capital gains tax just for that year and it's going to cost you your GIS and prescription coverage (depending on your province) the following year. |
Re: UK benefits
Originally Posted by Boy d
(Post 10258781)
Thanks for the link i will mention it to him. Maybe he does get that not sure. I do worry as he's on his todd now and getting older. The rest of the family dont want anything to do with him.
Originally Posted by Boy d
(Post 10257151)
That being said, 98 quid a week that my old man is trying to get by on is pretty crap.
Originally Posted by Boy d
(Post 10257839)
, quite a bit more than 400 quid a month in the UK.
Originally Posted by Boy d
(Post 10257861)
If you own your own home you get 98 quid a week but if you don't you get more.
... for all his efforts and not sponging off the system he gets 98 squid a week. |
Re: UK benefits
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 10258797)
Are you sure you don't know? You seemed pretty certain earlier.
hardly makes a big difference does it? 98 quid a week is the max basic uk pension.....end of. I see you have chosen to attack a meaningless aspect of my posts rather than the specifics. As i said you clearly have undertaken commenting on an issue you know nowt about. It seems clear to me that you are defending the UK at all costs without an ounce of knowledge that can contribute to this topic. |
Re: UK benefits
Originally Posted by Boy d
(Post 10258927)
What is your issue exactly? Do you have anything to offer, or are you just held bent on attacking me?
hardly makes a big difference does it? 98 quid a week is the max basic uk pension.....end of. I see you have chosen to attack a meaningless aspect of my posts rather than the specifics. As i said you clearly have undertaken commenting on an issue you know nowt about. It seems clear to me that you are defending the UK at all costs without an ounce of knowledge that can contribute to this topic. |
Re: UK benefits
Originally Posted by Boy d
(Post 10258927)
What is your issue exactly? Do you have anything to offer, or are you just hell bent on attacking me?
hardly makes a big difference does it? 98 quid a week is the max basic uk pension.....end of. I see you have chosen to attack a meaningless aspect of my posts rather than the specifics. As i said you clearly have undertaken commenting on an issue you know nowt about. It seems clear to me that you are defending the UK at all costs without an ounce of knowledge that can contribute to this topic. Let me see... the UK Government says "The full basic State Pension for a single person is £107.45 per week in 2012-13." |
Re: UK benefits
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 10258941)
Yet again you repeat the 98 quid, then chastise me for challenging it, saying it's a meaningless part of your argument?
Let me see... the UK Government says "The full basic State Pension for a single person is £107.45 per week in 2012-13." |
Re: UK benefits
better off there than over here in the US. At least you can get some kind of help in the UK.
|
Re: UK benefits
As a point of information, the Pension Credit for a single person is actually £142.70, according to the DirectGov site.
Also, the full basic state pension is not the maximum state pension, since many pensioners also get payments from SERPS (the State Earnings Related Pension Scheme). |
Re: UK benefits
Originally Posted by Boy d
(Post 10258927)
What is your issue exactly? Do you have anything to offer, or are you just hell bent on attacking me?
hardly makes a big difference does it? 98 quid a week is the max basic uk pension.....end of. WRONG. I see you have chosen to attack a meaningless aspect of my posts rather than the specifics. As i said you clearly have undertaken commenting on an issue you know nowt about. It seems clear to me that you are defending the UK at all costs without an ounce of knowledge that can contribute to this topic. I'm talking from personal knowledge being a UK pensioner |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 12:08 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.