British Expats

British Expats (https://britishexpats.com/forum/)
-   The Maple Leaf (https://britishexpats.com/forum/maple-leaf-98/)
-   -   Touch typing (https://britishexpats.com/forum/maple-leaf-98/touch-typing-741117/)

Jingsamichty Dec 6th 2011 4:08 am

Touch typing
 
Go on... have a go, see what you get.

In my sample text, I got 41 wpm, with 3 mistakes.

christmasoompa Dec 6th 2011 4:16 am

Re: Touch typing
 
Had to give it a go to check my typing is still up to speed (nothing to do with putting off writing yet more Christmas cards of course).

83 wpm, no mistakes.

iaink Dec 6th 2011 4:16 am

Re: Touch typing
 
38, with one mistake. mind you , I was trying to be more careful than usual.

iaink Dec 6th 2011 4:17 am

Re: Touch typing
 

Originally Posted by christmasoompa (Post 9773692)

83 wpm, no mistakes.

:eek: I should have lied too :p

christmasoompa Dec 6th 2011 4:24 am

Re: Touch typing
 

Originally Posted by iaink (Post 9773695)
:eek: I should have lied too :p

Would have thought with all your speedy edits your typing would be faster actually. ;):D

My time at secretarial college wasn't entirely wasted anyway, seems I can still type reasonably fast. I once worked with a girl that had a 100wpm typing speed. :eek:

Clearly the mods are bored today.............

Former Lancastrian Dec 6th 2011 4:29 am

Re: Touch typing
 
Also explains why sometimes while Im typing an answer yours has already been posted :lol:

Keep up the good work.

Dont they now have speech to text programmes that save you actually having to type?

christmasoompa Dec 6th 2011 4:36 am

Re: Touch typing
 

Originally Posted by Former Lancastrian (Post 9773730)
Dont they now have speech to text programmes that save you actually having to type?

Yes, they're rubbish. You know how when you try to use your handsfree on your phone and call somebody, most of the time you end up phoning the wrong person or your phone asks you to repeat the name 10 times? They're like that, only worse. :lol:

iaink Dec 6th 2011 4:41 am

Re: Touch typing
 

Originally Posted by christmasoompa (Post 9773716)
Would have thought with all your speedy edits your typing would be faster actually. ;):D

My time at secretarial college wasn't entirely wasted anyway, seems I can still type reasonably fast. I once worked with a girl that had a 100wpm typing speed. :eek:

Clearly the mods are bored today.............

My mum was a secretary.... 120wpm in pre Word Processor days, and some ridiculous shorthand rate too.


Clearly its not a genetic trait.

Oink Dec 6th 2011 4:43 am

Re: Touch typing
 
It said I got 326wpm with one mistake. I fear the one mistake was the whole thing.

christmasoompa Dec 6th 2011 4:44 am

Re: Touch typing
 

Originally Posted by iaink (Post 9773760)
My mum was a secretary.... 120wpm in pre Word Processor days, and some ridiculous shorthand rate too.

Blimey, that's amazing. I did shorthand too, was rubbish at it and have never used it since college so I'd imagine it's probably about 10wpm now. :o

Seedubs Dec 6th 2011 6:10 am

Re: Touch typing
 
I was taught on an old manual typewriter. The pass mark back then for my Class 1 was 30 wpm and I think you were allowed 1 mistake per 5 wpm. Nowdays I am around 60 wpm, but it is much easier on a keyboard.

AmyDavid Dec 6th 2011 12:05 pm

Re: Touch typing
 
85 wpm and nil mistakes. :starsmile:

JB0591 Dec 6th 2011 12:19 pm

Re: Touch typing
 
2686 wpm and 92 mistakes

....C&P wins

pinkmcfarquhar Dec 6th 2011 1:20 pm

Re: Touch typing
 
88wpm and 6 mistakes.

careless as ever.

caretaker Dec 6th 2011 2:01 pm

Re: Touch typing
 
If I remember correctly, we had to do 25 wpm in grade 10 to pass and 40 wpm in grade 11. I think I squeaked by but I was never %100 on the numbers in the top row. I can, however type 'Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their party.' with absolutely blinding speed and no mistakes. Too bad there's no call for that. The test in the link was hopeless on my phone - why is there a comma behind every word?

Chookie Dec 6th 2011 5:42 pm

Re: Touch typing
 
I got 54 wpm, but lots of mistakes, mostly because I am crap at spelling even when copying the text.

Partially discharged Dec 7th 2011 12:22 am

Re: Touch typing
 

Originally Posted by Jingsamichty (Post 9773678)
Go on... have a go, see what you get.

In my sample text, I got 41 wpm, with 3 mistakes.

72 wpm with 8 mistakes.

Alan2005 Dec 7th 2011 3:39 am

Re: Touch typing
 

Originally Posted by caretaker (Post 9774782)
If I remember correctly, we had to do 25 wpm in grade 10 to pass and 40 wpm in grade 11. I think I squeaked by but I was never %100 on the numbers in the top row. I can, however type 'Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their party.' with absolutely blinding speed and no mistakes. Too bad there's no call for that. The test in the link was hopeless on my phone - why is there a comma behind every word?

They've been quite clever. The comma doesn't appear in a desktop browser, but it's in the text as it appears when you copy it. It's why cut+paste gives you around 100 errors.

(61 wpm + 3 errors)

ann m Dec 7th 2011 8:23 am

Re: Touch typing
 

Originally Posted by iaink (Post 9773760)
My mum was a secretary.... 120wpm in pre Word Processor days, and some ridiculous shorthand rate too.

Ditto my mum - she was a speedy whizz across the page or keyboard.

Will go and do test when I have a few mins.

Chookie Dec 7th 2011 3:04 pm

Re: Touch typing
 
I should add, that while my typing may not be fantastic, I am pretty good , both fast and accurate with data entry using the numerical keypad.

I spent 4 years doing a PhD and inputting research data (mostly numbers - the weight of eggs believe it or not!)... that kind of stays with you.

mandymoochops Dec 7th 2011 3:24 pm

Re: Touch typing
 
31 wpm with 2 mistakes, hmm slow and careless, can only get better I guess :thumbup:

Siouxie Dec 7th 2011 3:28 pm

Re: Touch typing
 
73wpm (1 mistake).

I too learned shorthand (pitmans) and typing as a young lass - courtesy of Clarke's College - and somewhere have the certificates to prove it. The course was 'business studies' and you had to write orders, letters of complaint & etc., to practice your skills. My hand writing, of course, was appalling and homework was often thrown back at me in disgust! :)

"The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog" (and) "Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of the party" were our practice sentences, repeatedly typed to the William Tell Overture on ancient Underwood typewriters (complete with bell when your carriage hit the end). When a mistake was made woe betide if you rubbed it out on the carbon copy (literally a carbon copy) and went through the paper or smudged it.

Those were the days, sigh................ and I am so glad they are gone!

Yay for word processors and computers!

:D

ann m Dec 7th 2011 3:58 pm

Re: Touch typing
 
61wpm - no mistakes. Im ahppy wtih tht! :D

The4BellsLondon Dec 7th 2011 5:14 pm

Re: Touch typing
 
Hmm 38wpm and 2 mistakes - that's why I was never a secretary and had other people to type my letters, until the PC wiped out the typing pool - baah humbug!

ultrarunner Dec 14th 2011 1:28 am

Re: Touch typing
 
Impressive skills.....shame the folks in certain service industries don't have this when dealing with them on the phone :D

tallperson Dec 14th 2011 2:24 am

Re: Touch typing
 
I started but fell asleep before I got to the end............... :)

BristolUK Dec 14th 2011 7:11 am

Re: Touch typing
 

Originally Posted by Chookie (Post 9774936)
I got 54 wpm, but lots of mistakes, mostly because I am crap at spelling even when copying the text.

I wouldn't be so sure you made "proper" mistakes.

I got 31 wpm with 4 supposed mistakes.

The words by and as are not normally capitalised mid-sentence so I didn't capitalise them. So I'm calling that two mistakes, not four. :p


All times are GMT -12. The time now is 7:31 am.

Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.