Terror attack in NZ
#2
Re: Terror attack in NZ
I think there should be exceptions for giving the death penalty in countries where it is not legal. This is one of those times.
I purposely haven't read all the gory details, but I am amazed the suspect was captured alive.
I purposely haven't read all the gory details, but I am amazed the suspect was captured alive.
#3
Re: Terror attack in NZ
News here says they captured 3, also had two bombs, a well thought out planned terrorist attack
lots of injuries too I just heard
lots of injuries too I just heard
Last edited by magnumpi; Mar 15th 2019 at 6:10 pm.
#4
Re: Terror attack in NZ
My mother had a phrase that she'd wheel out on occasions, 'There are more out than in', meaning that not all disturbed people get put away.
In this case, you have an obsession, no doubt fed by utterances from those who should know better, that immigration and antipathy towards some religions, is something to be resisted by slaughtering anyone who fits the description.
The madness behind this doctrine is made even more obscene since it seeks to explain the actions of a white australian supposedly defending his european heritage and you must ask yourselves how such ideas germinate in the first place.
You don't have to dig deep into australian, canadian or US, history for that matter to unearth the inhuman actions of white 'settlers' against anyone not considered white enough or who just happened to live where white invaders wanted to be.
As a white boy growing up in england, I was intrigued by a world covered in pink and the legacy of an empire over which the sun never set. My geogaphy books were full of pictures of the masai tending herds in africa or the tattooed maori in far off new zealand. The history books were full of the exploits of Clive of India and General Gordon. The world was described as being peaceful under the benevolence of empire.
But, as we now understand, this was an exercise in propaganda, not so much to hide the truth, as to ignore it completely.
I've often said that not enough people understand their own history, If they did they might take a different view of the iraqi fleeing from a country invaded once again by a western power, running from a country whose borders were drawn by other westerners irrespective of tribal boundaries, or the syrian running from a civil war encouraged and supported by anti-Assad westerners.
We, whites, we descendants of those invaders who, even now find ourselves immigrants in other conquered lands, should realise that we should tread lightly in the hope that those who were here before us don't behave as badly as this australian bigot has.
In this case, you have an obsession, no doubt fed by utterances from those who should know better, that immigration and antipathy towards some religions, is something to be resisted by slaughtering anyone who fits the description.
The madness behind this doctrine is made even more obscene since it seeks to explain the actions of a white australian supposedly defending his european heritage and you must ask yourselves how such ideas germinate in the first place.
You don't have to dig deep into australian, canadian or US, history for that matter to unearth the inhuman actions of white 'settlers' against anyone not considered white enough or who just happened to live where white invaders wanted to be.
As a white boy growing up in england, I was intrigued by a world covered in pink and the legacy of an empire over which the sun never set. My geogaphy books were full of pictures of the masai tending herds in africa or the tattooed maori in far off new zealand. The history books were full of the exploits of Clive of India and General Gordon. The world was described as being peaceful under the benevolence of empire.
But, as we now understand, this was an exercise in propaganda, not so much to hide the truth, as to ignore it completely.
I've often said that not enough people understand their own history, If they did they might take a different view of the iraqi fleeing from a country invaded once again by a western power, running from a country whose borders were drawn by other westerners irrespective of tribal boundaries, or the syrian running from a civil war encouraged and supported by anti-Assad westerners.
We, whites, we descendants of those invaders who, even now find ourselves immigrants in other conquered lands, should realise that we should tread lightly in the hope that those who were here before us don't behave as badly as this australian bigot has.
#5
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Feb 2013
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 3,874
Re: Terror attack in NZ
Seemingly the guy had plans to attack a third mosque "if he could make it there"
#6
Re: Terror attack in NZ
Yes, quite a contrast between Jacinda and Trump...
https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...-and-integrity
https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...-and-integrity
#8
Re: Terror attack in NZ
#9
Forum Regular
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 104
Re: Terror attack in NZ
Hi
personally i dont like the NZ Pm's reaction,
it most likely will result in a to fast knee jerk policy that will be put place
and i have seen no mention on the tv clips ( i have seen ) about what they are going to do to counteract the threat of the ied's the attacker had occuring again
cheers
jerry
personally i dont like the NZ Pm's reaction,
it most likely will result in a to fast knee jerk policy that will be put place
and i have seen no mention on the tv clips ( i have seen ) about what they are going to do to counteract the threat of the ied's the attacker had occuring again
cheers
jerry
#10
Re: Terror attack in NZ
Hi
personally i dont like the NZ Pm's reaction,
it most likely will result in a to fast knee jerk policy that will be put place
and i have seen no mention on the tv clips ( i have seen ) about what they are going to do to counteract the threat of the ied's the attacker had occuring again
cheers
jerry
personally i dont like the NZ Pm's reaction,
it most likely will result in a to fast knee jerk policy that will be put place
and i have seen no mention on the tv clips ( i have seen ) about what they are going to do to counteract the threat of the ied's the attacker had occuring again
cheers
jerry
#11
Forum Regular
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 104
Re: Terror attack in NZ
Hi
no probs with gun control
hicap magazines should only be in govenment controlled hands
as j understand NZ has no gun registry, they dont know who has what
my logic is register them all first, know who has what then decide what to ban
the only sure way of not creating 'ghost' guns
laws done correctly not by what appears to me to be a political knee jerk government reaction
cheers
jerry
no probs with gun control
hicap magazines should only be in govenment controlled hands
as j understand NZ has no gun registry, they dont know who has what
my logic is register them all first, know who has what then decide what to ban
the only sure way of not creating 'ghost' guns
laws done correctly not by what appears to me to be a political knee jerk government reaction
cheers
jerry
#12
Re: Terror attack in NZ
Hi
no probs with gun control
hicap magazines should only be in govenment controlled hands
as j understand NZ has no gun registry, they dont know who has what
my logic is register them all first, know who has what then decide what to ban
the only sure way of not creating 'ghost' guns
laws done correctly not by what appears to me to be a political knee jerk government reaction
cheers
jerry
#13
Re: Terror attack in NZ
I don't see that at all. In the video we see shot after shot being blasted and magazines being changed in a moment. No one, outside of a war, needs that firepower. The NZ government's new policy seems sensible and the phase in process reasonable. No guns will be created by it.
#14
Re: Terror attack in NZ
I don't see that at all. In the video we see shot after shot being blasted and magazines being changed in a moment. No one, outside of a war, needs that firepower. The NZ government's new policy seems sensible and the phase in process reasonable. No guns will be created by it.
I think the NZ immediate ban is also a good signal to the US, that gun control does not need to be a tortuous process. Britain should know, post Dunblane.