|
Re: Scots give the UK a bad reputation again.
Originally Posted by bats
(Post 11508739)
You said the same in post 8, though you chose to use a different set of offensive words.
Get over yourself, FLs weak jokes are far from being in the same category of offensiveness. There isn't even a rude word for Scots is there? Though it's hardly rude. Unless you take it that way. Al Murray does it the best: |
Re: Scots give the UK a bad reputation again.
Why are you allowed to shorten "Scottish" to "Scots" but can't shorten "Pakistanis" to "Pakis"?
|
Re: Scots give the UK a bad reputation again.
Originally Posted by haggis88
(Post 11518062)
Why are you allowed to shorten "Scottish" to "Scots" but can't shorten "Pakistanis" to "Pakis"?
|
Re: Scots give the UK a bad reputation again.
well **** with a ******* and **** in the **** ******, ****
|
Re: Scots give the UK a bad reputation again.
Originally Posted by haggis88
(Post 11518062)
Why are you allowed to shorten "Scottish" to "Scots" but can't shorten "Pakistanis" to "Pakis"?
Oh my the shame |
Re: Scots give the UK a bad reputation again.
Originally Posted by haggis88
(Post 11518062)
Why are you allowed to shorten "Scottish" to "Scots" but can't shorten "Pakistanis" to "Pakis"?
|
Re: Scots give the UK a bad reputation again.
Originally Posted by caretaker
(Post 11518270)
Because they know if you can't say Scots you might say Scotch.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 7:17 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.