![]() |
Passport seized
What's with these passports seizures I keep reading about? According to this CIC article:
He was identified as a high-risk traveller and had his passport taken away, but there wasn't enough evidence for police to charge him and detain him. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms says: Every citizen of Canada has the right to enter, remain in and leave Canada. It doesn't sound like it counts for much. |
Re: Passport seized
We live in times much different than those when Charter was written. Haven't other western nations instituted similar protection procedures?
|
Re: Passport seized
The question is not why take the passport, that looks obvious to me, the question is why this guy, and possibly many more nutters were let back into the free world without surveillance being instigated on them
What we need here is a little Canadian Guamtamano Island retreat for these happy fighting fit folks |
Re: Passport seized
Originally Posted by FlyingDutchman6666
(Post 11447041)
What's with these passports seizures I keep reading about? According to this CIC article:
So merely the suspicion of being "high risk" is enough to have your passport taken away? No conviction in a court of law? Guilty until proven innocent ? The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms says: Every citizen of Canada has the right to enter, remain in and leave Canada. It doesn't sound like it counts for much. Looks like their decision was correct. |
Re: Passport seized
What decision was correct? Confining everyone vaguely suspect to Canada? Sounds like they hit the jackpot twice.
|
Re: Passport seized
Originally Posted by FlyingDutchman6666
(Post 11447088)
What decision was correct? Confining everyone vaguely suspect to Canada? Sounds like they hit the jackpot twice.
90 more like him still out there breathing the same air as us, that's :ohmy: |
Re: Passport seized
Originally Posted by FlyingDutchman6666
(Post 11447088)
What decision was correct? Confining everyone vaguely suspect to Canada? Sounds like they hit the jackpot twice.
He was "High Risk". I'm sure you don't earn that status by j-walking or dropping litter on the street. |
Re: Passport seized
Well they clearly didn't have enough evidence to even charge him. And how do you know they don't seize passports on a whim? How many innocent people had their passports seized just to block these two nutcases?
Are there court documents we can read to see exactly what the process is? Is there even a court involved? Or Just the spooks? We all know how well that turned out in the run-up to the Iraq war. |
Re: Passport seized
Originally Posted by plasticcanuck
(Post 11447052)
We live in times much different than those when Charter was written.
|
Re: Passport seized
Originally Posted by FlyingDutchman6666
(Post 11447105)
Well they clearly didn't have enough evidence to even charge him. And how do you know they don't seize passports on a whim? How many innocent people had their passports seized just to block these two nutcases?
Are there court documents we can read to see exactly what the process is? Is there even a court involved? Or Just the spooks? We all know how well that turned out in the run-up to the Iraq war. |
Re: Passport seized
@Flying Dutch
How do u know they did? |
Re: Passport seized
Originally Posted by magnumpi
(Post 11447117)
How do u know they did?
If you take away enough passports, eventually one or two nutcases with seized passports are going to go ape. Which of course proves the government was totally correct... right?? |
Re: Passport seized
Originally Posted by FlyingDutchman6666
(Post 11447041)
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms says: Every citizen of Canada has the right to enter, remain in and leave Canada. It doesn't sound like it counts for much.
I haven't checked the small print in my Canadian passport, but I'm pretty sure the UK one says it's government property and must be surrendered on request. I presume the Canadian one is similar. |
Re: Passport seized
Can they even charge some one for attempting to go to an Islamic country?
|
Re: Passport seized
Originally Posted by FlyingDutchman6666
(Post 11447121)
Because they didn't have enough evidence to charge these people, let alone convict them. That sounds like "on a whim" to me, unless proven otherwise.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 9:40 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.