Overcrowded Britian
#17
Part Time Poster









Joined: Jan 2004
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 4,219












As discussed on here before;
The population density in Canada looks low because of all the empty land, but in reality with I believe 81% living in a urban areas, for most people in Canada the real population density is going to be higher here ( 25% of Canada population live in the greater GTA (golden horse shoe)

#18
Forum Regular



Joined: Sep 2011
Location: Epsom, er no, Toronto...
Posts: 135


Yep...
As discussed on here before;
The population density in Canada looks low because of all the empty land, but in reality with I believe 81% living in a urban areas, for most people in Canada the real population density is going to be higher here ( 25% of Canada population live in the greater GTA (golden horse shoe)
As discussed on here before;
The population density in Canada looks low because of all the empty land, but in reality with I believe 81% living in a urban areas, for most people in Canada the real population density is going to be higher here ( 25% of Canada population live in the greater GTA (golden horse shoe)

#19
Part Time Poster









Joined: Jan 2004
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 4,219












London UK 1336 people /km2
Toronto CAN 3972 people /km2 that was in 2006

#20
Yorkshire meets Vegas






Joined: Jul 2004
Location: T. ON (so there!)
Posts: 1,354












Yeah, but it also depends on what the definitions are:
Is London defined as Zone 1, Zones 1- 6 or Greater London, which includes country bits.
Is Toronto defined as City of Toronto, Toronto Municipality or GTA.
Not really comparing like with like IMO, also parts of London - like the city are very depopulated. IIRC when I worked in the big smoke the City of London was classed as completely non-residential. This clearly has an impact on density and compare that to Toronto's financial district where bankers work cheek by jowl with residents...
Is London defined as Zone 1, Zones 1- 6 or Greater London, which includes country bits.
Is Toronto defined as City of Toronto, Toronto Municipality or GTA.
Not really comparing like with like IMO, also parts of London - like the city are very depopulated. IIRC when I worked in the big smoke the City of London was classed as completely non-residential. This clearly has an impact on density and compare that to Toronto's financial district where bankers work cheek by jowl with residents...

#21
Forum Regular



Joined: Sep 2011
Location: Epsom, er no, Toronto...
Posts: 135


Yeah, but it also depends on what the definitions are:
Is London defined as Zone 1, Zones 1- 6 or Greater London, which includes country bits.
Is Toronto defined as City of Toronto, Toronto Municipality or GTA.
Not really comparing like with like IMO, also parts of London - like the city are very depopulated. IIRC when I worked in the big smoke the City of London was classed as completely non-residential. This clearly has an impact on density and compare that to Toronto's financial district where bankers work cheek by jowl with residents...
Is London defined as Zone 1, Zones 1- 6 or Greater London, which includes country bits.
Is Toronto defined as City of Toronto, Toronto Municipality or GTA.
Not really comparing like with like IMO, also parts of London - like the city are very depopulated. IIRC when I worked in the big smoke the City of London was classed as completely non-residential. This clearly has an impact on density and compare that to Toronto's financial district where bankers work cheek by jowl with residents...

#22


Spoiler:
Last edited by Pulaski; Mar 14th 2013 at 1:25 am.
