Overcrowded Britian
#1
Bristolish expat






Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Bristol ~ Nanaimo, BC ... It's a bit like Salem's Lot!!
Posts: 1,699













#2
Analyst for hire






Joined: Jan 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,698












It's not very accurate. Netherlands for instance has twice the population density of the UK. That's not even taking into account small principalities like San Marino, Monaco and Gibraltar etc that are denser than both, but they're pretty much just cities not lands. Then there's Malta.
Even the text description is wrong as Japan has 873 per square mile, the UK has 673.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...lation_density
Even the text description is wrong as Japan has 873 per square mile, the UK has 673.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...lation_density

#3

It's not very accurate. Netherlands for instance has twice the population density of the UK. That's not even taking into account small principalities like San Marino, Monaco and Gibraltar etc that are denser than both, but they're pretty much just cities not lands. Then there's Malta.
Even the text description is wrong as Japan has 873 per square mile, the UK has 673.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...lation_density
Even the text description is wrong as Japan has 873 per square mile, the UK has 673.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...lation_density

#4

It's not very accurate. Netherlands for instance has twice the population density of the UK. That's not even taking into account small principalities like San Marino, Monaco and Gibraltar etc that are denser than both, but they're pretty much just cities not lands. Then there's Malta.
Even the text description is wrong as Japan has 873 per square mile, the UK has 673.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...lation_density
Even the text description is wrong as Japan has 873 per square mile, the UK has 673.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...lation_density

#6
Bristolish expat






Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Bristol ~ Nanaimo, BC ... It's a bit like Salem's Lot!!
Posts: 1,699












It's not very accurate. Netherlands for instance has twice the population density of the UK. That's not even taking into account small principalities like San Marino, Monaco and Gibraltar etc that are denser than both, but they're pretty much just cities not lands. Then there's Malta.
Even the text description is wrong as Japan has 873 per square mile, the UK has 673.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...lation_density
Even the text description is wrong as Japan has 873 per square mile, the UK has 673.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...lation_density

Last edited by bananahammock; Mar 9th 2013 at 4:42 pm.

#7

We could do with shipping a lot of "indigenous" British people out and bringing in more immigrants, IMO.

#8
Bristolish expat






Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Bristol ~ Nanaimo, BC ... It's a bit like Salem's Lot!!
Posts: 1,699












#10

From what I remember, there's something like an acre of land for every person in Britain. The government just prohibits Britons from living on most of it.
You only have to look out of the window while flying there to see how underpopulated most of the country is.
You only have to look out of the window while flying there to see how underpopulated most of the country is.

#13

I think I read somewhere, that if the entire population of the world lived at the same density as NYC, we would take up an area the size of Texas.

#14

See this link for countries by population density :http://www.indexmundi.com/g/r.aspx?v=21000

#15


