|
Re: Opinions please (photo's)
Originally Posted by Oakvillian
(Post 6414969)
(does it count if I'm an engineer but working in marketing?) :)
|
Re: Opinions please (photo's)
Originally Posted by Oakvillian
(Post 6414969)
I prefer 2 - the rocks in the foreground give it an interesting extra dimension and some additional texture.
But I seem to be going against the grain - most other engineers have preferred #1 (does it count if I'm an engineer but working in marketing?) :) |
Re: Opinions please (photo's)
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 6414977)
Probably evidence to suggest your judgment is perhaps impaired:sneaky:
OY! :p |
Re: Opinions please (photo's)
Image 2.......from an artistic point of view there's more to hold my interest. I think it's also slightly sharper. :)
|
Re: Opinions please (photo's)
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by Bill_S
(Post 6414972)
Very nice shots, Steve. I was up there in 2005 - cold up there, ain't it!
I prefer image 1; I like the way the mist is framing the cone. Howver, right now I'm using an extraordinarily crappy monitor, so I can't see very much of the foreground in either image. I might change my opinion when I look at these at home. When you were driving up did you see the cyclists heading down? Actually Bill it was quite nice up there that day as evidenced by this pic it's a rare shot of me, I'm the goof on the left.:p Yep saw lots of cyclists going down and as we were walking to the observation area at the very top 10,075' we were passed by a fellow on a bicycle who had cycled all the way to the top from the valley floor in one go. :eek: Cheers and thanks to all of you. Steve |
Re: Opinions please (photo's)
I was going to say #1, level pegging now;)
Great pics by the way:) |
Re: Opinions please (photo's)
both great pictures but i think number 2 is slightly better
julie |
Re: Opinions please (photo's)
No 2
The composition conforms to the golden section/rule of thirds business and so is more pleasing to the eye. My personal comment would be to prefer it with some sky cropped off so that there is very little blue. But thats being picky as its a great photo. |
Re: Opinions please (photo's)
Loved both but prefer #1:D
|
Re: Opinions please (photo's)
Originally Posted by daft batty
(Post 6415937)
No 2
The composition conforms to the golden section/rule of thirds business and so is more pleasing to the eye. My personal comment would be to prefer it with some sky cropped off so that there is very little blue. But thats being picky as its a great photo. This one's for you and no it's not a Budweiser. :p:rofl::rofl: http://jjd.pbase.com/hangman/image/97869170 Yes? No? :) |
Re: Opinions please (photo's)
#1 for me - not sure why, just looks more appealing....
|
Re: Opinions please (photo's)
#2 for me, though I may even prefer the DB version.
And for the record I am an engineer according to the North American usage though have never thought of myself as one (officially an Enterprise Architect whatever that means!) |
Re: Opinions please (photo's)
Originally Posted by Steve_P
(Post 6416014)
This one's for you and no it's not a Budweiser. :p:rofl::rofl:
http://jjd.pbase.com/hangman/image/97869170 Yes? No? :) possibly even a smidge more. ;) |
Re: Opinions please (photo's)
Originally Posted by daft batty
(Post 6416146)
yes,yes yes!
possibly even a smidge more. ;) http://www.pbase.com/hangman/image/97871356 |
Re: Opinions please (photo's)
Yes
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 7:19 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.