British Expats

British Expats (https://britishexpats.com/forum/)
-   The Maple Leaf (https://britishexpats.com/forum/maple-leaf-98/)
-   -   London Fire Question (https://britishexpats.com/forum/maple-leaf-98/london-fire-question-898054/)

magnumpi Jun 14th 2017 3:09 am

London Fire Question
 
Most may have seen this in the news by now or heard of it, but I am flabbergasted by the pics of the whole building burning? How can a whole building burn down, or up, or whatever, I have seen apartment fires but they usually just damage a small area only.

Are UK buildings made of straw and paper ? No way should a whole building suffer such damage in this day and age !!! NO WAY !!

Witnesses say children thrown from London highrise to save them from deadly fire - World - CBC News

Atlantic Xpat Jun 14th 2017 3:11 am

Re: London Fire Question
 
Allegedly the cladding recently installed on the outside wasn't fireproof.

MidAtlantic Jun 14th 2017 3:33 am

Re: London Fire Question
 

Originally Posted by Atlantic Xpat (Post 12273052)
Allegedly the cladding recently installed on the outside wasn't fireproof.

There is certainly something seriously wrong about it. Compliance with the building regs and fire prevention measures should ensure that the fire is contained within one flat and certainly that escape routes remain usable.

I have seen several London fires where just one flat in a block is ablaze but, apart from flames from windows going up the outside, nothing else is affected. That's how it should be.

Pulaski Jun 14th 2017 3:40 am

Re: London Fire Question
 

Originally Posted by magnumpi (Post 12273050)
.... Are UK buildings made of straw and paper ? No way should a whole building suffer such damage in this day and age !!! ....

There are plans afoot in the US and Canada to building timber framed apartments/condos up to 18 stories. :blink: I know of one built a decade ago here in NC that is ten stories, and that isn't cheap apartments but is comprised of high-end condos with a French chateau style exterior, that were originally sold for $700$-$800k each. IIRC

mrken30 Jun 14th 2017 3:47 am

Re: London Fire Question
 

Originally Posted by Pulaski (Post 12273080)
There are plans afoot in the US and Canada to building timber framed apartments/condos up to 18 stories. :blink: I know of one built a decade ago here in NC that is ten stories, and that isn't cheap apartments but is comprised of high-end condos with a French chateau style exterior, that were originally sold for $700$-$800k each. IIRC

One has just been built.

Portland Home To Tallest Wooden Building In The US

https://cleantechnica.com/2017/06/12...n-building-us/

mrken30 Jun 14th 2017 3:49 am

Re: London Fire Question
 

Originally Posted by MidAtlantic (Post 12273074)
There is certainly something seriously wrong about it. Compliance with the building regs and fire prevention measures should ensure that the fire is contained within one flat and certainly that escape routes remain usable.

I have seen several London fires where just one flat in a block is ablaze but, apart from flames from windows going up the outside, nothing else is affected. That's how it should be.

I am assuming that new uPVC windows were installed. These probably just melted and allowed the cladding to catch fire.

I wonder if the company that installed the cladding will remain solvent for very long.

mrken30 Jun 14th 2017 3:55 am

Re: London Fire Question
 
This is a daily mail article, but there may be some truth in what they say.

London Fire: No sprinklers or fire alarm in Grenfell Tower | Daily Mail Online

sharkus Jun 14th 2017 3:57 am

Re: London Fire Question
 
The exterior was modernised with rain screen cladding, believed to have included thermal insulation, and replacement windows, while curtain wall facades, a new heating system and smoke extract and ventilation system were also installed.

Take from here

It does look rather horrific, and there are fears it'll collapse.

Apparently residents complained about risk of fire previously as well - have a look here

I've always been slightly concerned about the buildings over here, as the new stuff going up over the past 10 years (probably longer too), seems all to be wood framed, which does explain how large cookie-cutter sub-divisions can get thrown up in a very short space of time, but it also seems to be a big fire risk, as one burning building could overtake another. Sure, there is meant to be some kind of firebreak material between the buildings (I'm thinking row / townhouse / small apartment complexes) but I suspect it's the bare minimum required by code.

dbd33 Jun 14th 2017 4:25 am

Re: London Fire Question
 

Originally Posted by sharkus (Post 12273093)

I've always been slightly concerned about the buildings over here, as the new stuff going up over the past 10 years (probably longer too), seems all to be wood framed, which does explain how large cookie-cutter sub-divisions can get thrown up in a very short space of time, but it also seems to be a big fire risk, as one burning building could overtake another. Sure, there is meant to be some kind of firebreak material between the buildings (I'm thinking row / townhouse / small apartment complexes) but I suspect it's the bare minimum required by code.

When we added a floor to our house we were obliged to finish the walls that were near to neighbouring houses with fire resistant drywall. I don't know how effective it is but it's bloody heavy.

mrken30 Jun 14th 2017 4:49 am

Re: London Fire Question
 

Originally Posted by dbd33 (Post 12273104)
When we added a floor to our house we were obliged to finish the walls that were near to neighbouring houses with fire resistant drywall. I don't know how effective it is but it's bloody heavy.

I assume that was inside the house. I know where I live, vinyl siding is used to tidy up older looking homes.

Siouxie Jun 14th 2017 4:54 am

Re: London Fire Question
 
Just terrible.

Did the building's new cladding make the fire much worse?

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...k-tower-blocks

BristolUK Jun 14th 2017 5:06 am

Re: London Fire Question
 

...building control, fire regulation, and health and safety standards.......Daily Mail...
I know I'm at risk of being accused of point scoring, or some such, inappropriate comments etc

But is this really the Daily Mail running an article alleging important safety standards not being met? The same Daily Mail that complains about petty H&S legislation and Red Tape?

Personally I can't think of a more appropriate time to make such a comment than when the devastating consequences of alleged cutting corners are made apparent.

Shard Jun 14th 2017 5:09 am

Re: London Fire Question
 
I've often thought that it should be compulsory for occupants in a high rise to have some sort of rope/abseil system as an emergency resource. Apparently in this fire some occupants were tying sheets together as a means to escape.

dbd33 Jun 14th 2017 5:13 am

Re: London Fire Question
 

Originally Posted by mrken30 (Post 12273132)
I assume that was inside the house. I know where I live, vinyl siding is used to tidy up older looking homes.

Yes, inside. That was a previous house. At the current one we tore the vinyl siding off and took it to the dump.

caretaker Jun 14th 2017 6:21 am

Re: London Fire Question
 
On the early morning news they reported that out of 125 suites about 25 had their own smoke detectors, and there were no common area smoke detectors and no sprinklers.


All times are GMT -12. The time now is 12:47 am.

Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.