![]() |
Re: Linked-In "lady"
What is odd was the Daily Mail were publishing social media comments from both legal professionals as headline news the last two days.
It has now been pulled. I wonder where the legal threat came from? |
Re: Linked-In "lady"
My take on it is that he was a bit of an idiot for doing it (& knew it had the potential of not being well perceived) but she handled it all wrong. The grown up thing to do would've been to ignore it, unlink & block him. He would've got the message that it was wrong. Instead she chose to chastise him then share with her friends how clever she thinks her response was for some attention & praise.
All she has done is made any potential employer not want to touch her with a barge pole for fear over being dragged to a tribunal every 5 mins. She has not done herself or any other of us women in male dominated environment any favours. Plus if she didn't want people judging her on her looks, why have a photo? I don't have one, it's not a requirement. |
Re: Linked-In "lady"
Tell you what though. He was right about his daughter. :ohmy:
http://our-voices-arkansas.com/wp-co...p-on-wrist.jpg :rofl::rofl: |
Re: Linked-In "lady"
Originally Posted by confused_uk
(Post 11746080)
My take on it is that he was a bit of an idiot for doing it (& knew it had the potential of not being well perceived) but she handled it all wrong. The grown up thing to do would've been to ignore it, unlink & block him. He would've got the message that it was wrong. Instead she chose to chastise him then share with her friends how clever she thinks her response was for some attention & praise.
All she has done is made any potential employer not want to touch her with a barge pole for fear over being dragged to a tribunal every 5 mins. She has not done herself or any other of us women in male dominated environment any favours. Plus if she didn't want people judging her on her looks, why have a photo? I don't have one, it's not a requirement. |
Re: Linked-In "lady"
Originally Posted by bats
(Post 11746019)
Perhaps if he had prefaced his words with comments on her professional achievements then your argument might be valid but no it was straight in with comments on her appearance. This make me think that it's all he considered.
|
Re: Linked-In "lady"
Originally Posted by caretaker
(Post 11746276)
A little foreplay?
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 1:29 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.