Harvey Weinstein
It's not hard to believe that the famed Hollywood casting couch is real, but it is hard to believe how this guy was able to operate for so long, given how famous and powerful many of his 'colleagues' have become.
|
Re: Harvey Weinstein
Heard a piece on The Current on CBC radio this morning. The whole culture of what used to be called "gag orders" and are now usually referred to as "non-disclosure agreements" is pretty poisonous. A young aspiring actress, or anybody in what is essentially precarious employment reliant on references from well connected people like Weinstein, is paid off to keep shtum. The way these contracts are written, the abused party could never afford to be sued for breaching the terms, so never mentions anything to anybody even beyond the narrow scope of the gag order. And so it goes on.
Almost more worrying in Weinstein's case is the whole network of enablers now being dragged out of the woodwork. While his company was quick to dismiss him when this came to light in the press, it is pretty bleeding obvious that senior associates knew exactly what he was about, and that employees up and down the organization have been covering up his criminal behaviour for years and years. |
Re: Harvey Weinstein
Perhaps I’m overly cynical, jaded, whatever one wants to call it, but I’ve been aware of this guy’s reputation & the allegations for years & I’m not surprised by the cover-your-ass scrambling currently going on. Nor am I surprised that NDAs have kept it under wraps for so long.
Reminds me of the Jimmy Saville debacle (amongst others): I first heard rumours/2nd hand accounts in the eighties. As did - afaik - law enforcement and the “powers that be”. |
Re: Harvey Weinstein
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 12358526)
It's not hard to believe that the famed Hollywood casting couch is real, but it is hard to believe how this guy was able to operate for so long, given how famous and powerful many of his 'colleagues' have become.
The real question is why his protectors suddenly decided to toss him under the bus. |
Re: Harvey Weinstein
Originally Posted by MarkG
(Post 12358628)
"You'll never work in this town again" is not an idle threat in Hollywood.
The real question is why his protectors suddenly decided to toss him under the bus. |
Re: Harvey Weinstein
Originally Posted by Oakvillian
(Post 12358605)
Heard a piece on The Current on CBC radio this morning. The whole culture of what used to be called "gag orders" and are now usually referred to as "non-disclosure agreements" is pretty poisonous. A young aspiring actress, or anybody in what is essentially precarious employment reliant on references from well connected people like Weinstein, is paid off to keep shtum. The way these contracts are written, the abused party could never afford to be sued for breaching the terms, so never mentions anything to anybody even beyond the narrow scope of the gag order. And so it goes on.
Almost more worrying in Weinstein's case is the whole network of enablers now being dragged out of the woodwork. While his company was quick to dismiss him when this came to light in the press, it is pretty bleeding obvious that senior associates knew exactly what he was about, and that employees up and down the organization have been covering up his criminal behaviour for years and years. |
Re: Harvey Weinstein
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 12358638)
The casting couch may be despicable and degrading, but is it criminal behaviour?
|
Re: Harvey Weinstein
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 12358638)
The casting couch may be despicable and degrading, but is it criminal behaviour?
|
Re: Harvey Weinstein
Originally Posted by mikelincs
(Post 12358641)
sexual harassment and sexual assault are crimes.
Despicable, but not criminal? |
Re: Harvey Weinstein
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 12358676)
I know that. I'm not 100% convinced that a "transactional" encounter (I'll give you a leg up in the business if you ...err... scratch my back) counts as assault.
Despicable, but not criminal? |
Re: Harvey Weinstein
Hmm. Think we need our learned friend AC to comment on this...!
|
Re: Harvey Weinstein
Well if its all true...which seems likely, I hope he gets what coming to him. Anyone who has such extreme arrogance and shows such contempt for women, deserves to come crashing down with a big thump.
Hopefully he will "never work in that town again". |
Re: Harvey Weinstein
Based on jokes that have been made in TV over the years about this man, seems it likely was no hidden secret of how he behaved.
https://globalnews.ca/news/3796504/s...edium=Facebook These sorts of jokes don't come out of nowhere. |
Re: Harvey Weinstein
Originally Posted by Oakvillian
(Post 12358715)
"You'll never work in this industry again unless you give me a blow-job now"
|
Re: Harvey Weinstein
Originally Posted by Shirtback
(Post 12358616)
Perhaps I’m overly cynical, jaded, whatever one wants to call it, but I’ve been aware of this guy’s reputation & the allegations for years & I’m not surprised by the cover-your-ass scrambling currently going on. Nor am I surprised that NDAs have kept it under wraps for so long.
Reminds me of the Jimmy Saville debacle (amongst others): I first heard rumours/2nd hand accounts in the eighties. As did - afaik - law enforcement and the “powers that be”. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...rvey-weinstein |
All times are GMT. The time now is 8:23 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.