British Expats

British Expats (https://britishexpats.com/forum/)
-   The Maple Leaf (https://britishexpats.com/forum/maple-leaf-98/)
-   -   Harvey Weinstein (https://britishexpats.com/forum/maple-leaf-98/harvey-weinstein-904444/)

Shard Oct 11th 2017 11:38 am

Harvey Weinstein
 
It's not hard to believe that the famed Hollywood casting couch is real, but it is hard to believe how this guy was able to operate for so long, given how famous and powerful many of his 'colleagues' have become.

Oakvillian Oct 11th 2017 1:37 pm

Re: Harvey Weinstein
 
Heard a piece on The Current on CBC radio this morning. The whole culture of what used to be called "gag orders" and are now usually referred to as "non-disclosure agreements" is pretty poisonous. A young aspiring actress, or anybody in what is essentially precarious employment reliant on references from well connected people like Weinstein, is paid off to keep shtum. The way these contracts are written, the abused party could never afford to be sued for breaching the terms, so never mentions anything to anybody even beyond the narrow scope of the gag order. And so it goes on.

Almost more worrying in Weinstein's case is the whole network of enablers now being dragged out of the woodwork. While his company was quick to dismiss him when this came to light in the press, it is pretty bleeding obvious that senior associates knew exactly what he was about, and that employees up and down the organization have been covering up his criminal behaviour for years and years.

Shirtback Oct 11th 2017 1:51 pm

Re: Harvey Weinstein
 
Perhaps I’m overly cynical, jaded, whatever one wants to call it, but I’ve been aware of this guy’s reputation & the allegations for years & I’m not surprised by the cover-your-ass scrambling currently going on. Nor am I surprised that NDAs have kept it under wraps for so long.

Reminds me of the Jimmy Saville debacle (amongst others): I first heard rumours/2nd hand accounts in the eighties. As did - afaik - law enforcement and the “powers that be”.

MarkG Oct 11th 2017 2:08 pm

Re: Harvey Weinstein
 

Originally Posted by Shard (Post 12358526)
It's not hard to believe that the famed Hollywood casting couch is real, but it is hard to believe how this guy was able to operate for so long, given how famous and powerful many of his 'colleagues' have become.

"You'll never work in this town again" is not an idle threat in Hollywood.

The real question is why his protectors suddenly decided to toss him under the bus.

mikelincs Oct 11th 2017 2:15 pm

Re: Harvey Weinstein
 

Originally Posted by MarkG (Post 12358628)
"You'll never work in this town again" is not an idle threat in Hollywood.

The real question is why his protectors suddenly decided to toss him under the bus.

Because the publicity was beginning to hit the company, it's a bit like the JS phenomenon in the UK, getting away with it for years because of who he is, then someone has the guts to speak out, and then others also come out from hiding. It seems as though he liked to have informal interviews in his hotel suite, excuse himself to use the bathroom then return wearing only a robe which wasn't fastened. They should have done what my wife did when she was confronted by a flasher, he just opened his coat, so she said,'sorry, I roll my own' , he ran off.

Jingsamichty Oct 11th 2017 2:24 pm

Re: Harvey Weinstein
 

Originally Posted by Oakvillian (Post 12358605)
Heard a piece on The Current on CBC radio this morning. The whole culture of what used to be called "gag orders" and are now usually referred to as "non-disclosure agreements" is pretty poisonous. A young aspiring actress, or anybody in what is essentially precarious employment reliant on references from well connected people like Weinstein, is paid off to keep shtum. The way these contracts are written, the abused party could never afford to be sued for breaching the terms, so never mentions anything to anybody even beyond the narrow scope of the gag order. And so it goes on.

Almost more worrying in Weinstein's case is the whole network of enablers now being dragged out of the woodwork. While his company was quick to dismiss him when this came to light in the press, it is pretty bleeding obvious that senior associates knew exactly what he was about, and that employees up and down the organization have been covering up his criminal behaviour for years and years.

The casting couch may be despicable and degrading, but is it criminal behaviour?

mikelincs Oct 11th 2017 2:29 pm

Re: Harvey Weinstein
 

Originally Posted by Jingsamichty (Post 12358638)
The casting couch may be despicable and degrading, but is it criminal behaviour?

sexual harassment and sexual assault are crimes.

Shard Oct 11th 2017 2:46 pm

Re: Harvey Weinstein
 

Originally Posted by Jingsamichty (Post 12358638)
The casting couch may be despicable and degrading, but is it criminal behaviour?

I wondered the same.

Jingsamichty Oct 11th 2017 3:29 pm

Re: Harvey Weinstein
 

Originally Posted by mikelincs (Post 12358641)
sexual harassment and sexual assault are crimes.

I know that. I'm not 100% convinced that a "transactional" encounter (I'll give you a leg up in the business if you ...err... scratch my back) counts as assault.

Despicable, but not criminal?

Oakvillian Oct 11th 2017 4:09 pm

Re: Harvey Weinstein
 

Originally Posted by Jingsamichty (Post 12358676)
I know that. I'm not 100% convinced that a "transactional" encounter (I'll give you a leg up in the business if you ...err... scratch my back) counts as assault.

Despicable, but not criminal?

"You'll never work in this industry again unless you give me a blow-job now" is a bit more than a "transactional encounter." Consent gained under such duress is not consent: sexual acts performed under such false consent are assaults.

Shard Oct 11th 2017 4:15 pm

Re: Harvey Weinstein
 
Hmm. Think we need our learned friend AC to comment on this...!

Paul_Shepherd Oct 11th 2017 4:48 pm

Re: Harvey Weinstein
 
Well if its all true...which seems likely, I hope he gets what coming to him. Anyone who has such extreme arrogance and shows such contempt for women, deserves to come crashing down with a big thump.

Hopefully he will "never work in that town again".

scrubbedexpat091 Oct 11th 2017 5:00 pm

Re: Harvey Weinstein
 
Based on jokes that have been made in TV over the years about this man, seems it likely was no hidden secret of how he behaved.

https://globalnews.ca/news/3796504/s...edium=Facebook

These sorts of jokes don't come out of nowhere.

dbd33 Oct 11th 2017 5:10 pm

Re: Harvey Weinstein
 

Originally Posted by Oakvillian (Post 12358715)
"You'll never work in this industry again unless you give me a blow-job now"

Is that what's meant by "a gag order"?

jerryhung Oct 11th 2017 5:10 pm

Re: Harvey Weinstein
 

Originally Posted by Shirtback (Post 12358616)
Perhaps I’m overly cynical, jaded, whatever one wants to call it, but I’ve been aware of this guy’s reputation & the allegations for years & I’m not surprised by the cover-your-ass scrambling currently going on. Nor am I surprised that NDAs have kept it under wraps for so long.

Reminds me of the Jimmy Saville debacle (amongst others): I first heard rumours/2nd hand accounts in the eighties. As did - afaik - law enforcement and the “powers that be”.

Manhattan DA didn't press charges. The police officer involved was livid. Cryus Vance received $$$$ from Weinstein lawyer:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...rvey-weinstein


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:23 am.

Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.