![]() |
Eddie Izzard - Labour Support
|
Re: Eddie Izzard - Labour Support
Is this an indication of your voting intentions mr richo?
|
Re: Eddie Izzard - Labour Support
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 8501794)
Is this an indication of your voting intentions mr richo?
Mr Clegg gave a pretty good performance in the debate last night. I think he opened a few peoples eyes so it'll be interesting to see if he can build momentum. I'm on the fence between Gordy and Nick. |
Re: Eddie Izzard - Labour Support
Originally Posted by el_richo
(Post 8501816)
Well, my vote will be as far away from "Call me Dave" as possible. Whether that's Labour or the Lib Dems, i'm undecided.
Mr Clegg gave a pretty good performance in the debate last night. I think he opened a few peoples eyes so it'll be interesting to see if he can build momentum. I'm on the fence between Gordy and Nick. Have those that have "had their eyes opened" by the debate not been following politics for the past while? |
Re: Eddie Izzard - Labour Support
Eddie should have dressed up like Maggie to do this!:rofl:
|
Re: Eddie Izzard - Labour Support
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 8501826)
This is the danger. The UK is heading toward a "presidential" style where the policies are less important than how "sexy" the leader is.
Have those that have "had their eyes opened" by the debate not been following politics for the past while? Still, as long as it's not Cameron and his goons, i'm not that fussed. |
Re: Eddie Izzard - Labour Support
Originally Posted by triumphguy
(Post 8501830)
Eddie should have dressed up like Maggie to do this!:rofl:
|
Re: Eddie Izzard - Labour Support
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 8501826)
This is the danger. The UK is heading toward a "presidential" style where the policies are less important than how "sexy" the leader is.
Have those that have "had their eyes opened" by the debate not been following politics for the past while? |
Re: Eddie Izzard - Labour Support
Originally Posted by el_richo
(Post 8501836)
Well that's the thing. There is that risk for sure but as the only one to provide numbers backing up his proposals, he stood out to people. Plus old Vince Cable is on a roll.
Still, as long as it's not Cameron and his goons, i'm not that fussed. |
Re: Eddie Izzard - Labour Support
Originally Posted by jimf
(Post 8501867)
It's easy to quote numbers when you know you'll never have to stand by them though.
|
Re: Eddie Izzard - Labour Support
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 8501838)
What you have to remember is that the vast majority of the electorate are idiots.
|
Re: Eddie Izzard - Labour Support
Originally Posted by el_richo
(Post 8502007)
Tis true. I notice much of the larger figures have been scrutinised yet have not been disputed. Well, from the reviews i've seen anyway.
http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/north...4229-26260996/ It's interesting that in theory based on the swing to the liberals in the poll labour would be 3rd in the popular vote but have the largest number of seats! |
Re: Eddie Izzard - Labour Support
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 8501826)
This is the danger. The UK is heading toward a "presidential" style where the policies are less important than how "sexy" the leader is.
|
Re: Eddie Izzard - Labour Support
Originally Posted by MarkG
(Post 8502170)
I presume you've been asleep since 1997 :).
|
Re: Eddie Izzard - Labour Support
I'll be supporting Eddie Izzard in Calgary next month, so does that mean I am supporting Labour by proxy? :p
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 7:01 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.