Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

oooo the LAW!! man's law has changed more often in history than any other aspect of humanity. It will change again, and again and then again!!!

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

There is no law that has more power than the laws of nature. If you try and break one you usually end up dead. Mans law only exisits to serve popular culture. They can be made and unmade to suit the mood of the people. etc... homosexulaty is legal in canada, the states, europe, but try and tour afganistan or iraq where homosexuality is punishible by death. mans law in effect. Natural law... man has sex with man, no offspring, the bloodline dies. man has sex with woman she gets pregnant and produces offspring to continue the bloodline. Mans law will always change. the laws of mother nature are the same as they were a billion years ago. You cannot judge what is natural by mans law, as the definition will change with time.

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

What, so sex is only good for breeding? Does having a vasectomy make me mentally ill?

Anyway, so much for your laws:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7330196.stm

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

Well that is the primary reason to have sex is it not? the fact that it is pleasurable just ensures copulation and procreation. just because homosexuality is not a proven mental disease does not mean it is the natural thing to do. It dosn't matter much because homos can't breed anyway. that so called "man" was a woman first, he\she always had an uterus.

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

dbd33? I thought you were washing your hair tonight?

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

Yeah - its either db33 or a troll. Someone is 'avin' us on I fink!!

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

The news story that link goes to just confirms how broken homes and immoral upbringing produces sexually confused teens that end up gay or going for a sex change. The society today would have a boy act like a girl or vice versa, instead of instilling the proper sexual roles upon the children. the human genome is unbiased towards sexuality, but it does control wether you are male or female. and if you are born a male, a man you should be. not some poor bloke who is made to think that he should be a woman because his penis is to small, or mabye he was taught to love his daddy the wrong way. sexual orentation starts in child hood, and if you tell the child they can be whatever sex they want, they will be confused and choose what they think you want them to be, instead of just being what they are

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

I wish I was gay cos I'm a lesbian magnet. Unfortuantely my troubled family life likely turned me straight... very straight... so straight that I don't mind boy dogs humping my leg.

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

The clarity, the clarity! PM me Thor baby, I'll rock your world and God be my judge.

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

Not me mate. I can't say I've heard of Mr. Lukiwski but I'd think that as a Conservative he's obliged to be at least mildly homophobic. I don't suppose Thorstien's views on faggotry clash strongly with those of Preston Manning or Steven Harper.

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

Wow... I came back to the thread to point out that the Toronto Star has a poll about this guy and find this. Wonderful.

http://www.thestar.com/#

'Is an apology sufficient?'

66%/33% To the forgive-and-forgets or anti-limp-wrist brigade, or whatever their reasons when I submitted.

.. Not for me it's not. Contraception ftw.

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

Oh really! Mr. Lukiwski has been a household word for ....... hours, at least.

If Thorstien is not you, then maybe Stockwell Day's meds have run low?

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

well it's been a blast, but I've more pressing matters than discussing homosexuality and politicians, and theroies of how the politicain became gay. lol. Final note- Keep Lukiwski, let him fix his mistakes, and vote for a better MP next election.

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

Can I guess that you are making these posts too prove just how offensive Lukiwski's remarks were? If you are than I do see your side of the argument. However have not changed my position. If you actually believe this crap then maybe if will help you get fast tracked in to Canada considering the current government! BTW there are several species of animals that do have intercorse with the same sex, saw it on a documentry once. I would get some examples but I haven't activated my parental controls yet and am not brave enough to google "homosexuality in the wild"

Just because some say Lukwiski should not have to resign does not mean we agree with the sentiments of what was said by him. Not being in SK you may not understand that this was done by a desperate provincial NDP gov(who I actually voted for this last election) that lost and now wants to discredit the Sask Party that is in power. Now the federal opposition parties are jumping on this too send the message that the conservative party of today are just the same rednecks from out west that were in the REEEFOOORM party. Maybe the forgive and forgets are just jaded by the Gotcha! mentality of politics. If the comments were made 1 year go or made in public I might be less forgiving.

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

Not Quo, surely?

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

Giraffes. Always at it.

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

Can't trust anything with a neck that long!

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

So go on, do tell, did you break the record for how long can I be a troll before the mods kick me off?

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

Rather a shame they're not lesbians really.

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

:rofl:

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

Giraffes only evolved long necks because their disgusting homosexuality causes them to fart a great deal.

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

I'm not very political, I try and follow politics, then I fall asleep. I just had to comment on the latest news story and provide my view point as a Home grown canadian citizen.

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

Again, I don't think you've said anything that would clash with the views of most people who would describe themselves in those terms. I personally don't much care for Canadians but I fear there's little one can do about them.

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

My views on homosexuality are just that. MY views. I think there are more important things to worry about than wether you want to munch carpet (mmm) or eat a choclate starfish(eeww), or your comments on the subject. hmmm contridictary eh? well I must say that I would argue just for the sake of proving you wrong. as a mentally ill person (ADD) I some times find it hard to stay on topic and rember all the details. so if I've digressed please forgive me and if you would like clarification don't be afriad to ask.

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

Please. It denigrates people who are truly insane when people who merely have difficulty writing coherently and a fixation with other people's gential agitations claim mental illness as an excuse. So, you're a bit of a redneck, someone who would have been comfortable in South Africa in the sixties, that just makes you unpleasant, it doesn't make you mad.

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

The Stockwell Day theory is firming up. (as, of course, am I)

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

ADD is a developmental disorder not mental disorder

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

Mmmm... Stockwell Day... firming... politics aside, I would let him hump my leg.

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

As opposed, of course, to homosexuality.

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

It's a dog eat dog world out there.

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

So if you don't like canadians why don't you move back to your own country?

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

"And I'm wearing milkbone underwear"

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

I enjoy flaunting myself before them.


More seriously, there are few Canadians in and around Toronto, I rarely meet one so not thinking much of them really isn't an issue day-to-day.

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

Well paint me purple and call me a lair. nice to see some facts on the matter. thank you for the correction. Hey people, if I was wrong about that one, what else might be right? As I said earlier, these are my views and I could be wrong. I've got nothing against homosexuals, It just makes me wonder why natural selection would create them?

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

I apologise for the oversight, unfortunately my multi tasking ability is not at it's best I fear watching Star Wars is taking the largest part of my brain action. May the Force Be With You http://*************.net/star-wars-smiley-5472.gif

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

Gay men exist to create gay porn which is sexually arousing to heterosexual women. Most will deny that because it seems unfeminine to get wet watching two, or more, blokes go at it.

Heterosexual women trapped by the confines of matrimony then turn to their passionless, sexually docile husbands as that is their only choice to get their rocks off and babies appear, repeat.

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

:eek::rofl:

See - it's easy when you know the answer .....

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

.lol. 'Married and bored, or single and lonely'.

Not sure about natural selection but it's not just gay people who can get their rocks off with same sex experiences as HWP happily points out. Sex is about pleasure, emotions, not just babies. Hell, women don't even need go near a d*ck to get pregnant if they don't want to. Pick some hunky dna from a catalogue and you're away.

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

g'nite and good bye. I'm outta here.

Re: Does Lukiwski need to go?
 

Oh hell... all women need is a healthy volunteer, a bowl and a turkey baster. I could go on about the natual selection of kitchen utensils but I'm really not very domesticated.