![]() |
Re: The dark side of layoffs and bad economy
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 11811293)
Do you think that Mr. Harper might be prosecuted for destroying the Canadian economy any time soon?
Is there nothing that man can't do? BTW, is there supposed to be a bright side of layoffs and a bad economy? I suppose it's good if you're rich and can buy up a lot of assets cheap...? |
Re: The dark side of layoffs and bad economy
Originally Posted by magnumpi
(Post 11811126)
On a lighter note regarding the piss poor economy, I just filled up in London for 87c a litre. :@)
|
Re: The dark side of layoffs and bad economy
Originally Posted by MarkG
(Post 11811711)
You mean it was Harper that knocked oil down from $100+ a barrel to $40?
Now look what's happened. |
Re: The dark side of layoffs and bad economy
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 11811771)
Now look what's happened.
|
Re: The dark side of layoffs and bad economy
Originally Posted by JonboyE
(Post 11811825)
The Canadian dollar went up so much on the back of oil that a shed load of manufacturing jobs in Ontario and Quebec went south to Mexico?
|
Re: The dark side of layoffs and bad economy
Originally Posted by Novocastrian
(Post 11811771)
No, it was Harper who bet the whole Canadian economy on the gamble that the price would stay over $100. The tar sands yield the most expensive to produce oil and were clearly going to become useless first.
Now look what's happened. |
Re: The dark side of layoffs and bad economy
Originally Posted by JonboyE
(Post 11811825)
The Canadian dollar went up so much on the back of oil that a shed load of manufacturing jobs in Ontario and Quebec went south to Mexico?
|
Re: The dark side of layoffs and bad economy
Originally Posted by Alan2005
(Post 11811953)
Tbf, they were heading there anyway. Western countries can't compete on wages, let alone working conditions and environmental protection.
Now new employers have started to move in to the area, and a number of them are ...... cotton mills! :blink: The difference? The new mills have modern, reliable machinery, that need fewer staff and less maintenance, and it turns out that much of the issue with the old mills that failed was as much chronic under-investment as it was low wages in completing countries. |
Re: The dark side of layoffs and bad economy
They say 2016 is going to be worse....
|
Re: The dark side of layoffs and bad economy
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 11811961)
That is not entirely true, and the margins by which production in a low-labour-cost country is more profitable are much lower than they were just a few years ago. My part of the US lost a lot of cotton mills and the economy languished for more than a decade looking for new industries and employers.
Now new employers have started to move in to the area, and a number of them are ...... cotton mills! :blink: The difference? The new mills have modern, reliable machinery, and it turns out that the issue with the old mills that failed was as much chronic under-investment as it was low wages in completing countries. But anything that is highly polluting / labour intensive always carries a risk of being off-shored if the volumes are high enough. And some of that will only have been brought forward because of the strong loonie. (source: my armchair) |
Re: The dark side of layoffs and bad economy
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 11811311)
Is any ethnic break-down available? I wonder if the influx of East Asian immigrants into BC has had a measurable impact on the suicide rate as East Asian countries are often reported to have significantly higher suicide rates than western countries. :unsure:
|
Re: The dark side of layoffs and bad economy
Originally Posted by JonboyE
(Post 11811825)
The Canadian dollar went up so much on the back of oil that a shed load of manufacturing jobs in Ontario and Quebec went south to Mexico?
WTF, I'm out of there. |
Re: The dark side of layoffs and bad economy
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 11811961)
That is not entirely true, and the margins by which production in a low-labour-cost country is more profitable are much lower than they were just a few years ago. My part of the US lost a lot of cotton mills and the economy languished for more than a decade looking for new industries and employers.
Now new employers have started to move in to the area, and a number of them are ...... cotton mills! :blink: The difference? The new mills have modern, reliable machinery, that need fewer staff and less maintenance, and it turns out that much of the issue with the old mills that failed was as much chronic under-investment as it was low wages in completing countries. Took this town about a decade to somewhat recover from the exodus of industry in the late 90's into the early 00's. The recovery is largely in the form of being close to Vancouver for commuters, and housing being 500k-600k instead of 1 million, and retail jobs at Wal-Mart, Home Depot and such. Town will never be a place where people live and work in the community like it was with industry and is not a commuting town, but it did recover and is growing... Now if housing ever collapses in Vancouver, the desirability of this place will likely do the same, most come here simply for lower cost houses and a 1 hour commute time. Local worker wages have collapsed a great deal, but overall average wage is high as it's inflated by out of town workers who commute and tend to be in the 6 figure range income wise... Largest employers who are not a government entity are Wal-Mart with 150 roughly employees, Home Depot with 100 and Save On Foods with 100. The next largest is Squamish Terminals (shipping port) with around 75 and another grocery store with 75 and the trash company with 75. Gov't agencies are by far the largest employers, but are mostly skilled like nursing, teaching and such. |
Re: The dark side of layoffs and bad economy
Originally Posted by Edo
(Post 11811964)
They say 2016 is going to be worse....
|
Re: The dark side of layoffs and bad economy
Originally Posted by JamesM
(Post 11811853)
Not to mention the scale of environmental damage that has been done by the tar sands either.
But yes of course. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 3:03 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.