Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Jsmth321
(Post 12887097)
It's the running complaint online with young people in Vancouver blaming boomers for not wearing masks, but reality is I saw just as many 50+ people wearing masks as I did 30 and under wearing masks, there seemed to be no consistency in mask wearing based on age. But Vancouver young adults seem to have this massive hate for boomers, its really odd to read and listen to. They seem to think all boomers are wealthy and sitting on piles of cash.
In Kelowna, I don't see high mask usage, at least compared to Vancouver, but its mostly older people wearing masks from what I have noticed, not young people. But there is far less masks being worn in general out this way, which seems consistent with the lower mainland as well, the more blue collar and conservative areas of the LM have less mask usage as well. The inter-generational angst in Vancouver is understandable, although the sky high property prices are not directly their doing. |
Re: Coronavirus
|
Re: Coronavirus
30 year old man in Toronto, finally awake and off ventilator. 59 days on the ventilator, lost 130 pounds. Other members of his family also had the virus but recovered.
Currently he is unable to walk, and has limited strength in his arms and will be discharged soon from hospital to a rehabilitation centre. Article here. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 12887111)
I guess less population density means the transmission risk is lower.
For population density per km2 Montreal is 3,889 and Toronto 4,334. Montreal has a slightly smaller population density but has over 28,000 cases as opposed to Toronto's 15,000. Is a crowded subway to blame? According to wiki, Toronto subway ridership is 1.58m while Montreal's is 1.367m. So even with that Montreal's figure is lower. What are the reasons for Montreal having nearly twice as many cases? |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Jsmth321
(Post 12887172)
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 12887231)
A comparison with Montreal and Toronto is interesting. Montreal's population is about two-thirds that of Toronto.
For population density per km2 Montreal is 3,889 and Toronto 4,334. Montreal has a slightly smaller population density but has over 28,000 cases as opposed to Toronto's 15,000. Is a crowded subway to blame? According to wiki, Toronto subway ridership is 1.58m while Montreal's is 1.367m. So even with that Montreal's figure is lower. What are the reasons for Montreal having nearly twice as many cases? |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 12887243)
No idea. Quebec being more tactile than Ontario? Timing of the initial infection, and timing of lockdown measures? Intergenerational households? Poutine?
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 12887243)
No idea. Quebec being more tactile than Ontario? Timing of the initial infection, and timing of lockdown measures? Intergenerational households? Poutine?
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 12887243)
No idea. Quebec being more tactile than Ontario? Timing of the initial infection, and timing of lockdown measures? Intergenerational households? Poutine?
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by bats
(Post 12887262)
Maybe French, when she is spoken, is more spitty?
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 12887299)
The Dutch must have no chance. :lol:
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by caretaker
(Post 12887314)
Neither of them were a match for the Spitzkrieg.
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 12887251)
It was my mother in law's birthday yesterday and she wanted Poutine for dinner. If that's the cause, one of us will be quarantined for a bit. :lol:
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 12887351)
Fabulous. :thumbup: Who made it ?
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 12887231)
A comparison with Montreal and Toronto is interesting. Montreal's population is about two-thirds that of Toronto.
For population density per km2 Montreal is 3,889 and Toronto 4,334. Montreal has a slightly smaller population density but has over 28,000 cases as opposed to Toronto's 15,000. Is a crowded subway to blame? According to wiki, Toronto subway ridership is 1.58m while Montreal's is 1.367m. So even with that Montreal's figure is lower. What are the reasons for Montreal having nearly twice as many cases? |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 12887231)
A comparison with Montreal and Toronto is interesting. Montreal's population is about two-thirds that of Toronto.
For population density per km2 Montreal is 3,889 and Toronto 4,334. Montreal has a slightly smaller population density but has over 28,000 cases as opposed to Toronto's 15,000. Is a crowded subway to blame? According to wiki, Toronto subway ridership is 1.58m while Montreal's is 1.367m. So even with that Montreal's figure is lower. What are the reasons for Montreal having nearly twice as many cases? https://www.amtrak.com/adirondack-train |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Siouxie
(Post 12888170)
There was a direct train from New York to Montreal running daily... perhaps they received an influx of US visitors prior to lockdown of the border...
It only took one person to increase NB's figures by 30% |
Re: Coronavirus
I believe Quebec also had their spring break earlier than many parts of Canada just before NY and other places went down the tubes, and saw a fair amount of young people travelling for spring break to places like Florida. I imagine college age students who travelled on spring break also brought back the virus.
By the time spring break for example happened in BC, things were better known, restrictions in place, and non-essential travel discouraged and the border restricted etc etc, so nobody really was able to travel for spring break. |
Re: Coronavirus
81 new cases over the weekend, 81 over a 3 day period.
A community outbreak has been declared in Abbotsford at Fraser Valley Packing which pack blueberries, 15 have tested positive so far. BC at a turning point, residents asked to pull back on social interactions and recommit to social distancing. Haida Gwaii now up to 14 cases all linked to residents and off island travel. (there were some talk last week it was tourists but appears it was residents leaving the island and returning) Outbreak in Kelowna continues to grow, cases linked to Kelowna up to 86, over 1,000 people in self isolation province wide. Okanagan has had 107 positive tests between July 10 and July 23. During the same period, 58 people were diagnosed south of the Fraser River, 49 in Vancouver and four in Richmond. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/briti...y-27-1.5663897 Seems this area in Kelowna and related is the hot spot. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Jsmth321
(Post 12888309)
81 new cases over the weekend, 81 over a 3 day period.
A community outbreak has been declared in Abbotsford at Fraser Valley Packing which pack blueberries, 15 have tested positive so far. BC at a turning point, residents asked to pull back on social interactions and recommit to social distancing. Haida Gwaii now up to 14 cases all linked to residents and off island travel. (there were some talk last week it was tourists but appears it was residents leaving the island and returning) Outbreak in Kelowna continues to grow, cases linked to Kelowna up to 86, over 1,000 people in self isolation province wide. Okanagan has had 107 positive tests between July 10 and July 23. During the same period, 58 people were diagnosed south of the Fraser River, 49 in Vancouver and four in Richmond. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/briti...y-27-1.5663897 Seems this area in Kelowna and related is the hot spot. It is clearly difficult to keep people's attention when the numbers are low and people think there is "no risk", so they refuse to take the pandemic seriously, drop their guard, (if it was ever in fact "up" :rolleyes: ) and, well, then all this happens. ^ :( |
Re: Coronavirus
Additional exposures linked to flights.
Aero Mexico 696 Mexico City to Vancouver on July 15 and 17 Air Canada 111 Toronto to Vancouver on July 13 Air Canada 8073 Vancouver to Victoria July 13 Air Canada 311 Montreal to Vancouver July 13 |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 12888313)
I'm sorry to hear that, but really not at all surprised.
It is clearly difficult to keep people's attention when the numbers are low and people think there is "no risk", so they refuse to take the pandemic seriously, drop their guard, (if it was ever in fact "up" :rolleyes: ) and, well, then all this happens. ^ :( |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Jsmth321
(Post 12888317)
For sure, the amount of times I have heard people say, oh we are not that bad, well low amount of cases and quickly become a big amount of cases if precautions are thrown out.
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Jsmth321
(Post 12888309)
81 new cases over the weekend, 81 over a 3 day period.
A community outbreak has been declared in Abbotsford at Fraser Valley Packing which pack blueberries, 15 have tested positive so far. BC at a turning point, residents asked to pull back on social interactions and recommit to social distancing. Haida Gwaii now up to 14 cases all linked to residents and off island travel. (there were some talk last week it was tourists but appears it was residents leaving the island and returning) Outbreak in Kelowna continues to grow, cases linked to Kelowna up to 86, over 1,000 people in self isolation province wide. Okanagan has had 107 positive tests between July 10 and July 23. During the same period, 58 people were diagnosed south of the Fraser River, 49 in Vancouver and four in Richmond. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/briti...y-27-1.5663897 Seems this area in Kelowna and related is the hot spot. Yet look at the figures for Canada as a whole, 400 odd infections listed today, i'm assuming that a weekend count yet only 11 deaths, out of a country with 37 million people. We must be doing something right no? |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by plasticcanuck
(Post 12800907)
I foresee the day when many nations of the world will have permanent isolation/containment camps, each with its own airfield/hospital facilities. Then sufferers of such medical conditions as this virus can be transported home and more easily quarantined and reducing exposure risks to other members of society.
Oh wait, that's the source of the second wave there, sorry. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by spouse of scouse
(Post 12888323)
Exactly. Case in point, the state of Victoria in Oz.
The VIC government's real failure was setting up the circumstances for a COVID-19 breakout from potentially-infected overseas returnees, inadequately policed by inadequately-trained and supervised contract security workers, within the quarantine hotels. This same dynamic had occurred before within the "developed" world, e.g. it manifested in Singapore before it occurred in Victoria, Australia. "The government" rushes in to support the incomes of those who were previously in secure work (to be sure, for a good reason in that context, to maintain their consumer demand and avoid tanking that part of the economy) but then does nothing for those in "insecure" work, a.k.a. the "gig economy". So the insecure workers keep working, regardless of their immediate health status. And they branch out into new insecure work opportunities, like security work at quarantine hotels. And they come home to households in high-rise public housing, and to family members who have equally insecure work in aged-care facilities. And then the second wave starts happening, with everyone from the Victorian premier on down blaming those who live hand-to-mouth for going to work when they're sick. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by abner
(Post 12888488)
To be clear, though, Victoria's failing was not from reducing restrictions too early. The VIC state government had gone harder and earlier into lockdown than most of the rest of Australia, and had copped some criticism for that. And when VIC started to lighten up on restrictions, their late-May, early-June new-case counts did actually seem to support that approach.
The VIC government's real failure was setting up the circumstances for a COVID-19 breakout from potentially-infected overseas returnees, inadequately policed by inadequately-trained and supervised contract security workers, within the quarantine hotels. This same dynamic had occurred before within the "developed" world, e.g. it manifested in Singapore before it occurred in Victoria, Australia. "The government" rushes in to support the incomes of those who were previously in secure work (to be sure, for a good reason in that context, to maintain their consumer demand and avoid tanking that part of the economy) but then does nothing for those in "insecure" work, a.k.a. the "gig economy". So the insecure workers keep working, regardless of their immediate health status. And they branch out into new insecure work opportunities, like security work at quarantine hotels. And they come home to households in high-rise public housing, and to family members who have equally insecure work in aged-care facilities. And then the second wave starts happening, with everyone from the Victorian premier on down blaming those who live hand-to-mouth for going to work when they're sick. |
Re: Coronavirus
What we need is a bunch of these specially trained COVID detector dogs at the arrival hall of all major intl airports.
Apparently they had a 94% detection rate, here is one of the little buggers in action https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.c...79-020-05281-3 These preliminary findings indicate that trained detection dogs can identify respiratory secretion samples from hospitalised and clinically diseased SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals by discriminating between samples from SARS-CoV-2 infected patients and negative controls. This data may form the basis for the reliable screening method of SARS-CoV-2 infected people. |
Re: Coronavirus
First time since March 17th there have been less than 10 people in hospital with COVID, 9 as of today's update.
23 more cases in the last 24 hours, 1 additional death. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Jsmth321
(Post 12888868)
First time since March 17th there have been less than 10 people in hospital with COVID, 9 as of today's update.
23 more cases in the last 24 hours, 1 additional death. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 12888885)
Just following loosely. So in BC, the cases are starting to rise, but the hospitalized are currently low. Is that the status?
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Jsmth321
(Post 12888886)
Pretty much. More recent cases seem to be a lot of 20-30 age group, so I assume that age group being healthier overall probably leading to less severe illness.
https://cfjctoday.com/2020/07/28/cov...na-strip-club/ |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Danny B
(Post 12888890)
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Danny B
(Post 12888890)
I haven't been to a strip club in 20 years... |
Re: Coronavirus
BC plans to have K-12 go back to school in September with some changes.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/briti...plan-1.5666749 |
Re: Coronavirus
Toronto moves to Stage 3 on Friday at 12.01am. Restaurants, theatres and business can open for business.
https://www.cp24.com/news/ontario-to...iday-1.5043344 Masks have become mandatory in common areas of all condo buildings. |
Re: Coronavirus
41 new cases in BC in the last 24 hours, 6 more cases on Haida Gwaii, no additional deaths.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/briti...aths-1.5668082 |
Re: Coronavirus
|
Re: Coronavirus
Any idea of how many case are "serious"? :unsure:
UK 302,000 cases, 46,000 deaths ~ 15% case deaths Canada 115,00 cases 8,900 deaths ~ 8% case deaths Unscientific (as cases are hard to count) say about 1:10 ratio of death once 'cased'. Would like to see a breakdown by age category. |
Re: Coronavirus
You can scroll down and there is deaths by age group for Canada.
https://health-infobase.canada.ca/co...-cases.html#a7 Looks like 71% were 80 or older. 18% 70 to 79 7.1% 60 to 69 2.3% 50 to 59 0.6% 40 to 49 0.2 % 30 to 39 0.1% 20 to 29 1 death in the under 19 group. The link also shows total deaths per age group 49 and under no group has over 49 with the 49 deaths being 40 to 49. Makes sense as long term care homes were hit hard in Canada and mostly made up of older people.
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 12889882)
Any idea of how many case are "serious"? :unsure:
UK 302,000 cases, 46,000 deaths ~ 15% case deaths Canada 115,00 cases 8,900 deaths ~ 8% case deaths Unscientific (as cases are hard to count) say about 1:10 ratio of death once 'cased'. Would like to see a breakdown by age category. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:32 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.