![]() |
Re: Coronavirus
Good news for all you cheese fiends
Now where did I put that Gouda? |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Teaandtoday5
(Post 12866440)
Good news for all you cheese fiends
Now where did I put that Gouda? |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 12865771)
She never left ! He and his team can claim full credit for an extra 20,000 deaths due to his self-assured dithering in March. And now he's hell bent on driving the country off the Brexit cliff too.
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Atlantic Xpat
(Post 12864303)
I haven't seen actual disinfectant wipes for sale in stores since February. I have seen stores with limited supplies used to wipe carts etc. That's still happening here at least.
|
Re: Coronavirus
|
Re: Coronavirus
The poem was written in reference to the cholera epidemic that spread worldwide from Africa in the 1860's.
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/british...fdc62bf3c9.jpg https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/british...86f5728991.jpg |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by caretaker
(Post 12866897)
The poem was written in reference to the cholera epidemic that spread worldwide from Africa in the 1860's.
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/british...fdc62bf3c9.jpg https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/british...86f5728991.jpg But nothing about video conference calls. :rofl: |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by caretaker
(Post 12866897)
The poem was written in reference to the cholera epidemic that spread worldwide from Africa in the 1860's.
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/british...fdc62bf3c9.jpg https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/british...86f5728991.jpg |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by MillieF
(Post 12866933)
thank you
The poem, it turns out, was written in March of this year by Kitty O'Meara, (the friend who sent it to me checked when I questioned something else he'd sent), but it's still good. |
Re: Coronavirus
I don't have any Canadian contacts who have had the virus but my family back in England did. One still tested positive some three weeks after they no longer had symptoms, another just had mild sore throat and cough. My brother was the sickest I've ever known him to be and he was a stay at home mild case of COVID. He looked and felt awful. Another friend, his wife and his adult kids were treated at home. One kid never tested positive, never had symptoms. One kid no symptoms but was +ve. He was very sick too but again no hospital admission.
My Facebook feed has hospital worker friends that are dealing with patients and it's as bad as they say. We've been lucky out here in the sticks. No community spread but that will no doubt change as things open up. |
Re: Coronavirus
Long term care homes are not the place to be, either as resident or employee.
14 residents and 3 staff have so far tested positive. https://bc.ctvnews.ca/14-residents-t...lity-1.4984688 |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by bats
(Post 12867328)
..... One kid no symptoms but was +ve. He was very sick too but again no hospital admission. .....
|
Re: Coronavirus
God give me strength. You mean I have been queueing up in the rain for nothing.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...rsity-experts/ |
Re: Coronavirus
I got tested today, at a drive-in place. Ten minutes, low key, efficient, friendly, no cost, results on Wednesday. It seems like something everyone should do reasonably often.
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 12867517)
I got tested today, at a drive-in place. Ten minutes, low key, efficient, friendly, no cost, results on Wednesday. It seems like something everyone should do reasonably often.
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 12867517)
I got tested today, at a drive-in place. Ten minutes, low key, efficient, friendly, no cost, results on Wednesday. It seems like something everyone should do reasonably often.
|
Re: Coronavirus
I'm still afraid to go out there, wouldn't venture to a testing center, that's where all the sick people go.
|
Re: Coronavirus
Is there a benefit to getting tested if no symptoms are present? Seems one could be negative today, and next week be positive, or am I missing something?
BC unless showing symptoms one doesn't fit into the current testing protocol at least from what the BC CDC website lists. I'll get tested if a doctor recommends it, but otherwise I don't think I will. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Jsmth321
(Post 12867824)
Is there a benefit to getting tested if no symptoms are present? Seems one could be negative today, and next week be positive, or am I missing something?
BC unless showing symptoms one doesn't fit into the current testing protocol at least from what the BC CDC website lists. I'll get tested if a doctor recommends it, but otherwise I don't think I will. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by tumbleweedly
(Post 12867808)
I'm still afraid to go out there, wouldn't venture to a testing center, that's where all the sick people go.
|
Re: Coronavirus
Today the dentist called to confirm a routine appointment. I declined, thinking it far from safe. I wonder now if dentists require that patients have masks and just sort of poke around blindly.
|
Re: Coronavirus
Apparently a colleague was greeting people upon entry to the store and a guy came in with a couple of other people, one of whom coughed. The guy said "she's been doing that for hours and she's from Campbellton" - otherwise known as the Covid-19 capital of an otherwise almost free from active case province.
This was relayed to my SD some time later and she immediately said the colleague should tell the manager. I can't believe the greeter didn't report it straight away. The guy should have been asked to leave and maybe police called too. It's very likely a joke. But people have been charged for stuff like this and in other cases stores have closed for cleaning. What if it's not a joke? I'm tempted to report it via crimestoppers but if anything happened to have it investigated - store CCTV check, police interview etc - there could be confidentiality implications for my SD. This is where you need a union so a delegation could go to management. |
Re: Coronavirus
I couldn't do a shopping trip without at least one trip to the water closet.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-53064651 |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by BristolUK
(Post 12867904)
It's very likely a joke. But people have been charged for stuff like this and in other cases stores have closed for cleaning. What if it's not a joke? . |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by MillieF
(Post 12868480)
We are ‘officially’ opening our main doors on Monday, and I am uncomfortable. There is only my colleague and me up there, and tape on the floor near the glass. Some of our clients are in bad situations and couldn’t self isolate if heaven commanded it. This second wave talk really bothers me...it’s a bit like NB and snow...not so much if but when. We’ve been lucky so far :fingerscrossed:
Do you have clients from out of zone 3? |
Re: Coronavirus
I'll wager that there will be no significant second wave.
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 12868501)
I'll wager that there will be no significant second wave.
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 12868504)
Have you been watching Mike Pence or something? I think it's too early for a prediction like that. The virus hasn't gone away, all that's changed is that we're going from serious lockdown to attempted avoidance.
BC has 19 new cases, 2 new outbreaks in healthcare facilities one being a small community hospital which is now limited to emergency care only. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/briti...stem-1.5616648 Upside the health region we are moving to has only had 196 cases to date, so risk might be lower, Vancouver Health region is the 2nd most cases in BC. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 12868504)
Have you been watching Mike Pence or something? I think it's too early for a prediction like that. The virus hasn't gone away, all that's changed is that we're going from serious lockdown to attempted avoidance.
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 12868532)
No. I have been studying the data rather than listening to the media. Whatever you set the wager at, I'll take the bet.
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Jsmth321
(Post 12868516)
I agree. The first wave hasn't even ended yet in many places, and seems when one outbreak is under control another pops up.
BC has 19 new cases, 2 new outbreaks in healthcare facilities one being a small community hospital which is now limited to emergency care only. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/briti...stem-1.5616648 Upside the health region we are moving to has only had 196 cases to date, so risk might be lower, Vancouver Health region is the 2nd most cases in BC. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 12868613)
Hardly a thing to bet on ! .
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 12868613)
Hardly a thing to bet on ! The "media" in this case is qualified epidemiologists who also are studying the data, and their current conclusion seems to be that a second wave is likely.
This channel is worth a look at if you have some hours to spare: As I have indicated before, policy appears, to me, to be backwards. Those unlikely to be affected should all get infected as quickly as they can and those likely to be affected should do all they can to isolate from the rest. The media's obsession with number of infections is somewhat baffling to me. |
Re: Coronavirus
Total COVID-19 cases in Canada: 100,026 diagnoses, 8,254 deaths (as of June 18, 10:30 a.m. ET)]
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 12868501)
I'll wager that there will be no significant second wave.
|
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Danny B
(Post 12868824)
What country are you referring to when you say that? China?
Like Dbd33 stated above, what is a continuation of the first wave v. those not affected is the issue but, of those jurisdictions that had a significant number of infections, I, and many others far more knowledgeable and expert than me, don't anticipate any so-called second wave. |
Re: Coronavirus
As of today no active cases in Newfoundland & Labrador. 261 cases. 3 deaths. 258 recovered.
There appear to be some benefits in most of the province being an Island! We enter level 2 next week - bars, gyms etc reopening albeit with physical distancing in place. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 12868737)
Are these the same experts that haven't been able to predict, with any real accuracy, what was going to happen in the past?
As I have indicated before, policy appears, to me, to be backwards. Those unlikely to be affected should all get infected as quickly as they can and those likely to be affected should do all they can to isolate from the rest. The media's obsession with number of infections is somewhat baffling to me. I don't think we are the stage if understanding of Covid where we can proactively encourage low-risk individuals to get infected and gain some immunity. We have no idea whether the immunity if permanent or not. And even amongst that populations segment (younger/fit people for want of a better word) there is still a mortality rate attributable to the disease. Having said that, I do see the economic/society argument for permitting one segment to return to normal (with protection) while the other shields, and it the disease does not taper off that may be the only way forward. |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Almost Canadian
(Post 12868844)
All of them that have had significant numbers in the first wave.
Like Dbd33 stated above, what is a continuation of the first wave v. those not affected is the issue but, of those jurisdictions that had a significant number of infections, I, and many others far more knowledgeable and expert than me, don't anticipate any so-called second wave. A infection rate based comparison fails because testing rates vary by location and, within a location, the rate of testing and the quality of the tests will improve. Deaths is a better measure, there's some variance in the definition of cause of death between jurisdictions but not, typically, within one jurisdiction over a year. The problem with deaths is that the low hanging fruit have fallen and there's greater awareness of the virus now so, for the rate of deaths to be greater than in the first wave, the situation has to be markedly worse. I expect there to be a great deal of sickness and death in the coming months but don't know that it'll be quantifiable as the "second wave that started on the morning of October 3rd". |
Re: Coronavirus
Originally Posted by Shard
(Post 12868898)
...Sweden is another fine example...
I don't think we are the stage if understanding of Covid where we can proactively encourage low-risk individuals to get infected and gain some immunity. We have no idea whether the immunity if permanent or not. For all people might think the at risk can simply shelter and stay in, even if they do that absolutely 100%, unless they live alone, they are still going to come into contact with some people - in the same home as well as others - who might not otherwise be infectious but for the fact that others have sought to get infected and have passed it on. It's almost as if some have forgotten there is a period between exposure and showing symptoms where one is infectious and passing it on unknowingly. Like the health workers who have carried it into care homes at great cost. Or politicians and their wives and colleagues. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 9:25 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.