Coronavirus
#1186
Re: Coronavirus
found a family size for 1:99 that be me for the weekend
#1187
#1188
Re: Coronavirus
Excellent news. BC folk should be very proud of these results. Staying the fack home is working.
#1189
Re: Coronavirus
NB?
I think it's the same as everywhere else, just lower numbers. We're only 776,000 in the province. The positive results tripled in 6 days at one point.
But being that much smaller, less dense, all the usual responses happened earlier so our peak may be less dramatic so long as people don't get complacent.
I suppose, when you consider the proportion of older people is much higher here than other provinces things could be worse.
I think it's the same as everywhere else, just lower numbers. We're only 776,000 in the province. The positive results tripled in 6 days at one point.
But being that much smaller, less dense, all the usual responses happened earlier so our peak may be less dramatic so long as people don't get complacent.
I suppose, when you consider the proportion of older people is much higher here than other provinces things could be worse.
#1190
Account Closed
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0
Re: Coronavirus
BC is also part of 25 initiatives around the world working toward a vaccine for COVID-19.
South Carolina is the closest state to BC's population both having around 5 million, they have 1,917 cases, 35 deaths and they have done far less tests 18,314 vs BC at 48,508 tests as of today.
So I do think we are doing very well so far.
Last edited by scrubbedexpat091; Apr 4th 2020 at 10:05 pm.
#1191
Re: Coronavirus
Lots of signage around here about social distancing. People are advised to stay 6' 5" apart. I know the government says 2 metres so, at last, I have an idea of a metre beyond "a yard and a bit".
#1192
Re: Coronavirus
Does anyone have a plan as to how we expose everyone to this, or is life never going to return to normal? I get that we have to keep the healthcare system going, but how is the future spike to be avoided?
Are the borders going to be permanently shut?
Are the borders going to be permanently shut?
#1193
Re: Coronavirus
The original idea was to reflect the penetration of cough droplets at about 6 feet or 2m. You have wonder at the lack of understanding displayed when making a sign stating "advised to stay 6' 5" apart". So 6' 4" is too close and 6' 6" too far apart?
Looks like I'll need to go out with a tape measure in future, wouldn't want to upset the sign police.
#1194
Re: Coronavirus
I'm seldom surprised at the lack of common sense some people display.
The original idea was to reflect the penetration of cough droplets at about 6 feet or 2m. You have wonder at the lack of understanding displayed when making a sign stating "advised to stay 6' 5" apart". So 6' 4" is too close and 6' 6" too far apart?
Looks like I'll need to go out with a tape measure in future, wouldn't want to upset the sign police.
The original idea was to reflect the penetration of cough droplets at about 6 feet or 2m. You have wonder at the lack of understanding displayed when making a sign stating "advised to stay 6' 5" apart". So 6' 4" is too close and 6' 6" too far apart?
Looks like I'll need to go out with a tape measure in future, wouldn't want to upset the sign police.
#1195
Re: Coronavirus
And..... Nothing but GREED.
https://globalnews.ca/news/6777097/c...spensing-fees/
I've rarely seen a more despicable example of exploiting a crisis by a recognised representative organisation than the restriction of dispensing prescriptions to 30 days whilst retaining the full dispensing cost.
When we see other health professionals putting their very lives on the line, we witness the most heinous example of price gouging I can remember. It's even worse to my mind than paid hospital parking.. but only just.
The excuse that this is to retain supply during the C19 crisis betrays the understanding that the same quantity is dispensed and since individual prescriptions are staggered the daily supply will not change. This is nothing more than blatent exploitation by a monopolistic cadre of those in need.
https://globalnews.ca/news/6777097/c...spensing-fees/
I've rarely seen a more despicable example of exploiting a crisis by a recognised representative organisation than the restriction of dispensing prescriptions to 30 days whilst retaining the full dispensing cost.
When we see other health professionals putting their very lives on the line, we witness the most heinous example of price gouging I can remember. It's even worse to my mind than paid hospital parking.. but only just.
The excuse that this is to retain supply during the C19 crisis betrays the understanding that the same quantity is dispensed and since individual prescriptions are staggered the daily supply will not change. This is nothing more than blatent exploitation by a monopolistic cadre of those in need.
#1196
Account Closed
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0
Re: Coronavirus
And..... Nothing but GREED.
https://globalnews.ca/news/6777097/c...spensing-fees/
I've rarely seen a more despicable example of exploiting a crisis by a recognised representative organisation than the restriction of dispensing prescriptions to 30 days whilst retaining the full dispensing cost.
When we see other health professionals putting their very lives on the line, we witness the most heinous example of price gouging I can remember. It's even worse to my mind than paid hospital parking.. but only just.
The excuse that this is to retain supply during the C19 crisis betrays the understanding that the same quantity is dispensed and since individual prescriptions are staggered the daily supply will not change. This is nothing more than blatent exploitation by a monopolistic cadre of those in need.
https://globalnews.ca/news/6777097/c...spensing-fees/
I've rarely seen a more despicable example of exploiting a crisis by a recognised representative organisation than the restriction of dispensing prescriptions to 30 days whilst retaining the full dispensing cost.
When we see other health professionals putting their very lives on the line, we witness the most heinous example of price gouging I can remember. It's even worse to my mind than paid hospital parking.. but only just.
The excuse that this is to retain supply during the C19 crisis betrays the understanding that the same quantity is dispensed and since individual prescriptions are staggered the daily supply will not change. This is nothing more than blatent exploitation by a monopolistic cadre of those in need.
My doctor does 60 day supply.
But could certainly see if people are used to every 90 days, suddenly having to pay a filling fee/s monthly could really add up if one has several prescriptions. Often the filling fee exceeds the cost of the medication, why can prescription drugs just be sold at one set price and do away with the filling fee altogether?
I wonder if those in houses with yards and space are feeling better vs those stuck in small apartments with limited outdoor space and room inside. Seems being in a house with a yard would be more beneficially mental health wise vs stuck in a small space with no yard etc, at least with a yard there is something to do to occupy time, not so much in an apartment or condo.
I wish we had a kind and understanding landlord like this one.
“I really don’t care about money right now, I care about YOU … You shouldn’t be struggling to find a roof for your family.”
Last edited by scrubbedexpat091; Apr 5th 2020 at 2:02 am.
#1197
Re: Coronavirus
I've rarely seen a more despicable example of exploiting a crisis by a recognised representative organisation than the restriction of dispensing prescriptions to 30 days whilst retaining the full dispensing cost.
When we see other health professionals putting their very lives on the line, we witness the most heinous example of price gouging I can remember. It's even worse to my mind than paid hospital parking.. but only just.
The excuse that this is to retain supply during the C19 crisis betrays the understanding that the same quantity is dispensed and since individual prescriptions are staggered the daily supply will not change. .
When we see other health professionals putting their very lives on the line, we witness the most heinous example of price gouging I can remember. It's even worse to my mind than paid hospital parking.. but only just.
The excuse that this is to retain supply during the C19 crisis betrays the understanding that the same quantity is dispensed and since individual prescriptions are staggered the daily supply will not change. .
Perhaps the thinking is that a certain number of patients will get three months worth, come down with the virus and either through hospitalisation or death will not need the remaining supply which will go to waste. If that happens when they've only been given a month of meds there's potential to save two-thirds for everyone still breathing on their own.
Presumably it makes no difference to those with employee coverage that pay a %? Or do health benefits not cover the dispensing fee?
#1198
Re: Coronavirus
#1199
Re: Coronavirus
I wonder if the pharmacist association are thinking that there may be some interruption to supplies. Like the USA mysteriously diverting shipments their way. Again. Or so many staff being off sick or dead that production falls. Maybe they've had warning about it.
Perhaps the thinking is that a certain number of patients will get three months worth, come down with the virus and either through hospitalisation or death will not need the remaining supply which will go to waste. If that happens when they've only been given a month of meds there's potential to save two-thirds for everyone still breathing on their own.
Presumably it makes no difference to those with employee coverage that pay a %? Or do health benefits not cover the dispensing fee?
Perhaps the thinking is that a certain number of patients will get three months worth, come down with the virus and either through hospitalisation or death will not need the remaining supply which will go to waste. If that happens when they've only been given a month of meds there's potential to save two-thirds for everyone still breathing on their own.
Presumably it makes no difference to those with employee coverage that pay a %? Or do health benefits not cover the dispensing fee?
It doesn't matter how frequently the medication is dispensed, the same quantity is supplied.
It's the wish to retain the same individual dispensing cost that betrays why this is being done. As pensioners, in our case this will triple the dispensing costs for no other reason than their wish to grab this opportunity in order to enrich their member individual pharmacists. Greed pure and simple.
The fear that a proportion of medication going to waste in anticipation of patients dying of C19 is grasping at straws.
#1200
Re: Coronavirus
I think you're being far too charitable.
It doesn't matter how frequently the medication is dispensed, the same quantity is supplied.
It's the wish to retain the same individual dispensing cost that betrays why this is being done. As pensioners, in our case this will triple the dispensing costs for no other reason than their wish to grab this opportunity in order to enrich their member individual pharmacists. Greed pure and simple.
The fear that a proportion of medication going to waste in anticipation of patients dying of C19 is grasping at straws.
It doesn't matter how frequently the medication is dispensed, the same quantity is supplied.
It's the wish to retain the same individual dispensing cost that betrays why this is being done. As pensioners, in our case this will triple the dispensing costs for no other reason than their wish to grab this opportunity in order to enrich their member individual pharmacists. Greed pure and simple.
The fear that a proportion of medication going to waste in anticipation of patients dying of C19 is grasping at straws.
My point about an interruption in supplies was that yes, it's the same quantity overall but if three months are dished out to two thirds of the people needing the meds and then the supply is interrupted and it's all gone, then those who would be about due to get their three months worth cannot and may not get any.
Whereas if the others have only been allowed one month at a time, then everyone has something to be going on with while they await further supplies.
It's the same thinking behind the bog paper when some couldn't get any because others took more than was needed.
Why are you so sure they are not allowing for the possibility of shortages? We've just seen the US getting medical supplies intended for Germany and Canada.