![]() |
Best review I've seen in a long time.
|
Re: Best review I've seen in a long time.
Originally Posted by GavinR
(Post 9346460)
|
Re: Best review I've seen in a long time.
I didnt realise that the web even existed in 1971 when that was clearly written:rolleyes:
Makes me despair for my daughters that such sexist nonsense is still churned out. |
Re: Best review I've seen in a long time.
Ding,ding!! All aboard the Offended Bus!
|
Re: Best review I've seen in a long time.
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 9347279)
I didnt realise that the web even existed in 1971 when that was clearly written:rolleyes:
Makes me despair for my daughters that such sexist nonsense is still churned out. Guys will always state such things about girls, girls will always state such things about guys. I am confident that, perish the thought, you girls may one day say such things about members of the opposite sex, or other girls if the fancy takes them. I say this as a father of 2 girls myself.;) |
Re: Best review I've seen in a long time.
So you dont find the lumping together of women from particular cities a teeny bit sexist then? Just seemed crass to me.
|
Re: Best review I've seen in a long time.
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 9347306)
So you dont find the lumping together of women from particular cities a teeny bit sexist then? Just seemed crass to me.
Sexist means that you believe that someone's capabilities are lessened because of their gender. That article was (gasp!) a humourous appreciation of women. It is, I believe, still allowed to notice the relative attractiveness of women, or should we all just be paired off by numbers? |
Re: Best review I've seen in a long time.
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 9347311)
No, Iain, it's not sexist.
|
Re: Best review I've seen in a long time.
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 9347322)
Nag, it's just objectification.
I can't believe I have just typed the word 'objectification'... |
Re: Best review I've seen in a long time.
It's clearly bunkum. Buenos Airies should have been #1 not #10.;)
|
Re: Best review I've seen in a long time.
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 9347331)
Well, sexism is just the application of said objectification.
|
Re: Best review I've seen in a long time.
Is it sexist to objectify the self-objectified :confused:
Originally Posted by Jingsamichty
(Post 9347331)
Well, sexism is just the application of said objectification.
I can't believe I have just typed the word 'objectification'... |
Re: Best review I've seen in a long time.
Originally Posted by iaink
(Post 9347306)
So you dont find the lumping together of women from particular cities a teeny bit sexist then? Just seemed crass to me.
See if for what it is. A crappy bit of "journalism" targeted to mostly male readers. Nothing wrong with that. Maybe this will make you feel better ;) |
Re: Best review I've seen in a long time.
|
Re: Best review I've seen in a long time.
Originally Posted by dbd33
(Post 9347437)
You don't have children, do you?
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 6:44 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.